Folks on-line
'
1
Forums Albums Skins 1
Search Register Logon


You are logged in as a guest. Logon or register an account to access more features.
OTHER FORUMS:    Horse Trailers  -   Trucks   -   Cutting  -   Reining  -   Roping 
'
RE: Real News March 2019
Moderators: luluwhit, gotothewhip, crossspur, ForumAdmin

Jump to page : 1 2 3
Now viewing page 2 [20 messages per page]
Last activity 2019-03-21 1:21 PM
43 replies, 1469 views

View previous thread :: View next thread
   General Discussion -> Barrel Talk
Refresh
Message format
 
Frodo
Reg. Jul 2004
Posted 2019-03-06 11:26 AM (#7424355 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


"Heck's Coming With Me"


Posts: 9174
5000200020001002525
Location: Kansas

Since I quit barrel racing a lot of my entertainment is found at the local and very nice casino.  Lately I've noticed many many unsavory non-English speaking characters hanging out there.  No doubt in my mind they've come from the caravans.  Wonder how it happens they don't have the money to live in Central America but they do have the money to gamble.  I work for the money I spend there.  I don't think they do. Our system is a total disaster.  They should have been deported the minute they stepped foot on U.S. soil, instead they're put on buses to go wherever they please.

 

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bear
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2019-03-06 11:55 AM (#7424361 - in reply to #7424340)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019



BHW Resident Surgeon


Posts: 24286
500050005000500020002000100100252525
Location: Bastrop, Texas

OregonBR - 2019-03-06 9:40 AM























Border at ‘breaking point,’ New York Times reports



Two and a half weeks after President Donald J. Trump declared a National Emergency to address the crisis on our border, mainstream media outlets have dug into the numbers—and the personal stories—surrounding America’s broken immigration system.  

What they’ve found comes as a shock to many Americans who never knew the trauma felt by those living in the shadows—including both U.S. citizens and migrants alike:



  • “More than 76,000 migrants crossed the border without authorization in February, more than double the levels from the same period last year and approaching the largest numbers seen in any February in the last 12 years,” The New York Times reported today.
     

  • On Sunday, The New York Times published firsthand accounts of “the hidden nightmare of sexual violence on the border,” citing President Trump’s quote that “one in three women are sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”
     

  • On February 15, after President Trump’s border announcement, CNN’s Jim Acosta spoke with an “angel mom” immigrant whose only son was murdered by a previously deported criminal alien. “President Trump is completely correct on this issue—we need to protect this country,” she told CNN.
     


This morning, the Department of Homeland Security released staggering numbers that put these stories in context. American law enforcement officers are apprehending more than 2,000 aliens every day at our Southern border. All told, U.S. Border Patrol has apprehended over 268,000 individuals since the beginning of this fiscal year in October—a 97 percent increase from the previous year.

Democrat leaders are holding firm. “There is no crisis at the border,” the Democrat House Majority Leader insisted a little more than a week ago. To their credit, however, more journalists are starting to simply tell the stories of what’s happening on our border—and letting Americans decide for themselves what they think about it.  

These reports are welcome. The ongoing humanitarian and security disaster at our border shouldn’t be a partisan issue, and the heart-wrenching stories it causes shouldn’t be told only by conservative media. A modern, safe, and secure immigration system would be a bipartisan triumph that renews Americans’ faith in Washington.

The only thing standing in our way is the political will.

Our country is facing a growing emergency at the border.

Watch: Congressman and Air Force Reservist says yes, a wall would help!





 


As the leading mouthpiece for the Democrat party, and the tip of the “Trump hate” spear, you do realize what the NYT is doing, don’t you?  They are hedging their bets, in the event the border crisis can no longer be denied.  This sets up an alternative avenue for blaming Trump.  They will claim that Trump’s executive order prompted a huge surge in illegal immigration so as to gain foothold to the US.... now they can blame Trump no matter what happens.  Don’t fall for the notion that the NYT has all of a sudden conceded that we have a border crisis.  They never will....ever.

i know these evil bastards like every square inch of my body.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-06 12:18 PM (#7424362 - in reply to #7424361)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Bear - 2019-03-06 9:55 AM


OregonBR - 2019-03-06 9:40 AM























Border at ‘breaking point,’ New York Times reports



Two and a half weeks after President Donald J. Trump declared a National Emergency to address the crisis on our border, mainstream media outlets have dug into the numbers—and the personal stories—surrounding America’s broken immigration system.  

What they’ve found comes as a shock to many Americans who never knew the trauma felt by those living in the shadows—including both U.S. citizens and migrants alike:



  • “More than 76,000 migrants crossed the border without authorization in February, more than double the levels from the same period last year and approaching the largest numbers seen in any February in the last 12 years,” The New York Times reported today.
     

  • On Sunday, The New York Times published firsthand accounts of “the hidden nightmare of sexual violence on the border,” citing President Trump’s quote that “one in three women are sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”
     

  • On February 15, after President Trump’s border announcement, CNN’s Jim Acosta spoke with an “angel mom” immigrant whose only son was murdered by a previously deported criminal alien. “President Trump is completely correct on this issue—we need to protect this country,” she told CNN.
     


This morning, the Department of Homeland Security released staggering numbers that put these stories in context. American law enforcement officers are apprehending more than 2,000 aliens every day at our Southern border. All told, U.S. Border Patrol has apprehended over 268,000 individuals since the beginning of this fiscal year in October—a 97 percent increase from the previous year.

Democrat leaders are holding firm. “There is no crisis at the border,” the Democrat House Majority Leader insisted a little more than a week ago. To their credit, however, more journalists are starting to simply tell the stories of what’s happening on our border—and letting Americans decide for themselves what they think about it.  

These reports are welcome. The ongoing humanitarian and security disaster at our border shouldn’t be a partisan issue, and the heart-wrenching stories it causes shouldn’t be told only by conservative media. A modern, safe, and secure immigration system would be a bipartisan triumph that renews Americans’ faith in Washington.

The only thing standing in our way is the political will.

Our country is facing a growing emergency at the border.

Watch: Congressman and Air Force Reservist says yes, a wall would help!





 



As the leading mouthpiece for the Democrat party, and the tip of the “Trump hate” spear, you do realize what the NYT is doing, don’t you?  They are hedging their bets, in the event the border crisis can no longer be denied.  This sets up an alternative avenue for blaming Trump.  They will claim that Trump’s executive order prompted a huge surge in illegal immigration so as to gain foothold to the US.... now they can blame Trump no matter what happens.  Don’t fall for the notion that the NYT has all of a sudden conceded that we have a border crisis.  They never will....ever.


i know these evil bastards like every square inch of my body.


Only in the mind of a dem will that sound plausible.  So ya. I know you're right. 

I wonder how bad it's going to get before Trump declassifies all the documents showing the YUGE mess that the deep state have been perpetrating on the American people?  It's really difficult being patient. 

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-06 12:27 PM (#7424363 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Nielsen declares migration crisis 'spiraling out of control,' warns it will get 'even worse'

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen issued a dire assessment Wednesday of the migration crisis on the southern border, telling a House committee that illegal immigration is “spiraling out of control” and predicting that crisis will “get even worse” in the coming months.

And in a startling revelation, she said Customs and Border Protection is on track to apprehend almost 1 million illegal immigrants at the border this year.

 

“In February, we saw a 30 percent jump over the previous month, with agents apprehending or encountering nearly 75,000 aliens,” Nielsen told the House Committee on Homeland Security. “This is an 80 percent increase over the same time last year. And I can report today that CBP is forecasting the problem will get even worse this spring as the weather warms up.”

SOUTHERN BORDER AT 'BREAKING POINT' AFTER MORE THAN 76,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TRIED CROSSING IN FEBRUARY, OFFICIALS SAY

“We want to strengthen legal immigration and welcome more individuals through a merit-based system that enhances our economic vitality and the vibrancy of our diverse nation. We also will continue to uphold our humanitarian ideals,” she said. “But illegal immigration is simply spiraling out of control and threatening public safety and national security.”

Nielsen’s testimony came a day after the Trump administration released figures showing that more than 2,000 migrants are apprehended each day, a total of 268,000 since the beginning of the fiscal year. DHS reports that the Border Patrol is apprehending illegal immigrants at the highest rate since 2007.

“We face a crisis -- a real, serious, and sustained crisis at our borders. We have tens of thousands of illegal aliens arriving at our doorstep every month. We have drugs, criminals, and violence spilling into our country every week,” she said.

Nielsen raised concerns not only about the sheer number of crossings but the specific rise in families and unaccompanied children.

HOUSE REJECTS TRUMP EMERGENCY DECLARATION, SETTING UP POTENTIAL VETO SHUTDOWN

“Over 60 percent of the current flow are family units and unaccompanied alien children, and 60 percent are non-Mexican,” she said.

Figures released by DHS on Tuesday said that apprehensions of family unit aliens and unaccompanied children surged by 338 percent and 54 percent, respectively.

Nielsen predicted disaster if migrant flows escalate: “Our capacity is already severely strained, but these increases will overwhelm the system entirely.”

“This is not a ‘manufactured’ crisis. This is truly an emergency,” she said.

The testimony comes as Trump pursues his declaration of a national emergency on the border. He declared such an emergency last month after Congress passed a spending bill authorization $1.4 billion for barriers on the border -- well short of the $5.7 billion Trump demanded.

Trump’s declaration would give him access to about $3.6 billion for projects on the border, but the move has seen fierce opposition from Democrats and some Republicans, several of whom are expected to support a congressional rebuke of the emergency declaration -- which could, in turn, prompt Trump's first-ever veto. The House has already passed the measure.

In her testimony, Nielsen called on Congress to pass laws that allows “the safe and prompt return” of illegal immigrant children to their home countries and close loopholes she says allows criminals to be released into the U.S.

Meanwhile, in prepared testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan said in testimony that the initial investments in Trump's wall project were being put “to good use” and barriers in key areas have “made an immediate impact” in stopping illegal immigration in hot spots.

But he also warned of increasing migration flows, particularly of families and children, and said that in the El Paso sector there had been a 434 percent increase in apprehensions this fiscal year.

“Many of these are family units and [unaccompanied alien children] arriving in large groups, which exacerbates capacity constraints in our facilities,” he said.

He also said there have been large groups of mostly family units on buses from Guatemala coming to cross the border. So far, he said there have been 70 instances of more than 100 migrants crossing the border at a time this year alone.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

But Nielsen’s comments seemed likely to be brushed off by Democrats. Before Nielsen spoke, Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., criticized Trump’s “non-existent emergency” at the border.

Fox News' Gregg Re contributed to this report. 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-06 3:01 PM (#7424388 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Another good Dan Bongino broadcast. We need to start fighting back.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wk0cFKH8cTs

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Frodo
Reg. Jul 2004
Posted 2019-03-06 3:48 PM (#7424392 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


"Heck's Coming With Me"


Posts: 9174
5000200020001002525
Location: Kansas

Just saw where the DNC is going to bar Fox News commentators from hosting their presidental debates.  Bret Baier, Martha McCallum and Chris Wallace have done it in the past and did a great job.  Chris Wallace has always struck me a liberal.  I don't even like him very much.  Candidates are afraid of being asked real questions in my opinion.  They prefer "what's your favorite color" or "who's your favorite actor."  

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-07 10:27 AM (#7424446 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Another judicial travesty on the 2020 Census citizenship question

A leftist San Francisco-based federal judge has gone the last federal judge one better and declared Commerce secretary Wilbur Ross's request for a citizenship question on the coming 2020 census form "unconstitutional." The judge said just the asking of it amounted to "bad faith" and as the Washington Post reported, merely asking that "broke the law."

The administration has been on the losing end of scores of court decisions involving immigration issues since President Trump took office. But the census case has taken on special significance because it strikes at the heart of the United States’ form of government and because of what Seeborg described as a “strong showing of bad faith” by a Cabinet secretary who, influenced in part by White House advisers, tried to conceal his motives.

The cases against Ross have been brought by jurisdictions with significant immigrant populations. Only two have completed trials, the case heard by Furman and brought by 18 states led by New York, and today’s challenge, initiated by the state of California and combined with a suit brought by the city of San Jose.

The judge's reasoning wasn't some law that says you can't ask a citizenship question, but his own interpretations of Ross's motive.

Seeborg, like Furman, found after a trial that Ross misrepresented both to the public and Congress his reasons for adding the citizenship question last March. Ross claimed he was acting at the request of the Justice Department in the interest of enforcing the Voting Rights Act.

In reality, the “evidence establishes” that the voting rights explanation was just “a pretext” and that Ross “acted in bad faith” when he claimed otherwise.

He pursued the citizenship question after hearing from then-White House adviser Stephen K. Bannon and Kris Kobach, the vice chair of Trump’s now-disbanded voting fraud commission.

Here's the reality: Motive is irrelevant. What Ross said he wanted is one thing, he probably should have been more direct. But the right to know isn't irrelevant. And all that's being asked for in that Census questionaire is information, information that every resident is legally bound to answer. The argument presented from the left is that illegal immigrants won't answer the Census if a citizenship question is on it, and they must be accommodated. Yet not answering is exactly what's breaking the law, not the question. Illegals have already broken immigration law by entering the U.S. illegally, setting up shop, having citizen children, and taking jobs. Many have stolen Americans' identifications either to steal money or to pursue work. The fact that illegals are likely to display the same lawless attitude on the matter of answering the Census just illustrates the chain of lawlessness surrounding illegal immigration. Yet in squelching the citizenship question, the judge is ruling that the Census should actually accommodate them, not the rest of us, and not the right to know.

Because what's happening here is something that does need to be discussed in our representative democracy. Should congressional seats, all of which are alloted in approximately 300,000-sized population blocs, include seats where the majority of the residents are non-citizens? Democrats are actually sending congressional representatives to Congress based on this dynamic in California, where many of the most powerful congressmen and state assembly members have 9% to 10% voter turnout rates, owing to the gargantuan size of the illegal populations represented. Buttressed by the numbers (but not the votes) that create those districts, they go on to make decisions in Congress with the exact same power as congressmen representing legitimate citizen districts, for the rest of us. Foreign influence? You bet.

Here's another thing: The populations in the districts is key to determining how many electoral college votes are allotted per state. California has a huge number, inflated by the large presence of illegal residents. And better still, all of the blue counties cancel out the votes of all of the red counties in the allotment of delegates. Foreigners ruling us? You bet.

Any questions why Democrats want every illegal they can get across our unprotected border? Their entire basis of power, that little edge that puts them over the top in every election in California, is built on foreign nationals, not U.S. citizens. It's hardly different from a foreign army coming in and taking over.

Yet all the Census question seeks is mere information so that the matter can be discussed, and it gets this blast of overkill from the judge. Note that the Census asks all kinds of intrusive questions - from income, to race, to whether you moved, to education, to emergency preparedness, to whether you actually voted. But it asks nothing about citizenship and it's putting out a $500 million "communications campaign" to beef up numbers of respondents. Its allies in the GAO have even put out a map of the Census intentions in the form of a big blue-state America. That, along with its uncooperative attitude to Ross himself, suggests there's going to be some numbers gaming to help Democratic seat counts in this 2020 Census.

Information. Ross just wants some information. The judge's rabid squelching of that is nothing but a bid to keep that information from getting out in the name of helping Democrats retain power.  Should California be determining who should be U.S. president based on the strength of its foreign - and illegally present - population? That's what this dishonest ruling is really about while it wouldn't hurt Ross to be more direct about it, it's what the rest of us want to know and frankly, have a right to know.

A leftist San Francisco-based federal judge has gone the last federal judge one better and declared Commerce secretary Wilbur Ross's request for a citizenship question on the coming 2020 census form "unconstitutional." The judge said just the asking of it amounted to "bad faith" and as the Washington Post reported, merely asking that "broke the law."

The administration has been on the losing end of scores of court decisions involving immigration issues since President Trump took office. But the census case has taken on special significance because it strikes at the heart of the United States’ form of government and because of what Seeborg described as a “strong showing of bad faith” by a Cabinet secretary who, influenced in part by White House advisers, tried to conceal his motives.

The cases against Ross have been brought by jurisdictions with significant immigrant populations. Only two have completed trials, the case heard by Furman and brought by 18 states led by New York, and today’s challenge, initiated by the state of California and combined with a suit brought by the city of San Jose.

The judge's reasoning wasn't some law that says you can't ask a citizenship question, but his own interpretations of Ross's motive.

Seeborg, like Furman, found after a trial that Ross misrepresented both to the public and Congress his reasons for adding the citizenship question last March. Ross claimed he was acting at the request of the Justice Department in the interest of enforcing the Voting Rights Act.

In reality, the “evidence establishes” that the voting rights explanation was just “a pretext” and that Ross “acted in bad faith” when he claimed otherwise.

He pursued the citizenship question after hearing from then-White House adviser Stephen K. Bannon and Kris Kobach, the vice chair of Trump’s now-disbanded voting fraud commission.

Here's the reality: Motive is irrelevant. What Ross said he wanted is one thing, he probably should have been more direct. But the right to know isn't irrelevant. And all that's being asked for in that Census questionaire is information, information that every resident is legally bound to answer. The argument presented from the left is that illegal immigrants won't answer the Census if a citizenship question is on it, and they must be accommodated. Yet not answering is exactly what's breaking the law, not the question. Illegals have already broken immigration law by entering the U.S. illegally, setting up shop, having citizen children, and taking jobs. Many have stolen Americans' identifications either to steal money or to pursue work. The fact that illegals are likely to display the same lawless attitude on the matter of answering the Census just illustrates the chain of lawlessness surrounding illegal immigration. Yet in squelching the citizenship question, the judge is ruling that the Census should actually accommodate them, not the rest of us, and not the right to know.

Because what's happening here is something that does need to be discussed in our representative democracy. Should congressional seats, all of which are alloted in approximately 300,000-sized population blocs, include seats where the majority of the residents are non-citizens? Democrats are actually sending congressional representatives to Congress based on this dynamic in California, where many of the most powerful congressmen and state assembly members have 9% to 10% voter turnout rates, owing to the gargantuan size of the illegal populations represented. Buttressed by the numbers (but not the votes) that create those districts, they go on to make decisions in Congress with the exact same power as congressmen representing legitimate citizen districts, for the rest of us. Foreign influence? You bet.

Here's another thing: The populations in the districts is key to determining how many electoral college votes are allotted per state. California has a huge number, inflated by the large presence of illegal residents. And better still, all of the blue counties cancel out the votes of all of the red counties in the allotment of delegates. Foreigners ruling us? You bet.

Any questions why Democrats want every illegal they can get across our unprotected border? Their entire basis of power, that little edge that puts them over the top in every election in California, is built on foreign nationals, not U.S. citizens. It's hardly different from a foreign army coming in and taking over.

Yet all the Census question seeks is mere information so that the matter can be discussed, and it gets this blast of overkill from the judge. Note that the Census asks all kinds of intrusive questions - from income, to race, to whether you moved, to education, to emergency preparedness, to whether you actually voted. But it asks nothing about citizenship and it's putting out a $500 million "communications campaign" to beef up numbers of respondents. Its allies in the GAO have even put out a map of the Census intentions in the form of a big blue-state America. That, along with its uncooperative attitude to Ross himself, suggests there's going to be some numbers gaming to help Democratic seat counts in this 2020 Census.

Information. Ross just wants some information. The judge's rabid squelching of that is nothing but a bid to keep that information from getting out in the name of helping Democrats retain power.  Should California be determining who should be U.S. president based on the strength of its foreign - and illegally present - population? That's what this dishonest ruling is really about while it wouldn't hurt Ross to be more direct about it, it's what the rest of us want to know and frankly, have a right to know.



Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/03/another_judicial_travesty_on_the_2020_census_citizenship_question.html#ixzz5hVJYCz96 
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-07 2:39 PM (#7424477 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Rep. Matt Gaetz: House Democrats' harassment of Trump makes silence during Obama-era highly conspicuous

Anti-Trump Democrats in Washington have egg on their face. They’re reacting inconsistently and frantically as the Mueller investigation winds down absent proof of collusion. Intel Chairman Adam Schiff has promised for months that he “had the goods” showing “demonstrable evidence” of Trump’s collusion with Russia.  It’s evidence we’ve never seen because it doesn’t exist.

To cover for this now-exposed lie, House Democrats just launched a new 81-pronged investigation.  They aren’t just fishing; they’re fishing with dynamite.

But this new zeal for endless, unfocused probing of the executive branch in the name of “oversight” is a newfound passion for House Democrats.

ANDREW C. MCCARTHY: WOULD MUELLER INDICT TRUMP FOR 'ATTEMPTING' TO FIRE MUELLER?

Democrats’ harassment of President Trump today makes their silence during the Obama administration even more conspicuous.

Consider Gerald Walpin, the inspector general of AmeriCorps. Walpin found that Kevin Johnson, former NBA star and mayor of Sacramento, had engaged in serial “inappropriate conduct” with high school girls, and blatantly misused nearly a million dollars in federal grants. Taxpayer dollars were spent trying to silence underage victims of sexual assault. Walpin did important, revealing work — so you’d expect that he would have been praised for his discoveries, right?

Wrong: Gerald Walpin was unceremoniously fired. Congress was not notified in advance, as is required by law, and, even worse, the White House did not cut its ties with Kevin Johnson. It even awarded Sacramento a new $650,000 AmeriCorps grant.

Hearings held by the Democrat-led House of Representatives on this topic? Zero. Democrat-led requests for documents? Subpoenas? Depositions? Zero, zero, and zero.

Walpin’s firing was in no way an isolated incident. Other Inspectors General from Amtrak to OMB were abused, threatened, fired, and forced into retirement by the Obama administration.

Why wasn’t Congress up in arms about the mistreatment of government watchdogs? The answer is simple: these abuses happened in the first years of Obama’s presidency, when the House was under Democrat control, and scandals of varying magnitudes were quickly and dutifully swept under the rug.

Hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign aid was given to Palestinian-affiliated groups, as well as the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA), which employs many members of Hamas. Congressman Mark Kirk summed up the threat, explaining that if America were “route $900 million to this area, and let’s say that Hamas was only able to steal 10 percent of that, we would still become Hamas’s second-largest funder after Iran.”

Foreign aid to terrorist organizations? No hearings. No document requests. No subpoenas.

How about the Obama administration keeping tabs on critics of ObamaCare? Trying to collect data on (and silence) political opposition? No hearings. No document requests.

How about Obama’s vast and wasteful “stimulus package,” which stunted job growth, wasted public funds, and — surely coincidentally! — only benefited solidly “blue” states and districts? No hearings. No document requests. No subpoenas.

Holding Congressional hearings is the purview of the majority, and during the first years of the Obama administration, Democrats could not be bothered.

Compare that to Democrats today. They have sent countless letters to the White House and every department in the Executive Branch, demanding documents, testimony, and information. The Judiciary and Oversight Committees have become tools to distract the President with a fact-free impeachment case.

What a sham — and what a shame. Democrats want to peer into every second of President Trump’s life, hoping to find a smoking gun. After three years and tens of millions of taxpayer dollars spent on the Mueller probe, they’re now saying that his report is not a conclusion, but instead, a jumping-off point for more investigations. Their witch hunt is nothing more than a sham investigation in search of a fabricated crime, but they’re still going full steam ahead.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Where was the Scooby Gang when America needed them, when we had a reckless and destructive Executive Branch in desperate need of scrutiny? They were drinking the Kool-Aid, and pretending that nothing was wrong.

If Democrats insist on looking for skeletons in the closet, they should take a long look at themselves. They’ve hidden more than their fair share.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
vjls
Reg. Mar 2005
Posted 2019-03-07 4:41 PM (#7424483 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Miracle in the Making


Posts: 3004
20001000

my question is  why don/t they put razor wire on top sides and bottom

would stop that climbing

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-08 4:26 PM (#7424583 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Manafort was sentenced yesterday to 47 months for offenses not related to any collusion.  The judge specified there was no collusion by Manaford with Russia.  Therefore, there was no collusion by the Trump team.  It was all FAKE!  PERIOD!  Dan Bongino https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxquRFOkG0A

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-08 5:41 PM (#7424589 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-09 3:37 PM (#7424618 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Hannity: We now have ****ing evidence on the 'deep state'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWNyucoCH3o

 



Edited by OregonBR 2019-03-11 10:56 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-11 10:57 AM (#7424705 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

How AOC got elected and what the people that put her in office have planned for our future. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h5iv6sECGU&fbclid=IwAR1c5nV6Ogte-Ii6ToNANoNKHUKkjvNomPT0svPTm0wI887UZA1Zfig2uKQ

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
jettster
Reg. Jun 2007
Posted 2019-03-12 11:22 PM (#7424827 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019



...Dot Dot Dot...


Posts: 2003
2000
Location: SW New Mexico

I truly wish that people would listen to actual stories related by residence on the southern border. We are inundated with unmentionable diseases coming across the border... sex trafficking ...child abductions..drugs and God knows what else .

hundreds ...are being apprehended daily which means there's hundreds that are not.

76.000 of them since October ...that will fill a football stadium. A big one. That is a population of a major city....pathetic democratic politicians and their brainwashed followers ..dont believe us.

We are crying for help here in NM.

Cowboys for Trump just went to Santa Fe to The RoundHouse to make our presence known to our Progressive socialist dictator for governor. She wouldn't come out of course. there was 96 on horseback, plus others..walkers ..protesters holding signs... family members.. ranchers ..people who care. Between 700-1.000.

Cowboys for Trump spoke against HB 51 which is the worst abortion law in the country..HB6

Doubling registration fees on vehicles and trailers which would be disastrous for anyone !

higher taxes for everyone ... choking regulations on the oil and gas industry which fund this state.. even though the previous administration left this state with a billion dollar surplus.

They also spoke along with 31 out of 33 sheriff's representing the counties in New Mexico their support to make every County a second amendment Sanctuary. They will not uphold any red flag law that this radical Governor will dictate. She is signing everything into law as fast as possible so fast it would make your head spin.

But of course the local media didn't really say much about it.

But if you get on Facebook look up Cowboys for Trump.

It is a awesome grassroots conservative movement to get back to the Constitution and make America a great country once again.



Edited by jettster 2019-03-12 11:31 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-18 9:06 PM (#7425190 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

NZ shooting??  False Flag?  Yep.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4xDX9YTj_0

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-19 10:06 AM (#7425230 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

David Nunes files 250 Million $ suit against twitter.  https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/18/devin-nunes-sues-twitter-over-conservative-shadow-/

I bet facebook gets one too.  

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-19 11:30 AM (#7425251 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

This is a great article about Trump and WHY I love him, warts and all.  It's about time we had a fighter in our White House.  I've gotten very tired of the world cr*pping on us.  

https://ronaldyatesbooks.com/2018/10/everyone-is-smart-except-donald-trump-rabbi-dov-fischer/?fbclid=IwAR2v3D67XlpjjFqhbHZ9o-qcMZeSclPFCl7oVcLGI9ZV4ZpBhs39Bh1ZqdI

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-19 12:12 PM (#7425258 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

@Breaking911: Facebook blocks Trump’s director of social media from making ‘public comments’. They done stepped in it now.  What will happen next???  BWAHAHAHAHA



Edited by OregonBR 2019-03-19 12:14 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Frodo
Reg. Jul 2004
Posted 2019-03-19 12:24 PM (#7425260 - in reply to #7424023)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


"Heck's Coming With Me"


Posts: 9174
5000200020001002525
Location: Kansas

They kicked Diamond and Silk off Facebook too for their conservative views.  But you can't keep those two quiet.   They asked the other day how Congress members made $164,000 a year but came out of office millionaires.  Good question.   Same question can be asked of Barack Obama.  Hmmmmmm!

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2019-03-19 12:31 PM (#7425262 - in reply to #7425260)
Subject: RE: Real News March 2019


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19089
50005000500020002000252525
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Frodo - 2019-03-19 10:24 AM


They kicked Diamond and Silk off Facebook too for their conservative views.  But you can't keep those two quiet.   They asked the other day how Congress members made $164,000 a year but came out of office millionaires.  Good question.   Same question can be asked of Barack Obama.  Hmmmmmm!


Me. Me. I can answer that.  Foreign contributions to their "foundations".  They all have them. 

Example:

If you're Pelosi, your husband gets the contract to build the highspeed rail project in CA.  Billions of dollars down the tube.  Never to be finished.  Ooops. 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1 2 3
Now viewing page 2 [20 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread
Message format
 

'
Registered to: Barrel Horse World
(Delete all cookies set by this site)
Running MegaBBS ASP Forum Software
© 2002-2019 PD9 Software