Error encountered in: C:\HostingSpaces\weblevel\forums.barrelhorseworld.com\wwwroot\forum\templates\original\fragments\template-begin.asp
Microsoft VBScript compilation error - Expected statement
Clayton foals
barrelracin85
Reg. May 2005
Posted 2013-11-28 10:50 AM
Subject: Clayton foals



Works Hard For The Money


Posts: 4469
200020001001001001002525
Location: Memphis, TN
I know they have been discussed quite a bit here. Just saw one of his foals is running in the Super Stakes at the BFA. Owned by Jud Little, horse name- Scamper To Dat Cash, sire- Clayton, dam- Desierita Juno by Juno Dat Cash. I know people have been wanting to see how his get will perform so here is that chance.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
mruggles
Reg. Oct 2008
Posted 2013-11-28 11:35 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Good Grief!


Posts: 6343
5000100010010010025
Location: Cap'n Joan Rotgut.....alberta
Poor horse......he doesn't even realize the amount of pressure on him....M
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bibliafarm
Reg. Jul 2008
Posted 2013-11-28 12:10 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Warmblood with Wings


Posts: 27846
50005000500050005000200050010010010025
Location: Florida..
I feel like its the people putting pressure on him. he probrably could care less.. He will go do his best.. if people wouldnt judge them or others it wouldnt be such a  huge ordeal. just my opinion of course..it was the owners choice and their money to do it. its really no ones business but i also realize thats not how the barrelracing  community feels..as in all the horses.. some days are good some are bad.. they cant be superstars all the time.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
The1CowgirlsEnvy
Reg. Aug 2011
Posted 2013-11-28 6:40 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Elite Veteran


Posts: 808
500100100100
I've been waiting to see one of his babies run for years now. It'll be interesting and the conversations on BHW that will go with it even more so lol.

I looked the horse up and found that in 2012 the horse sold for 9k so I wonder how JL ended back up with him.

Edited by The1CowgirlsEnvy 2013-11-28 6:45 PM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Southtxponygirl
Reg. Nov 2006
Posted 2013-11-28 6:52 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



A Somebody to Everybody


Posts: 41354
5000500050005000500050005000500010001001001002525
Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas
Bibliafarm - 2013-11-28 12:10 PM I feel like its the people putting pressure on him. he probrably could care less.. He will go do his best.. if people wouldnt judge them or others it wouldnt be such a  huge ordeal. just my opinion of course..it was the owners choice and their money to do it. its really no ones business but i also realize thats not how the barrelracing  community feels..as in all the horses.. some days are good some are bad.. they cant be superstars all the time.

 Very true, even the Greatest have off days. I bet there will be many waiting to see one run and ifs a bad run holy cow they will be picking it to pecies. I'm sure you will have some really nice hard running baby's and then there will be the ones that dont run. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
HotPants
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2013-11-28 7:10 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Elite Veteran


Posts: 907
500100100100100
Location: a secret
Who is the jockey??? even if he has a bad day you know it will be the riders fault......  jmo.....
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CYA Ranch
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-11-28 8:47 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

More bootie than waist!


Posts: 18425
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Location: Riding Crackhead.
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-28 10:50 AM I know they have been discussed quite a bit here. Just saw one of his foals is running in the Super Stakes at the BFA. Owned by Jud Little, horse name- Scamper To Dat Cash, sire- Clayton, dam- Desierita Juno by Juno Dat Cash. I know people have been wanting to see how his get will perform so here is that chance.

Will be very exciting to see how he does!  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CrossCreek
Reg. Mar 2007
Posted 2013-11-28 10:14 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Elite Veteran


Posts: 1062
10002525
Location: Probably On the Road to the Next Barrel Race!
The1CowgirlsEnvy - 2013-11-28 6:40 PM

I've been waiting to see one of his babies run for years now. It'll be interesting and the conversations on BHW that will go with it even more so lol.

I looked the horse up and found that in 2012 the horse sold for 9k so I wonder how JL ended back up with him.

I'm kinda surprised that horse only sold for $9,000...just sayin, I woulda thought those foals would have brought a super-premium price.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
zipper
Reg. Jan 2004
Posted 2013-11-29 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


The Expert Expert


Posts: 3455
200010001001001001002525
Location: Western performance horse Hades
In response to quote above -- He didn't sell.  

Edited by zipper 2013-11-29 9:25 AM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
barrelracin85
Reg. May 2005
Posted 2013-11-29 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Works Hard For The Money


Posts: 4469
200020001001001001002525
Location: Memphis, TN
zipper - 2013-11-29 9:23 AM

In response to quote above -- He didn't sell.  

I would guess they had a reserve set and it wasn't met.

My only thought on the matter is it's a tough race to premier at. They must believe in this colt to pay the entry fee and go up against the caliber of colts running.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Morab76
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-11-29 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Ms. Manners


Posts: 1820
1000500100100100
Location: Oklahoma
If Clayton's foal crop is discounted because this one has a bad run, then those will be the folks who never wanted to give Clayton's progeny a chance anyways.  The proof will be in the long term  I'd never breed to him, but am excited to see how his foals perform and mature in the pen..
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CarpeDiem
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2013-11-29 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Veteran


Posts: 171
1002525
 Phillip Kenyon started both the Clayton colts. They were going really well this summer. Can't wait to see them run!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
willyturnit
Reg. Dec 2005
Posted 2013-11-29 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Left Out


Posts: 6797
50001000500100100252525
Location: Silex Missouri
If people discount them it's because this one will be out of a good mare. Not some pasture horse that someone had the money to breed to Clayton. It has been my understanding Charmayne was choosey about the mares bred to him. Meaning, the mares were performers or have/had already produced performers. So if the first crop flops you can bet people will consider it to be a direct reflection on his siring ability. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Karlaw
Reg. Jul 2011
Posted 2013-11-29 2:23 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Cat Collector


Posts: 1430
100010010010010025
I think that these poor colts dont stand a chance, everyone is holding such high expectations for them, until one makes the NFR they will never be good enough & thats sad. I hope they all do great just to shut some people up!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Morab76
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-11-29 3:09 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Ms. Manners


Posts: 1820
1000500100100100
Location: Oklahoma
I agree with the point about the quality of mares he was bred too.  This first crop will certainly be a good test for his siring ability, but I still think it will be several years before we see a true reflection of Clayton's ability as a sire.  We can say this about any sire, though . . . breed to the best group of mares one can find and hope the foals end up in hands of people who get them trained and working to their potential.  If a stud has a large percentage of poor performers and/or no stand-outs from mares who are proven excellent producers, we'll know the common denominator.  Maybe it will take time to find Clayton's best nick, but I don't believe it is fair or accurate to judge siring ability on a small handful of futurity entries.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
SKM
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2013-11-29 3:55 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Saint Stacey


500050005000500050005000500050010010010010025

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.

1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.
2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.
3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 
4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.
5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.

I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
LRQHS
Reg. Nov 2011
Posted 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Shipwrecked and Flat Out Zapped


Posts: 16390
5000500050001000100100100252525
Location: DUMPING CATS AND PIGS IN TEXAS :)
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.



 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Ridenrun4745
Reg. Sep 2010
Posted 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Expert


Posts: 1543
100050025
Location: MI
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM

SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.



 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....

I second that.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
SwishMiss
Reg. Sep 2008
Posted 2013-11-29 4:37 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Pig-Bear Dog Lover


20001002525
Enjoyed reading this thread. Honestly if they don't start doing something soon ill be worried. He looks more like a little cow horse than anything... I think more and more barrel racers are going for race lines these days. Wish the best for his offspring and fingers crossed that they do well. Its exciting to keep up with!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
DVM2Be
Reg. Dec 2009
Posted 2013-11-29 4:40 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Elite Veteran


Posts: 641
50010025
Location: Michigan
I know when he first started standing to the public his stud fee was $4,000... is it still that high?  The only place I saw a stud fee listed was at the SDP Buffalo Ranch page and it said the fee is $2,500... so did they decide maybe $4k was unreasonable? Just asking... 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bibliafarm
Reg. Jul 2008
Posted 2013-11-29 5:39 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Warmblood with Wings


Posts: 27846
50005000500050005000200050010010010025
Location: Florida..
SKM - 2013-11-29 4:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.



I agree about a crop of some but not just one or two..  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
barrelracin85
Reg. May 2005
Posted 2013-11-29 5:42 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Works Hard For The Money


Posts: 4469
200020001001001001002525
Location: Memphis, TN
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM

LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM

SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.



 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....

I second that.

Third. Very valid points.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Oregonracer2
Reg. Sep 2003
Posted 2013-11-29 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



"Tamer of the Fiery Dragon"


Posts: 5418
5000100100100100
Location: Depends where the next barrel race is.....
I watched this horse being worked this summer and he is really cool! Don't hold anything against a horse in their first few races. Futurities are the start of their careers, not their career. I know what he is, I have seen his sister work too. Both are nice big boned horses that really liked to work. Since I have seen them, I am looking for one or might breed a mare to him myself. Nice, nice, nice! 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
BMW
Reg. Jan 2010
Posted 2013-11-29 7:21 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Expert


Posts: 3147
2000100010025
DVM2Be - 2013-11-29 4:40 PM

I know when he first started standing to the public his stud fee was $4,000... is it still that high?  The only place I saw a stud fee listed was at the SDP Buffalo Ranch page and it said the fee is $2,500... so did they decide maybe $4k was unreasonable? Just asking... 

I don't know about barrel horse studs, but TBs typically drop the stud fee on the third/fourth crop. Then when their two year olds hit the track the stud fee will reflect their success/failure on the track.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
DVM2Be
Reg. Dec 2009
Posted 2013-11-29 7:54 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Elite Veteran


Posts: 641
50010025
Location: Michigan
BMW - 2013-11-29 7:21 PM
DVM2Be - 2013-11-29 4:40 PM I know when he first started standing to the public his stud fee was $4,000... is it still that high?  The only place I saw a stud fee listed was at the SDP Buffalo Ranch page and it said the fee is $2,500... so did they decide maybe $4k was unreasonable? Just asking... 
I don't know about barrel horse studs, but TBs typically drop the stud fee on the third/fourth crop. Then when their two year olds hit the track the stud fee will reflect their success/failure on the track.

Oh good to know! That makes sense. I guess I wasn't sure why his would drop already since he hasn't had any offspring perform yet... But maybe they know something we don't. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Swannranch
Reg. Sep 2005
Posted 2013-11-30 7:02 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Miss Southern Sunshine


Posts: 7427
5000200010010010010025
Location: South Central Florida
SwishMiss - 2013-11-29 5:37 PM Enjoyed reading this thread. Honestly if they don't start doing something soon ill be worried. He looks more like a little cow horse than anything... I think more and more barrel racers are going for race lines these days. Wish the best for his offspring and fingers crossed that they do well. Its exciting to keep up with!

Isn't this year the first year that the first crop is old enough to do something?  What year did he start standing?  I can't remember. . .
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bibliafarm
Reg. Jul 2008
Posted 2013-11-30 7:14 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Warmblood with Wings


Posts: 27846
50005000500050005000200050010010010025
Location: Florida..
Swannranch - 2013-11-30 8:02 PM
SwishMiss - 2013-11-29 5:37 PM Enjoyed reading this thread. Honestly if they don't start doing something soon ill be worried. He looks more like a little cow horse than anything... I think more and more barrel racers are going for race lines these days. Wish the best for his offspring and fingers crossed that they do well. Its exciting to keep up with!
Isn't this year the first year that the first crop is old enough to do something?  What year did he start standing?  I can't remember. . .

yes.. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Fancie_That_Chrome_
Reg. Mar 2012
Posted 2013-11-30 7:48 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Expert


Posts: 1229
100010010025
Location: Royal J Performance Horses, AZ
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-29 4:42 PM
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.


 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
I second that.
Third. Very valid points.

Agree, whole heartedly. I hope that if he fails as a sire they stop breeding him. but that probably wont happen. Have to make all that cloning money back some how right?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bibliafarm
Reg. Jul 2008
Posted 2013-11-30 9:57 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Warmblood with Wings


Posts: 27846
50005000500050005000200050010010010025
Location: Florida..
Fancie_That_Chrome_ - 2013-11-30 8:48 PM
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-29 4:42 PM
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.


 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
I second that.
Third. Very valid points.
Agree, whole heartedly. I hope that if he fails as a sire they stop breeding him. but that probably wont happen. Have to make all that cloning money back some how right?

 I wish people felt that way regarding all the stallions not just the cloned ones.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
akammes1997
Reg. Jan 2013
Posted 2013-11-30 11:08 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Regular


Posts: 57
2525
Location: Wishing I was riding
Bibliafarm - 2013-11-30 9:57 PM

Fancie_That_Chrome_ - 2013-11-30 8:48 PM
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-29 4:42 PM
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.


 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
I second that.
Third. Very valid points.
Agree, whole heartedly. I hope that if he fails as a sire they stop breeding him. but that probably wont happen. Have to make all that cloning money back some how right?

 I wish people felt that way regarding all the stallions not just the cloned ones.

Amen to that!!!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
aqhabarrelchic1
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2013-12-01 3:16 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Expert


Posts: 3300
20001000100100100
SKM - 2013-11-30 1:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.

1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.
2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.
3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 
4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.
5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.

I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.


I agree with the mare power that people have given him he better have some winning big time!!! I'd rather see him breed crap mares and produce great horses. That's a sign of a great stud.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Fancie_That_Chrome_
Reg. Mar 2012
Posted 2013-12-01 4:29 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Expert


Posts: 1229
100010010025
Location: Royal J Performance Horses, AZ
akammes1997 - 2013-11-30 10:08 PM
Bibliafarm - 2013-11-30 9:57 PM
Fancie_That_Chrome_ - 2013-11-30 8:48 PM
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-29 4:42 PM
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.


 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
I second that.
Third. Very valid points.
Agree, whole heartedly. I hope that if he fails as a sire they stop breeding him. but that probably wont happen. Have to make all that cloning money back some how right?
 I wish people felt that way regarding all the stallions not just the cloned ones.
Amen to that!!!

Trust me I agree with that too, but it kind of opens a small can of worms and there is a grey area. IMO, it gets in a little deep.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2013-12-01 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
Fancie_That_Chrome_ - 2013-12-01 4:29 AM

akammes1997 - 2013-11-30 10:08 PM
Bibliafarm - 2013-11-30 9:57 PM
Fancie_That_Chrome_ - 2013-11-30 8:48 PM
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-29 4:42 PM
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.


 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
I second that.
Third. Very valid points.
Agree, whole heartedly. I hope that if he fails as a sire they stop breeding him. but that probably wont happen. Have to make all that cloning money back some how right?
 I wish people felt that way regarding all the stallions not just the cloned ones.
Amen to that!!!

Trust me I agree with that too, but it kind of opens a small can of worms and there is a grey area. IMO, it gets in a little deep.

Brings up an interesting thought. What crop years were Scamper and Hot Shot for their sires?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
barrelracin85
Reg. May 2005
Posted 2013-12-01 7:49 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Works Hard For The Money


Posts: 4469
200020001001001001002525
Location: Memphis, TN
Just curious, does anyone know if any of the other horse clones have foals showing yet? I tried to see if any of the get out of the Smart Little Lena clones were showing yet but didn't have any luck. I know it's just like any stud though. It's all a gamble. Amazing performers do not always mean amazing producers. This is just one of the most expensive gambles we have seen lol.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2013-12-01 7:54 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
barrelracin85 - 2013-12-01 7:49 AM

Just curious, does anyone know if any of the other horse clones have foals showing yet? I tried to see if any of the get out of the Smart Little Lena clones were showing yet but didn't have any luck. I know it's just like any stud though. It's all a gamble. Amazing performers do not always mean amazing producers. This is just one of the most expensive gambles we have seen lol.

None of the clones in cutting ever made it to a futurity that I remember. Most SLL went abroad for breeding purposes. The other clones in cutting are now breeding. Nothing from a second generation clone is old enough, I believe.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
barrelracin85
Reg. May 2005
Posted 2013-12-01 8:03 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Works Hard For The Money


Posts: 4469
200020001001001001002525
Location: Memphis, TN
rockette - 2013-12-01 7:54 AM

barrelracin85 - 2013-12-01 7:49 AM

Just curious, does anyone know if any of the other horse clones have foals showing yet? I tried to see if any of the get out of the Smart Little Lena clones were showing yet but didn't have any luck. I know it's just like any stud though. It's all a gamble. Amazing performers do not always mean amazing producers. This is just one of the most expensive gambles we have seen lol.

None of the clones in cutting ever made it to a futurity that I remember. Most SLL went abroad for breeding purposes. The other clones in cutting are now breeding. Nothing from a second generation clone is old enough, I believe.

Yeah that's about all I found in regards to SLL. Of course he is different because he proved himself as a producer before he was cloned. With Scamper it is completely unknown until now. I want to say that the people behind the SLL clones voted not to show the clones and to use them strictly for breeding. There was a video of one cutting but I don't think they actually competed on him. Just did it more to show he could and would do it. I didn't think the Hotshot clones were breeding yet and couldn't remember what other horses were cloned. I just don't follow it enough honestly.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2013-12-01 8:13 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
barrelracin85 - 2013-12-01 8:03 AM

rockette - 2013-12-01 7:54 AM

barrelracin85 - 2013-12-01 7:49 AM

Just curious, does anyone know if any of the other horse clones have foals showing yet? I tried to see if any of the get out of the Smart Little Lena clones were showing yet but didn't have any luck. I know it's just like any stud though. It's all a gamble. Amazing performers do not always mean amazing producers. This is just one of the most expensive gambles we have seen lol.

None of the clones in cutting ever made it to a futurity that I remember. Most SLL went abroad for breeding purposes. The other clones in cutting are now breeding. Nothing from a second generation clone is old enough, I believe.

Yeah that's about all I found in regards to SLL. Of course he is different because he proved himself as a producer before he was cloned. With Scamper it is completely unknown until now. I want to say that the people behind the SLL clones voted not to show the clones and to use them strictly for breeding. There was a video of one cutting but I don't think they actually competed on him. Just did it more to show he could and would do it. I didn't think the Hotshot clones were breeding yet and couldn't remember what other horses were cloned. I just don't follow it enough honestly.

I think they cloned a couple of champion bucking horses. I want to say Air wolf? Wonder how they are going?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
dhdqhllc
Reg. Feb 2011
Posted 2013-12-01 8:36 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Always Off Topic


Posts: 6382
50001000100100100252525
Location: ND
Fancie_That_Chrome_ - 2013-11-30 7:48 PM
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-29 4:42 PM
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.


 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
I second that.
Third. Very valid points.
Agree, whole heartedly. I hope that if he fails as a sire they stop breeding him. but that probably wont happen. Have to make all that cloning money back some how right?

 right....because if his foals don't have all kinds of succes in the big barrel pens, they are obviously worthless horses
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
dhdqhllc
Reg. Feb 2011
Posted 2013-12-01 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Always Off Topic


Posts: 6382
50001000100100100252525
Location: ND
akammes1997 - 2013-11-30 11:08 PM
Bibliafarm - 2013-11-30 9:57 PM
Fancie_That_Chrome_ - 2013-11-30 8:48 PM
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-29 4:42 PM
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.

1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.
2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.
3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 
4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.
5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.

I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.

 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
I second that.
Third. Very valid points.
Agree, whole heartedly. I hope that if he fails as a sire they stop breeding him. but that probably wont happen. Have to make all that cloning money back some how right?
 I wish people felt that way regarding all the stallions not just the cloned ones.
Amen to that!!!
 i wish people would quit riding horses that don't win 1D's and rodeos...or at least place in the top 5.....all those other horses should be culled

Edited by dhdqhllc 2013-12-01 8:40 AM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CYA Ranch
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-12-01 9:08 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

More bootie than waist!


Posts: 18425
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Location: Riding Crackhead.
dhdqhllc - 2013-12-01 8:38 AM
akammes1997 - 2013-11-30 11:08 PM
Bibliafarm - 2013-11-30 9:57 PM
Fancie_That_Chrome_ - 2013-11-30 8:48 PM
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-29 4:42 PM
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.


 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
I second that.
Third. Very valid points.
Agree, whole heartedly. I hope that if he fails as a sire they stop breeding him. but that probably wont happen. Have to make all that cloning money back some how right?
 I wish people felt that way regarding all the stallions not just the cloned ones.
Amen to that!!!
 i wish people would quit riding horses that don't win 1D's and rodeos...or at least place in the top 5.....all those other horses should be culled

Dang.....I need to put a bullet in all my horses.  
 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bibliafarm
Reg. Jul 2008
Posted 2013-12-01 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Warmblood with Wings


Posts: 27846
50005000500050005000200050010010010025
Location: Florida..
 my point is  .. he can produce good horses.. just because they dont win at barrelracing  doesnt mean they arent good horses.. also I think to many focus on clones being a issue .I have no yes or no about any of it.. but it gets rather tiring hearing how so many put so much on the cloned .. and not enough on the stallions reproducing  out there breeding to just make $$...over and over again..quality is better then quantity
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CYA Ranch
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-12-01 9:54 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

More bootie than waist!


Posts: 18425
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Location: Riding Crackhead.
Bibliafarm - 2013-12-01 9:47 AM  my point is  .. he can produce good horses.. just because they dont win at barrelracing  doesnt mean they arent good horses.. also I think to many focus on clones being a issue .I have no yes or no about any of it.. but it gets rather tiring hearing how so many put so much on the cloned .. and not enough on the stallions reproducing  out there breeding to just make $$...over and over again..quality is better then quantity

You are so very right Bibs.  I only have 1 broodmare and that's only because she's my retired barrel mare who poured out heart and soul for me so I want to "try" and get those genetics back for the future.  I have no desire to have a stockpile of horses in fact I've left her open a year and now she'll foal in the spring.  Whether I breed her back or not this spring is still up in the air.  How many horses do I need?  Each stallion I breed to gives me an anxiety attack because in my little world I feel like I need to make the most of that foal to represent that stallion to the best of my ability.  Sadly my ability probably isn't up to the standards of what my horses should have.  I have a long yearling filly sired by Bender.  I don't want to let Tia down.  I'm weird like that though. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Ridenrun4745
Reg. Sep 2010
Posted 2013-12-01 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Expert


Posts: 1543
100050025
Location: MI
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-01 9:54 AM

Bibliafarm - 2013-12-01 9:47 AM  my point is  .. he can produce good horses.. just because they dont win at barrelracing  doesnt mean they arent good horses.. also I think to many focus on clones being a issue .I have no yes or no about any of it.. but it gets rather tiring hearing how so many put so much on the cloned .. and not enough on the stallions reproducing  out there breeding to just make $$...over and over again..quality is better then quantity

You are so very right Bibs.  I only have 1 broodmare and that's only because she's my retired barrel mare who poured out heart and soul for me so I want to "try" and get those genetics back for the future.  I have no desire to have a stockpile of horses in fact I've left her open a year and now she'll foal in the spring.  Whether I breed her back or not this spring is still up in the air.  How many horses do I need?  Each stallion I breed to gives me an anxiety attack because in my little world I feel like I need to make the most of that foal to represent that stallion to the best of my ability.  Sadly my ability probably isn't up to the standards of what my horses should have.  I have a long yearling filly sired by Bender.  I don't want to let Tia down.  I'm weird like that though. 

I get what you're saying. I think what you guys are saying makes a lot of sense.
I have to wonder how much of an incorrect emphasis we are putting on clones being the exact same as their original? I don't know if this will come out right, but I guess much of what I'm wondering is the age-old genetics vs. environment emphasis on growth and development. I'm not discounting that the DNA is the same, but like Clayton, while built much like Scamper, it appears that he has different markings (star, snip, etc)...so I would imagine that there are other differences as well? Maybe not...
I guess another way to put it - do you breed to a stud only for their DNA? Or do you breed for how the horse expresses that DNA? (and might 2 horses 'express' their DNA differently due to different environment?) I think my point it - I'd rather take Clayton for who he is, rather than Scamper's clone.
I'll be honest, I'm an au natural type of gal, I wouldn't breed a mare to a clone if given a free breeding. BUT, that being said, I wouldn't judge a horse or person on their choices, or solely on their parentage. I like to see how they perform.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Dr. Luv
Reg. May 2010
Posted 2013-12-01 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Veteran


Posts: 272
1001002525
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-12-01 12:37 PM

CYA Ranch - 2013-12-01 9:54 AM

Bibliafarm - 2013-12-01 9:47 AM  my point is  .. he can produce good horses.. just because they dont win at barrelracing  doesnt mean they arent good horses.. also I think to many focus on clones being a issue .I have no yes or no about any of it.. but it gets rather tiring hearing how so many put so much on the cloned .. and not enough on the stallions reproducing  out there breeding to just make $$...over and over again..quality is better then quantity

You are so very right Bibs.  I only have 1 broodmare and that's only because she's my retired barrel mare who poured out heart and soul for me so I want to "try" and get those genetics back for the future.  I have no desire to have a stockpile of horses in fact I've left her open a year and now she'll foal in the spring.  Whether I breed her back or not this spring is still up in the air.  How many horses do I need?  Each stallion I breed to gives me an anxiety attack because in my little world I feel like I need to make the most of that foal to represent that stallion to the best of my ability.  Sadly my ability probably isn't up to the standards of what my horses should have.  I have a long yearling filly sired by Bender.  I don't want to let Tia down.  I'm weird like that though. 

I get what you're saying. I think what you guys are saying makes a lot of sense.
I have to wonder how much of an incorrect emphasis we are putting on clones being the exact same as their original? I don't know if this will come out right, but I guess much of what I'm wondering is the age-old genetics vs. environment emphasis on growth and development. I'm not discounting that the DNA is the same, but like Clayton, while built much like Scamper, it appears that he has different markings (star, snip, etc)...so I would imagine that there are other differences as well? Maybe not...
I guess another way to put it - do you breed to a stud only for their DNA? Or do you breed for how the horse expresses that DNA? (and might 2 horses 'express' their DNA differently due to different environment?) I think my point it - I'd rather take Clayton for who he is, rather than Scamper's clone.
I'll be honest, I'm an au natural type of gal, I wouldn't breed a mare to a clone if given a free breeding. BUT, that being said, I wouldn't judge a horse or person on their choices, or solely on their parentage. I like to see how they perform.

Here is a way to look at it. FDD Dynasty is a TWIN to First Dynastia. TWIN- exact same DNA. However FDD Dynasty ran better and so far is producing better and stands for a higher stud fee. While First Dynastia stands at a lower price, doesn't get the quality book of mares FDD does. So, to answer your question people want not only the genetics but they want a sire who has performed and has proven himself as a sire of performers.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
roanrider
Reg. Apr 2004
Posted 2013-12-01 2:25 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Expert


Posts: 1414
1000100100100100
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-01 10:54 AM
Bibliafarm - 2013-12-01 9:47 AM  my point is  .. he can produce good horses.. just because they dont win at barrelracing  doesnt mean they arent good horses.. also I think to many focus on clones being a issue .I have no yes or no about any of it.. but it gets rather tiring hearing how so many put so much on the cloned .. and not enough on the stallions reproducing  out there breeding to just make $$...over and over again..quality is better then quantity
You are so very right Bibs.  I only have 1 broodmare and that's only because she's my retired barrel mare who poured out heart and soul for me so I want to "try" and get those genetics back for the future.  I have no desire to have a stockpile of horses in fact I've left her open a year and now she'll foal in the spring.  Whether I breed her back or not this spring is still up in the air.  How many horses do I need?  Each stallion I breed to gives me an anxiety attack because in my little world I feel like I need to make the most of that foal to represent that stallion to the best of my ability.  Sadly my ability probably isn't up to the standards of what my horses should have.  I have a long yearling filly sired by Bender.  I don't want to let Tia down.  I'm weird like that though. 

I hate to see you in distress over this so I'll come get her.  That way the pressure is on me and you can sleep good at night!  


I completely understand what you're saying, I feel the same way!!!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
GoGaited
Reg. May 2013
Posted 2013-12-01 3:16 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Veteran


Posts: 292
100100252525
Location: Northeast Nebraska
So, Scampers sire and dam, did they produce anything besides Scamper that was any good?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
jbhoot
Reg. Jan 2010
Posted 2013-12-01 3:54 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Proud to be Deplorable


Posts: 1929
100050010010010010025
GoGaited - 2013-12-01 3:16 PM

So, Scampers sire and dam, did they produce anything besides Scamper that was any good?

Not really. As far as I am concerned Scamper was a freak. To me if you look at his blood lines nothing screams barrel horse. Yet he is by far the best barrel horse ever. As to Clayton who knows as of yet he is just an experiment. I think he has a good chance at it mainly because he has been bred to some really good mares. If his colts do well than the question will be does it come from the mares or the stud. Right now I would lean towards the mares and the money behind them.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nevertooold
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2013-12-01 4:09 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



I Prefer to Live in Fantasy Land


Posts: 64864
500050005000500050005000500050005000500050005000200020005001001001002525
Location: In the Hills of Texas
jbhoot - 2013-12-01 3:54 PM
GoGaited - 2013-12-01 3:16 PM So, Scampers sire and dam, did they produce anything besides Scamper that was any good?
Not really. As far as I am concerned Scamper was a freak. To me if you look at his blood lines nothing screams barrel horse. Yet he is by far the best barrel horse ever. As to Clayton who knows as of yet he is just an experiment. I think he has a good chance at it mainly because he has been bred to some really good mares. If his colts do well than the question will be does it come from the mares or the stud. Right now I would lean towards the mares and the money behind them.

I agree.

Years ago I tried a mare that was out of Scamper's sire and she was a total puke. She wasn't wired right.

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Swannranch
Reg. Sep 2005
Posted 2013-12-01 5:12 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Miss Southern Sunshine


Posts: 7427
5000200010010010010025
Location: South Central Florida
barrelracin85 - 2013-12-01 9:03 AM
rockette - 2013-12-01 7:54 AM
barrelracin85 - 2013-12-01 7:49 AM Just curious, does anyone know if any of the other horse clones have foals showing yet? I tried to see if any of the get out of the Smart Little Lena clones were showing yet but didn't have any luck. I know it's just like any stud though. It's all a gamble. Amazing performers do not always mean amazing producers. This is just one of the most expensive gambles we have seen lol.
None of the clones in cutting ever made it to a futurity that I remember. Most SLL went abroad for breeding purposes. The other clones in cutting are now breeding. Nothing from a second generation clone is old enough, I believe.
Yeah that's about all I found in regards to SLL. Of course he is different because he proved himself as a producer before he was cloned. With Scamper it is completely unknown until now. I want to say that the people behind the SLL clones voted not to show the clones and to use them strictly for breeding. There was a video of one cutting but I don't think they actually competed on him. Just did it more to show he could and would do it. I didn't think the Hotshot clones were breeding yet and couldn't remember what other horses were cloned. I just don't follow it enough honestly.

Im pretty sure there is only one Hot Shot clone.  I read there were 4 or 5 implanted.  First one born was sold and it passed away from something NONgentic, like an accident or something.  Then the one they have now and the other two did not take.  I'm not and expert, but I like watching and I'm pretty sure this is correct.
However the Hot Shot clones should not be old enough yet.  Not sure he is either.  I think he is maybe 4 this year?  He is breding, but I don't know if he did last year, but his ad is in Barrel Horse News...well not a specific ad but he is listed on the breeders page.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Swannranch
Reg. Sep 2005
Posted 2013-12-01 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Miss Southern Sunshine


Posts: 7427
5000200010010010010025
Location: South Central Florida
jbhoot - 2013-12-01 4:54 PM
GoGaited - 2013-12-01 3:16 PM So, Scampers sire and dam, did they produce anything besides Scamper that was any good?
Not really. As far as I am concerned Scamper was a freak. To me if you look at his blood lines nothing screams barrel horse. Yet he is by far the best barrel horse ever. As to Clayton who knows as of yet he is just an experiment. I think he has a good chance at it mainly because he has been bred to some really good mares. If his colts do well than the question will be does it come from the mares or the stud. Right now I would lean towards the mares and the money behind them.

Agreed, but I think this is true of any stud.  If you look at the best of the best Studs, and the star horses from their breding, very VERY few are from no name mare sires. I'm not sure that was gramatically correct, but I think you know what I mean. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
angelica
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2013-12-01 5:42 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


I Really Love Jeans


Posts: 3173
200010001002525
Location: North Dakota
The people that pay the premium to breed to a clone put the time and professional training into the horse they get. When you have a great mare and top notch training they are going to do better than average. I personally would not breed to a clone but i don't have any negative feelings towards anyone who does. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CYA Ranch
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-12-01 6:52 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

More bootie than waist!


Posts: 18425
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Location: Riding Crackhead.
roanrider - 2013-12-01 2:25 PM
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-01 10:54 AM
Bibliafarm - 2013-12-01 9:47 AM  my point is  .. he can produce good horses.. just because they dont win at barrelracing  doesnt mean they arent good horses.. also I think to many focus on clones being a issue .I have no yes or no about any of it.. but it gets rather tiring hearing how so many put so much on the cloned .. and not enough on the stallions reproducing  out there breeding to just make $$...over and over again..quality is better then quantity
You are so very right Bibs.  I only have 1 broodmare and that's only because she's my retired barrel mare who poured out heart and soul for me so I want to "try" and get those genetics back for the future.  I have no desire to have a stockpile of horses in fact I've left her open a year and now she'll foal in the spring.  Whether I breed her back or not this spring is still up in the air.  How many horses do I need?  Each stallion I breed to gives me an anxiety attack because in my little world I feel like I need to make the most of that foal to represent that stallion to the best of my ability.  Sadly my ability probably isn't up to the standards of what my horses should have.  I have a long yearling filly sired by Bender.  I don't want to let Tia down.  I'm weird like that though. 
I hate to see you in distress over this so I'll come get her.  That way the pressure is on me and you can sleep good at night!  





I completely understand what you're saying, I feel the same way!!!

There are some days I'd put a stamp on her butt and send her to you.  Reason being is I've spoiled her so much she's annoying as hell.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
hotpaints
Reg. Feb 2007
Posted 2013-12-01 7:12 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Elite Veteran


Posts: 898
500100100100252525
Location: Mountains of VA
What people tend to forget...........the "stars" have to be aligned just right for any horse to become a GREAT horse. Scamper is the perfect example. Secretariat is another great example and I can think of many more.........Hotshot. Bloodlines, conformation, etc. go nowhere if not in the right hands at the right time.

PLUS, many GREAT horses are standing around in somebody's field or "gasp' in somebody's backyard.  It just depends on how much money an owner is willing to spend to get the horse "proven". Heck, at the right show, barrel run, etc. any horse could be a 1st class horse.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Morab76
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-12-01 7:22 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Ms. Manners


Posts: 1820
1000500100100100
Location: Oklahoma
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-12-01 12:37 PM
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-01 9:54 AM
Bibliafarm - 2013-12-01 9:47 AM  my point is  .. he can produce good horses.. just because they dont win at barrelracing  doesnt mean they arent good horses.. also I think to many focus on clones being a issue .I have no yes or no about any of it.. but it gets rather tiring hearing how so many put so much on the cloned .. and not enough on the stallions reproducing  out there breeding to just make $$...over and over again..quality is better then quantity
You are so very right Bibs.  I only have 1 broodmare and that's only because she's my retired barrel mare who poured out heart and soul for me so I want to "try" and get those genetics back for the future.  I have no desire to have a stockpile of horses in fact I've left her open a year and now she'll foal in the spring.  Whether I breed her back or not this spring is still up in the air.  How many horses do I need?  Each stallion I breed to gives me an anxiety attack because in my little world I feel like I need to make the most of that foal to represent that stallion to the best of my ability.  Sadly my ability probably isn't up to the standards of what my horses should have.  I have a long yearling filly sired by Bender.  I don't want to let Tia down.  I'm weird like that though. 
I get what you're saying. I think what you guys are saying makes a lot of sense. I have to wonder how much of an incorrect emphasis we are putting on clones being the exact same as their original? I don't know if this will come out right, but I guess much of what I'm wondering is the age-old genetics vs. environment emphasis on growth and development. I'm not discounting that the DNA is the same, but like Clayton, while built much like Scamper, it appears that he has different markings (star, snip, etc)...so I would imagine that there are other differences as well? Maybe not... I guess another way to put it - do you breed to a stud only for their DNA? Or do you breed for how the horse expresses that DNA? (and might 2 horses 'express' their DNA differently due to different environment?) I think my point it - I'd rather take Clayton for who he is, rather than Scamper's clone. I'll be honest, I'm an au natural type of gal, I wouldn't breed a mare to a clone if given a free breeding. BUT, that being said, I wouldn't judge a horse or person on their choices, or solely on their parentage. I like to see how they perform.

 Excellent point . . .
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Morab76
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-12-01 7:24 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Ms. Manners


Posts: 1820
1000500100100100
Location: Oklahoma
Wouldn't it be interesting if they found Clayton's foals excelled at reining or another discipline other than barrels?  That'd be a hoot.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
The1CowgirlsEnvy
Reg. Aug 2011
Posted 2013-12-01 7:54 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Elite Veteran


Posts: 808
500100100100
dhdqhllc - 2013-12-01 6:36 AM

Fancie_That_Chrome_ - 2013-11-30 7:48 PM
barrelracin85 - 2013-11-29 4:42 PM
Ridenrun4745 - 2013-11-29 4:33 PM
LRQHS - 2013-11-29 4:03 PM
SKM - 2013-11-29 3:55 PM

JMHO but they have no choice but to prove him with his first 2 crops. He was set up to prove Greatness by being born to begin with.



1) He's bred an elite book of mares his entire career as a stallion to date.

2) He has a higher stud fee even as a freshman sire than even Frechman's Guy or Dash Ta Fame ever did. Name one stallion that sires predominately barrel horses that has ever stood for $4,000+ their first year at stud.

3) They've hand picked the mares and given him more opportunities that way than even Frenchmans Guy or any other well know barrel sire who started out just breeding any mare that booked to them.
 

4) His foals are in the hands of the top trainers in the nation.

5) They have hung their hat on the fact that Scamper was the most elite barrel horse of all time so he deserves to pass on his genetics.



I hate to say this but if he doesn't produce winners in his first couple of crops, then it wasn't because of lack of mares, training, etc. It will be because of lack of siring ability. Again, that is JHMO.


 Well, for what it's worth, I thoroughly enjoy reading all of your honest opinions....
I second that.
Third. Very valid points.
Agree, whole heartedly. I hope that if he fails as a sire they stop breeding him. but that probably wont happen. Have to make all that cloning money back some how right?

 right....because if his foals don't have all kinds of succes in the big barrel pens, they are obviously worthless horses

I don't think anyone is saying the foals will be/are worthless, just that I wouldn't want to spend $2500/$4000 to get a foal that will never be more then a 3D/4D horse.

Edited by The1CowgirlsEnvy 2013-12-01 8:31 PM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
roanrider
Reg. Apr 2004
Posted 2013-12-01 8:21 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Expert


Posts: 1414
1000100100100100
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-01 7:52 PM
roanrider - 2013-12-01 2:25 PM
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-01 10:54 AM
Bibliafarm - 2013-12-01 9:47 AM  my point is  .. he can produce good horses.. just because they dont win at barrelracing  doesnt mean they arent good horses.. also I think to many focus on clones being a issue .I have no yes or no about any of it.. but it gets rather tiring hearing how so many put so much on the cloned .. and not enough on the stallions reproducing  out there breeding to just make $$...over and over again..quality is better then quantity
You are so very right Bibs.  I only have 1 broodmare and that's only because she's my retired barrel mare who poured out heart and soul for me so I want to "try" and get those genetics back for the future.  I have no desire to have a stockpile of horses in fact I've left her open a year and now she'll foal in the spring.  Whether I breed her back or not this spring is still up in the air.  How many horses do I need?  Each stallion I breed to gives me an anxiety attack because in my little world I feel like I need to make the most of that foal to represent that stallion to the best of my ability.  Sadly my ability probably isn't up to the standards of what my horses should have.  I have a long yearling filly sired by Bender.  I don't want to let Tia down.  I'm weird like that though. 
I hate to see you in distress over this so I'll come get her.  That way the pressure is on me and you can sleep good at night!  





I completely understand what you're saying, I feel the same way!!!
There are some days I'd put a stamp on her butt and send her to you.  Reason being is I've spoiled her so much she's annoying as hell.  

I'll be west bound in the morning.    
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2013-12-01 8:50 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
hotpaints - 2013-12-01 7:12 PM

What people tend to forget...........the "stars" have to be aligned just right for any horse to become a GREAT horse. Scamper is the perfect example. Secretariat is another great example and I can think of many more.........Hotshot. Bloodlines, conformation, etc. go nowhere if not in the right hands at the right time.

PLUS, many GREAT horses are standing around in somebody's field or "gasp' in somebody's backyard.  It just depends on how much money an owner is willing to spend to get the horse "proven". Heck, at the right show, barrel run, etc. any horse could be a 1st class horse.

Actually I disagree with Secretariat being in that category. His sire Bold Ruler led th TB sire list 9 times. His dam Something Royal was the daughter of an English triple Crown winner, she also produced stakes winner Sir Gaylord.

Edited by rockette 2013-12-01 8:51 PM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
WYOracer
Reg. Feb 2012
Posted 2013-12-01 10:56 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Elite Veteran


Posts: 972
5001001001001002525
Location: Texas!
I think she means the whole Bold Ruler colts were not known for running distance races and he won...smoked the field in the Belmont by 31 lengths proving everyone wrong on his ability to run distance.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Leo
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2013-12-02 12:37 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Night Chat Leader


Posts: 13150
50005000200010001002525
Location: Home....Smiling M Farms
The only Hot Shot clone left, is standing this year.  He's at VF with an intro fee of $2500.

5 were 'made', 3 made it to birth, 2 died in freak accidents.  Another Shot is the only one left. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2013-12-02 5:55 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
WYOracer - 2013-12-01 10:56 PM

I think she means the whole Bold Ruler colts were not known for running distance races and he won...smoked the field in the Belmont by 31 lengths proving everyone wrong on his ability to run distance.

I still disagree, Bold Ruler sired a chsmpion almost every year. He was well known and can be found in many champion horses pedigrees. While the barrel horses we are talking about have sires who only sired named champion. I would put John Henry in place of Secretariat.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
hotpaints
Reg. Feb 2007
Posted 2013-12-02 6:53 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Elite Veteran


Posts: 898
500100100100252525
Location: Mountains of VA
rockette - 2013-12-01 8:50 PM
hotpaints - 2013-12-01 7:12 PM What people tend to forget...........the "stars" have to be aligned just right for any horse to become a GREAT horse. Scamper is the perfect example. Secretariat is another great example and I can think of many more.........Hotshot. Bloodlines, conformation, etc. go nowhere if not in the right hands at the right time.



PLUS, many GREAT horses are standing around in somebody's field or "gasp' in somebody's backyard.  It just depends on how much money an owner is willing to spend to get the horse "proven". Heck, at the right show, barrel run, etc. any horse could be a 1st class horse.
Actually I disagree with Secretariat being in that category. His sire Bold Ruler led th TB sire list 9 times. His dam Something Royal was the daughter of an English triple Crown winner, she also produced stakes winner Sir Gaylord.

I admit that I am not that "up" on TB racing facts. However, just how many star race horses did Secretariat produce, male or female? Here in Virginia, Secretariat is considered a fluke that was never able to successfully reproduce equal to or better than himself.

I also have a perfect example here at my farm. We own a TB mare sired by Rahy. The year her dam was bred for her, his stud fee was $10,000. As a race horse he was a phenom but as a sire he was a dink. However, he is considered a broodmare sire and his grandget have done extremely well. So for example, cloning Rahy would be a waste of money and time IMO.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
carlos
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2013-12-02 8:12 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


"aint no Barbie"


Posts: 2272
20001001002525
Location: san antonio texas
For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.
Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CYA Ranch
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-12-02 8:14 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

More bootie than waist!


Posts: 18425
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Location: Riding Crackhead.
carlos - 2013-12-02 8:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
TurnLane
Reg. May 2007
Posted 2013-12-02 8:23 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Pork Fat is my Favorite


Posts: 3791
20001000500100100252525
Location: The Oklahoma plains.
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-02 8:14 AM
carlos - 2013-12-02 8:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    
 

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
willyturnit
Reg. Dec 2005
Posted 2013-12-02 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Left Out


Posts: 6797
50001000500100100252525
Location: Silex Missouri
carlos - 2013-12-02 8:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    

I don't think there is one person on this thread who has stated that they "hate Clayton and his babies".  I have read this thread several times. The debate, by some, is will the success or failure of this first crop be the determining factor as to if he is a successful stallion. Another point is was it genetics people were after or the expression of those genetics. But not once did I see someone on this particular thread say they hated him or  his offspring. Heck for that matter not sure why it is that big of a deal. There are a lot of barrel racers who don't want to or won't own a horse with Beduino bloodlines. Clayton is no different. there will be those who are against cloning .There are those who are mad because people chose to clone their horses and now AQHA is being forced to register those foals. But again, I have not seen anyone say they hated Clayton or his offspring. Any young sire is open to scrutinizing. Whether or not they have produced a one horse wonder or if they are a flop. It's part of the owning of a stallion.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
BamaCanChaser
Reg. Nov 2012
Posted 2013-12-02 8:47 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Expert


Posts: 2097
2000252525
Location: Deep South
willyturnit - 2013-12-02 8:38 AM

carlos - 2013-12-02 8:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    

I don't think there is one person on this thread who has stated that they "hate Clayton and his babies".  I have read this thread several times. The debate, by some, is will the success or failure of this first crop be the determining factor as to if he is a successful stallion. Another point is was it genetics people were after or the expression of those genetics. But not once did I see someone on this particular thread say they hated him or  his offspring. Heck for that matter not sure why it is that big of a deal. There are a lot of barrel racers who don't want to or won't own a horse with Beduino bloodlines. Clayton is no different. there will be those who are against cloning .There are those who are mad because people chose to clone their horses and now AQHA is being forced to register those foals. But again, I have not seen anyone say they hated Clayton or his offspring. Any young sire is open to scrutinizing. Whether or not they have produced a one horse wonder or if they are a flop. It's part of the owning of a stallion.  

Well said.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
barrelracr131
Reg. Aug 2011
Posted 2013-12-02 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Hungarian Midget Woman


50002000100100
Location: Midwest
carlos - 2013-12-02 8:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    

I'll take one... if someone has one they hate... I will do them that favor....just throwing that out there lol 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Swannranch
Reg. Sep 2005
Posted 2013-12-02 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Miss Southern Sunshine


Posts: 7427
5000200010010010010025
Location: South Central Florida
willyturnit - 2013-12-02 9:38 AM
carlos - 2013-12-02 8:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    
I don't think there is one person on this thread who has stated that they "hate Clayton and his babies".  I have read this thread several times. The debate, by some, is will the success or failure of this first crop be the determining factor as to if he is a successful stallion. Another point is was it genetics people were after or the expression of those genetics. But not once did I see someone on this particular thread say they hated him or  his offspring. Heck for that matter not sure why it is that big of a deal. There are a lot of barrel racers who don't want to or won't own a horse with Beduino bloodlines. Clayton is no different. there will be those who are against cloning .There are those who are mad because people chose to clone their horses and now AQHA is being forced to register those foals. But again, I have not seen anyone say they hated Clayton or his offspring. Any young sire is open to scrutinizing. Whether or not they have produced a one horse wonder or if they are a flop. It's part of the owning of a stallion.  

This was well said.  I happen to like cloning, I would bred to a clone in a second if I had the money.  I don't think it's for everyone, but I did not see any Clayton bashing here.

My only problem with the cloning, is the court decission.  I think someone should start a cloning registery. . .could be a part of AQHA or a private organization.  I would like to see them registered.  BUT I don't understand why the Government can force a private organization or association to set it's rules a certain way.  Just seems intrusive...I know big shock.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
c-mae
Reg. May 2012
Posted 2013-12-02 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals





10010010025
I am confused...Clayton is Scampers clone right? And clones cant be registered or can they? And can you enter horses in the BFA that arent registered for proof of age?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
TurnLane
Reg. May 2007
Posted 2013-12-02 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Pork Fat is my Favorite


Posts: 3791
20001000500100100252525
Location: The Oklahoma plains.
c-mae - 2013-12-02 9:29 AM I am confused...Clayton is Scampers clone right? And clones cant be registered or can they? And can you enter horses in the BFA that arent registered for proof of age?

Pretty sure you can enter non registered horses in BFA and several futurities with age verification by vet or whatever the governing rules say for each event. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
palgalz
Reg. Nov 2005
Posted 2013-12-02 9:38 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Elite Veteran


Posts: 1163
10001002525
Location: Sapulpa, OK
I still think the mare is 80% of the genetic makeup of the foal...... so if he is only bred to good mares, he will produce. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
barrelracr131
Reg. Aug 2011
Posted 2013-12-02 10:03 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Hungarian Midget Woman


50002000100100
Location: Midwest
palgalz - 2013-12-02 9:38 AM I still think the mare is 80% of the genetic makeup of the foal...... so if he is only bred to good mares, he will produce. 

No....it's 50/50 nuclear DNA

Foal may take on more "behavioral" aspects from the mare from being raised by her...but in terms of genetic makeup, it's 50/50

Minus the mtDNA....but that is a VERY small segment of DNA... MUCH less than nuclear DNA 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bibliafarm
Reg. Jul 2008
Posted 2013-12-02 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Warmblood with Wings


Posts: 27846
50005000500050005000200050010010010025
Location: Florida..
carlos - 2013-12-02 9:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.
Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    
No they wont.. because a few people I have run across  are dead set aganist them being successful.and I am not saying ones on this thread....  

Edited by Bibliafarm 2013-12-02 10:09 AM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
sorrel horse ranch
Reg. Apr 2006
Posted 2013-12-02 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Angel in a Sorrel Coat


Posts: 16030
500050005000100025
Location: In a happy place
carlos - 2013-12-02 7:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2013-12-02 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
hotpaints - 2013-12-02 6:53 AM

rockette - 2013-12-01 8:50 PM
hotpaints - 2013-12-01 7:12 PM What people tend to forget...........the "stars" have to be aligned just right for any horse to become a GREAT horse. Scamper is the perfect example. Secretariat is another great example and I can think of many more.........Hotshot. Bloodlines, conformation, etc. go nowhere if not in the right hands at the right time.



PLUS, many GREAT horses are standing around in somebody's field or "gasp' in somebody's backyard.  It just depends on how much money an owner is willing to spend to get the horse "proven". Heck, at the right show, barrel run, etc. any horse could be a 1st class horse.
Actually I disagree with Secretariat being in that category. His sire Bold Ruler led th TB sire list 9 times. His dam Something Royal was the daughter of an English triple Crown winner, she also produced stakes winner Sir Gaylord.

I admit that I am not that "up" on TB racing facts. However, just how many star race horses did Secretariat produce, male or female? Here in Virginia, Secretariat is considered a fluke that was never able to successfully reproduce equal to or better than himself.

I also have a perfect example here at my farm. We own a TB mare sired by Rahy. The year her dam was bred for her, his stud fee was $10,000. As a race horse he was a phenom but as a sire he was a dink. However, he is considered a broodmare sire and his grandget have done extremely well. So for example, cloning Rahy would be a waste of money and time IMO.

Ok, I get where you are coming from. I thought you meant Secretariat wad a fluke because Bold Ruler was not a good sire. Now I understand you mean Secretariat as a performer than sire. I gotcha now. I agree.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
carlos
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2013-12-02 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


"aint no Barbie"


Posts: 2272
20001001002525
Location: san antonio texas
willyturnit - 2013-12-02 8:38 AM
carlos - 2013-12-02 8:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    
I don't think there is one person on this thread who has stated that they "hate Clayton and his babies".  I have read this thread several times. The debate, by some, is will the success or failure of this first crop be the determining factor as to if he is a successful stallion. Another point is was it genetics people were after or the expression of those genetics. But not once did I see someone on this particular thread say they hated him or  his offspring. Heck for that matter not sure why it is that big of a deal. There are a lot of barrel racers who don't want to or won't own a horse with Beduino bloodlines. Clayton is no different. there will be those who are against cloning .There are those who are mad because people chose to clone their horses and now AQHA is being forced to register those foals. But again, I have not seen anyone say they hated Clayton or his offspring. Any young sire is open to scrutinizing. Whether or not they have produced a one horse wonder or if they are a flop. It's part of the owning of a stallion.  

WO... wait a second I'm not starting a fight so please back off.  OK OK hate is a strong word I threw it out there hastily and without thought so I apologize for saying "hate"... Please forgive me and move on from that.  Just substitute the word "hate" for "don't like" or "has something against".  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
barrelracerdude
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2013-12-02 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Expert


Posts: 1691
1000500100252525
Location: Pendleton, OR
All I have to say is... "Run Jack Run!"  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
willyturnit
Reg. Dec 2005
Posted 2013-12-02 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Left Out


Posts: 6797
50001000500100100252525
Location: Silex Missouri
carlos - 2013-12-02 12:28 PM
willyturnit - 2013-12-02 8:38 AM
carlos - 2013-12-02 8:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    
I don't think there is one person on this thread who has stated that they "hate Clayton and his babies".  I have read this thread several times. The debate, by some, is will the success or failure of this first crop be the determining factor as to if he is a successful stallion. Another point is was it genetics people were after or the expression of those genetics. But not once did I see someone on this particular thread say they hated him or  his offspring. Heck for that matter not sure why it is that big of a deal. There are a lot of barrel racers who don't want to or won't own a horse with Beduino bloodlines. Clayton is no different. there will be those who are against cloning .There are those who are mad because people chose to clone their horses and now AQHA is being forced to register those foals. But again, I have not seen anyone say they hated Clayton or his offspring. Any young sire is open to scrutinizing. Whether or not they have produced a one horse wonder or if they are a flop. It's part of the owning of a stallion.  
WO... wait a second I'm not starting a fight so please back off.  OK OK hate is a strong word I threw it out there hastily and without thought so I apologize for saying "hate"... Please forgive me and move on from that.  Just substitute the word "hate" for "don't like" or "has something against".  

I'm not attacking you. I use larger font because it is easier for me to read.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
speedjunkie
Reg. Dec 2011
Posted 2013-12-02 1:36 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Expert


Posts: 1218
1000100100
Location: Great NW
carlos - 2013-12-02 6:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
BMW
Reg. Jan 2010
Posted 2013-12-02 2:00 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Expert


Posts: 3147
2000100010025
rockette - 2013-12-02 11:07 AM

hotpaints - 2013-12-02 6:53 AM

rockette - 2013-12-01 8:50 PM
hotpaints - 2013-12-01 7:12 PM What people tend to forget...........the "stars" have to be aligned just right for any horse to become a GREAT horse. Scamper is the perfect example. Secretariat is another great example and I can think of many more.........Hotshot. Bloodlines, conformation, etc. go nowhere if not in the right hands at the right time.



PLUS, many GREAT horses are standing around in somebody's field or "gasp' in somebody's backyard.  It just depends on how much money an owner is willing to spend to get the horse "proven". Heck, at the right show, barrel run, etc. any horse could be a 1st class horse.
Actually I disagree with Secretariat being in that category. His sire Bold Ruler led th TB sire list 9 times. His dam Something Royal was the daughter of an English triple Crown winner, she also produced stakes winner Sir Gaylord.

I admit that I am not that "up" on TB racing facts. However, just how many star race horses did Secretariat produce, male or female? Here in Virginia, Secretariat is considered a fluke that was never able to successfully reproduce equal to or better than himself.

I also have a perfect example here at my farm. We own a TB mare sired by Rahy. The year her dam was bred for her, his stud fee was $10,000. As a race horse he was a phenom but as a sire he was a dink. However, he is considered a broodmare sire and his grandget have done extremely well. So for example, cloning Rahy would be a waste of money and time IMO.

Ok, I get where you are coming from. I thought you meant Secretariat wad a fluke because Bold Ruler was not a good sire. Now I understand you mean Secretariat as a performer than sire. I gotcha now. I agree.

Secretariat's sons were average race horses, but his daughters will keep his name around for a long time-very sought after as broodmares. And some of those daughters were scorpions on the race track as well.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
dhdqhllc
Reg. Feb 2011
Posted 2013-12-02 2:06 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Always Off Topic


Posts: 6382
50001000100100100252525
Location: ND
which brings us to short sighted and narrow vision versus far sighted and wide vision.......

it's not til generations later that we really understand what an inidividuals genetics mean to the performance of that line....

which in the end is good that there are folks that realize that instead of banking their opinions of first foal crops..... 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2013-12-08 9:04 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
Doesn't Trevor Brazile have a Clayton baby? Wonder if Shada will train the horse for barrels or if Trevor will rope on it?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Fancie_That_Chrome_
Reg. Mar 2012
Posted 2013-12-08 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Expert


Posts: 1229
100010010025
Location: Royal J Performance Horses, AZ
willyturnit - 2013-12-02 11:48 AM
carlos - 2013-12-02 12:28 PM
willyturnit - 2013-12-02 8:38 AM
carlos - 2013-12-02 8:12 AM For those of you that hate Clayton and his babies....   So what's gonna happen when a few years from now some of you are at some barrel race somewhere and someone comes in and just smokes the field or just turns your head because this horse just looked nice and ran a nice set of cans.  You go up and ask the person about his/her horse and it happens to be  a Clayton baby!!!  Cuz that's gonna happen.

Will you admit then that you actually complimented a horse that turned out to be a Clayton baby??    
I don't think there is one person on this thread who has stated that they "hate Clayton and his babies".  I have read this thread several times. The debate, by some, is will the success or failure of this first crop be the determining factor as to if he is a successful stallion. Another point is was it genetics people were after or the expression of those genetics. But not once did I see someone on this particular thread say they hated him or  his offspring. Heck for that matter not sure why it is that big of a deal. There are a lot of barrel racers who don't want to or won't own a horse with Beduino bloodlines. Clayton is no different. there will be those who are against cloning .There are those who are mad because people chose to clone their horses and now AQHA is being forced to register those foals. But again, I have not seen anyone say they hated Clayton or his offspring. Any young sire is open to scrutinizing. Whether or not they have produced a one horse wonder or if they are a flop. It's part of the owning of a stallion.  
WO... wait a second I'm not starting a fight so please back off.  OK OK hate is a strong word I threw it out there hastily and without thought so I apologize for saying "hate"... Please forgive me and move on from that.  Just substitute the word "hate" for "don't like" or "has something against".  
I'm not attacking you. I use larger font because it is easier for me to read.  

Yeah, I like large font too.
Sorry, sorry I couldn't resist! 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CYA Ranch
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-12-08 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

More bootie than waist!


Posts: 18425
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Location: Riding Crackhead.
rockette - 2013-12-08 9:04 AM Doesn't Trevor Brazile have a Clayton baby? Wonder if Shada will train the horse for barrels or if Trevor will rope on it?

If they do have one of his colts he/she would be in excellent hands and will be exciting to see what happens to that one in the future.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2013-12-08 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-08 10:24 AM

rockette - 2013-12-08 9:04 AM Doesn't Trevor Brazile have a Clayton baby? Wonder if Shada will train the horse for barrels or if Trevor will rope on it?

If they do have one of his colts he/she would be in excellent hands and will be exciting to see what happens to that one in the future.  

I'm watching Being Trevor Brazile before I go to work. Just got me thinking that I thought Charmayne said that they had one.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Phoenix98
Reg. Sep 2006
Posted 2013-12-08 11:54 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Extreme Veteran


Posts: 459
1001001001002525
Location: La Vernia, TX
Scamper himself wasn't a futurity horse. He was a phenomenally consistent and durable athlete that was able to stay at the top of competition for an entire decade. It will certainly take as long to see if Clayton's get inherit the gritty hardiness that made Scamper great.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Oregonracer2
Reg. Sep 2003
Posted 2013-12-10 7:50 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



"Tamer of the Fiery Dragon"


Posts: 5418
5000100100100100
Location: Depends where the next barrel race is.....
To answer your doubts as to whether or not the Clayton babies will futurity.... a Clayton colt just won $7500 in the Super Stakes race! Way to go Janae and Scamp!  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
bennie1
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2013-12-10 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Queen Boobie 2


Posts: 7521
50002000500
Oregonracer2 - 2013-12-10 7:50 PM

To answer your doubts as to whether or not the Clayton babies will futurity.... a Clayton colt just won $7500 in the Super Stakes race! Way to go Janae and Scamp!  

 Cool! What was the bottom side?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CYA Ranch
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2013-12-10 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

More bootie than waist!


Posts: 18425
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Location: Riding Crackhead.
Oregonracer2 - 2013-12-10 7:50 PM To answer your doubts as to whether or not the Clayton babies will futurity.... a Clayton colt just won $7500 in the Super Stakes race! Way to go Janae and Scamp!  

Wooohoo!  I wish I could have seen that.  If someone has a video please share!  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
3 To Go
Reg. Oct 2012
Posted 2013-12-10 7:55 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 591
500252525
bennie1 - 2013-12-10 5:53 PM

Oregonracer2 - 2013-12-10 7:50 PM

To answer your doubts as to whether or not the Clayton babies will futurity.... a Clayton colt just won $7500 in the Super Stakes race! Way to go Janae and Scamp!  

 Cool! What was the bottom side?

Juno Dat Cash
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
dhdqhllc
Reg. Feb 2011
Posted 2013-12-10 7:55 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Always Off Topic


Posts: 6382
50001000100100100252525
Location: ND
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-10 7:53 PM
Oregonracer2 - 2013-12-10 7:50 PM To answer your doubts as to whether or not the Clayton babies will futurity.... a Clayton colt just won $7500 in the Super Stakes race! Way to go Janae and Scamp!  
Wooohoo!  I wish I could have seen that.  If someone has a video please share!  

 where did that fit in as far as placings???
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
bennie1
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2013-12-10 8:05 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Queen Boobie 2


Posts: 7521
50002000500
dhdqhllc - 2013-12-10 7:55 PM

CYA Ranch - 2013-12-10 7:53 PM
Oregonracer2 - 2013-12-10 7:50 PM To answer your doubts as to whether or not the Clayton babies will futurity.... a Clayton colt just won $7500 in the Super Stakes race! Way to go Janae and Scamp!  
Wooohoo!  I wish I could have seen that.  If someone has a video please share!  

 where did that fit in as far as placings???

 I *think* it was 7th in the slot race.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
teehaha
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2013-12-11 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Living on the edge of common sense


Posts: 24139
50005000500050002000200010025
Location: Carpenter, WY
 Just sitting here kind of wondering....we get a 'Clayton' thread about once a month.  I wonder why the FG clones aren't getting the same scrutiny




 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
geronabean
Reg. Sep 2003
Posted 2013-12-11 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Queen Bean of Ponyland


Posts: 24955
5000500050005000200020005001001001001002525
Location: WYOMING
bennie1 - 2013-12-10 9:05 PM
dhdqhllc - 2013-12-10 7:55 PM
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-10 7:53 PM
Oregonracer2 - 2013-12-10 7:50 PM To answer your doubts as to whether or not the Clayton babies will futurity.... a Clayton colt just won $7500 in the Super Stakes race! Way to go Janae and Scamp!  
Wooohoo!  I wish I could have seen that.  If someone has a video please share!  
 where did that fit in as far as placings???
 I *think* it was 7th in the slot race.

 Very cool but my big question is....

how many Clayton babies will be named Scamp?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
dhdqhllc
Reg. Feb 2011
Posted 2013-12-11 9:25 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Always Off Topic


Posts: 6382
50001000100100100252525
Location: ND
teehaha - 2013-12-11 9:12 AM  Just sitting here kind of wondering....we get a 'Clayton' thread about once a month.  I wonder why the FG clones aren't getting the same scrutiny









 

have they bred anything with those clones???? 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
teehaha
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2013-12-11 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Living on the edge of common sense


Posts: 24139
50005000500050002000200010025
Location: Carpenter, WY
dhdqhllc - 2013-12-11 7:25 AM
teehaha - 2013-12-11 9:12 AM  Just sitting here kind of wondering....we get a 'Clayton' thread about once a month.  I wonder why the FG clones aren't getting the same scrutiny




 
have they bred anything with those clones???? 
 so it's the clone's reproducing that twitapates everyone :)?  Your guess would be as good as mine if they've bred anything.  



 

Edited by teehaha 2013-12-11 9:40 AM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
dhdqhllc
Reg. Feb 2011
Posted 2013-12-11 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Always Off Topic


Posts: 6382
50001000100100100252525
Location: ND
teehaha - 2013-12-11 9:37 AM
dhdqhllc - 2013-12-11 7:25 AM
teehaha - 2013-12-11 9:12 AM  Just sitting here kind of wondering....we get a 'Clayton' thread about once a month.  I wonder why the FG clones aren't getting the same scrutiny









 
have they bred anything with those clones???? 
 so it's the clone's reproducing that twitapates everyone :)?  Your guess would be as good as mine if they've bred anything.  







 

 i'm sure they haven't........

when they do, the twitterpating will begin.....or tweeting or twatting or whatever.....do they really have their own Twitter feed????
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
DVM2Be
Reg. Dec 2009
Posted 2013-12-11 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Elite Veteran


Posts: 641
50010025
Location: Michigan
bennie1 - 2013-12-10 8:05 PM
dhdqhllc - 2013-12-10 7:55 PM
CYA Ranch - 2013-12-10 7:53 PM
Oregonracer2 - 2013-12-10 7:50 PM To answer your doubts as to whether or not the Clayton babies will futurity.... a Clayton colt just won $7500 in the Super Stakes race! Way to go Janae and Scamp!  
Wooohoo!  I wish I could have seen that.  If someone has a video please share!  
 where did that fit in as far as placings???
 I *think* it was 7th in the slot race.

BFA posted the results on their website and it looks like yes he was 7th!  http://www.barrelfuturitiesofamerica.com/results/2013-bfa-world-championship/188-super-stakes.html

I would love to see a video too if anyone digs one up... :
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
classicpotatochip
Reg. Mar 2011
Posted 2013-12-11 11:32 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Owner of a ratting catting machine


Posts: 2258
20001001002525
I think what seriously fascinates me about Scamper is his body. When I think about his physical resiliency to make run after run after run in crazy rodeo ground conditions without the soundness tools and science we have now---Wow!

I would absolutely love to try a colt by Clayton from a badass black type mare. Never know, he might pay off his stud fees just in saving medical bills. I personally feel the barrel horse pen could use a shot of down and dirty bone and hardiness.

It's all an absolute crap shoot whether you get a good baby wth a good brain or not. Dad raised 5 colts out of his old pet Julie mare and the neighbors stud. (Yes, albeit old school performance blood, ah hem, sort of like Scampers) One was my kid horse by the time he was 4. One was my grandmothers 'maw maw horse'. The other three ended up in a bucking string, with one going all the way to Madison Square Garden.

My point: I wouldn't mind getting to sort through some Clayton colts to find that 'one' and paying to do it--the 'one' would totally be worth it!!!!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Calangelo
Reg. Nov 2003
Posted 2013-12-11 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Military family

Rebel Without a Cause


Posts: 2758
20005001001002525
Location: Adopt a homeless pet - www.petfinder.com!
Oregonracer2 - 2013-12-10 7:50 PM To answer your doubts as to whether or not the Clayton babies will futurity.... a Clayton colt just won $7500 in the Super Stakes race! Way to go Janae and Scamp!  

I was SOOO happy to see that horse place!!  Maybe now it'll shut people up - at least I can hope - I get tired of all the negativity towards Clayton!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
WrapSnap
Reg. Dec 2010
Posted 2013-12-11 8:02 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


I AM being nice


Posts: 4396
20002000100100100252525
Location: MD
Having now seen a couple of Clayton foals run this week, I have to say, I have been impressed with them. Nice looking horses that have shown some definite quality.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
dhdqhllc
Reg. Feb 2011
Posted 2013-12-11 8:10 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Always Off Topic


Posts: 6382
50001000100100100252525
Location: ND
WrapSnap - 2013-12-11 8:02 PM Having now seen a couple of Clayton foals run this week, I have to say, I have been impressed with them. Nice looking horses that have shown some definite quality.

 i think some of the evaluation of Clayton's offspring needs to be held until it is seen how his offspring out of good mares and not just the pick of the litter great mares perform.  But even at this point, he is a success.......

i'm still gonna wait and save my money for Bo's clone....
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
WrapSnap
Reg. Dec 2010
Posted 2013-12-11 8:13 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


I AM being nice


Posts: 4396
20002000100100100252525
Location: MD
dhdqhllc - 2013-12-11 8:10 PM

WrapSnap - 2013-12-11 8:02 PM Having now seen a couple of Clayton foals run this week, I have to say, I have been impressed with them. Nice looking horses that have shown some definite quality.

 i think some of the evaluation of Clayton's offspring needs to be held until it is seen how his offspring out of good mares and not just the pick of the litter great mares perform.  But even at this point, he is a success.......

i'm still gonna wait and save my money for Bo's clone....

I agree that I'm not going to base my overall opinion of Clayton as a sire off of the two colts that I have seen this week. My opinion of the two colts that I have seen is that they have both exhibited some quality. I don't think we'll ever see any foals out of anything other than "pick of the litter" mares.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2015-08-21 12:50 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
Does anyone have any updates on Clayton babies? Or Another Shot?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Whoop Z Day Z
Reg. Sep 2007
Posted 2015-08-22 11:57 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Miss Not Exciting


Posts: 3279
20001000100100252525
Location: Ft Worth TX
Heres my opinion for what its worth... A month or so ago I read an article that did research on a large group of TB and tied in their breeding and ranked them with different crosses (elite/ weak mare/sire). Here the order they were ranked after the research was done.
1. Elite Mare, Weak Stallion
2. Elite Mare, Elite stallion
3. Weak mare, Weak Stallion
4. Weak Mare, Elite Stallion
With that being said, and considering Clayton was bred to "Elite mares," I would only expect them to pan out well performing. However we need to remember not every horse is cut out to make a futurity horse, some are late bloomers. IMO Scamper was not bred to be anything but a "late bloomer." In my mind I will be curious as to what the coming years bring with his offspring more then anything. Now say in the next 3-4 years none of them made anything, then I would say he just didn't have siring power (Secretariat NEVER made a great sire in racing, but was a good maternal sire). It happens and no one knows what he will produce it was a big risk to begin with, now we sit and watch.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
rockette
Reg. Jul 2013
Posted 2015-08-23 9:20 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 557
5002525
Location: Kansas and loving it
I was wondering how they were doing. I am not trying to start a fight. Cloning controversy aside. Curious if they were like peppy San badgers, need a day job every day.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Swannranch
Reg. Sep 2005
Posted 2015-08-23 11:39 AM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals


Miss Southern Sunshine


Posts: 7427
5000200010010010010025
Location: South Central Florida
Whoop Z Day Z - 2015-08-23 12:57 AM Heres my opinion for what its worth... A month or so ago I read an article that did research on a large group of TB and tied in their breeding and ranked them with different crosses (elite/ weak mare/sire). Here the order they were ranked after the research was done. 1. Elite Mare, Weak Stallion 2. Elite Mare, Elite stallion 3. Weak mare, Weak Stallion 4. Weak Mare, Elite Stallion With that being said, and considering Clayton was bred to "Elite mares," I would only expect them to pan out well performing. However we need to remember not every horse is cut out to make a futurity horse, some are late bloomers. IMO Scamper was not bred to be anything but a "late bloomer." In my mind I will be curious as to what the coming years bring with his offspring more then anything. Now say in the next 3-4 years none of them made anything, then I would say he just didn't have siring power (Secretariat NEVER made a great sire in racing, but was a good maternal sire). It happens and no one knows what he will produce it was a big risk to begin with, now we sit and watch.

Very interesting.

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nevertooold
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2015-08-23 12:27 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



I Prefer to Live in Fantasy Land


Posts: 64864
500050005000500050005000500050005000500050005000200020005001001001002525
Location: In the Hills of Texas
Only Elite mares should be bred to anything. JMHO 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Linda D
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2015-08-23 7:32 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Been Blessed


Posts: 7587
50002000500252525
Location: Living in my Promised Land
Nevertooold - 2015-08-23 12:27 PM Only Elite mares should be bred to anything. JMHO 

 How many times can I like this post? You are so right!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
cyount2009
Reg. Apr 2012
Posted 2015-08-24 1:58 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Expert


Posts: 1898
1000500100100100252525
Nevertooold - 2015-08-23 12:27 PM

Only Elite mares should be bred to anything. JMHO 

This kind of made me chuckle, especially on this thread. Neither Scamper's dam or sire were necessarily "elite" horses.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
SKM
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2015-08-24 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



Saint Stacey


500050005000500050005000500050010010010010025
cyount2009 - 2015-08-24 12:58 PM

Nevertooold - 2015-08-23 12:27 PM

Only Elite mares should be bred to anything. JMHO 

This kind of made me chuckle, especially on this thread. Neither Scamper's dam or sire were necessarily "elite" horses.

 And exactly how many Scamper's have there been? He is one of a kind for a reason and a far cry from what is normal.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nevertooold
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2015-08-24 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: Clayton foals



I Prefer to Live in Fantasy Land


Posts: 64864
500050005000500050005000500050005000500050005000200020005001001001002525
Location: In the Hills of Texas
SKM - 2015-08-24 2:11 PM
cyount2009 - 2015-08-24 12:58 PM
Nevertooold - 2015-08-23 12:27 PM Only Elite mares should be bred to anything. JMHO 
This kind of made me chuckle, especially on this thread. Neither Scamper's dam or sire were necessarily "elite" horses.
 And exactly how many Scamper's have there been? He is one of a kind for a reason and a far cry from what is normal.

Supports my post. LOL

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom