barrelracr131 - 2013-12-27 10:47 AM i'd take a pothead over an alchy any day of the week...at least potheads are pretty happy most of the time  

Whiteboy - 2013-12-27 10:48 AM  What is an alchy? 

barrelracr131 - 2013-12-27 10:56 AM alcoholic, sry personal abbrv spelling lol 

barrelracr131 - 2013-12-27 9:47 AM i'd take a pothead over an alchy any day of the week...at least potheads are pretty happy most of the time  

graciemay - 2013-12-27 11:01 AM Militant Liberals are very rarely happy, or on task that doesn't involve attempts at mind control.

Can you tell it's my last day? 

graciemay - 2013-12-27 11:01 AM


Militant Liberals are very rarely happy, or on task that doesn't involve attempts at mind control.
Can you tell it's my last day? 

DD2012 - 2013-12-27 2:10 PM


so if you support the legalization of MJ your a liberal?


If so call me Mr. Ried

barrelracr131 - 2013-12-27 9:47 AM i'd take a pothead over an alchy any day of the week...at least potheads are pretty happy most of the time  

SKM - 2013-12-27 3:46 PM The legal pot laws here are a joke and total farce. Hear me out....



1) Pot is legalized so that they can tax it and give the revenue to schools (sounds like a great idea, right? I mean, if people are going to do it... why not make income via taxing?)



2) So then what happens after the voters legalize it? They vote for a huge tax hike. Makes sense, right? I mean, after all.... we need that revenue to improve the school system. Sounds great... .in theory.



3) So then what do they do? Come up with a new law... you can grow 5 pot plants in your home legally. So say goodbye to the tax revenue for schools.



So that leaves us with the question.... who on earth needs 5 pot plants for personal consumption? Because if you need 5 pot plants... you are putting Cheech and Chong to shame. You would have to be smoking that stuff every minute of every waking hour if you use that much weed.



This state is such a libtard joke anymore. 

HotbearLVR - 2013-12-30 10:37 AM I've always wondered how they enforce DUI laws when someone is stoned. How do they prove a driver is under the influence of marijuana? THC can stay in the system for a couple weeks. The war on drugs has been lost for years. Now we have several states where pot is legal, so they should serve as experimental labs where the effects of legalized pot can be studied. Dozens of questions can be answered and dozens of issues analyzed. We should have most of the answers within 10 years or so. The problem, as many have alluded to, is that not only people become dependent on pot....so does government. Tax revenues is tempting.......but what happens if society concludes that legalized pot is much more destructive than we anticipated? Now we have a government revenue source that we will want to eliminate. Good luck with that! Places like Colorado, California, and Oregon should serve as vast experiments. After all, this is what they have decided on, so let them be the nation's guinea pigs. Soon we shall have some answers. It may well turn out that pot will be natures way of population control.

HotbearLVR - 2013-12-30 11:37 AM I've always wondered how they enforce DUI laws when someone is stoned. How do they prove a driver is under the influence of marijuana? THC can stay in the system for a couple weeks.

Red Raider - 2013-12-30 11:54 AM Drug related DWI/DUI's are based more on impairment than what is in the system so to speak.  Most of your case is established by how that person acts, speaks and interacts during the stop.  You can bring in experts to testify that a certain amount of a drug in a person's system should be an impairment but it's not as an exact science/level as alcohol is because drugs affect everybody differently.  Given that the typical DWI driver who appears to be driving impaired is usually over twice the limit, it's kind of the same concept when you pull someone over for a drug DWI.  You don't have to have a medical degree to know when someone is stoned and shouldn't be driving.

Three 4 Luck - 2013-12-30 12:23 PM  I can't pass a field sobriety test stone cold sober due to medical issues.  Then what?

Red Raider - 2013-12-30 12:32 PM It's not just one clue on those tests that they look at or one test in specific so I'd say you'd be okay unless you were high on drugs or drinking.  The things that a prosecutor looks for in those tests are not always what everybody thinks.  They are designed to do certain things to show impairment.  Basically it comes down to not driving if you are taking medication that does effect you to a certain level where it's obvious that you shouldn't be behind the wheel.    

Three 4 Luck - 2013-12-30 12:51 PM  My issues are balance related due to a surgically removed balance nerve. I do ok if I can see, but in low light or eyes closed, I appear drunk if I'm on my feet. I also get tongue tied sometimes from lingering brain damage. My brain functions fine, it just doesn't always communicate properly. LOL. Add that to my temper when someone is being an ass, and being falsely accused is a worry that stays in the back of my mind. 

Red Raider - 2013-12-30 11:57 AM A lot of people have balance problems so I wouldn't be too worried.  Honestly, a good look into your eyes and doing a standard test related to that pretty much tells the story to any officer correctly trained, be it drugs or alcohol.  The rest that is asked of you to do is more for the jury to see how impaired you were than anything really.  Once you've been trained to see those eye changes and movements, you'll know it when you see it on pretty much 99% of the population.