|
|
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
      
| Fort Worth vet accused of keeping dog alive for blood transfusionsAHave more to add? News tip? Tell usBY ELIZABETH CAMPBELL AND DEANNA BOYD liz@star-telegram.com, dboyd@star-telegram.comFORT WORTH — Authorities raided a popular veterinary clinic Tuesday morning after a woman said that a dog she took in to be euthanized was being kept alive and used for blood transfusions. Fort Worth police and officers from the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners spent several hours at the Camp Bowie Animal Clinic at 5709 Lovell Ave., in west Fort Worth. Two dogs were seized by animal control officers, authorities said. Lou Tierce, a long-time Fort Worth veterinarian, is accused of deceiving Jamie and Marian Harris of Aledo into believing that their 5-year-old Leonberger named Sid was euthanized last fall because of a degenerative spinal condition. In fact, Sid was being “bled” for plasma and other experimental treatments, Marian Harris said. “The biggest hurt in all of this is the deception and what it means with something that means so much to you,” she said. “Our pets are family members.” The family filed a complaint with the state last week. Jim Eggleston, a Weatherford attorney who is representing the Harris family, said allegations have surfaced that more dogs and cats — some with serious illnesses — were being kept alive for blood transfusions and other experimental treatments. “You have a vet keeping dogs under false pretenses,” he said. “You have family pets that people thought were cremated or put down peacefully that may still be alive.” A person who answered the phone at the clinic Tuesday morning said Tierce was too busy to talk. Other efforts to reach Tierce were unsuccessful. Customers caught off-guardSgt. Raymond Bush, a police spokesman, said police received a criminal complaint last week that animals were being mistreated — and stolen from clients — at the clinic. “If the city of Fort Worth is able to determine that the law was broken, then down the road, warrants could be issued for somebody’s arrest,” Bush said. The raid began shortly before 10 a.m., when animal control officers and plain-clothes investigators parked at a vacant fried chicken restaurant next to the clinic. Two of the investigators went inside while the others talked to a female employee who was loading supplies into her car. By afternoon, animal control workers carried out two dogs, one in a carrier, from the clinic. “At this point, these animals are evidence,” Bush said. Starry Bourgea, 49, had stopped in the business Tuesday morning to check on the costs of shots for her Jack Russell terrier/Yorkie mix, Sally Mae, and said she found the presence of investigators unsettling. “Did they hurt an animal?” she asked reporters at the clinic. “We’re not supposed to hurt animals. They’re like babies. We’re supposed to care for them. Make sure they’re safe and feed them and give them treats. My Sally Mae is so spoiled, I don’t want to bring her here anymore if this is all going on.” Bruce Barker of Fort Worth stopped by to ask questions about his chocolate lab’s upcoming biopsy and said he was “shocked” to find police and reporters milling about outside. “I thought somebody had been killed in there or something,” Barker said. Barker, who had his soft-coated Wheaton Terrier put down at the clinic in December, said he’s used the vet for about a decade. He said he intends to seek proof before making any judgments. “They’re innocent as far as I’m concerned until there’s proof,” Barker said. “That’s not going to keep me from bringing my dog here. … He’s absolutely the best vet I’ve ever seen.” “I’d let him operate on me,” he added. Symantha Spence rushed to the clinic in near tears after her husband called her and told her that he’d read about the investigation and raid on Facebook. Spence said the family’s golden retriever, Shiner Bock, had died at the vet clinic in March and now she wants to be sure that she was told the truth. “We brought him in on a Sunday night and he was very ill. Monday morning, we got the phone call that he had passed away,” Spence said. “We never saw him again so I just wanted to make sure that he did pass away, for sure. We love this vet. They’re been nothing but good for us but we just want to make sure after hearing what we heard today.” Allegations detailed in complaintThe Harrises brought Sid to the clinic in May 2013 because of a problem with the dog’s anal glands. Tierce told the Harrises that he wanted to use a new “cold laser” procedure and that it might take longer for the dog to recover, according to the complaint filed April 22 with the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners. Over time, Sid did not appear to be getting better, according to the complaint. In September, Jamie Harris went to Tierce’s clinic to see Sid, and was shocked when the dog dragged himself into the lobby because he could not lift his hind quarters. According to the complaint, Jamie Harris was told that Sid was suffering from a reaction to a medication cocktail.The Harrises were also told that Sid had a congenital spinal defect and needed to be put down. The family said their goodbyes to Sid and agreed to let the clinic take care of the burial.Six months later, on April 21, Harris said she was “shocked” when she got a call from a former veterinary technician at the clinic, telling her that Sid was still alive. The employee told Harris that she quit that day because she could no longer work in a clinic where the animals were mistreated.The employee told Harris that Sid spent almost 24 hours a day in a cage, littered with his own feces and urine, and that he had been injured by another employee.Jamie and Marian Harris described how they drove to the clinic and while two friends guarded the front and back doors as her husband distracted the receptionist, Harris went to the back, found Sid in a cage and rescued him.Tierce came outside, according to the complaint, and explained that he had not euthanized Sid because some of his employees had threatened to quit if he did.The Harrises left with Sid and took him to another veterinarian, who told them that it appeared Sid had been tapped for blood transfusions.Sid is now back home in Aledo with the Harris family. | |
| | |
 Miss Laundry Misshap
Posts: 5271
    
| As much as it hurts, I wouldn't just leave my dog for the vets to euthanize alone. I'd have to be there.
But for vets to do this to this poor animal, They need to be kept and bled for research in horrible conditions. :( | |
| | |
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1182
     Location: Do I hear Banjos? | This all just sounds crazy. I would love to know the full story. How does an anal gland issue become paralysis? Reaction to a drug cocktail caused the paralysis? None of that part makes much sense. In all my years as a vet tech...we rarely needed a blood donor for a transfusion. On the rare occasion we did...one of us would volunteer our pet to give a little blood...the vet included. We had large dogs and they felt no more than a needle stick and sat on the table on a blanket munching canned dog food. The donation process itself doesn't have to be stressful for the animal. But why would they need to keep a poor dog alive just for that purpose?? I'm wondering if the dog was injured while at the clinic which could better explain the loss of rear limb function...but to keep it alive in that state after telling the owner he'd be euthanized?? That's wrong on so many levels.
I will say that the first vet I worked for did lie to a client once about euthanizing a cat. Lady brought a sweet yellow young tom cat in and asked how much it cost to neuter him. $30 (it was 1991)....she thought that was too much...so she asked how much to just put him to sleep. $20. She decided to just have the stray put down. There was nothing wrong with the poor kitty. So my boss took her money...neutered the cat...and took it home to live with him. Was it dishonest of him...sure...but it was in the animal's best interests...and I reallly really respected him for that!
If these allegations prove true...this fort worth Vet doesn't deserve to own a pet let alone be a veterinarian.
| |
| | |
I'm Over It!!
Posts: 2830
     
| What do they mean... "if they can prove that he has broken the law"? Allegations of animal cruelty aside, charging the owner for euthanization and disposal of a dog that weighed over 100 lbs. and is very expensive. And if the procedures were never done... that's fraud. And what about the other owner who's dog was supposedly cremated? But there are no records of it ever happening? Charging for that is also fraud. | |
| | |
 I Chore in Chucks
Posts: 2882
        Location: MD | oh my goodness. how do some people sleep at night.... pathetic. | |
| | |
The Advice Guru
Posts: 6419
     
| TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 8:06 AM
This all just sounds crazy. I would love to know the full story. How does an anal gland issue become paralysis? Reaction to a drug cocktail caused the paralysis? None of that part makes much sense. In all my years as a vet tech...we rarely needed a blood donor for a transfusion. On the rare occasion we did...one of us would volunteer our pet to give a little blood...the vet included. We had large dogs and they felt no more than a needle stick and sat on the table on a blanket munching canned dog food. The donation process itself doesn't have to be stressful for the animal. But why would they need to keep a poor dog alive just for that purpose?? I'm wondering if the dog was injured while at the clinic which could better explain the loss of rear limb function...but to keep it alive in that state after telling the owner he'd be euthanized?? That's wrong on so many levels.
I will say that the first vet I worked for did lie to a client once about euthanizing a cat. Lady brought a sweet yellow young tom cat in and asked how much it cost to neuter him. $30 (it was 1991)....she thought that was too much...so she asked how much to just put him to sleep. $20. She decided to just have the stray put down. There was nothing wrong with the poor kitty. So my boss took her money...neutered the cat...and took it home to live with him. Was it dishonest of him...sure...but it was in the animal's best interests...and I reallly really respected him for that!
If these allegations prove true...this fort worth Vet doesn't deserve to own a pet let alone be a veterinarian.
Your vet committed fraud, theft, and should have lost his licence. He should still loose his license. | |
| | |
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1182
     Location: Do I hear Banjos? | cheryl makofka - 2014-05-01 9:01 AM TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 8:06 AM This all just sounds crazy. I would love to know the full story. How does an anal gland issue become paralysis? Reaction to a drug cocktail caused the paralysis? None of that part makes much sense. In all my years as a vet tech...we rarely needed a blood donor for a transfusion. On the rare occasion we did...one of us would volunteer our pet to give a little blood...the vet included. We had large dogs and they felt no more than a needle stick and sat on the table on a blanket munching canned dog food. The donation process itself doesn't have to be stressful for the animal. But why would they need to keep a poor dog alive just for that purpose?? I'm wondering if the dog was injured while at the clinic which could better explain the loss of rear limb function...but to keep it alive in that state after telling the owner he'd be euthanized?? That's wrong on so many levels.
I will say that the first vet I worked for did lie to a client once about euthanizing a cat. Lady brought a sweet yellow young tom cat in and asked how much it cost to neuter him. $30 (it was 1991)....she thought that was too much...so she asked how much to just put him to sleep. $20. She decided to just have the stray put down. There was nothing wrong with the poor kitty. So my boss took her money...neutered the cat...and took it home to live with him. Was it dishonest of him...sure...but it was in the animal's best interests...and I reallly really respected him for that!
If these allegations prove true...this fort worth Vet doesn't deserve to own a pet let alone be a veterinarian.
Your vet committed fraud, theft, and should have lost his licence. He should still loose his license.
Seriously? I shouldn't bother to respond to that...but I will.
That man did more good for animals and yes people in that community than I could fit in a book. He would cut his bills and do a lot for free when a pet owner couldn't afford to treat a saveable animal. He worked hard until he could no longer comfortably work on the cows and horses. He retired and unfortunately passed away from a heart attack just about a week later...in his barn...taking care of animals.
Who are you to judge his actions now? Some folks just can't resist I guess. | |
| | |
The Advice Guru
Posts: 6419
     
| TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 9:11 AM
cheryl makofka - 2014-05-01 9:01 AM TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 8:06 AM This all just sounds crazy. I would love to know the full story. How does an anal gland issue become paralysis? Reaction to a drug cocktail caused the paralysis? None of that part makes much sense. In all my years as a vet tech...we rarely needed a blood donor for a transfusion. On the rare occasion we did...one of us would volunteer our pet to give a little blood...the vet included. We had large dogs and they felt no more than a needle stick and sat on the table on a blanket munching canned dog food. The donation process itself doesn't have to be stressful for the animal. But why would they need to keep a poor dog alive just for that purpose?? I'm wondering if the dog was injured while at the clinic which could better explain the loss of rear limb function...but to keep it alive in that state after telling the owner he'd be euthanized?? That's wrong on so many levels.
I will say that the first vet I worked for did lie to a client once about euthanizing a cat. Lady brought a sweet yellow young tom cat in and asked how much it cost to neuter him. $30 (it was 1991)....she thought that was too much...so she asked how much to just put him to sleep. $20. She decided to just have the stray put down. There was nothing wrong with the poor kitty. So my boss took her money...neutered the cat...and took it home to live with him. Was it dishonest of him...sure...but it was in the animal's best interests...and I reallly really respected him for that!
If these allegations prove true...this fort worth Vet doesn't deserve to own a pet let alone be a veterinarian.
Your vet committed fraud, theft, and should have lost his licence. He should still loose his license.
Seriously? I shouldn't bother to respond to that...but I will.
That man did more good for animals and yes people in that community than I could fit in a book. He would cut his bills and do a lot for free when a pet owner couldn't afford to treat a saveable animal. He worked hard until he could no longer comfortably work on the cows and horses. He retired and unfortunately passed away from a heart attack just about a week later...in his barn...taking care of animals.
Who are you to judge his actions now? Some folks just can't resist I guess.
He was a professional, he took the money from the woman with instructions for the animal to be euthanized. You say he didn't euthanize the animal, but charged for it anyway. This is fraud, a violation of his code of ethics as a vet.
It doesn't matter how many rights he did, he charged for a euthanization and didn't follow through. It is the same as the initial article. | |
| | |
 Serious Snap Trapper
Posts: 4275
       Location: In The Snow, AZ | TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 7:11 AM cheryl makofka - 2014-05-01 9:01 AM TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 8:06 AM This all just sounds crazy. I would love to know the full story. How does an anal gland issue become paralysis? Reaction to a drug cocktail caused the paralysis? None of that part makes much sense. In all my years as a vet tech...we rarely needed a blood donor for a transfusion. On the rare occasion we did...one of us would volunteer our pet to give a little blood...the vet included. We had large dogs and they felt no more than a needle stick and sat on the table on a blanket munching canned dog food. The donation process itself doesn't have to be stressful for the animal. But why would they need to keep a poor dog alive just for that purpose?? I'm wondering if the dog was injured while at the clinic which could better explain the loss of rear limb function...but to keep it alive in that state after telling the owner he'd be euthanized?? That's wrong on so many levels.
I will say that the first vet I worked for did lie to a client once about euthanizing a cat. Lady brought a sweet yellow young tom cat in and asked how much it cost to neuter him. $30 (it was 1991)....she thought that was too much...so she asked how much to just put him to sleep. $20. She decided to just have the stray put down. There was nothing wrong with the poor kitty. So my boss took her money...neutered the cat...and took it home to live with him. Was it dishonest of him...sure...but it was in the animal's best interests...and I reallly really respected him for that!
If these allegations prove true...this fort worth Vet doesn't deserve to own a pet let alone be a veterinarian.
Your vet committed fraud, theft, and should have lost his licence. He should still loose his license. Seriously? I shouldn't bother to respond to that...but I will.
That man did more good for animals and yes people in that community than I could fit in a book. He would cut his bills and do a lot for free when a pet owner couldn't afford to treat a saveable animal. He worked hard until he could no longer comfortably work on the cows and horses. He retired and unfortunately passed away from a heart attack just about a week later...in his barn...taking care of animals.
Who are you to judge his actions now? Some folks just can't resist I guess.
What he did may have been legally wrong. But I thinks it's commendable. To the lady, it was just a stray cat, that if it wasn't neutered, and cheaply so, that he wasn't worth life. The cat probably wasn't worth the trouble it could have gotten him into though. The vet crossed a line of legalities. But he trusted his morals.
| |
| | |
 A Somebody to Everybody
Posts: 41354
              Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas | cheryl makofka - 2014-05-01 9:54 AM TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 9:11 AM cheryl makofka - 2014-05-01 9:01 AM TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 8:06 AM This all just sounds crazy. I would love to know the full story. How does an anal gland issue become paralysis? Reaction to a drug cocktail caused the paralysis? None of that part makes much sense. In all my years as a vet tech...we rarely needed a blood donor for a transfusion. On the rare occasion we did...one of us would volunteer our pet to give a little blood...the vet included. We had large dogs and they felt no more than a needle stick and sat on the table on a blanket munching canned dog food. The donation process itself doesn't have to be stressful for the animal. But why would they need to keep a poor dog alive just for that purpose?? I'm wondering if the dog was injured while at the clinic which could better explain the loss of rear limb function...but to keep it alive in that state after telling the owner he'd be euthanized?? That's wrong on so many levels.
I will say that the first vet I worked for did lie to a client once about euthanizing a cat. Lady brought a sweet yellow young tom cat in and asked how much it cost to neuter him. $30 (it was 1991)....she thought that was too much...so she asked how much to just put him to sleep. $20. She decided to just have the stray put down. There was nothing wrong with the poor kitty. So my boss took her money...neutered the cat...and took it home to live with him. Was it dishonest of him...sure...but it was in the animal's best interests...and I reallly really respected him for that!
If these allegations prove true...this fort worth Vet doesn't deserve to own a pet let alone be a veterinarian.
Your vet committed fraud, theft, and should have lost his licence. He should still loose his license. Seriously? I shouldn't bother to respond to that...but I will.
That man did more good for animals and yes people in that community than I could fit in a book. He would cut his bills and do a lot for free when a pet owner couldn't afford to treat a saveable animal. He worked hard until he could no longer comfortably work on the cows and horses. He retired and unfortunately passed away from a heart attack just about a week later...in his barn...taking care of animals.
Who are you to judge his actions now? Some folks just can't resist I guess. He was a professional, he took the money from the woman with instructions for the animal to be euthanized. You say he didn't euthanize the animal, but charged for it anyway. This is fraud, a violation of his code of ethics as a vet. It doesn't matter how many rights he did, he charged for a euthanization and didn't follow through. It is the same as the initial article.
He should have not charged the lady at all and should have tolded her he was going to keep the cat for his self. | |
| | |
The Advice Guru
Posts: 6419
     
| ~BINGO~ - 2014-05-01 9:54 AM
TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 7:11 AM cheryl makofka - 2014-05-01 9:01 AM TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 8:06 AM This all just sounds crazy. I would love to know the full story. How does an anal gland issue become paralysis? Reaction to a drug cocktail caused the paralysis? None of that part makes much sense. In all my years as a vet tech...we rarely needed a blood donor for a transfusion. On the rare occasion we did...one of us would volunteer our pet to give a little blood...the vet included. We had large dogs and they felt no more than a needle stick and sat on the table on a blanket munching canned dog food. The donation process itself doesn't have to be stressful for the animal. But why would they need to keep a poor dog alive just for that purpose?? I'm wondering if the dog was injured while at the clinic which could better explain the loss of rear limb function...but to keep it alive in that state after telling the owner he'd be euthanized?? That's wrong on so many levels.
I will say that the first vet I worked for did lie to a client once about euthanizing a cat. Lady brought a sweet yellow young tom cat in and asked how much it cost to neuter him. $30 (it was 1991)....she thought that was too much...so she asked how much to just put him to sleep. $20. She decided to just have the stray put down. There was nothing wrong with the poor kitty. So my boss took her money...neutered the cat...and took it home to live with him. Was it dishonest of him...sure...but it was in the animal's best interests...and I reallly really respected him for that!
If these allegations prove true...this fort worth Vet doesn't deserve to own a pet let alone be a veterinarian.
Your vet committed fraud, theft, and should have lost his licence. He should still loose his license. Seriously? I shouldn't bother to respond to that...but I will.
That man did more good for animals and yes people in that community than I could fit in a book. He would cut his bills and do a lot for free when a pet owner couldn't afford to treat a saveable animal. He worked hard until he could no longer comfortably work on the cows and horses. He retired and unfortunately passed away from a heart attack just about a week later...in his barn...taking care of animals.
Who are you to judge his actions now? Some folks just can't resist I guess.
What he did may have been legally wrong. But I thinks it's commendable. To the lady, it was just a stray cat, that if it wasn't neutered, and cheaply so, that he wasn't worth life. The cat probably wasn't worth the trouble it could have gotten him into though. The vet crossed a line of legalities. But he trusted his morals.
He took money for something he didn't do, and lied to the lady. Where is the morals, you have to remember he is a vet and is held to a higher standard, as I said earlier he violated his code of ethics.
This makes me wonder what else he did illegally?
| |
| | |
 A Somebody to Everybody
Posts: 41354
              Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas | rodeomom3 - 2014-05-01 7:24 AM Fort Worth vet accused of keeping dog alive for blood transfusions
A
Have more to add? News tip? Tell us
BY ELIZABETH CAMPBELL AND DEANNA BOYD
liz@star-telegram.com, dboyd@star-telegram.com
FORT WORTH — Authorities raided a popular veterinary clinic Tuesday morning after a woman said that a dog she took in to be euthanized was being kept alive and used for blood transfusions.
Fort Worth police and officers from the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners spent several hours at the Camp Bowie Animal Clinic at 5709 Lovell Ave., in west Fort Worth. Two dogs were seized by animal control officers, authorities said.
Lou Tierce, a long-time Fort Worth veterinarian, is accused of deceiving Jamie and Marian Harris of Aledo into believing that their 5-year-old Leonberger named Sid was euthanized last fall because of a degenerative spinal condition.
In fact, Sid was being “bled” for plasma and other experimental treatments, Marian Harris said.
“The biggest hurt in all of this is the deception and what it means with something that means so much to you,” she said. “Our pets are family members.”
The family filed a complaint with the state last week.
Jim Eggleston, a Weatherford attorney who is representing the Harris family, said allegations have surfaced that more dogs and cats — some with serious illnesses — were being kept alive for blood transfusions and other experimental treatments.
“You have a vet keeping dogs under false pretenses,” he said. “You have family pets that people thought were cremated or put down peacefully that may still be alive.”
A person who answered the phone at the clinic Tuesday morning said Tierce was too busy to talk. Other efforts to reach Tierce were unsuccessful.
Customers caught off-guard
Sgt. Raymond Bush, a police spokesman, said police received a criminal complaint last week that animals were being mistreated — and stolen from clients — at the clinic.
“If the city of Fort Worth is able to determine that the law was broken, then down the road, warrants could be issued for somebody’s arrest,” Bush said.
The raid began shortly before 10 a.m., when animal control officers and plain-clothes investigators parked at a vacant fried chicken restaurant next to the clinic. Two of the investigators went inside while the others talked to a female employee who was loading supplies into her car.
By afternoon, animal control workers carried out two dogs, one in a carrier, from the clinic.
“At this point, these animals are evidence,” Bush said.
Starry Bourgea, 49, had stopped in the business Tuesday morning to check on the costs of shots for her Jack Russell terrier/Yorkie mix, Sally Mae, and said she found the presence of investigators unsettling.
“Did they hurt an animal?” she asked reporters at the clinic. “We’re not supposed to hurt animals. They’re like babies. We’re supposed to care for them. Make sure they’re safe and feed them and give them treats. My Sally Mae is so spoiled, I don’t want to bring her here anymore if this is all going on.”
Bruce Barker of Fort Worth stopped by to ask questions about his chocolate lab’s upcoming biopsy and said he was “shocked” to find police and reporters milling about outside.
“I thought somebody had been killed in there or something,” Barker said.
Barker, who had his soft-coated Wheaton Terrier put down at the clinic in December, said he’s used the vet for about a decade. He said he intends to seek proof before making any judgments.
“They’re innocent as far as I’m concerned until there’s proof,” Barker said. “That’s not going to keep me from bringing my dog here. … He’s absolutely the best vet I’ve ever seen.”
“I’d let him operate on me,” he added.
Symantha Spence rushed to the clinic in near tears after her husband called her and told her that he’d read about the investigation and raid on Facebook. Spence said the family’s golden retriever, Shiner Bock, had died at the vet clinic in March and now she wants to be sure that she was told the truth.
“We brought him in on a Sunday night and he was very ill. Monday morning, we got the phone call that he had passed away,” Spence said. “We never saw him again so I just wanted to make sure that he did pass away, for sure. We love this vet. They’re been nothing but good for us but we just want to make sure after hearing what we heard today.”
Allegations detailed in complaint
The Harrises brought Sid to the clinic in May 2013 because of a problem with the dog’s anal glands.
Tierce told the Harrises that he wanted to use a new “cold laser” procedure and that it might take longer for the dog to recover, according to the complaint filed April 22 with the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners.
Over time, Sid did not appear to be getting better, according to the complaint.
In September, Jamie Harris went to Tierce’s clinic to see Sid, and was shocked when the dog dragged himself into the lobby because he could not lift his hind quarters. According to the complaint, Jamie Harris was told that Sid was suffering from a reaction to a medication cocktail.
The Harrises were also told that Sid had a congenital spinal defect and needed to be put down. The family said their goodbyes to Sid and agreed to let the clinic take care of the burial.
Six months later, on April 21, Harris said she was “shocked” when she got a call from a former veterinary technician at the clinic, telling her that Sid was still alive. The employee told Harris that she quit that day because she could no longer work in a clinic where the animals were mistreated.
The employee told Harris that Sid spent almost 24 hours a day in a cage, littered with his own feces and urine, and that he had been injured by another employee.
Jamie and Marian Harris described how they drove to the clinic and while two friends guarded the front and back doors as her husband distracted the receptionist, Harris went to the back, found Sid in a cage and rescued him.
Tierce came outside, according to the complaint, and explained that he had not euthanized Sid because some of his employees had threatened to quit if he did.
The Harrises left with Sid and took him to another veterinarian, who told them that it appeared Sid had been tapped for blood transfusions.
Sid is now back home in Aledo with the Harris family.
If this was my pet, you bet I would be right there with you getting our mug shots done together, how horrible for something like this to happen,and its just so sad to even think this was happening to this poor dog. | |
| | |
  Whack and Roll
Posts: 6342
      Location: NE Texas | I saw this on the news the other night and it was sickening....but not nearly as sickening as the young man who's dog was shot by an officer who came to investigate a break in. That one I couldn't even watch it was so upsetting. That young man was heart broken and it killed my soul to watch the interview! I'd agree though....ya'll would be seeing my mug shot too. What is wrong with people?!?!?!!? | |
| | |
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 830
     Location: Paradise , tx |
He took money for something he didn't do, and lied to the lady. Where is the morals, you have to remember he is a vet and is held to a higher standard, as I said earlier he violated his code of ethics. This makes me wonder what else he did illegally?
I do agree with you on this. Maybe he meant well, but went about it the wrong way | |
| | |
Veteran
Posts: 171
  
| I dont even have words that are printabe for public comsumption for this article. So sad | |
| | |
 Voice of Reason
     Location: NOT at Wal Mart | TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 7:11 AM cheryl makofka - 2014-05-01 9:01 AM TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 8:06 AM This all just sounds crazy. I would love to know the full story. How does an anal gland issue become paralysis? Reaction to a drug cocktail caused the paralysis? None of that part makes much sense. In all my years as a vet tech...we rarely needed a blood donor for a transfusion. On the rare occasion we did...one of us would volunteer our pet to give a little blood...the vet included. We had large dogs and they felt no more than a needle stick and sat on the table on a blanket munching canned dog food. The donation process itself doesn't have to be stressful for the animal. But why would they need to keep a poor dog alive just for that purpose?? I'm wondering if the dog was injured while at the clinic which could better explain the loss of rear limb function...but to keep it alive in that state after telling the owner he'd be euthanized?? That's wrong on so many levels.
I will say that the first vet I worked for did lie to a client once about euthanizing a cat. Lady brought a sweet yellow young tom cat in and asked how much it cost to neuter him. $30 (it was 1991)....she thought that was too much...so she asked how much to just put him to sleep. $20. She decided to just have the stray put down. There was nothing wrong with the poor kitty. So my boss took her money...neutered the cat...and took it home to live with him. Was it dishonest of him...sure...but it was in the animal's best interests...and I reallly really respected him for that!
If these allegations prove true...this fort worth Vet doesn't deserve to own a pet let alone be a veterinarian.
Your vet committed fraud, theft, and should have lost his licence. He should still loose his license. Seriously? I shouldn't bother to respond to that...but I will.
That man did more good for animals and yes people in that community than I could fit in a book. He would cut his bills and do a lot for free when a pet owner couldn't afford to treat a saveable animal. He worked hard until he could no longer comfortably work on the cows and horses. He retired and unfortunately passed away from a heart attack just about a week later...in his barn...taking care of animals.
Who are you to judge his actions now? Some folks just can't resist I guess.
In 1992 i was working at a Vet clinic in Phoenix, cat came in caught in a car fan, surgery was very expensive, client opted to euthanize, Dr said, lets do the sx, we did, cast the cat, 3 mos later cast comes off, cat is limping but alive, sent home with one of the assistant's to rehab, 1 month later cat gets out and 2 weeks later showes up on owners door step! oops! True story. So I'll bet this happens more that people know. | |
| | |
Regular
Posts: 75
  
| After working as a vet tech through high school and undergrad and working for three different vets I advise everyone to go back and watch their pet be euthanized. Your dog is scared and yea its hard but would you want their last moments to be with someone they didn't know? You wouldn't want to be alone so don't make your beloved pet be alone no matter how hard it is for you. Also, I have worked for dishonest vets who I wouldn't trust to vaccinate my hamster (I don't actually own a hamster) if I wasn't watching. I actually took two German Shepherds home that were to be euthanized by one vet I worked for and I think he actually did get paid for the services of disposal as well. They belonged to a client's father who had passed away. She brought them to her home and she said they "attacked" her little yorkie. She brought them in to be put down because she feared it might open her up to legal issues giving them away since they were "dog aggressive." I brought them home that evening and they not so much as barked at my dogs nor chased my cats. Both have been great dogs and great with kids.
Another thing that should be more strictly enforced is the actual disposal of the animal. Two vets I worked for threw animals in the trash instead of having them correctly disposed of and charged the clients outrageous fees for actually just throwing the animals in the trash. If you love your dog DO NOT leave the remains there once euthanized because very few vets actually dispose of them properly. I am somewhat skeptical about cremation companies as well. One place a town over had to be closed when it was found they were bury animals in a mass grave and not actually cremating them, they did this to cut costs and make more money. | |
| | |
 Expert
Posts: 1304
   
| The f**kkkk....that's all I have to say. What's wrong with people?!?!? | |
| | |
The Advice Guru
Posts: 6419
     
| justcruzin - 2014-05-01 12:37 PM
TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 7:11 AM cheryl makofka - 2014-05-01 9:01 AM TrailGirl - 2014-05-01 8:06 AM This all just sounds crazy. I would love to know the full story. How does an anal gland issue become paralysis? Reaction to a drug cocktail caused the paralysis? None of that part makes much sense. In all my years as a vet tech...we rarely needed a blood donor for a transfusion. On the rare occasion we did...one of us would volunteer our pet to give a little blood...the vet included. We had large dogs and they felt no more than a needle stick and sat on the table on a blanket munching canned dog food. The donation process itself doesn't have to be stressful for the animal. But why would they need to keep a poor dog alive just for that purpose?? I'm wondering if the dog was injured while at the clinic which could better explain the loss of rear limb function...but to keep it alive in that state after telling the owner he'd be euthanized?? That's wrong on so many levels.
I will say that the first vet I worked for did lie to a client once about euthanizing a cat. Lady brought a sweet yellow young tom cat in and asked how much it cost to neuter him. $30 (it was 1991)....she thought that was too much...so she asked how much to just put him to sleep. $20. She decided to just have the stray put down. There was nothing wrong with the poor kitty. So my boss took her money...neutered the cat...and took it home to live with him. Was it dishonest of him...sure...but it was in the animal's best interests...and I reallly really respected him for that!
If these allegations prove true...this fort worth Vet doesn't deserve to own a pet let alone be a veterinarian.
Your vet committed fraud, theft, and should have lost his licence. He should still loose his license. Seriously? I shouldn't bother to respond to that...but I will.
That man did more good for animals and yes people in that community than I could fit in a book. He would cut his bills and do a lot for free when a pet owner couldn't afford to treat a saveable animal. He worked hard until he could no longer comfortably work on the cows and horses. He retired and unfortunately passed away from a heart attack just about a week later...in his barn...taking care of animals.
Who are you to judge his actions now? Some folks just can't resist I guess.
In 1992 i was working at a Vet clinic in Phoenix, cat came in caught in a car fan, surgery was very expensive, client opted to euthanize, Dr said, lets do the sx, we did, cast the cat, 3 mos later cast comes off, cat is limping but alive, sent home with one of the assistant's to rehab, 1 month later cat gets out and 2 weeks later showes up on owners door step! oops! True story. So I'll bet this happens more that people know.
If the vet received money and told the client the cat was euthanized or going to be, that vet needs to be reported as well.
It is different if the vet discusses with the client that they will take ownership of the animal and complete xyz. If the client agrees there is no illegal activity.
Also if people know this vets are committing fraud, theft, etc and do not report it, you are enabling criminal activity and you may possibly be charged with whatever as you were a willing participant of criminal activity. | |
| | |
 Worst.Housekeeper.EVER.
    Location: Missouri | When I was a tech years ago, we used shelter dogs for transfusions. Not sure if this is still done? Once, the vet picked out a beautiful blue heeler. After we took his blood, we kept him at the clinic trying to find him a home. Ends up that his owner came in one day and recognized him. Awesome moment and one I won't forget! We saved the dog, the dog saved another dog, and he was reunited with his owner.  As far as keeping animals alive, apparently, I was fortunate to work with honest veterinarians. I can't imagine them doing something so awful...especially in that dog's condition! WHY???? Surely there are easier/better options! | |
| | |
Regular
Posts: 55
 
| I feel I owe this reply not only to Dr. Tierce but to the memory of my Dobie Marcus. About ten or more years ago I took Marcus to Dr. Tierce after a very well known and great Equine Vet, knowing that I could not find any help for my dog and was facing putting my young{4 yr old} to sleep, told me of Dr. Tierce. Dr. Tierce saved my dog and he lived until he was 12 years old and never had any more signs or problems. I had taken my dog to many vets, tests were done and spent thousands; no one gave me hope. When I went to Dr. Tierce there were dogs all over the clinic. Some were pulling their little wagons to help them get around due to spine and limb problems. When I was there, there were dogs that belonged to some of Ft. Worth's most rich and famous- names on buildings famous. The clinic is old and so is Dr. Tierce but I can only imagine how many dogs and cats lives were saved by this genius. Did he make mistakes and was he too focused on those that could be saved? I don't know,
but I know he loved deeply the animals I saw him with and HE SAVED MY DOG. How often do you think any blood was needed or how often was blood taken? If any of you have ever had an animal that you loved in a life or death situation wouldn't you appreciate the animal that saved your animals with only a small needle prick. | |
| | |
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
      
| cstone - 2014-05-01 7:55 PM I feel I owe this reply not only to Dr. Tierce but to the memory of my Dobie Marcus. About ten or more years ago I took Marcus to Dr. Tierce after a very well known and great Equine Vet, knowing that I could not find any help for my dog and was facing putting my young{4 yr old} to sleep, told me of Dr. Tierce. Dr. Tierce saved my dog and he lived until he was 12 years old and never had any more signs or problems. I had taken my dog to many vets, tests were done and spent thousands; no one gave me hope. When I went to Dr. Tierce there were dogs all over the clinic. Some were pulling their little wagons to help them get around due to spine and limb problems. When I was there, there were dogs that belonged to some of Ft. Worth's most rich and famous- names on buildings famous. The clinic is old and so is Dr. Tierce but I can only imagine how many dogs and cats lives were saved by this genius. Did he make mistakes and was he too focused on those that could be saved? I don't know, but I know he loved deeply the animals I saw him with and HE SAVED MY DOG. How often do you think any blood was needed or how often was blood taken? If any of you have ever had an animal that you loved in a life or death situation wouldn't you appreciate the animal that saved your animals with only a small needle prick.
There has been lots of testimonials to the many great things this vet did, however it does not excuse keeping a dog in a cage 24 hours a day for the purpose of giving blood. No, I would not appreciate that he told a family their injured pet needed to be euthanized then keep the injured pet in a dirty cage 24 hours a day. That would make me sick to my stomach that a person could justify treating a pet that way. I have been to clinics where they have dogs and cats for the purpose of blood donations and these animals are the clinic pets, free to roam the clinic and loved on daily. That I can appreciate and understand. | |
| | |
Regular
Posts: 55
 
| The owner wanted the dog put to sleep. Anal glands do smell, but not a good reason that should result in death. What are the owner of the dog going to do with it now? I know Dr. Tierce could not tolerate owners that would not put forth the effort to care for their animals. I do not know these people, but I do know Dr. Tierce. Do you know him or these people or are you getting your information from the media? It seems a shame that after 40 + years of saving lives, a disgruntled employee, the media, and people who did not want their dog have went on a witch hunt. But it makes for a good news story. Keep watching and let the media decide what you are going to believe. | |
| | |
The Advice Guru
Posts: 6419
     
| cstone - 2014-05-01 9:06 PM
The owner wanted the dog put to sleep. Anal glands do smell, but not a good reason that should result in death. What are the owner of the dog going to do with it now? I know Dr. Tierce could not tolerate owners that would not put forth the effort to care for their animals. I do not know these people, but I do know Dr. Tierce. Do you know him or these people or are you getting your information from the media? It seems a shame that after 40 + years of saving lives, a disgruntled employee, the media, and people who did not want their dog have went on a witch hunt. But it makes for a good news story. Keep watching and let the media decide what you are going to believe.
That is awesome the vet helped you, but however many rights don't make up for a wrong. If the people asked for their animal to be euthanized, the vet has two choices to refuse, or to euthanize. Any other option without consent of the owners is illegal.
For all of you who think this behaviour is okay, how would you like to pay the regular cost of injections, and 5 years later you are informed the vet was injecting only saline into the joint. By this time your horse is crippled and possibly euthanized or turned into a pasture pet because of behaviour and lameness issues. | |
| | |
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
      
| cstone - 2014-05-01 9:06 PM
The owner wanted the dog put to sleep. Anal glands do smell, but not a good reason that should result in death. What are the owner of the dog going to do with it now? I know Dr. Tierce could not tolerate owners that would not put forth the effort to care for their animals. I do not know these people, but I do know Dr. Tierce. Do you know him or these people or are you getting your information from the media? It seems a shame that after 40 + years of saving lives, a disgruntled employee, the media, and people who did not want their dog have went on a witch hunt. But it makes for a good news story. Keep watching and let the media decide what you are going to believe.
The owners of the dog did not want him put to sleep because of anal glad problems. They left the dog there for treatment, the dog lost the use of his rear legs. The owners were told he had a spinal condition and needed to be euthanized. Google the story and watch the interview with the owners, it is not the media. | |
| | |
Regular
Posts: 55
 
| "Google the story and watch the interview with the owners, it is not the media."
Lol ....google, interview, not media
Okay!! I understand now. | |
| | |
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
      
|
The owners gave an on camera interview, no media interpretation, the owners words themselves. Now whether they are outright lying, I don't know. The media misinterprets and reports incorrect "facts" all the time in print.
Why do you believe that it was a disgruntled employee? Are you believing the media????
Edited by rodeomom3 2014-05-01 10:16 PM
| |
| | |
Elite Veteran
Posts: 1029
  Location: TX | Someone needs to find the documents from the attorney on other accounts. One of my friends friend worked for this vet when she was younger, he was abusive to his employees as well.
http://media.nbcdfw.com/documents/The+Story+of+Sid.pdf
Edited by getacheck 2014-05-01 11:27 PM
| |
| | |
 Extreme Veteran
Posts: 369
    
| This is local news for me so i have been seeing it daily. It seems there are others that have left their animals to be euthanized. That in itself is amazing that anybody could do, regardless of your reason. Unspeakable to me, to “leave your pet to be euthanized". And so many parts of this story are unbeleivable, like hitting an animal that didnt go under the antiseptic. Werent there other sane people in the room to complain? And then, there are so many of his clients on the news raving about his good work for them. And the tech that turned him in, while she may have been justified seems to have a hidden agenda. But will the whole story be told, nooo. | |
| |
|