|
|
 Expert
Posts: 4121
   Location: SE Louisiana | I never realized until now... just how good looking he is... CC at Pimlico.
(cc.jpg)
Attachments ----------------
cc.jpg (97KB - 304 downloads)
|
|
| |
|
  Roan Wonder
         Location: SW MO |         |
|
| |
|
 Undercover Amish Mafia Member
Posts: 9992
           Location: Kansas | such a handsome boy!!!! |
|
| |
|
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 596
    Location: Somewhere in the middle of nowhere | Wow! He is a good looking boy!  |
|
| |
|
Rad Dork
Posts: 5218
   Location: Oklahoma | I love pretty horses that know they're pretty! |
|
| |
|
 Miss Laundry Misshap
Posts: 5271
    
| I love that look! He's such a handsome fellow! |
|
| |
|
 The best bad guy on the internet
Posts: 3519
   Location: Arizona | He should walk away with this win, no problem!!! |
|
| |
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 667
   
| He is beautiful...
I also cant get over the way they can pull up to that ramp and not have to drop their ramp down.. he just walks straight off the trailer. pretty need and first class for a handsome guy. |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 4121
   Location: SE Louisiana | LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:18 PM
He should walk away with this win, no problem!!!
It depends on how he handles sharp turns... Honestly.. I call it 'The Look Of Eagles'... This is the 1st time I've seen it since 1973.. Yes he knows what he is.. |
|
| |
|
 A Somebody to Everybody
Posts: 41354
              Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas | What a handsome Prince |
|
| |
|
  More bootie than waist!
Posts: 18425
          Location: Riding Crackhead. | Watching him run the Derby gave me goosebumps. I'm looking forward to the next race! |
|
| |
|
 The best bad guy on the internet
Posts: 3519
   Location: Arizona | komet. - 2014-05-13 11:35 AM
LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:18 PM
He should walk away with this win, no problem!!!
It depends on how he handles sharp turns... Honestly.. I call it 'The Look Of Eagles'... This is the 1st time I've seen it since 1973.. Yes he knows what he is..
He's yet to be really "challenged"! He has a lot more and we have yet to see it!! The Belmont, this will be his challenge!! |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 4121
   Location: SE Louisiana | LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:37 PM
komet. - 2014-05-13 11:35 AM
LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:18 PM
He should walk away with this win, no problem!!!
It depends on how he handles sharp turns... Honestly.. I call it 'The Look Of Eagles'... This is the 1st time I've seen it since 1973.. Yes he knows what he is..
He's yet to be really "challenged"! He has a lot more and we have yet to see it!! The Belmont, this will be his challenge!!
2:24 flat is the time to beat.. I don't see that ever being done... I have tears running down my face remembering that race...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V18ui3Rtjz4
Nothing but a hand ride....
 |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 2457
      
| komet. - 2014-05-13 12:47 PM
LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:37 PM
komet. - 2014-05-13 11:35 AM
LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:18 PM
He should walk away with this win, no problem!!!
It depends on how he handles sharp turns... Honestly.. I call it 'The Look Of Eagles'... This is the 1st time I've seen it since 1973.. Yes he knows what he is..
He's yet to be really "challenged"! He has a lot more and we have yet to see it!! The Belmont, this will be his challenge!!
2:24 flat is the time to beat.. I don't see that ever being done... I have tears running down my face remembering that race...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V18ui3Rtjz4
Nothing but a hand ride....

He was such a gorgeous runner ... took that field handily :) Makes me smile every time I watch. |
|
| |
|
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 591
   
| California Chrome all the way!! He's our home town hero!
|
|
| |
|
  Whack and Roll
Posts: 6342
      Location: NE Texas | I so hope he gets it done, but I fear it won't happen. I'm a huge fan of the connections and how this has played out....seeing regular Joe's have the success they have had who love the horse more than the money. There will never be another Secretariat if for no other reason that today's trainers aren't preparing these horses to work and sustain like he was able to. This is a different time and different mentality than was being used in the 70's I think.
That being said, I will be wearing purple and green and cheering like a wild woman for CC to cross the wire first and go into the Belmont with at least a chance to obtain the final jewel of the Triple Crown. |
|
| |
|
  Keeper of the King Snake
Posts: 7622
    Location: Dubach, LA | I never tire of watching that race. CC may be a good race horse, but he won't be another Secretariat. |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 2457
      
| Herbie - 2014-05-13 12:57 PM
I so hope he gets it done, but I fear it won't happen. I'm a huge fan of the connections and how this has played out....seeing regular Joe's have the success they have had who love the horse more than the money. There will never be another Secretariat if for no other reason that today's trainers aren't preparing these horses to work and sustain like he was able to. This is a different time and different mentality than was being used in the 70's I think.
That being said, I will be wearing purple and green and cheering like a wild woman for CC to cross the wire first and go into the Belmont with at least a chance to obtain the final jewel of the Triple Crown.
I agree. Along the lines of trainers not pushing the horses like they used to, I find it interesting how the industry as a whole has been trending towards lighter made horses - I'm talking bone structure here - that don't hold up as well to the training push as the heavier built horses from 30 years ago. (just my observation - nothing scientific)
And yes I will be cheering CC on too!! |
|
| |
|
  Whack and Roll
Posts: 6342
      Location: NE Texas | lindseylou2290 - 2014-05-13 1:05 PM Herbie - 2014-05-13 12:57 PM I so hope he gets it done, but I fear it won't happen. I'm a huge fan of the connections and how this has played out....seeing regular Joe's have the success they have had who love the horse more than the money. There will never be another Secretariat if for no other reason that today's trainers aren't preparing these horses to work and sustain like he was able to. This is a different time and different mentality than was being used in the 70's I think.
That being said, I will be wearing purple and green and cheering like a wild woman for CC to cross the wire first and go into the Belmont with at least a chance to obtain the final jewel of the Triple Crown. I agree. Along the lines of trainers not pushing the horses like they used to, I find it interesting how the industry as a whole has been trending towards lighter made horses - I'm talking bone structure here - that don't hold up as well to the training push as the heavier built horses from 30 years ago. (just my observation - nothing scientific ) And yes I will be cheering CC on too!!
I will have to disagree with you on the lighter boned horses being weaker boned. The diameter of bone doesn't determine density....in fact, smaller/lighter bone is stronger and more forgiving that big thick bone considering both are conditioned the same way. Bone density is built, not bred. That being said, in order for bone to be dense, these horses have to be conditioned to perform what they are being asked to to. A finer boned horse equals a quicker turn of foot, requires less energy to exert the same motion as his big footed/heavy boned counterpart. Smaller bones also have higher tensile strength than that of larger/thick boned horses. Look at it this way....if you take a big thick tree limb and apply force to it, what happens when it does break......it shatters into a million pieces. Now do the same with a branch about half the size....it will bend before it breaks, and typically will break clean in two. Same goes for bone.....bone with smaller diameter will result in fewer catastrophic injuries than that of its larger, thicker, heavier counterpart. The problem is, the large majority of trainers are putting these horses in bubble wrap and not preparing them structurally to perform the task at hand. And what we have is a big, strong, beautiful horse that is literally running on toothpicks. |
|
| |
|
 Midget Lover
          Location: Kentucky | I'm not looking for another Secretariat, and I'm sure CC's owners aren't either... they just want their boy to go all the way and win the Triple Crown!! I want to see it too! |
|
| |
|
 Works Hard For The Money
Posts: 4469
        Location: Memphis, TN | TNcowgirl88 - 2014-05-13 12:18 PM
He is beautiful...
I also cant get over the way they can pull up to that ramp and not have to drop their ramp down.. he just walks straight off the trailer. pretty need and first class for a handsome guy.
Well as with all the good ones Chrome is a little quirky and actually doesn't just walk right off. They say he always has to be backed out of the trailers. I imagine this picture was taken right after he turned around. He refuses to walk out though lol. |
|
| |
|
 Hugs to You
Posts: 7551
     Location: In The Land of Cotton | barrelracin85 - 2014-05-13 2:33 PM TNcowgirl88 - 2014-05-13 12:18 PM He is beautiful... I also cant get over the way they can pull up to that ramp and not have to drop their ramp down.. he just walks straight off the trailer. pretty need and first class for a handsome guy. Well as with all the good ones Chrome is a little quirky and actually doesn't just walk right off. They say he always has to be backed out of the trailers. I imagine this picture was taken right after he turned around. He refuses to walk out though lol.
I watched a video on FB of him backing out, turning his hip to the left and then leading him forward. |
|
| |
|
 Extreme Veteran
Posts: 443
     Location: Southern IL somewhere between KY and MO | Herbie - 2014-05-13 12:57 PM I so hope he gets it done, but I fear it won't happen. I'm a huge fan of the connections and how this has played out....seeing regular Joe's have the success they have had who love the horse more than the money. There will never be another Secretariat if for no other reason that today's trainers aren't preparing these horses to work and sustain like he was able to. This is a different time and different mentality than was being used in the 70's I think.
That being said, I will be wearing purple and green and cheering like a wild woman for CC to cross the wire first and go into the Belmont with at least a chance to obtain the final jewel of the Triple Crown.
You have to remember is trainer is from the '70's the man knows what he is doing...I can't wait to see the race Sat. My money is on CC |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 4121
   Location: SE Louisiana | Herbie - 2014-05-13 1:15 PM
lindseylou2290 - 2014-05-13 1:05 PM Herbie - 2014-05-13 12:57 PM I so hope he gets it done, but I fear it won't happen. I'm a huge fan of the connections and how this has played out....seeing regular Joe's have the success they have had who love the horse more than the money. There will never be another Secretariat if for no other reason that today's trainers aren't preparing these horses to work and sustain like he was able to. This is a different time and different mentality than was being used in the 70's I think.
That being said, I will be wearing purple and green and cheering like a wild woman for CC to cross the wire first and go into the Belmont with at least a chance to obtain the final jewel of the Triple Crown. I agree. Along the lines of trainers not pushing the horses like they used to, I find it interesting how the industry as a whole has been trending towards lighter made horses - I'm talking bone structure here - that don't hold up as well to the training push as the heavier built horses from 30 years ago. (just my observation - nothing scientific ) And yes I will be cheering CC on too!!
I will have to disagree with you on the lighter boned horses being weaker boned. The diameter of bone doesn't determine density....in fact, smaller/lighter bone is stronger and more forgiving that big thick bone considering both are conditioned the same way. Bone density is built, not bred. That being said, in order for bone to be dense, these horses have to be conditioned to perform what they are being asked to to. A finer boned horse equals a quicker turn of foot, requires less energy to exert the same motion as his big footed/heavy boned counterpart. Smaller bones also have higher tensile strength than that of larger/thick boned horses. Look at it this way....if you take a big thick tree limb and apply force to it, what happens when it does break......it shatters into a million pieces. Now do the same with a branch about half the size....it will bend before it breaks, and typically will break clean in two. Same goes for bone.....bone with smaller diameter will result in fewer catastrophic injuries than that of its larger, thicker, heavier counterpart. The problem is, the large majority of trainers are putting these horses in bubble wrap and not preparing them structurally to perform the task at hand. And what we have is a big, strong, beautiful horse that is literally running on toothpicks.
Iw ill not disagree with you.. I remember watching the Match Race Ruffian...... Such a waste.... |
|
| |
|
  Whack and Roll
Posts: 6342
      Location: NE Texas | coco~n~cash - 2014-05-13 1:42 PM Herbie - 2014-05-13 12:57 PM I so hope he gets it done, but I fear it won't happen. I'm a huge fan of the connections and how this has played out....seeing regular Joe's have the success they have had who love the horse more than the money. There will never be another Secretariat if for no other reason that today's trainers aren't preparing these horses to work and sustain like he was able to. This is a different time and different mentality than was being used in the 70's I think.
That being said, I will be wearing purple and green and cheering like a wild woman for CC to cross the wire first and go into the Belmont with at least a chance to obtain the final jewel of the Triple Crown. You have to remember is trainer is from the '70's the man knows what he is doing...I can't wait to see the race Sat. My money is on CC
You are so right.....and being that he was the personal exercise rider for Swaps makes me ask even more why he has abandoned the old school methods that he was an integral part of!
Copied from the ThoroEdge Equine Performance blog, which I love to follow and read: Above is the May 7th edition of the DRF, from the day Swaps won the Kentucky Derby. Click to enlarge. Day before the Derby: light jog like Chrome? Nope. 5 furlong work. Leading up to the big race: a leisurely week of jogging and light galloping like Chrome? Nope. 6F race 7 days prior to the First Saturday in May. Before that race? Another light week of ‘freshening up’? Nope. 4F blowout the day before AND a 5F breeze 3 days prior to that. The final 10 days before the Derby summarized: California Chrome – a single 4F work at Los Alamitos and perhaps 2 cumulative miles of galloping. 4 race speed furlongs total. Swaps – a 6F race, 3 works totaling just shy of 2 miles, and undoubtedly 10+ miles of galloping. 20 race speed furlongs total, 6 of them in an actual race. It’s well known that Chrome’s trainer Art Sherman was the exercise boy for Swaps during these times. I would love to ask him why he thinks trainer Mesh Tenney prepared Swaps in such a manner for a grueling Triple Crown season, and why today Mr. Sherman decides not to do the same? Regardless of what happens over the next few weeks, California Chrome is no Swaps and horses today pale in comparison to those of yesteryear when looking at total volume of exercise. And when you limit exercise, you limit response to exercise – i.e. improving both durability and stamina. If you were to measure the bone density of both Swaps and Chrome during their respective 3yo campaigns you would see a marked difference. |
|
| |
|
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 591
   
| Murphy - 2014-05-13 11:17 AM
I'm not looking for another Secretariat, and I'm sure CC's owners aren't either... they just want their boy to go all the way and win the Triple Crown!! I want to see it too!
He only has to win by a nose!
|
|
| |
|
  Whack and Roll
Posts: 6342
      Location: NE Texas | Please don't hear me saying that i'm not pulling for him, because I absolutely am. I've been following Chrome since before the Santa Anita and his journey has motivated me and brought me to tears at times. I'm hoping and praying for a safe trip for him, and all of the others #1, and secondly that he can withstand the grueling journey of the Triple Crown and comes out the other side victorious.
I AM looking for another Secretariat! It can be done, but we have to train them to do it!
Here's another interesting exerpt from the blog I referenced in my post before....if you don't read this, you should take some time to. Not only is it educational, but it makes perfect sense. Take a human sprinter, place him in a closet and let him about about 30 minutes a day to do some exercise and see how long he lasts. And he doesn't way 1000 pounds and bearing all of that weight on his middle finger....
I love the horse, and the connections, but a final quarter in 26+ off a slow pace does not bode well for the 12F Belmont in five weeks’ time. He would have lost every Derby on a fast track in the 1960’s by multiple lengths. Hell, the final HALF was :52!! That was not California Chrome accelerating down the Churchill stretch, that was him decelerating slightly less than the other slowpokes.
Once more, I use Assault as the example of what a Triple Crown winner does in the mornings from May thru June: MAY 3 – 4F in :48 4 – Won Kentucky Derby by 8 in 2:06 on sloppy track 5 – walked at CD 6 – shipped to Pimlico 8 – 3F in :40 9 – 8F in 1:45 11 – Won Preakness Stakes by a neck in 2:01 on fast track 12 – shipped to Belmont 16 – 4F in :52 18 – 3F in :40 20 – 4F in :48 22 – 8F in 1:44 24 – 3F in :35 25 – 1.25 miles in 2:05 (:50, 1:15, 1:40, 2:05) 28 – 4F in :50 29 – 1.5 miles in 2:32 JUNE 1 – Won Belmont Stakes by 3 in 2:31 on fast track 5 – 4F in :52 7 – 4F in :51 9 – 8F in 1:43 11 – 3F in :36 13 – 8F in 1:43 at Aqueduct 15 – Won Dwyer Stakes by 5 lengths in 2:07 on fast track To summarize: -With all those works, did he ever simply gallop? Does he need to? -16 breezes in that 45 day window, averaging nearly 6F per effort, in 12-13 sec/f paces. -A Triple Crown AND Dwyer win within those very same 6 weeks. -Note the Preakness was run 1 week after the Derby and he still worked TWICE. -Also note he worked the entire race distance of 1.5 miles 2 days before the Belmont. You gotta be kidding me. I feel like I am making this up. How about War Admiral in 1937? “”Between the Preakness and the June 5 Belmont Stakes, trainer George Conway poured it to the little Admiral. Working at three-day intervals, War Admiral breezed 11 furlongs in 2:22, 12 furlongs in 2:35.40, 12 furlongs in 2:34.60, and 12 furlongs again in 2:34.60, the last move coming just three days before the Belmont.” |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 4121
   Location: SE Louisiana | Did anyone notice.. The famous John Henry was eclipsed in the DERBY? |
|
| |
|
 Hog Tie My Mojo
Posts: 4847
       Location: Opelousas, LA | The problem is all the advances in veterinary medicine over the last 20 years have lead to us breeding fast horses that are way more fragile than horses of 30 years ago.
Think about it this way. If you took all the horses that had to have joints cortisoned, PRP, stem cell treatments, ulcer meds, etc. to perform at the top level of thier game and removed them from the genetic pool, what would you have left? A much smaller gene pool for sure, but a much stronger, hardier group of horses. I don't think horses of today could handle the workload of the horses 30 years ago, JMHO.
I sure hate to be second guessing CC's trainer considering the success he has had so far. As an "unknown" trainer myself I sure hate it when I finally get a really nice horse (cause it doesn't happen as often with a small barn vs. 100 head operation) and I have to hear people say how much better that horse could be if it had a "real" trainer. I hate it even worse when that horse gets moved to a big barn and I have to watch him struggle for the rest of his career.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that CC would not be the superstar he is had he been in a huge program from the start. I am sure Art Sherman knows CC inside and out and is doing what he feels is best to keep him happy and healthy so he can be the best he can be. |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 4121
   Location: SE Louisiana | Herbie - 2014-05-13 2:00 PM
Please don't hear me saying that i'm not pulling for him, because I absolutely am. I've been following Chrome since before the Santa Anita and his journey has motivated me and brought me to tears at times. I'm hoping and praying for a safe trip for him, and all of the others #1, and secondly that he can withstand the grueling journey of the Triple Crown and comes out the other side victorious.
I AM looking for another Secretariat! It can be done, but we have to train them to do it!
Here's another interesting exerpt from the blog I referenced in my post before....if you don't read this, you should take some time to. Not only is it educational, but it makes perfect sense. Take a human sprinter, place him in a closet and let him about about 30 minutes a day to do some exercise and see how long he lasts. And he doesn't way 1000 pounds and bearing all of that weight on his middle finger....
I love the horse, and the connections, but a final quarter in 26+ off a slow pace does not bode well for the 12F Belmont in five weeks’ time. He would have lost every Derby on a fast track in the 1960’s by multiple lengths. Hell, the final HALF was :52!! That was not California Chrome accelerating down the Churchill stretch, that was him decelerating slightly less than the other slowpokes.
Once more, I use Assault as the example of what a Triple Crown winner does in the mornings from May thru June: MAY 3 – 4F in :48 4 – Won Kentucky Derby by 8 in 2:06 on sloppy track 5 – walked at CD 6 – shipped to Pimlico 8 – 3F in :40 9 – 8F in 1:45 11 – Won Preakness Stakes by a neck in 2:01 on fast track 12 – shipped to Belmont 16 – 4F in :52 18 – 3F in :40 20 – 4F in :48 22 – 8F in 1:44 24 – 3F in :35 25 – 1.25 miles in 2:05 (:50, 1:15, 1:40, 2:05) 28 – 4F in :50 29 – 1.5 miles in 2:32 JUNE 1 – Won Belmont Stakes by 3 in 2:31 on fast track 5 – 4F in :52 7 – 4F in :51 9 – 8F in 1:43 11 – 3F in :36 13 – 8F in 1:43 at Aqueduct 15 – Won Dwyer Stakes by 5 lengths in 2:07 on fast track To summarize: -With all those works, did he ever simply gallop? Does he need to? -16 breezes in that 45 day window, averaging nearly 6F per effort, in 12-13 sec/f paces. -A Triple Crown AND Dwyer win within those very same 6 weeks. -Note the Preakness was run 1 week after the Derby and he still worked TWICE. -Also note he worked the entire race distance of 1.5 miles 2 days before the Belmont. You gotta be kidding me. I feel like I am making this up. How about War Admiral in 1937? “”Between the Preakness and the June 5 Belmont Stakes, trainer George Conway poured it to the little Admiral. Working at three-day intervals, War Admiral breezed 11 furlongs in 2:22, 12 furlongs in 2:35.40, 12 furlongs in 2:34.60, and 12 furlongs again in 2:34.60, the last move coming just three days before the Belmont.”
Pfttt!!! 2 :24 mile and a half... Bring it!!!! |
|
| |
|
  Angel in a Sorrel Coat
Posts: 16030
     Location: In a happy place | Herbie - 2014-05-13 1:15 PM lindseylou2290 - 2014-05-13 1:05 PM Herbie - 2014-05-13 12:57 PM I so hope he gets it done, but I fear it won't happen. I'm a huge fan of the connections and how this has played out....seeing regular Joe's have the success they have had who love the horse more than the money. There will never be another Secretariat if for no other reason that today's trainers aren't preparing these horses to work and sustain like he was able to. This is a different time and different mentality than was being used in the 70's I think.
That being said, I will be wearing purple and green and cheering like a wild woman for CC to cross the wire first and go into the Belmont with at least a chance to obtain the final jewel of the Triple Crown. I agree. Along the lines of trainers not pushing the horses like they used to, I find it interesting how the industry as a whole has been trending towards lighter made horses - I'm talking bone structure here - that don't hold up as well to the training push as the heavier built horses from 30 years ago. (just my observation - nothing scientific ) And yes I will be cheering CC on too!! I will have to disagree with you on the lighter boned horses being weaker boned. The diameter of bone doesn't determine density....in fact, smaller/lighter bone is stronger and more forgiving that big thick bone considering both are conditioned the same way. Bone density is built, not bred. That being said, in order for bone to be dense, these horses have to be conditioned to perform what they are being asked to to. A finer boned horse equals a quicker turn of foot, requires less energy to exert the same motion as his big footed/heavy boned counterpart. Smaller bones also have higher tensile strength than that of larger/thick boned horses. Look at it this way....if you take a big thick tree limb and apply force to it, what happens when it does break......it shatters into a million pieces. Now do the same with a branch about half the size....it will bend before it breaks, and typically will break clean in two. Same goes for bone.....bone with smaller diameter will result in fewer catastrophic injuries than that of its larger, thicker, heavier counterpart. The problem is, the large majority of trainers are putting these horses in bubble wrap and not preparing them structurally to perform the task at hand. And what we have is a big, strong, beautiful horse that is literally running on toothpicks.
I agree with the bone density description. Thank you Komet for posting the picture. CC is an absolutely beautiful boy with the Look Of Eagles. |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 4121
   Location: SE Louisiana | sorrel horse ranch - 2014-05-13 2:30 PM
Herbie - 2014-05-13 1:15 PM lindseylou2290 - 2014-05-13 1:05 PM Herbie - 2014-05-13 12:57 PM I so hope he gets it done, but I fear it won't happen. I'm a huge fan of the connections and how this has played out....seeing regular Joe's have the success they have had who love the horse more than the money. There will never be another Secretariat if for no other reason that today's trainers aren't preparing these horses to work and sustain like he was able to. This is a different time and different mentality than was being used in the 70's I think.
That being said, I will be wearing purple and green and cheering like a wild woman for CC to cross the wire first and go into the Belmont with at least a chance to obtain the final jewel of the Triple Crown. I agree. Along the lines of trainers not pushing the horses like they used to, I find it interesting how the industry as a whole has been trending towards lighter made horses - I'm talking bone structure here - that don't hold up as well to the training push as the heavier built horses from 30 years ago. (just my observation - nothing scientific ) And yes I will be cheering CC on too!! I will have to disagree with you on the lighter boned horses being weaker boned. The diameter of bone doesn't determine density....in fact, smaller/lighter bone is stronger and more forgiving that big thick bone considering both are conditioned the same way. Bone density is built, not bred. That being said, in order for bone to be dense, these horses have to be conditioned to perform what they are being asked to to. A finer boned horse equals a quicker turn of foot, requires less energy to exert the same motion as his big footed/heavy boned counterpart. Smaller bones also have higher tensile strength than that of larger/thick boned horses. Look at it this way....if you take a big thick tree limb and apply force to it, what happens when it does break......it shatters into a million pieces. Now do the same with a branch about half the size....it will bend before it breaks, and typically will break clean in two. Same goes for bone.....bone with smaller diameter will result in fewer catastrophic injuries than that of its larger, thicker, heavier counterpart. The problem is, the large majority of trainers are putting these horses in bubble wrap and not preparing them structurally to perform the task at hand. And what we have is a big, strong, beautiful horse that is literally running on toothpicks.
I agree with the bone density description. Thank you Komet for posting the picture. CC is an absolutely beautiful boy with the Look Of Eagles.
I'm not one to flirt.... but today l will...
|
|
| |
|
  Whack and Roll
Posts: 6342
      Location: NE Texas | Barnmom - 2014-05-13 2:17 PM The problem is all the advances in veterinary medicine over the last 20 years have lead to us breeding fast horses that are way more fragile than horses of 30 years ago.
Think about it this way. If you took all the horses that had to have joints cortisoned, PRP, stem cell treatments, ulcer meds, etc. to perform at the top level of thier game and removed them from the genetic pool, what would you have left? A much smaller gene pool for sure, but a much stronger, hardier group of horses. I don't think horses of today could handle the workload of the horses 30 years ago, JMHO.
I sure hate to be second guessing CC's trainer considering the success he has had so far. As an "unknown" trainer myself I sure hate it when I finally get a really nice horse (cause it doesn't happen as often with a small barn vs. 100 head operation) and I have to hear people say how much better that horse could be if it had a "real" trainer. I hate it even worse when that horse gets moved to a big barn and I have to watch him struggle for the rest of his career.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that CC would not be the superstar he is had he been in a huge program from the start. I am sure Art Sherman knows CC inside and out and is doing what he feels is best to keep him happy and healthy so he can be the best he can be. I totally agree with you in most all of what you said with the exception of that today's horses are more fragile. I think what has changed is the way we feed, the way we treat them as babies, etc. This theory has been proven that horses can be improved through an exercise program that starts slow and short and gradually increases by 1/4 mile per week..... As an owner, I know I was guilty of wanting to rush mine to get to the track, and I even know better. It takes a long time to build a locomotive from the inside out, most owners aren't willing to invest the $$$$ in the time it would take to do it.
I agree with you that Chrome would have been a lesser horse in another barn more than likely, and I too am an unknown trainer, though not of race horses, however I do study and follow the racehorse business and and try to continue educating myself as to how to better my program. I don't think Sherman has done a poor job....but I don't think he's done anything extraordinarily different than anyone else who has one entered on Saturday. There are people who are stepping out and training scientifically. They are few and far between, but they are out there.....mostly in the thoroughbred world and in Europe. If you read the blog I mentioned before, there have been more than one instance of a no name trainer purchasing a SOUND cheap claimer, taking the time to train them with science using heart monitors, intervals when the horse is physically ready (based on the HR and Vmax monitors) and there are some who have turned those cheap claimers into stakes horses.
I'm a believer in results and was shocked when I strapped that HR monitor to my barrel horse. Thinking he was fit for what I was asking him to do and then monitoring it scientifically quickly changed my mind.
That being said, I will be cheering Chrome on every step of the way. If he gets it done, no one will cheer louder than me! I think he's a special horse, it's been a special journey, and I can think of no way better to end it than with the sweet victory of the final two legs.
Edited by Herbie 2014-05-13 3:01 PM
|
|
| |
|
 Hog Tie My Mojo
Posts: 4847
       Location: Opelousas, LA | Herbie - 2014-05-13 2:54 PM Barnmom - 2014-05-13 2:17 PM The problem is all the advances in veterinary medicine over the last 20 years have lead to us breeding fast horses that are way more fragile than horses of 30 years ago.
Think about it this way. If you took all the horses that had to have joints cortisoned, PRP, stem cell treatments, ulcer meds, etc. to perform at the top level of thier game and removed them from the genetic pool, what would you have left? A much smaller gene pool for sure, but a much stronger, hardier group of horses. I don't think horses of today could handle the workload of the horses 30 years ago, JMHO.
I sure hate to be second guessing CC's trainer considering the success he has had so far. As an "unknown" trainer myself I sure hate it when I finally get a really nice horse (cause it doesn't happen as often with a small barn vs. 100 head operation) and I have to hear people say how much better that horse could be if it had a "real" trainer. I hate it even worse when that horse gets moved to a big barn and I have to watch him struggle for the rest of his career.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that CC would not be the superstar he is had he been in a huge program from the start. I am sure Art Sherman knows CC inside and out and is doing what he feels is best to keep him happy and healthy so he can be the best he can be.
I totally agree with you in most all of what you said with the exception of that today's horses are more fragile. I think what has changed is the way we feed, the way we treat them as babies, etc. This theory has been proven that horses can be improved through an exercise program that starts slow and short and gradually increases by 1/4 mile per week..... As an owner, I know I was guilty of wanting to rush mine to get to the track, and I even know better. It takes a long time to build a locomotive from the inside out, most owners aren't willing to invest the $$$$ in the time it would take to do it.
I agree with you that Chrome would have been a lesser horse in another barn more than likely. I don't think Sherman has done a poor job....but I don't think he's done anything extraordinarily different than anyone else who has one entered on Saturday. There are people who are stepping out and training scientifically. They are few and far between, but they are out there.....mostly in the thoroughbred world and in Europe. If you read the blog I mentioned before, there have been more than one instance of a no name trainer purchasing a SOUND cheap claimer, taking the time to train them with science (heart monitors, intervals when the horse is physically ready (based on the HR and Vmax monitors) and there are several who have turned those cheap claimers into stakes horses.
I'm a believer in results and was shocked when I strapped that HR monitor to my barrel horse. Thinking he was fit for what I was asking him to do and then monitoring it scientifically quickly changed my mind.
I can see where this type of training would be way more profitable in Europe, thier drug regulations and punishments actually have teeth over there.
And yes I do agree that the horses of today would be better off if they were trained harder, still not sure they could carry the workloads of the horses 50 or more years ago though. No telling how many horses back then couldn't handle the workload, they don't write articles about the ones that fall apart before thier talent is realized. Back then it was trial by fire and the ones that made it thru were rock solid, now we are able to patch them up and keep them going if thier talent warrants the time and effort.
|
|
| |
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 999
        Location: Sunny So Cal | He reminds me of Secretariat. He has such a presence about him and he looks very similar. A good looking horse!  |
|
| |
|
  Whack and Roll
Posts: 6342
      Location: NE Texas | That is a very good point, Barnmom and I tend to agree with you. We don't know how many didn't make it because they were crippled along the way......we also don't know how many statistically did make it, or if the rate of injury was significantly lower. Those things weren't recorded either. Only way to know for sure would be for someone to be willing to try something different, and be patient enough to see it through to fruition. That would be the tough part!
There's a college near me who has an equine program. A very affluent lady who has run a few TB's along the way has donated two or three studs and several mares to their breeding program. Now these aren't stakes winners, but there are a few who ran out a little bit of money or are really nicely bred a generation back. They sell these colts as weanlings or yearlings after they've gone through the "colt starting" program at the college for $750. My husband and I always joke about buying one of those colts and trying this method. If I had the time, and the facility to do it, I might would try it just for fun. You have to admit it would be an interesting study!
Edited by Herbie 2014-05-13 3:42 PM
|
|
| |
|
 Hog Tie My Mojo
Posts: 4847
       Location: Opelousas, LA | Herbie - 2014-05-13 3:25 PM That is a very good point, Barnmom and I tend to agree with you. We don't know how many didn't make it because they were crippled along the way......we also don't know how many statistically did make it, or if the rate of injury was significantly lower. Those things weren't recorded either. Only way to know for sure would be for someone to be willing to try something different, and be patient enough to see it through to fruition. That would be the tough part!
There's a college near me who has an equine program. A very affluent lady who has run a few TB's along the way has donated two or three studs and several mares to their breeding program. Now these aren't stakes winners, but there are a few who ran out a little bit of money or a really nicely bred a generation back. They sell these colts as weanlings or yearlings after they've gone through the "colt handling" program at the college for $750. My husband and I always joke about buying one of those colts and trying this method. You have to admit it would be an interesting study!
You should do it! |
|
| |
|
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 591
   
| Herbie - 2014-05-13 12:54 PM
Barnmom - 2014-05-13 2:17 PM The problem is all the advances in veterinary medicine over the last 20 years have lead to us breeding fast horses that are way more fragile than horses of 30 years ago.
Think about it this way. If you took all the horses that had to have joints cortisoned, PRP, stem cell treatments, ulcer meds, etc. to perform at the top level of thier game and removed them from the genetic pool, what would you have left? A much smaller gene pool for sure, but a much stronger, hardier group of horses. I don't think horses of today could handle the workload of the horses 30 years ago, JMHO.
I sure hate to be second guessing CC's trainer considering the success he has had so far. As an "unknown" trainer myself I sure hate it when I finally get a really nice horse (cause it doesn't happen as often with a small barn vs. 100 head operation) and I have to hear people say how much better that horse could be if it had a "real" trainer. I hate it even worse when that horse gets moved to a big barn and I have to watch him struggle for the rest of his career.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that CC would not be the superstar he is had he been in a huge program from the start. I am sure Art Sherman knows CC inside and out and is doing what he feels is best to keep him happy and healthy so he can be the best he can be. I totally agree with you in most all of what you said with the exception of that today's horses are more fragile. I think what has changed is the way we feed, the way we treat them as babies, etc. This theory has been proven that horses can be improved through an exercise program that starts slow and short and gradually increases by 1/4 mile per week..... As an owner, I know I was guilty of wanting to rush mine to get to the track, and I even know better. It takes a long time to build a locomotive from the inside out, most owners aren't willing to invest the $$$$ in the time it would take to do it.
I agree with you that Chrome would have been a lesser horse in another barn more than likely, and I too am an unknown trainer, though not of race horses, however I do study and follow the racehorse business and and try to continue educating myself as to how to better my program. I don't think Sherman has done a poor job....but I don't think he's done anything extraordinarily different than anyone else who has one entered on Saturday. There are people who are stepping out and training scientifically. They are few and far between, but they are out there.....mostly in the thoroughbred world and in Europe. If you read the blog I mentioned before, there have been more than one instance of a no name trainer purchasing a SOUND cheap claimer, taking the time to train them with science using heart monitors, intervals when the horse is physically ready (based on the HR and Vmax monitors) and there are some who have turned those cheap claimers into stakes horses.
I'm a believer in results and was shocked when I strapped that HR monitor to my barrel horse. Thinking he was fit for what I was asking him to do and then monitoring it scientifically quickly changed my mind.
That being said, I will be cheering Chrome on every step of the way. If he gets it done, no one will cheer louder than me! I think he's a special horse, it's been a special journey, and I can think of no way better to end it than with the sweet victory of the final two legs.
In your opinion Herbie - which horses will Chrome be running against that have been trained the way they did 30 years ago and will be hardier and stronger? I'm just wondering if most of the trainers now days do the same.
|
|
| |
|
  Whack and Roll
Posts: 6342
      Location: NE Texas | Barnmom - 2014-05-13 3:45 PM Herbie - 2014-05-13 3:25 PM That is a very good point, Barnmom and I tend to agree with you. We don't know how many didn't make it because they were crippled along the way......we also don't know how many statistically did make it, or if the rate of injury was significantly lower. Those things weren't recorded either. Only way to know for sure would be for someone to be willing to try something different, and be patient enough to see it through to fruition. That would be the tough part!
There's a college near me who has an equine program. A very affluent lady who has run a few TB's along the way has donated two or three studs and several mares to their breeding program. Now these aren't stakes winners, but there are a few who ran out a little bit of money or a really nicely bred a generation back. They sell these colts as weanlings or yearlings after they've gone through the "colt handling" program at the college for $750. My husband and I always joke about buying one of those colts and trying this method. You have to admit it would be an interesting study! You should do it!
Wouldn't it be fun just to see! I have a quarter mile track in the back pasture where I gallop my colts and barrel horses, but it is more than a big circle than an oval. If there were any way I could get to a track every morning or afford to pay someone to do it for me and know they'd do what i'd ask, I absolutely would! |
|
| |
|
  Whack and Roll
Posts: 6342
      Location: NE Texas | reditorun - 2014-05-13 3:59 PM Herbie - 2014-05-13 12:54 PM Barnmom - 2014-05-13 2:17 PM The problem is all the advances in veterinary medicine over the last 20 years have lead to us breeding fast horses that are way more fragile than horses of 30 years ago.
Think about it this way. If you took all the horses that had to have joints cortisoned, PRP, stem cell treatments, ulcer meds, etc. to perform at the top level of thier game and removed them from the genetic pool, what would you have left? A much smaller gene pool for sure, but a much stronger, hardier group of horses. I don't think horses of today could handle the workload of the horses 30 years ago, JMHO.
I sure hate to be second guessing CC's trainer considering the success he has had so far. As an "unknown" trainer myself I sure hate it when I finally get a really nice horse (cause it doesn't happen as often with a small barn vs. 100 head operation) and I have to hear people say how much better that horse could be if it had a "real" trainer. I hate it even worse when that horse gets moved to a big barn and I have to watch him struggle for the rest of his career.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that CC would not be the superstar he is had he been in a huge program from the start. I am sure Art Sherman knows CC inside and out and is doing what he feels is best to keep him happy and healthy so he can be the best he can be. I totally agree with you in most all of what you said with the exception of that today's horses are more fragile. I think what has changed is the way we feed, the way we treat them as babies, etc. This theory has been proven that horses can be improved through an exercise program that starts slow and short and gradually increases by 1/4 mile per week..... As an owner, I know I was guilty of wanting to rush mine to get to the track, and I even know better. It takes a long time to build a locomotive from the inside out, most owners aren't willing to invest the $$$$ in the time it would take to do it.
I agree with you that Chrome would have been a lesser horse in another barn more than likely, and I too am an unknown trainer, though not of race horses, however I do study and follow the racehorse business and and try to continue educating myself as to how to better my program. I don't think Sherman has done a poor job....but I don't think he's done anything extraordinarily different than anyone else who has one entered on Saturday. There are people who are stepping out and training scientifically. They are few and far between, but they are out there.....mostly in the thoroughbred world and in Europe. If you read the blog I mentioned before, there have been more than one instance of a no name trainer purchasing a SOUND cheap claimer, taking the time to train them with science using heart monitors, intervals when the horse is physically ready (based on the HR and Vmax monitors) and there are some who have turned those cheap claimers into stakes horses.
I'm a believer in results and was shocked when I strapped that HR monitor to my barrel horse. Thinking he was fit for what I was asking him to do and then monitoring it scientifically quickly changed my mind.
That being said, I will be cheering Chrome on every step of the way. If he gets it done, no one will cheer louder than me! I think he's a special horse, it's been a special journey, and I can think of no way better to end it than with the sweet victory of the final two legs. In your opinion Herbie - which horses will Chrome be running against that have been trained the way they did 30 years ago and will be hardier and stronger? I'm just wondering if most of the trainers now days do the same. I think Chrome is absolutely the best horse in the race. I think he has more heart and more charisma than any horse i've seen in a long time. He does have that look and I believe in my heart that he is special!
Prior to the Derby I think Samraat and Wicked Strong were worked a little more than the others leading up to the big race at Churchill. That being said, this program is not one that begins when the horse is race ready or even 2 months before.....it begins with the horse's first trip to the track. It is a completely different program that begins with 1/4 mile of jogging for a week and increasing very slowly from there to purposely avoid injury by overexerting the horse.....but instead build him slowly...."brick by brick". The heart monitor will cue you if something is wrong or if the horse is sore days before they show physical lameness through their resting heart rate and respirations being elevated.
That's what I meant by Sherman not doing anything extraordinarily different that anyone else when you follow their workouts....there are slight differences from trainer to trainer, but nothing drastic. I'm ready to see something extraordinary....and I hope that Chrome is it! I want to witness another Secretariat!
Edited by Herbie 2014-05-13 4:33 PM
|
|
| |
|
  More bootie than waist!
Posts: 18425
          Location: Riding Crackhead. | My son graduates on Sunday and I know Saturday I'll be running around here like a chicken with my head cut off getting the barn ready for the reception. I set the DVR but I'm sooooo hoping I can sneak to the house to watch. What time is the actual race? |
|
| |
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 999
        Location: Sunny So Cal | CYA Ranch - 2014-05-14 6:18 AM My son graduates on Sunday and I know Saturday I'll be running around here like a chicken with my head cut off getting the barn ready for the reception. I set the DVR but I'm sooooo hoping I can sneak to the house to watch. What time is the actual race?
3:18pm California Time |
|
| |
|
 Veteran
Posts: 292
     Location: Northeast Nebraska | komet. - 2014-05-13 12:47 PM
LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:37 PM
komet. - 2014-05-13 11:35 AM
LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:18 PM
He should walk away with this win, no problem!!!
It depends on how he handles sharp turns... Honestly.. I call it 'The Look Of Eagles'... This is the 1st time I've seen it since 1973.. Yes he knows what he is..
He's yet to be really "challenged"! He has a lot more and we have yet to see it!! The Belmont, this will be his challenge!!
2:24 flat is the time to beat.. I don't see that ever being done... I have tears running down my face remembering that race...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V18ui3Rtjz4
Nothing but a hand ride....

He goes back to Secretariat. Maybe, just maybe..... |
|
| |
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| I see that Commanding Curve is sitting this one out to prepare for the Belmont. The way he closed at the Derby, I think he's got a good shot. |
|
| |
|
 The best bad guy on the internet
Posts: 3519
   Location: Arizona | TXBO - 2014-05-15 9:00 AM
I see that Commanding Curve is sitting this one out to prepare for the Belmont. The way he closed at the Derby, I think he's got a good shot.
I think this is the horse that's going to challenge Californian Chrome. I see a neck to neck finish!! |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 4121
   Location: SE Louisiana | GoGaited - 2014-05-14 6:49 PM
komet. - 2014-05-13 12:47 PM
LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:37 PM
komet. - 2014-05-13 11:35 AM
LIVE2RUN - 2014-05-13 12:18 PM
He should walk away with this win, no problem!!!
It depends on how he handles sharp turns... Honestly.. I call it 'The Look Of Eagles'... This is the 1st time I've seen it since 1973.. Yes he knows what he is..
He's yet to be really "challenged"! He has a lot more and we have yet to see it!! The Belmont, this will be his challenge!!
2:24 flat is the time to beat.. I don't see that ever being done... I have tears running down my face remembering that race...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V18ui3Rtjz4
Nothing but a hand ride....

He goes back to Secretariat. Maybe, just maybe.....
As a mater of fact... he does....
http://www.allbreedpedigree.com/california+chrome |
|
| |