Error encountered in: C:\HostingSpaces\weblevel\forums.barrelhorseworld.com\wwwroot\forum\templates\original\fragments\template-begin.asp
Microsoft VBScript compilation error - Expected statement
Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?
TessBelle
Reg. Mar 2014
Posted 2014-05-18 3:27 PM
Subject: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Expert


Posts: 1477
1000100100100100252525
Location: In the land of peanuts and cotton
Not sure if it's true but I just read a article from CNN that said California Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont because.... He runs with a nasal strip. Seriously? I thought all a strip did was help him breath. Is this true or more to the story to what? I think there scared that the under dog or what ever the called him might win the triple crown.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
NJJ
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2014-05-18 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Fact Checker


Posts: 16575
5000500050001000500252525
Location: Displaced Iowegian
Not true......they haven't even made a request to the NY Racing Commission to ask permission to use the nasal strips....In the past they have not been allowed. Also, they have NOT made the decision to race him or not if they are not allowed.....I doubt seriously if the decision will be made because they are "scared" of him.....all speculation.........

ETA:
In 2012, I'll Have Another was the last horse to win the Derby and Preakness. He had worn nasal strips but his handlers were told he couldn't wear one in the Belmont. They were preparing to do so until I'll Have Another was scratched with a leg injury the day before the race.
 

Edited by NJJ 2014-05-18 3:39 PM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
jd&ez
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2014-05-18 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Expert


Posts: 1956
10005001001001001002525
Location: Ky
The trainer said the owner may not run him if they can't use the nasal strip. I would say that's nothing but a ploy to put pressure on the NY racing commission to allow it. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nateracer
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2014-05-18 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Miss Laundry Misshap


Posts: 5271
50001001002525
 I think it's a ploy and controversy always makes a good story. You can't spend 2 weeks saying he's special and then say it for 3 more.  This way they'll have something to talk about and debate. Wonder of the Flair Nasal Strip people will be bombarded with orders? Lol
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
motorjock
Reg. Nov 2004
Posted 2014-05-18 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Veteran


Posts: 170
1002525
Location: Texas
 Also says the reason the other owner wasn't there because he was upset with the way they were treated In Kentucky...Will definately make the movie a little better...adding some controversy....http://www.wfaa.com/sports/more/California-Chromes-run-in-Belmont-Stakes-in-doubt-over-nasal-strips-259715731.html
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
BARRELHORSE USA
Reg. Sep 2011
Posted 2014-05-18 4:32 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?




2000500100100252525
If I remember correctly I'LL HAVE ANOTHER .. had constant harassment and stall and barn moves by the New York Racing Commission after winning the Derby and Preakness

The owners pulled him and said the hexx with it ... and went home ...

http://www.equibase.com/profiles/Results.cfm?type=Horse&refno=85837...
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
TessBelle
Reg. Mar 2014
Posted 2014-05-18 4:35 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Expert


Posts: 1477
1000100100100100252525
Location: In the land of peanuts and cotton
jd&ez - 2014-05-18 4:08 PM

The trainer said the owner may not run him if they can't use the nasal strip. I would say that's nothing but a ploy to put pressure on the NY racing commission to allow it. 

What's the big deal about running with one? Like why won't they allow it.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Douglas J Gordon
Reg. Jun 2008
Posted 2014-05-18 5:11 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



BHW's Lance Armstrong
BHW Advertiser


Posts: 11134
50005000100010025
Location: Somewhere between S@%&# stirrer and Saint
 I wonder how well those nasal strip stick to hair any how????????
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nevertooold
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2014-05-18 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



I Prefer to Live in Fantasy Land


Posts: 64864
500050005000500050005000500050005000500050005000200020005001001001002525
Location: In the Hills of Texas
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nasal-strip-could-threaten-chromes-133840544--rah.html?soc_src=mediacontentsharebuttons
 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
runs4fun
Reg. Oct 2006
Posted 2014-05-18 5:31 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?





2000100050010010010025
How ridiculous!!  If it's against the rules, they should run him anyway.   I, personally, would lose a bit of respect for the owners/trainers if they scratch him over nasal strips.  Is he not a talented race horse w/o strips?  Do they help him that much?  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
ksjackofalltrades
Reg. Jan 2005
Posted 2014-05-18 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


BHW's Simon Cowell


500020001000500100100
Location: The Saudia Arabia of Wind Energy, Western Oklahoma
He has won 6 in a row since they started using the nasal strips.  With the Belmont being such a long race, stamina issues would definetly be a factor and then throw in the fact that he has issues with a lingering blister, I would say that the nasal strip issue would be a big deal.   
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
fatchance
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2014-05-18 5:42 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

The Original Cyber Bartender


5000500050005000200020005001002525
Location: Washington
Each state has their own set of rules and they do change from state to state.  CC owners, and their trainer knew about the steward ruling in 2012 that I'll Have Another would not be allowed to run in one there at Belmont.  I'll have Another got hurt the day before the Belmont and he drew out.  SO the ruling has not been tested. The NY stewards saying there has been no request as of yet is correct.

As far as do they work, Flair strips....6 wins in a row, pretty safe in saying they don't hurt.


Edited by fatchance 2014-05-18 5:43 PM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bibliafarm
Reg. Jul 2008
Posted 2014-05-18 5:44 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Warmblood with Wings


Posts: 27846
50005000500050005000200050010010010025
Location: Florida..
I think its all blahblahblah.. rumor control and words .Did any one hear out of the owners mouth personally they would not run him ? and NOT a newspaper article ..?just curious..
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Turner1
Reg. Nov 2003
Posted 2014-05-18 5:46 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


New Info Detective


Posts: 1551
10005002525
The strips are allowed in Standardbred racing in New York, why not TB?
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
fatchance
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2014-05-18 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

The Original Cyber Bartender


5000500050005000200020005001002525
Location: Washington
Turner1 - 2014-05-18 3:46 PM The strips are allowed in Standardbred racing in New York, why not TB?

Very valid point......all I can say is...it's New York.

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Snappy
Reg. Apr 2006
Posted 2014-05-18 6:27 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Expert


Posts: 2049
200025
Location: Utah
I actually told my my husband yesterday that I wondered if this would happen because of what happened before.... will be interesting to see how it all unfolds.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
CJE
Reg. Mar 2005
Posted 2014-05-18 7:39 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Famous for Not Complaining


Posts: 8848
50002000100050010010010025
Location: Broxton, Ga
Bibliafarm - 2014-05-17 6:44 PM I think its all blahblahblah.. rumor control and words .Did any one hear out of the owners mouth personally they would not run him ? and NOT a newspaper article ..?just curious..

They actually ask the owner about it this morning on Fox.......He seemed to indicated some concern but not a deal breaker.........if I remember correctly.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
AfleetEquine
Reg. Mar 2013
Posted 2014-05-18 7:42 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Extreme Veteran


Posts: 473
1001001001002525
Bibliafarm - 2014-05-18 6:44 PM

I think its all blahblahblah.. rumor control and words .Did any one hear out of the owners mouth personally they would not run him ? and NOT a newspaper article ..?just curious..

Yes. It was actually posted on HIS official page.

I'll Have Another put in a request to use one and got denied. Point moot when he had a soundness issue. He was prepared to run without them

HONESTLY. I would LOVE to see this horse race but you know what, GOOD for them for actually putting what they think is best for the horse first!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
amy laymon
Reg. Mar 2005
Posted 2014-05-18 7:57 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Arriving at the last minute!


Posts: 5148
500010025
Location: Kansas
Well if they run him without the strip and he loses by a bunch I will be a believer in the strips.  I haven't been sold on the concept myself. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Just Bring It
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2014-05-18 8:18 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Husband Spoiler


Posts: 4151
200020001002525
Location: North Dakota
amy laymon - 2014-05-18 7:57 PM Well if they run him without the strip and he loses by a bunch I will be a believer in the strips.  I haven't been sold on the concept myself. 

 I think they are great. My brother was a top BMX racer in the nation and he has very severe asthma but the nasal strips really helped him have enough wind to go 110% around a track. Not sure why it wouldn't help a horse breath better as well. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
jd&ez
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2014-05-18 8:21 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Expert


Posts: 1956
10005001001001001002525
Location: Ky
Again, I say it's a ploy to get the NY racing commission to allow the strips. It would be a PR nighmare for them if he didn't run. Brilliant strategy in my opinion.

I would bet my house that CC runs the Belmont. Just posturing at the moment.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
equussynergy
Reg. Feb 2009
Posted 2014-05-18 9:02 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Swiffer PIcker Upper


Posts: 4015
20002000
Location: Four Corners Colorado
 You know this right here is why I'd like to see a national racing commision so the rules would be the same across the nation.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
wimpyb
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2014-05-18 9:42 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Cinnamon Honey One


Posts: 6549
5000100050025
Location: between here and there
The trainer was on tv this am speaking about the flare strips on CC. He said he's been asked to do a lot of things he had never done like run a horse 2 weeks after a big race and it was successful. He has always ran 6 weeks between before. He said he trains in the mornings without them, but CC seems to prefer them in the afternoon so that's what they have been doing right along. All 6 races have been with them and like someone else said, with this being a longer race than he's ever run I sure wouldn't want to chance it otherwise.
I know I've used them when I'm stuffed up with allergies and they do help a lot. I don't like them, but they do work to open up the airway! Im not sure why not as they don't have any meds or performance enhancers in them. Yes, the standardbreds use them in NY, too but it's a different commission. Crazy for the TB's not able to use them.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
svincent
Reg. Feb 2012
Posted 2014-05-18 11:48 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


The Resident Destroyer of Liberal Logic


100050025
Location: PNW
Just slap some strips on the whole field... Performance enhancing or not, BOOM all of the sudden it is even again.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
redmansmyman11
Reg. Jan 2012
Posted 2014-05-19 12:16 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Expert


Posts: 1482
1000100100100100252525
Location: on my horse
svincent - 2014-05-18 10:48 PM

Just slap some strips on the whole field... Performance enhancing or not, BOOM all of the sudden it is even again.

That's exactly what I was thinking
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bob
Reg. Oct 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 12:55 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Expert


Posts: 4652
200020005001002525
Trust me, he will be running.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
komet.
Reg. Jun 2012
Posted 2014-05-19 5:02 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Expert


Posts: 4121
20002000100
Location: SE Louisiana
fatchance - 2014-05-18 5:47 PM

Turner1 - 2014-05-18 3:46 PM The strips are allowed in Standardbred racing in New York, why not TB?

Very valid point......all I can say is...it's New York.

 

Oh Please!!! Live Cover vrs AI and everything else???
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
TrailGirl
Reg. Jan 2014
Posted 2014-05-19 7:31 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Elite Veteran


Posts: 1182
1000100252525
Location: Do I hear Banjos?
I don't get the rationale for not allowing them.  If they "enhance performance" but are not a drug.  Heck let's not allow leg wraps, blinkers, shadow rolls etc either...I believe those may enhance performance too.   
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bear
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2014-05-19 7:56 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



BHW Resident Surgeon


Posts: 25352
500050005000500050001001001002525
Location: Bastrop, Texas
I think those things have been around for humans for about 20 years, and they do work for some people who snore, etc...  I remember one year at our NBHA state finals they were giving them away and I think most of them just fell off, because they wouldn't stick very well on the hair, and they were laying all over the place.  I assume they use benzoin or some adhesive to keep them on.  Someone mentioned a "blister".  Did he develop a blister where the nasal strip was applied?  If so, it will be healed up by then.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nateracer
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2014-05-19 7:57 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Miss Laundry Misshap


Posts: 5271
50001001002525
HotbearLVR - 2014-05-19 7:56 AM I think those things have been around for humans for about 20 years, and they do work for some people who snore, etc...  I remember one year at our NBHA state finals they were giving them away and I think most of them just fell off, because they wouldn't stick very well on the hair, and they were laying all over the place.  I assume they use benzoin or some adhesive to keep them on.  Someone mentioned a "blister".  Did he develop a blister where the nasal strip was applied?  If so, it will be healed up by then.

The blister was in his airway, which caused a cough.  Didn't have anything to do with the nasal strip 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
booney
Reg. Oct 2010
Posted 2014-05-19 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 395
100100100252525
They stick just fine for me.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
MS2011
Reg. Mar 2005
Posted 2014-05-19 8:21 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Own It and Move On


20002000100100100100
Location: The edge of no where
ksjackofalltrades - 2014-05-18 5:40 PM He has won 6 in a row since they started using the nasal strips.  With the Belmont being such a long race, stamina issues would definetly be a factor and then throw in the fact that he has issues with a lingering blister, I would say that the nasal strip issue would be a big deal.   

 FLAIR strips are the only thing other than Lasix that have been clinically proven to help with bleeders.  It's a non-drug aide, I would think it would be a very big deal.  I think not allowing them is stupid, and hope they get approved to run him with one.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Frodo
Reg. Jul 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


"Heck's Coming With Me"


Posts: 10797
50005000500100100252525
Location: Kansas
He'll run better without that annoying conglomeration of tape on his face. 

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Herbie
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2014-05-19 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Whack and Roll


Posts: 6342
5000100010010010025
Location: NE Texas
wimpyb - 2014-05-18 9:42 PM The trainer was on tv this am speaking about the flare strips on CC. He said he's been asked to do a lot of things he had never done like run a horse 2 weeks after a big race and it was successful. He has always ran 6 weeks between before. He said he trains in the mornings without them, but CC seems to prefer them in the afternoon so that's what they have been doing right along. All 6 races have been with them and like someone else said, with this being a longer race than he's ever run I sure wouldn't want to chance it otherwise. I know I've used them when I'm stuffed up with allergies and they do help a lot. I don't like them, but they do work to open up the airway! Im not sure why not as they don't have any meds or performance enhancers in them. Yes, the standardbreds use them in NY, too but it's a different commission. Crazy for the TB's not able to use them.
I'd love to know the other things Art Sherman was asked to do in the training of Chrome by the trainers.  Perry Martin is a scientist....someone who studies and ponders and thinks outside the box.  He is the one who wanted to start using the strips on Chrome and asked the trainer to do it.  He's also the one who wanted the horse to run back in two weeks.  I'd love to know what the "outline" Mr. Martin and Mr. Coburn handed Art Sherman regarding how they wanted their Derby horse trained.....i'll bet it's an interesting read for sure and will prove that science can play a big part in the training process if used correctly. 

All I can say is GO CHROME!!!!  I'll Have Another was denied his request to run with them in the Belmont and I doubt the NY racing commission will grant Chrome anything different.   


Edited by Herbie 2014-05-19 8:35 AM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Murphy
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2014-05-19 8:34 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Midget Lover


500050005000200010005001001002525
Location: Kentucky
I'd love to know why they are denied at the Belmont. I would think the strips are more of a preventative maintenance, than performance enhancing.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
crossspur
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Roan Wonder


50005000500050002000500252525
Location: SW MO
My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.
( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Lobo
Reg. Sep 2003
Posted 2014-05-19 9:21 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

You just got to get mean and mean it.


500050001000500100
Location: Arkansas
crossspur - 2014-05-19 9:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   

I don't think he will either.  Too many stalking him that have had plenty of rest. 

Just my personal opinion,  I wouldn't run him.  California Chrome doesn't have a thing to prove. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bucky
Reg. Nov 2007
Posted 2014-05-19 9:33 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?




100100
The stripes are more of a preventive maintenance than performance enhancing. It's not a drug just opens the airway up. If they are making a big deal about it allow the others to wear them problem solved. I love the stripes and I am a firm believer of them!

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Just Plain Lucky
Reg. Jun 2008
Posted 2014-05-19 9:38 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Thread Killer


Posts: 7545
5000200050025
Love The Chase, Chrome dam, was found to have a breathing problem after she was retired. I can imagine that the strip are helping at least a little. Considering the nature of racing, I'd bet the strip are the least "annoying" thing he has to worry about. They certainly aren't hurting his performance!  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Murphy
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2014-05-19 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Midget Lover


500050005000200010005001001002525
Location: Kentucky
NASAL STRIP APPROVED AND HE WILL RUN!  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Just Plain Lucky
Reg. Jun 2008
Posted 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Thread Killer


Posts: 7545
5000200050025
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM

My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.
( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   

Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
fatchance
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2014-05-19 9:46 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

The Original Cyber Bartender


5000500050005000200020005001002525
Location: Washington
Lobo - 2014-05-19 7:21 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 9:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
I don't think he will either.  Too many stalking him that have had plenty of rest. 



Just my personal opinion,  I wouldn't run him.  California Chrome doesn't have a thing to prove. 

Seriously?  

The NY stewards needs to make a decision about flair strips then put it in the books.  They need to stop having say who can't and who can use them.  It truly is that simple. 

The owners are on record calling CC the people's horse, well the people want a Triple Crown winner.  And the amount of money Belmont and New York will make if CC runs is staggering.  Not sure it is about a horse anymore, it's about what is always has been about....money.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
jenijill
Reg. Mar 2005
Posted 2014-05-19 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Desert Diva


Posts: 4946
2000200050010010010010025
Location: The birthplace of Honest Abe
He is running with his nasal strips. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
crossspur
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Roan Wonder


50005000500050002000500252525
Location: SW MO
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  

I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Murphy
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2014-05-19 10:43 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Midget Lover


500050005000200010005001001002525
Location: Kentucky
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:40 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  

I think he *can* run without the nasal strip, but he runs better with it on. I can run with flip flops.... but I'm better in tennis shoes. I don't strike him for the strip at all. That's like saying he shouldn't be on THE either.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
crossspur
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Roan Wonder


50005000500050002000500252525
Location: SW MO
fatchance - 2014-05-19 9:46 AM
Lobo - 2014-05-19 7:21 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 9:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
I don't think he will either.  Too many stalking him that have had plenty of rest. 



Just my personal opinion,  I wouldn't run him.  California Chrome doesn't have a thing to prove. 
Seriously?  



The NY stewards needs to make a decision about flair strips then put it in the books.  They need to stop having say who can't and who can use them.  It truly is that simple. 



The owners are on record calling CC the people's horse, well the people want a Triple Crown winner.  And the amount of money Belmont and New York will make if CC runs is staggering.  Not sure it is about a horse anymore, it's about what is always has been about....money.

If they have it as a rule they should keep it. It is just one more example of lowering your standards.   
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
crossspur
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Roan Wonder


50005000500050002000500252525
Location: SW MO
Murphy - 2014-05-19 10:43 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:40 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  
I think he *can* run without the nasal strip, but he runs better with it on. I can run with flip flops.... but I'm better in tennis shoes. I don't strike him for the strip at all. That's like saying he shouldn't be on THE either.  

Well like I said it's just my opinion. LOL & that about worth a 1/2 cent  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Just Plain Lucky
Reg. Jun 2008
Posted 2014-05-19 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Thread Killer


Posts: 7545
5000200050025
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:40 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  

Fair enough -however- the past champions did their best with what they had in body, technology, and technique. The present and future champions should be afforded the same chance. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
crossspur
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 10:59 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Roan Wonder


50005000500050002000500252525
Location: SW MO
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 10:51 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:40 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  
Fair enough -however- the past champions did their best with what they had in body, technology, and technique. The present and future champions should be afforded the same chance. 

I see it as this isn't just any athlete this is the triple crown winner & him having to have an aid to win just takes something away from his greatness. If he has to have that to win then is he as great as past winners. Would he have been able to win with it? We'll never know
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
fatchance
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2014-05-19 11:17 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

The Original Cyber Bartender


5000500050005000200020005001002525
Location: Washington
crossspur - 2014-05-19 8:45 AM
fatchance - 2014-05-19 9:46 AM
Lobo - 2014-05-19 7:21 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 9:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
I don't think he will either.  Too many stalking him that have had plenty of rest. 



Just my personal opinion,  I wouldn't run him.  California Chrome doesn't have a thing to prove. 
Seriously?  



The NY stewards needs to make a decision about flair strips then put it in the books.  They need to stop having say who can't and who can use them.  It truly is that simple. 



The owners are on record calling CC the people's horse, well the people want a Triple Crown winner.  And the amount of money Belmont and New York will make if CC runs is staggering.  Not sure it is about a horse anymore, it's about what is always has been about....money.
If they have it as a rule they should keep it. It is just one more example of lowering your standards.   

There was never a rule on it.  It was the Belmont stewards that had the say, and that is never a good idea.  After the voting by the racing commisson and the Jockey Club it will be in the books, as it needs to be.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
jbhoot
Reg. Jan 2010
Posted 2014-05-19 11:17 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Proud to be Deplorable


Posts: 1929
100050010010010010025
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:59 AM

Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 10:51 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:40 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  
Fair enough -however- the past champions did their best with what they had in body, technology, and technique. The present and future champions should be afforded the same chance. 

I see it as this isn't just any athlete this is the triple crown winner & him having to have an aid to win just takes something away from his greatness. If he has to have that to win then is he as great as past winners. Would he have been able to win with it? We'll never know

So by your way of thinking he should not run in blinkers or have his tongue tied either? After all these are aids to.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nateracer
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2014-05-19 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Miss Laundry Misshap


Posts: 5271
50001001002525
   YAY!!!  HE GETS to wear the STRIP!!!!!   
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Just Plain Lucky
Reg. Jun 2008
Posted 2014-05-19 11:22 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Thread Killer


Posts: 7545
5000200050025
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:59 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 10:51 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:40 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  
Fair enough -however- the past champions did their best with what they had in body, technology, and technique. The present and future champions should be afforded the same chance. 
I see it as this isn't just any athlete this is the triple crown winner & him having to have an aid to win just takes something away from his greatness. If he has to have that to win then is he as great as past winners. Would he have been able to win with it? We'll never know

I might agree with you if we had a Triple Crown winner every year or at least frequently. 


The horse that wins the Triple Crown is a champion, aids or no aids.

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nateracer
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2014-05-19 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Miss Laundry Misshap


Posts: 5271
50001001002525
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 11:22 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:59 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 10:51 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:40 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  
Fair enough -however- the past champions did their best with what they had in body, technology, and technique. The present and future champions should be afforded the same chance. 
I see it as this isn't just any athlete this is the triple crown winner & him having to have an aid to win just takes something away from his greatness. If he has to have that to win then is he as great as past winners. Would he have been able to win with it? We'll never know
I might agree with you if we had a Triple Crown winner every year or at least frequently. 





The horse that wins the Triple Crown is a champion, aids or no aids.


 

 Agreed!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
crossspur
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Roan Wonder


50005000500050002000500252525
Location: SW MO
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 11:22 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:59 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 10:51 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:40 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  
Fair enough -however- the past champions did their best with what they had in body, technology, and technique. The present and future champions should be afforded the same chance. 
I see it as this isn't just any athlete this is the triple crown winner & him having to have an aid to win just takes something away from his greatness. If he has to have that to win then is he as great as past winners. Would he have been able to win with it? We'll never know
I might agree with you if we had a Triple Crown winner every year or at least frequently. 





The horse that wins the Triple Crown is a champion, aids or no aids.


 

Ok for me it's just the opposite the reasons you listed are the reasons I'm against it. But like I said it's just me. I'm not saying anyone else is right or wrong.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
TrailGirl
Reg. Jan 2014
Posted 2014-05-19 12:07 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Elite Veteran


Posts: 1182
1000100252525
Location: Do I hear Banjos?
I see it as this isn't just any athlete this is the triple crown winner & him having to have an aid to win just takes something away from his greatness. If he has to have that to win then is he as great as past winners. Would he have been able to win with it? We'll never know"

This statement made me chuckle a bit.  I get what you are saying/feeling...but one of the universally agreed greatest horses ever...Secretariat... Ran his TC races with a hood/blinkers to help him focus and run better.  He wasn't as good without them apparently.  Does that diminish his greatness?  Not for me it doesn't.  But at the time it was seen as a potential weakness.  Much as the nasal strip discussion today.


 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
komet.
Reg. Jun 2012
Posted 2014-05-19 12:13 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Expert


Posts: 4121
20002000100
Location: SE Louisiana
crossspur - 2014-05-19 9:00 AM

My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.
( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   

Ya know.... I don't think he can win either.... But they allow blinders as aids and other things as well....
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
ACEINTHEHOLE
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2014-05-19 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Tough Patooty


Posts: 2615
2000500100
Location: Sperry, OK
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:59 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 10:51 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 11:40 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2014-05-19 9:44 AM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 10:00 AM My question is though do you really want the next triple crown winner to need an aid to run.

( JMO I don't think he can win anyway )   
Because shoes, certain bits, boots, and blinkers aren't aids?  
I guess we just have different standards of what a historial champion should be  
Fair enough -however- the past champions did their best with what they had in body, technology, and technique. The present and future champions should be afforded the same chance. 
I see it as this isn't just any athlete this is the triple crown winner & him having to have an aid to win just takes something away from his greatness. If he has to have that to win then is he as great as past winners. Would he have been able to win with it? We'll never know

So does that mean they shouldn't allow them to run on Lasix?  Should they have to be able to run at that caliber without bleeding to be considered great?  Lasix even has the potential to be performance inhancing since it is a vasodialator, we are talking about nose strips to just allow a little more air flow, that is all. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Cowgirl Kat
Reg. Aug 2013
Posted 2014-05-19 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Elite Veteran


Posts: 999
500100100100100252525
Location: Sunny So Cal
Definitely some California Chrome haters going on...yay California Chrome! Went to the Santa Anita Race Track this past weekend and they showed the Preakness on the big screen. Haven't heard the crowd get that excited and loud since Zenyatta. This is what we need right now. A fantastic story with a fantastic ending. Glad he gets to wear his nasal strips. GO CALIFORNIA CHROME! I'm rooting for the Kentucky Derby and Preakness winner California Chrome. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
crossspur
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 12:30 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Roan Wonder


50005000500050002000500252525
Location: SW MO
Ok so once again you all have made me sorry I said anything. I said it was just my feelings on the subject. Why did you paint your house the color you did? Why did you buy the brand of car you did? Because it's you opinion how you feel & what you like.
I maybe very wrong in my line of thinking & and I said my opinion wasn't worth a lot, but I think I should still be able to have that opinion  

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
komet.
Reg. Jun 2012
Posted 2014-05-19 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Expert


Posts: 4121
20002000100
Location: SE Louisiana
As I understand it, they don't even know that he IS a bleeder... and I can just see and hear the reaction of the country if he ran and won without the strip only to have blood pouring out of his nose in the winner circle... Yeah.. Guess they will let horses wear them from now on rather than have that happen..
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
TrailGirl
Reg. Jan 2014
Posted 2014-05-19 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?



Elite Veteran


Posts: 1182
1000100252525
Location: Do I hear Banjos?
crossspur - 2014-05-19 12:30 PM Ok so once again you all have made me sorry I said anything. I said it was just my feelings on the subject. Why did you paint your house the color you did? Why did you buy the brand of car you did? Because it's you opinion how you feel & what you like.

I maybe very wrong in my line of thinking & and I said my opinion wasn't worth a lot, but I think I should still be able to have that opinion  


 

You can and should absolutely have and share your opinion...but don't expect it to occur in a vacuum.  We have opinions about your opinion and in the spirit of information exchange and friendly debate we are likely to share those opinions too. 

Truly...you can't expect all others to agree.  And I felt a valid point needed to be made as far as the perception of what constitutes a great horse...aids or no.  I thought perhaps you didn't know that the great Secretariat also faced nay-sayers (or is that Neigh-sayers) in his day over his use of the hood/blinkers.

 
 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
crossspur
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2014-05-19 1:35 PM
Subject: RE: Chrome won't be allowed to run at Belmont... ?


Military family

Roan Wonder


50005000500050002000500252525
Location: SW MO
TrailGirl - 2014-05-19 1:10 PM
crossspur - 2014-05-19 12:30 PM Ok so once again you all have made me sorry I said anything. I said it was just my feelings on the subject. Why did you paint your house the color you did? Why did you buy the brand of car you did? Because it's you opinion how you feel & what you like.

I maybe very wrong in my line of thinking & and I said my opinion wasn't worth a lot, but I think I should still be able to have that opinion  


 
You can and should absolutely have and share your opinion...but don't expect it to occur in a vacuum.  We have opinions about your opinion and in the spirit of information exchange and friendly debate we are likely to share those opinions too. 



Truly...you can't expect all others to agree.  And I felt a valid point needed to be made as far as the perception of what constitutes a great horse...aids or no.  I thought perhaps you didn't know that the great Secretariat also faced nay-sayers (or is that Neigh-sayers) in his day over his use of the hood/blinkers.


 

 

I don't exccept anyone to agree with me, it's fine if no one does.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom