Error encountered in: C:\HostingSpaces\weblevel\forums.barrelhorseworld.com\wwwroot\forum\templates\original\fragments\template-begin.asp
Microsoft VBScript compilation error - Expected statement
The Value of Chrome?
Whiteboy
Reg. Jul 2012
Posted 2014-06-03 11:25 AM
Subject: The Value of Chrome?


Military family

That's White "Man" to You


Posts: 5515
5000500
 This is an interesting  article regarding the value of California Chrome based on a potential breeding career.  Thoughts?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/othersports/california-chromes-value-might-be-much-less-than-the-30-million-his-trainer-and-owners-expect/2014/06/02/19163db0-ea54-11e3-b98c-72cef4a00499_story.html
 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nateracer
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2014-06-03 11:35 AM
Subject: RE: The Value of Chrome?



Miss Laundry Misshap


Posts: 5271
50001001002525
His value will change on Saturday, so what's the point of talking about it now?  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Whiteboy
Reg. Jul 2012
Posted 2014-06-03 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: The Value of Chrome?


Military family

That's White "Man" to You


Posts: 5515
5000500
I hope your right.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
ride n slide
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2014-06-03 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: The Value of Chrome?



Veteran


Posts: 208
100100
 Lucky Pulpit though well bred, never won a race of consequence in 22 career starts and stood for a $2,500 stud fee.

His dam raced for an $8,000 price tag, and the dam’s dam was just as cheap. (The experts do say that the pedigree would look a lot better if Lucky Pulpit sired more Grade I stakes winners, proving that his son is not a genetic fluke.)


If better mares had been bred to him, he likely would have sired Grade 1 winners. Then he wouldn't be a "cheap" stud. Now better mares will be bred to LP and it will be interesting to see what happens. Breeding is a crap shoot!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
ThreeCorners
Reg. Nov 2003
Posted 2014-06-03 11:56 AM
Subject: RE: The Value of Chrome?


Military family
Tried and True


Posts: 21185
50005000500050001000100252525
Location: Where I am happiest
Actually, Lucky Pulpit has been a very successfull sire in California and his book sure does not read like a who's who of racing dams. He has been bred to the lesser mares, and yet, is a leading sire in Ca and with not alot of runers. The numbers crunch very high for him on percentages of total foals, to runners, to winners and out of not so good mares. Also, Beyer is failing to mention Lucky Pulpits lack of high end prowess on the track was due to a breathing problem.
 C.C's dam also had breathing issues that was discovered at the end of her  short career.She would panic pre-race and it was due to her physical lung maladie.  

 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
BMW
Reg. Jan 2010
Posted 2014-06-04 1:27 AM
Subject: RE: The Value of Chrome?


Expert


Posts: 3147
2000100010025
Sunday Silence won the Kentucky Derby, Preakness, and Breeders' Cup Classic, was second in the Belmont and ended up standing his entire stud career in Japan as few people in the U.S. were interested in breeding to him. In Japan he was a sensational sire as well as sire of sires. Hopefully the TB industry will not let CC go the way of SS.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
stayceem
Reg. May 2007
Posted 2014-06-04 3:04 AM
Subject: RE: The Value of Chrome?



Not Afraid to Work


Posts: 4717
20002000500100100
Ive read quite a few TB greats have failed at stud. so what does that say, they have the bloodlines but dont have the production. Maybe CC will have the production and becomes his own famous bloodline in 100 years from now. All the greats started somewhere.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nateracer
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2014-06-04 7:17 AM
Subject: RE: The Value of Chrome?



Miss Laundry Misshap


Posts: 5271
50001001002525
If we want to pull stud facts, I beleive Secretariat was a lousy colt sire.  His mares turned out some nice horses, but overall he was a dud for direct get.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Murphy
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2014-06-04 7:22 AM
Subject: RE: The Value of Chrome?



Midget Lover


500050005000200010005001001002525
Location: Kentucky
ThreeCorners - 2014-06-03 12:56 PM Actually, Lucky Pulpit has been a very successfull sire in California and his book sure does not read like a who's who of racing dams. He has been bred to the lesser mares, and yet, is a leading sire in Ca and with not alot of runers. The numbers crunch very high for him on percentages of total foals, to runners, to winners and out of not so good mares. Also, Beyer is failing to mention Lucky Pulpits lack of high end prowess on the track was due to a breathing problem.

 C.C's dam also had breathing issues that was discovered at the end of her  short career.She would panic pre-race and it was due to her physical lung maladie.  


 

Exactly. People keep saying that he is defying the odds because he wasn't bred from greats. Well, actually, he was. His lineage is not shabby at all. People just love a good underdog story. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom