Error encountered in: C:\HostingSpaces\weblevel\forums.barrelhorseworld.com\wwwroot\forum\templates\original\fragments\template-begin.asp
Microsoft VBScript compilation error - Expected statement

Double J Tree Fit


Burn n' Turn Reg. Dec 2011	Posted 2015-03-22 1:23 PM Subject: Double J Tree Fit
Elite Veteran Posts: 747	I love my Pozzi Pro, but I have a standard tree and think my gelding needs a #10. But I was looking on the Double J site and fell in love with a Pro Racer. Do the Pozzi and the Pro Racer fit extremely different? Would I still need a #10 if I were to get the Pro Racer? Just looking for some input since it's the weekend and there isn't anyone to get ahold of at Double J until tomorrow.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom

skye Reg. Jul 2004	Posted 2015-03-22 10:19 PM Subject: RE: Double J Tree Fit
Expert Posts: 2122 Location: The Great Northwest	I felt that the JJ Pro had too steep of a cantel. The Pozzi feel just right.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom

Rockin BS Reg. Sep 2004	Posted 2015-03-23 8:49 AM Subject: RE: Double J Tree Fit
Super Bumper Posts: 3392 Location: At the Brownderosa	You can have them build you a Pozzi if it's just the tooling/color/etc. that you're liking on the Pro Racer. The Pozzi, I love the deep seet. I'm not sure but I don't think the pro racer is built like that - thinking it has a flatter seat, not as high swells or cantle. Someone may know more about them that will comment on here to give you a better idea.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom

jschipper Reg. Feb 2010	Posted 2015-03-23 12:47 PM Subject: RE: Double J Tree Fit
Elite Veteran Posts: 964 Location: Alberta, Canada	I would recommend having him fit by a double j fitter... I did and my mare fit a tree i never would have even thought to consider for her!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom

cecollins0811 Reg. Aug 2013	Posted 2015-03-23 2:30 PM Subject: RE: Double J Tree Fit
Expert Posts: 1631 Location: Somewhere around here	jschipper - 2015-03-23 12:47 PM I would recommend having him fit by a double j fitter... I did and my mare fit a tree i never would have even thought to consider for her! I second this!
↑ Top ↓ Bottom