|
|
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | I realize some wont agree and thats ok.. Just a simple post ..although I use a 3 piece snaffle..the last paragraph I really like. ""When a lot of folks can't get a horse to operate on a feel, in a snaffle, what most are going to tell you "hell, get a little more bridle, get a little more shank on it, get a chain on it" and then when he's really wanting to flip over then "tie his head down". If he really runs into the tie down then "get a bicycle chain over his nose".............I mean it DOESN'T STOP, IT BECOMES MEDIEVAL WHAT THEY DO. But when you get a horse to where he's operating on a feel; it doesn'...t make much difference what you have. Whereas a lot of people leave the snaffle bit because they flunked out, they failed...............and then they go and get another bit. Of course these tack salesmen love that. They go and get another bit and then they flunk out in it, ruin their horse. Then they ruin them in that, then get another bit and then pretty soon they've got a whole wall full of bits and they still can't operate the **** thing. All that money they've wasted on bits; they could've probably bought a decent saddle for the horse so he didn't have to put up with the junk they were riding in. Now that would have been something that would have been worthwhile. So if you don't get it done in the snaffle (the basics that a horse needs, the fundamental movements that all horses need to do for whatever you have in mind for them) before moving on to something else, well............you're not going to get it."" - Buck Brannaman.
Edited by Bibliafarm 2015-10-24 9:12 PM
| |
| |
  Twin Sister to Queen Boobie
Posts: 13315
       Location: East Tennessee but who knows?! |     | |
| |
  Neat Freak
Posts: 11216
     Location: Wonderful Wyoming | I am a bit collector, most are super gentle but I keep most everything in a ring snaffle unless they are for sale. No one wants a horse that is 8 yrs old and in a ring snaffle. They think they aren't broke | |
| |
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | wyoming barrel racer - 2015-10-24 10:17 PM I am a bit collector, most are super gentle but I keep most everything in a ring snaffle unless they are for sale. No one wants a horse that is 8 yrs old and in a ring snaffle. They think they aren't broke
thats why I highlighted the last part.. thats the part that I believe in.. to put a foundation and the basics on a horse .. before moving to a stronger bit.. | |
| |
  Neat Freak
Posts: 11216
     Location: Wonderful Wyoming | Bibliafarm - 2015-10-24 8:22 PM wyoming barrel racer - 2015-10-24 10:17 PM I am a bit collector, most are super gentle but I keep most everything in a ring snaffle unless they are for sale. No one wants a horse that is 8 yrs old and in a ring snaffle. They think they aren't broke thats why I highlighted the last part.. thats the part that I believe in.. to put a foundation and the basics on a horse .. before moving to a stronger bit..
I just love a soft horse in a snaffle. I wouldn't put them in anything else for the most part except to sell. | |
| |
 Total Germophobe
Posts: 6437
       Location: Montana | I love to ride in a snaffle or variation. I like to try out different bits, but I don't stray very far! I'm so comfortable in a snaffle, it is unbelieveable. | |
| |
    Location: Friendswood, Texas | I believe Clinton Anderson shares a similar philosophy. I wonder what he would say about a Jr. Cowhorse. That's what we use. | |
| |
 I Chore in Chucks
Posts: 2882
        Location: MD | Love this.. I just saw this somewhere else yesterday. I'm thankful both horses can still work well in a snaffle at their age and experience level.
I also love just about anything that comes out of BB's mouth... It always seems to click! | |
| |
Red Bull Agressive
Posts: 5981
         Location: North Dakota |  I have ridden horses in stronger bits but I've also transitioned a handful horses down from strong bits to smooth snaffles. That is always the goal. A snaffle with no other equipment is always the goal. | |
| |
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | It's a nice feel good thought and I understand and agree with the intent of the statement. However, if you limit yourself to a snaffle, you will never get the most out of any horse. Every single performance horse trainer uses a more suited bit than a snaffle on an aged horse. There are very few horses that are really good snaffle horses. It has nothing to do with is the horse or trainer good, just most horses don't do that well in one. Now that doesn't mean they do poorly, just not great on a performance level.
We start every horse in a snaffle and it is the most appropriate colt bit, bar none. And every horse trained right should definitely be able to be ridden in a snaffle. I just see people taking this the wrong way, not necessarily here but all over. There is an awful lot of not quite right ideas being spread by the clinician type trainers. A lot of it is great. I like Buck, but there are a few things he says that I don't think are right. Mainly comes from his mentors, whom I think are a little over rated. You can darn sure baby a horse too much and they have a tendency to do just that. Then you ask them to bump up and grow up and you get resistance. So, not one philosophy of training is right, you have to be able to do it all, easy to hard and everything in between...at the right time.
Please don't take the above the wrong way. I know he means that looking just to bits and equipment to solve your personal training faults is never the answer. So I 100% agree!
Edited by Tdove 2015-10-25 10:46 AM
| |
| |
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | actually glad you posted..lol... i dont read him or study him but I guess some could take it wrong..I just saw this and reposted it because I agree with highlighted part and see so many going right to strong bit with out getting a foundation.. the 3 piece helps the suppling and bending and body control and if you skip it down later they will get stff...I was hoping no one would take it wrong..a starter bit for a strong foundation .. before you transition.. the highlighter part explains that .to go directly to a harsh bit without being able to do basic foundation work in a snaffle first could lead to issues down the road. your post made me realize that some could take it wrong and be lead to believe it means staying in a snaffle .. yes we ride all our upper level horses in other bits.. we start in snaffle and get solid foundation .. we move up.. we go back for schooling if we have issues that are basic and need suppling , body control that sort of thing.. work on strong backs .flexing etc.. I would have hoped that the highlighted area emphasized that but I guess not.. no we cant ride in a snaffle only.. as we move up.. impossible.. but its our go to bit.. and used more then others for daily work .. and we use the 3 piece KK training bit. so thank you for posting and making me realize the statements could be misinterpreted...I am a firm believer in taking lil bits of knowledge and information and trying it.. and all horses are differant.. for me a foundation in snaffle is the best approach as you stated as well.. 
Edited by Bibliafarm 2015-10-25 11:22 AM
| |
| |
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | cavyrunsbarrels - 2015-10-25 10:53 AM   I have ridden horses in stronger bits but I've also transitioned a handful horses down from strong bits to smooth snaffles. That is always the goal. A snaffle with no other equipment is always the goal. That would not be possible.. lightness in any bit is a goal.. a solid foundation is that key.. guess it depends what you are doing but more advanced impossible to only ride in a snaffle always..
Edited by Bibliafarm 2015-10-25 11:18 AM
| |
| |
Expert
Posts: 1694
      Location: Willows, CA | This is a touchy subject here. I have done a few events with Buck, and spent more days than I can count with the man that he would tell you that he learned most from, Ray Hunt. Inferring that perhaps Ray was overrated would be an interesting point if you did not spend time to really understand the depth of understanding that man and his mentor, Tom Dorrance had. None of these horsemen left a horse in a snaffle once the horse was ready to advance into a hackamore, then two rein and bridle following the traditional bridal horse system I was a presenter at the legacy of Legends event in Ft Worth last year with Buck. If I recall, his main horse was straight up in the bridle. Ray often told me that, for him, his favorite horses were the traditional California Bridal horse, and Dressage horses. The Spanish Riding School gave Ray a private demonstration when he was there, and it was a very special thing for Ray that they honored him that way The point of those guys was not to leave a horse in a snaffle. The point was not to move them on until they are ready, and not to move them on just because you can't get what you want. Today we are all in a hurry to rush a horse forward to fit aged event time tables. They have to be to a certain point by a certain time, ready or not. One way to try to do this is to shove more in their mouth than they are ready for. | |
| |
I just read the headlines
Posts: 4483
        
| winwillows - 2015-10-25 12:06 PM
This is a touchy subject here. I have done a few events with Buck, and spent more days than I can count with the man that he would tell you that he learned most from, Ray Hunt. Inferring that perhaps Ray was overrated would be an interesting point if you did not spend time to really understand the depth of understanding that man and his mentor, Tom Dorrance had. None of these horsemen left a horse in a snaffle once the horse was ready to advance into a hackamore, then two rein and bridle following the traditional bridal horse system I was a presenter at the legacy of Legends event in Ft Worth last year with Buck. If I recall, his main horse was straight up in the bridle. Ray often told me that, for him, his favorite horses were the traditional California Bridal horse, and Dressage horses. The Spanish Riding School gave Ray a private demonstration when he was there, and it was a very special thing for Ray that they honored him that way The point of those guys was not to leave a horse in a snaffle. The point was not to move them on until they are ready, and not to move them on just because you can't get what you want. Today we are all in a hurry to rush a horse forward to fit aged event time tables. They have to be to a certain point by a certain time, ready or not. One way to try to do this is to shove more in their mouth than they are ready for.
Thanks for the explanation. I can never explain it well to other people, but you sure did.
 | |
| |
  Neat Freak
Posts: 11216
     Location: Wonderful Wyoming | winwillows - 2015-10-25 11:06 AM This is a touchy subject here. I have done a few events with Buck, and spent more days than I can count with the man that he would tell you that he learned most from, Ray Hunt. Inferring that perhaps Ray was overrated would be an interesting point if you did not spend time to really understand the depth of understanding that man and his mentor, Tom Dorrance had. None of these horsemen left a horse in a snaffle once the horse was ready to advance into a hackamore, then two rein and bridle following the traditional bridal horse system I was a presenter at the legacy of Legends event in Ft Worth last year with Buck. If I recall, his main horse was straight up in the bridle. Ray often told me that, for him, his favorite horses were the traditional California Bridal horse, and Dressage horses. The Spanish Riding School gave Ray a private demonstration when he was there, and it was a very special thing for Ray that they honored him that way The point of those guys was not to leave a horse in a snaffle. The point was not to move them on until they are ready, and not to move them on just because you can't get what you want. Today we are all in a hurry to rush a horse forward to fit aged event time tables. They have to be to a certain point by a certain time, ready or not. One way to try to do this is to shove more in their mouth than they are ready for.
Very true, but since I barrel race, ranch and do HUS/jump. It is very possible to leave them indefinitly in a snaffle. Were I showing in cowhorse events then they must be moved up per the rules as is with a lot of events. | |
| |
Red Bull Agressive
Posts: 5981
         Location: North Dakota | Bibliafarm - 2015-10-25 11:16 AM cavyrunsbarrels - 2015-10-25 10:53 AM   I have ridden horses in stronger bits but I've also transitioned a handful horses down from strong bits to smooth snaffles. That is always the goal. A snaffle with no other equipment is always the goal. That would not be possible.. lightness in any bit is a goal.. a solid foundation is that key.. guess it depends what you are doing but more advanced impossible to only ride in a snaffle always..
Well these are not Grand Prix horses or high level anything really. So yes, my goal is to be able to ride my horses in snaffles. Of course if you are training a horse for high level dressage, you are going to transition to a double bridle. And a finished reiner, western pleasure horse, etc. is going to move to a curb. But not because they "need" a stronger bit or "can't" do something in a snaffle. Rather because they have been trained properly in a snaffle and when they are ready for even more precise, light cues they are introduced to other bits. I'll use Charolette and Valegro for an example, yes they are a GP dressage team and use a double bridle but still school in a snaffle. Valegro can perform all the GP movements, extremely well, in a loose ring. But of course the double bridle allows for even more subtle cues which is especially important in the competition ring. Most people are not like those I mentioned above. Most do what Buck is referring to. All the horses I've transitioned back to snaffles were put in strong bits they did NOT need and were NOT ready for. They were not trained to accept the bit lightly and carry it themselves. Their owners had issues so rather than work through it ,put a stronger bit on. I don't consider myself a trainer or anything special as a rider, but I worked really hard on gradually getting those horses back to snaffles to fix those foundational issues. Take my one and only horse right now, Cash, for example. Was ridden in bits stronger than he needs. I have had to slowly work back down to a french link full cheek. We are still in the process of getting him responding to when he is excited but it's getting better. I want to be able to be confident in a snaffle whether we're schooling dressage, trail riding, or practicing mounted shooting. But does that mean I am not open to re-introducing him to a curb once he's able to neck rein reliably? No. In fact that is the plan. But even so I should still be able to use a snaffle whenever I want and he will work well in it. That, to me, is a well trained horse. | |
| |
 Accident Prone
Posts: 22277
          Location: 100 miles from Nowhere, AR | Tdove - 2015-10-25 10:33 AM It's a nice feel good thought and I understand and agree with the intent of the statement. However, if you limit yourself to a snaffle, you will never get the most out of any horse. Every single performance horse trainer uses a more suited bit than a snaffle on an aged horse. There are very few horses that are really good snaffle horses. It has nothing to do with is the horse or trainer good, just most horses don't do that well in one. Now that doesn't mean they do poorly, just not great on a performance level. We start every horse in a snaffle and it is the most appropriate colt bit, bar none. And every horse trained right should definitely be able to be ridden in a snaffle. I just see people taking this the wrong way, not necessarily here but all over. There is an awful lot of not quite right ideas being spread by the clinician type trainers. A lot of it is great. I like Buck, but there are a few things he says that I don't think are right. Mainly comes from his mentors, whom I think are a little over rated. You can darn sure baby a horse too much and they have a tendency to do just that. Then you ask them to bump up and grow up and you get resistance. So, not one philosophy of training is right, you have to be able to do it all, easy to hard and everything in between...at the right time. Please don't take the above the wrong way. I know he means that looking just to bits and equipment to solve your personal training faults is never the answer. So I 100% agree!
I agree. I can ride any of mine in a snaffle, but other bits can provide a refinement of communication you just can't get in a snaffle. And when it comes to a hard running, high on adrenaline barrel horse, you might need a little louder bit to get their attention and still maintain quiet hands. That's not the goal as a trainer, but it's the reality for some horses. | |
| |
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | winwillows - 2015-10-25 1:06 PM This is a touchy subject here. I have done a few events with Buck, and spent more days than I can count with the man that he would tell you that he learned most from, Ray Hunt. Inferring that perhaps Ray was overrated would be an interesting point if you did not spend time to really understand the depth of understanding that man and his mentor, Tom Dorrance had. None of these horsemen left a horse in a snaffle once the horse was ready to advance into a hackamore, then two rein and bridle following the traditional bridal horse system I was a presenter at the legacy of Legends event in Ft Worth last year with Buck. If I recall, his main horse was straight up in the bridle. Ray often told me that, for him, his favorite horses were the traditional California Bridal horse, and Dressage horses. The Spanish Riding School gave Ray a private demonstration when he was there, and it was a very special thing for Ray that they honored him that way The point of those guys was not to leave a horse in a snaffle. The point was not to move them on until they are ready, and not to move them on just because you can't get what you want. Today we are all in a hurry to rush a horse forward to fit aged event time tables. They have to be to a certain point by a certain time, ready or not. One way to try to do this is to shove more in their mouth than they are ready for.
exactly.. its a it to get a firm foundation with,, I think I highlighted that as well.. | |
| |
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 509

| why isn't the spade bit considered midevil? I think there are so many people wh o forget how much he rides in a spade my neighbors try to mimic him they keep everything in an jerrimiah watt and have the most dead mouthed dull uncollected horses I've rode. It takes time a lot of feel and constant work to keep one light in a eggbut snaffle | |
| |
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | tin can - 2015-10-25 7:48 PM why isn't the spade bit considered midevil? I think there are so many people wh o forget how much he rides in a spade my neighbors try to mimic him they keep everything in an jerrimiah watt and have the most dead mouthed dull uncollected horses I've rode. It takes time a lot of feel and constant work to keep one light in a eggbut snaffle
i have no idea but I do know his statement is about a starter bit to get a foundation before transitioning.. it seems the article is being misunderstood.lol.. he never mentioned not to transition.. | |
| |
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 509

| Why can you only transition to a spade? I love buck and use apt of his methods i guess i lack talent i never stay totally in the snaffle. I do try to keep smooth good hands | |
| |
  Neat Freak
Posts: 11216
     Location: Wonderful Wyoming | Bibliafarm - 2015-10-25 6:19 PM tin can - 2015-10-25 7:48 PM why isn't the spade bit considered midevil? I think there are so many people wh o forget how much he rides in a spade my neighbors try to mimic him they keep everything in an jerrimiah watt and have the most dead mouthed dull uncollected horses I've rode. It takes time a lot of feel and constant work to keep one light in a eggbut snaffle i have no idea but I do know his statement is about a starter bit to get a foundation before transitioning.. it seems the article is being misunderstood.lol.. he never mentioned not to transition..
I perfectly understood the article and it makes perfect sense. But my tiny point is that some horses never need to transition or the rider/event they are trained for, means they never need to transition. Brandi Halls rode Slim in a snaffle. I know there were times she put him in something different when she felt the need, but he was as competitive as any out there, and ran most of the time in a snaffle. | |
| |
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | tin can - 2015-10-25 8:34 PM Why can you only transition to a spade? I love buck and use apt of his methods i guess i lack talent i never stay totally in the snaffle. I do try to keep smooth good hands
I guess Im confused.. I havent really watched anything about him but agree with his last statement.. on my first post.. .. I posted due to the last paragraph.. I feel start with a snaffle to get the basics down..or you will run into issues later on with harsher bits.. then transition to whatever you feel is best.. was my opinion only.I guess Im confused. | |
| |
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | wyoming barrel racer - 2015-10-25 8:43 PM Bibliafarm - 2015-10-25 6:19 PM tin can - 2015-10-25 7:48 PM why isn't the spade bit considered midevil? I think there are so many people wh o forget how much he rides in a spade my neighbors try to mimic him they keep everything in an jerrimiah watt and have the most dead mouthed dull uncollected horses I've rode. It takes time a lot of feel and constant work to keep one light in a eggbut snaffle i have no idea but I do know his statement is about a starter bit to get a foundation before transitioning.. it seems the article is being misunderstood.lol.. he never mentioned not to transition.. I perfectly understood the article and it makes perfect sense. But my tiny point is that some horses never need to transition or the rider/event they are trained for, means they never need to transition. Brandi Halls rode Slim in a snaffle. I know there were times she put him in something different when she felt the need, but he was as competitive as any out there, and ran most of the time in a snaffle. Some dont need to I dont think hes sayin that at all.. and I am not.... we all know our horses.. lol. I think my point and I "think" he is saying that starting with a snaffle is best to get a Solid foundation.dont SKIP that process of you might have issues.. . because some go right to harsher bits that was all .. some are impossible to stay in a snaffle.. but some stay in one.lol. the reason I posted is the last highlighted part.. transition or not. lol personally Id stay in my 3 piece as long as possible.. we school all our horses in them.. but we must per rules compete in a double bridle.. and as some say some horses need more.. so they transition
Edited by Bibliafarm 2015-10-25 8:11 PM
| |
| |
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | I agree with you and buck. I do hear all the time misinformed people saying that you should do everything in a snaffle, and they will ride one 10 years old that has never been in anything else, without much success. They cite stuff like this, incorrectly of course.
Ray was and Buck is a great horsemen, never would want to take that against them. Both are certainly much better than me in most ways. But they have a tendency to baby one too much for a top performer. Many idolize them and truth is there are many just as good or better, especially at maxing a horse out. I have heard of a few top trainers in Texas that were not too happy with the colts they were getting from Ray. Tried to get performance now from them and the horses would blow or get frustrated because no one had ever asked for much from them. Too much asking and not enough telling. The greatest trainers know when and how to do both. Ray was a great horse starter, because that is what a colt needs. Too much of that and you can create a confused, lazy one on down the line. Very few great horse staters are great horse finishers, and vice versa, due to this. Both are equally gifted and important.
Just wanted to clarify my earlier statement and thoughts. It takes all kinds to make the world go round. Never should you start a horse in anything other than a snaffle. Every horse needs to come out of it at different times. For some things, snaffled remain a good bit. Jumping and even barrel racing, I could see it useful on a finished horse.
Edited by Tdove 2015-10-26 9:10 AM
| |
| |
Expert
Posts: 1694
      Location: Willows, CA | Here we go. A spade is the most sensitive bit there is. It takes roughly seven years to make a bridle horse straight up in a spade if both you and the horse are good , often more. If you are not going to commit to the effort, and knowledge you should not go there. Quicker is abuse, just like a snaffle hauled back with two hands at the same time is abuse. A spade sets the angle at the pole with zero pressure. The whole idea is being very close to zero pressure. There is no resentment from the horse when this is right. People who rush this should not own horses. People who say that, when done properly, this is midevil have never ridden a truly sensitive responsive, partner that has followed this path. This takes knowledge, hands and patience, and is a wonder and true unity when done right. This is certainly not for everyone. Very few people have the patience or time to follow the traditional bridal horse path. Done properly, this is the least abusive training method there is. Unfortunately, most horse owners don't have the understanding or time for a spade. It is becoming a lost art.
Edited by winwillows 2015-10-25 10:34 PM
| |
| |
Expert
Posts: 1694
      Location: Willows, CA | Tdove - 2015-10-25 9:35 PM
I agree with you and buck. I do hear all the time misinformed people saying that you should do everything in a snaffle, and they will ride one 10 years old that has never been in anything else, without much success. They cite stuff like this, incorrectly of course.
Ray was and Buck is a great horsemen, never would want to take that against them. Both are certainly better than me in most ways. But they have a tendency to baby one too much for a top performer. Many idolize them and truth is there are many just as good or better, especially at maxing a horse out. I have heard of a few top trainers in Texas that were not too happy with the colts they were getting from Ray. Tried to get performance now from them and the horses would blow or get frustrated because no one had ever asked for much from them. Too much asking and not enough telling. The greatest trainers know when and how to do both. Ray was a great horse starter, because that is what a colt needs. Too much of that and you can create a confused, lazy one on down the line. Very few great horse staters are great horse finishers, and vice versa, due to this. Both are equally gifted and important.
Just wanted to clarify my earlier statement and thoughts. It takes all kinds to make the world go round. Never should you start a horse in anything other than a snaffle. Every horse needs to come out of it at different times. For some things, snaffled remain a good bit. Jumping and even barrel racing, I could see it useful on a finished horse.
I really don't want to start an argument here, but you are clearly confusing some typical Ray Hunt students with what Ray actually did, and tried to teach. I was actually there. You might want to give Bobby Engersoll a call about how these methods don't work for performance potential. Ray had no problem telling a horse what he wanted. He just had the courtesy to ask them first. Today's trainers are under pressure to make a horse look thirty days better every thirty days. If the horse makes it to the aged event great. If not, too bad. I understand that. But, to say horses started this way are less likely to perform is not the case. Horses started this way, in my opinion have a much better chance of staying together for a long carrier. | |
| |
The Resident Destroyer of Liberal Logic
   Location: PNW | winwillows - 2015-10-25 8:30 PM
Here we go. A spade is the most sensitive bit there is. It takes roughly seven years to make a bridle horse straight up in a spade if both you and the horse are good , often more. If you are not going to commit to the effort, and knowledge you should not go there. Quicker is abuse, just like a snaffle hauled back with two hands at the same time is abuse. A spade sets the angle at the pole with zero pressure. The whole idea is being very close to zero pressure. There is no resentment from the horse when this is right. People who rush this should not own horses. People who say that, when done properly, this is midevil have never ridden a truly sensitive responsive, partner that has followed this path. This takes knowledge, hands and patience, and is a wonder and true unity when done right. This is certainly not for everyone. Very few people have the patience or time to follow the traditional bridal horse path. Done properly, this is the least abusive training method there is. Unfortunately, most horse owners don't have the understanding or time for a spade. It is becoming a lost art.
THIS.  | |
| |
Hungarian Midget Woman
    Location: Midwest | winwillows - 2015-10-25 10:53 PM Tdove - 2015-10-25 9:35 PM I agree with you and buck. I do hear all the time misinformed people saying that you should do everything in a snaffle, and they will ride one 10 years old that has never been in anything else, without much success. They cite stuff like this, incorrectly of course. Ray was and Buck is a great horsemen, never would want to take that against them. Both are certainly better than me in most ways. But they have a tendency to baby one too much for a top performer. Many idolize them and truth is there are many just as good or better, especially at maxing a horse out. I have heard of a few top trainers in Texas that were not too happy with the colts they were getting from Ray. Tried to get performance now from them and the horses would blow or get frustrated because no one had ever asked for much from them. Too much asking and not enough telling. The greatest trainers know when and how to do both. Ray was a great horse starter, because that is what a colt needs. Too much of that and you can create a confused, lazy one on down the line. Very few great horse staters are great horse finishers, and vice versa, due to this. Both are equally gifted and important. Just wanted to clarify my earlier statement and thoughts. It takes all kinds to make the world go round. Never should you start a horse in anything other than a snaffle. Every horse needs to come out of it at different times. For some things, snaffled remain a good bit. Jumping and even barrel racing, I could see it useful on a finished horse. I really don't want to start an argument here, but you are clearly confusing some typical Ray Hunt students with what Ray actually did, and tried to teach. I was actually there. You might want to give Bobby Engersoll a call about how these methods don't work for performance potential. Ray had no problem telling a horse what he wanted. He just had the courtesy to ask them first. Today's trainers are under pressure to make a horse look thirty days better every thirty days. If the horse makes it to the aged event great. If not, too bad. I understand that. But, to say horses started this way are less likely to perform is not the case. Horses started this way, in my opinion have a much better chance of staying together for a long carrier.
agree | |
| |
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1100
  Location: Southeastern Idaho | winwillows - 2015-10-25 9:53 PM
Tdove - 2015-10-25 9:35 PM
I agree with you and buck. I do hear all the time misinformed people saying that you should do everything in a snaffle, and they will ride one 10 years old that has never been in anything else, without much success. They cite stuff like this, incorrectly of course.
Ray was and Buck is a great horsemen, never would want to take that against them. Both are certainly better than me in most ways. But they have a tendency to baby one too much for a top performer. Many idolize them and truth is there are many just as good or better, especially at maxing a horse out. I have heard of a few top trainers in Texas that were not too happy with the colts they were getting from Ray. Tried to get performance now from them and the horses would blow or get frustrated because no one had ever asked for much from them. Too much asking and not enough telling. The greatest trainers know when and how to do both. Ray was a great horse starter, because that is what a colt needs. Too much of that and you can create a confused, lazy one on down the line. Very few great horse staters are great horse finishers, and vice versa, due to this. Both are equally gifted and important.
Just wanted to clarify my earlier statement and thoughts. It takes all kinds to make the world go round. Never should you start a horse in anything other than a snaffle. Every horse needs to come out of it at different times. For some things, snaffled remain a good bit. Jumping and even barrel racing, I could see it useful on a finished horse.
I really don't want to start an argument here, but you are clearly confusing some typical Ray Hunt students with what Ray actually did, and tried to teach. I was actually there. You might want to give Bobby Engersoll a call about how these methods don't work for performance potential. Ray had no problem telling a horse what he wanted. He just had the courtesy to ask them first. Today's trainers are under pressure to make a horse look thirty days better every thirty days. If the horse makes it to the aged event great. If not, too bad. I understand that. But, to say horses started this way are less likely to perform is not the case. Horses started this way, in my opinion have a much better chance of staying together for a long carrier.
Agreed! My dad was a "Ray Hunt/Tom Dorrance" trainer. He spent a lot of time with these two men and still talks about them to this day. 2-3 year olds that I had my dad ride for me went on to be easy for me to take on to perform. I miss having him there to help me build that relationship right from the start.
Edited by luvropin 2015-10-26 10:46 AM
| |
| |
Elite Veteran
Posts: 975
        Location: The barn...where else? SW Missouri | Saw this article this morning and thought it was very interesting.
http://eclectic-horseman.com/starting-colts-snaffle-bit-vs-hackamor...
| |
| |
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | I said earlier that Katie starts horses in a snaffle. She uses a halter to start them, then a Hackamore, then a snaffle. Snaffle is the first bit they have. Also ground drives in a snaffle too before riding in it. Just another presprctive to add to that. | |
| |
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | Tdove - 2015-11-07 10:57 AM I said earlier that Katie starts horses in a snaffle. She uses a halter to start them, then a Hackamore, then a snaffle. Snaffle is the first bit they have. Also ground drives in a snaffle too before riding in it. Just another presprctive to add to that.
exactly what we do.. but 3 Piece .. we start halter, 3 piece and ground driving .. long lining.. | |
| |
 Expert
Posts: 3782
        Location: Gainesville, TX | winwillows - 2015-10-25 10:53 PM
Tdove - 2015-10-25 9:35 PM
I agree with you and buck. I do hear all the time misinformed people saying that you should do everything in a snaffle, and they will ride one 10 years old that has never been in anything else, without much success. They cite stuff like this, incorrectly of course.
Ray was and Buck is a great horsemen, never would want to take that against them. Both are certainly better than me in most ways. But they have a tendency to baby one too much for a top performer. Many idolize them and truth is there are many just as good or better, especially at maxing a horse out. I have heard of a few top trainers in Texas that were not too happy with the colts they were getting from Ray. Tried to get performance now from them and the horses would blow or get frustrated because no one had ever asked for much from them. Too much asking and not enough telling. The greatest trainers know when and how to do both. Ray was a great horse starter, because that is what a colt needs. Too much of that and you can create a confused, lazy one on down the line. Very few great horse staters are great horse finishers, and vice versa, due to this. Both are equally gifted and important.
Just wanted to clarify my earlier statement and thoughts. It takes all kinds to make the world go round. Never should you start a horse in anything other than a snaffle. Every horse needs to come out of it at different times. For some things, snaffled remain a good bit. Jumping and even barrel racing, I could see it useful on a finished horse.
I really don't want to start an argument here, but you are clearly confusing some typical Ray Hunt students with what Ray actually did, and tried to teach. I was actually there. You might want to give Bobby Engersoll a call about how these methods don't work for performance potential. Ray had no problem telling a horse what he wanted. He just had the courtesy to ask them first. Today's trainers are under pressure to make a horse look thirty days better every thirty days. If the horse makes it to the aged event great. If not, too bad. I understand that. But, to say horses started this way are less likely to perform is not the case. Horses started this way, in my opinion have a much better chance of staying together for a long carrier.
Just a thought. Maybe when those performance people got their horses back they started telling and pushing instead of asking. These were horses that were probably trained to like their job and to be asked first. I'm betting Ray and Buck probably put the horse before the ribbon. There's a lot of people winning money and ribbons who aren't so great as horse people and may be unwilling to make a study of their horses and actually learn to ride them as well as one of these types of trainers. So yes naturally that type of person might complain when their smart, willing soft horse didn't want to be told but asked.
Edited by oija 2015-11-08 11:56 AM
| |
| |
 Toastest with the Mostest
Posts: 5712
    Location: That part of Texas | Bibliafarm - 2015-10-24 8:18 PM I realize some wont agree and thats ok.. Just a simple post ..although I use a 3 piece snaffle..the last paragraph I really like.
""When a lot of folks can't get a horse to operate on a feel, in a snaffle, what most are going to tell you "hell, get a little more bridle, get a little more shank on it, get a chain on it" and then when he's really wanting to flip over then "tie his head down". If he really runs into the tie down then "get a bicycle chain over his nose".............I mean it DOESN'T STOP, IT BECOMES MEDIEVAL WHAT THEY DO.
But when you get a horse to where he's operating on a feel; it doesn'...t make much difference what you have.
Whereas a lot of people leave the snaffle bit because they flunked out, they failed...............and then they go and get another bit.
Of course these tack salesmen love that. They go and get another bit and then they flunk out in it, ruin their horse. Then they ruin them in that, then get another bit and then pretty soon they've got a whole wall full of bits and they still can't operate the **** thing.
All that money they've wasted on bits; they could've probably bought a decent saddle for the horse so he didn't have to put up with the junk they were riding in. Now that would have been something that would have been worthwhile.
So if you don't get it done in the snaffle (the basics that a horse needs, the fundamental movements that all horses need to do for whatever you have in mind for them) before moving on to something else, well............you're not going to get it."" - Buck Brannaman.
I agree with what others have posted about snaffles and transitioning to other bits but I also want to point out another way to read the quote: if you can't get the snaffle to work, maybe you need to look at yourself and not just the horse and a new bit. I see many people who try to use bits to overcompensate for their inability to properly ride and cover-up their lack of training themselves on how to properly work and work in a snaffle bit on a horse. So for me, it's not only a question of what bit the horse should be in but also one of what training is possibly lacking for the rider when things aren't going correctly. | |
| |
Expert
Posts: 1694
      Location: Willows, CA | Red Raider - 2015-11-09 11:09 AM
Bibliafarm - 2015-10-24 8:18 PM I realize some wont agree and thats ok.. Just a simple post ..although I use a 3 piece snaffle..the last paragraph I really like.
""When a lot of folks can't get a horse to operate on a feel, in a snaffle, what most are going to tell you "hell, get a little more bridle, get a little more shank on it, get a chain on it" and then when he's really wanting to flip over then "tie his head down". If he really runs into the tie down then "get a bicycle chain over his nose".............I mean it DOESN'T STOP, IT BECOMES MEDIEVAL WHAT THEY DO.
But when you get a horse to where he's operating on a feel; it doesn'...t make much difference what you have.
Whereas a lot of people leave the snaffle bit because they flunked out, they failed...............and then they go and get another bit.
Of course these tack salesmen love that. They go and get another bit and then they flunk out in it, ruin their horse. Then they ruin them in that, then get another bit and then pretty soon they've got a whole wall full of bits and they still can't operate the **** thing.
All that money they've wasted on bits; they could've probably bought a decent saddle for the horse so he didn't have to put up with the junk they were riding in. Now that would have been something that would have been worthwhile.
So if you don't get it done in the snaffle (the basics that a horse needs, the fundamental movements that all horses need to do for whatever you have in mind for them) before moving on to something else, well............you're not going to get it."" - Buck Brannaman.
I agree with what others have posted about snaffles and transitioning to other bits but I also want to point out another way to read the quote: if you can't get the snaffle to work, maybe you need to look at yourself and not just the horse and a new bit. I see many people who try to use bits to overcompensate for their inability to properly ride and cover-up their lack of training themselves on how to properly work and work in a snaffle bit on a horse. So for me, it's not only a question of what bit the horse should be in but also one of what training is possibly lacking for the rider when things aren't going correctly.
I think this is what was meant in the original statement. You do not stay in a snaffle bit forever, unless you choose to. But, you do not move on until you get as much from the snaffle as the horse can properly give. I do not train aged event horses. I do not ride horses for the public. My goal is a finished horse without that kind of pressure. Most trainers do not have the luxury of taking whatever time it takes. Customers demand results every month. I understand that there are many good horsemen who train aged event horses for the public. There is a very different pressure curve here on both the horse and the horse trainer. I think we are talking about something different here.
Buck's point was to move a horse forward into a different, more sensitive bit because you have achieved all the horse had to give in what you are using now. Moving on because you are on a timeline or can't get what you want may create resistance that gets in the way of advancement in the long run. That might be a snaffle, going from a large hackamore to a smaller one, or from one bit to another. I see many more horses blow up because of this than because of being treated too softly or with too much patience. I know a lot of good trainers who get more from their horses by slowing down than by pushing forward too soon. For some this might not pay the bills as well, but more of those horses survive past their aged event years.
Edited by winwillows 2015-11-09 12:26 PM
| |
| |
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | Red Raider - 2015-11-09 12:09 PM Bibliafarm - 2015-10-24 8:18 PM I realize some wont agree and thats ok.. Just a simple post ..although I use a 3 piece snaffle..the last paragraph I really like.
""When a lot of folks can't get a horse to operate on a feel, in a snaffle, what most are going to tell you "hell, get a little more bridle, get a little more shank on it, get a chain on it" and then when he's really wanting to flip over then "tie his head down". If he really runs into the tie down then "get a bicycle chain over his nose".............I mean it DOESN'T STOP, IT BECOMES MEDIEVAL WHAT THEY DO.
But when you get a horse to where he's operating on a feel; it doesn'...t make much difference what you have.
Whereas a lot of people leave the snaffle bit because they flunked out, they failed...............and then they go and get another bit.
Of course these tack salesmen love that. They go and get another bit and then they flunk out in it, ruin their horse. Then they ruin them in that, then get another bit and then pretty soon they've got a whole wall full of bits and they still can't operate the **** thing.
All that money they've wasted on bits; they could've probably bought a decent saddle for the horse so he didn't have to put up with the junk they were riding in. Now that would have been something that would have been worthwhile.
So if you don't get it done in the snaffle (the basics that a horse needs, the fundamental movements that all horses need to do for whatever you have in mind for them) before moving on to something else, well............you're not going to get it."" - Buck Brannaman. I agree with what others have posted about snaffles and transitioning to other bits but I also want to point out another way to read the quote: if you can't get the snaffle to work, maybe you need to look at yourself and not just the horse and a new bit. I see many people who try to use bits to overcompensate for their inability to properly ride and cover-up their lack of training themselves on how to properly work and work in a snaffle bit on a horse. So for me, it's not only a question of what bit the horse should be in but also one of what training is possibly lacking for the rider when things aren't going correctly.
That is what it means or why I posted it.. dont go to stronger bit to do what you as a rider should learn to do .. basics and foundations.. | |
| |
Expert
Posts: 1694
      Location: Willows, CA | Bibliafarm - 2015-11-09 5:05 PM
Red Raider - 2015-11-09 12:09 PM Bibliafarm - 2015-10-24 8:18 PM I realize some wont agree and thats ok.. Just a simple post ..although I use a 3 piece snaffle..the last paragraph I really like.
""When a lot of folks can't get a horse to operate on a feel, in a snaffle, what most are going to tell you "hell, get a little more bridle, get a little more shank on it, get a chain on it" and then when he's really wanting to flip over then "tie his head down". If he really runs into the tie down then "get a bicycle chain over his nose".............I mean it DOESN'T STOP, IT BECOMES MEDIEVAL WHAT THEY DO.
But when you get a horse to where he's operating on a feel; it doesn'...t make much difference what you have.
Whereas a lot of people leave the snaffle bit because they flunked out, they failed...............and then they go and get another bit.
Of course these tack salesmen love that. They go and get another bit and then they flunk out in it, ruin their horse. Then they ruin them in that, then get another bit and then pretty soon they've got a whole wall full of bits and they still can't operate the **** thing.
All that money they've wasted on bits; they could've probably bought a decent saddle for the horse so he didn't have to put up with the junk they were riding in. Now that would have been something that would have been worthwhile.
So if you don't get it done in the snaffle (the basics that a horse needs, the fundamental movements that all horses need to do for whatever you have in mind for them) before moving on to something else, well............you're not going to get it."" - Buck Brannaman. I agree with what others have posted about snaffles and transitioning to other bits but I also want to point out another way to read the quote: if you can't get the snaffle to work, maybe you need to look at yourself and not just the horse and a new bit. I see many people who try to use bits to overcompensate for their inability to properly ride and cover-up their lack of training themselves on how to properly work and work in a snaffle bit on a horse. So for me, it's not only a question of what bit the horse should be in but also one of what training is possibly lacking for the rider when things aren't going correctly.
That is what it means or why I posted it.. dont go to stronger bit to do what you as a rider should learn to do .. basics and foundations..
Yes, I was agreeing above. I see it this way also. And agree. | |
| |
 Maine-iac
Posts: 3334
      Location: Got Lobsta? | I went to my first Buck clinic in 2014. I showed up with my barrel horse, blingy saddle - I didn't have the straw hat, chaps, or flag. I just wanted to learn something new. That I did. It was 3 day clinic - 1/2 days. My mind was BLOWN! I've always had a combo bit and learning to ride with long split reins and a snaffle was a learning experience. My whole world opened up and I see now through the horses's eyes, not my own. The last 2 years have been the best riding years I've had and I hope at one time or another you all can attend one of his clinics. I'm not a horsemanship guru, but it was an amazing experience even though I only retained about 1/8 of what he said! Videos didn't help me, hands on clinic did!  | |
| |
Expert
Posts: 1694
      Location: Willows, CA | Mainer-racer - 2015-11-10 8:26 AM
I went to my first Buck clinic in 2014. I showed up with my barrel horse, blingy saddle - I didn't have the straw hat, chaps, or flag. I just wanted to learn something new. That I did. It was 3 day clinic - 1/2 days. My mind was BLOWN! I've always had a combo bit and learning to ride with long split reins and a snaffle was a learning experience. My whole world opened up and I see now through the horses's eyes, not my own. The last 2 years have been the best riding years I've had and I hope at one time or another you all can attend one of his clinics. I'm not a horsemanship guru, but it was an amazing experience even though I only retained about 1/8 of what he said! Videos didn't help me, hands on clinic did! 
I will be doing the Legacy of Legends event in Ft Worth with Buck in a few months. Buck has really evolved over the years. If you are in Texas this is a great chance to watch one of the best ambassadors of Ray Hunts teachings. This is a great event, and lots of fun to be part of. | |
| |
 pressure dripper
Posts: 8696
        Location: the end of the rainbow | winwillows - 2015-11-10 9:05 PM Mainer-racer - 2015-11-10 8:26 AM I went to my first Buck clinic in 2014. I showed up with my barrel horse, blingy saddle - I didn't have the straw hat, chaps, or flag. I just wanted to learn something new. That I did. It was 3 day clinic - 1/2 days. My mind was BLOWN! I've always had a combo bit and learning to ride with long split reins and a snaffle was a learning experience. My whole world opened up and I see now through the horses's eyes, not my own. The last 2 years have been the best riding years I've had and I hope at one time or another you all can attend one of his clinics. I'm not a horsemanship guru, but it was an amazing experience even though I only retained about 1/8 of what he said! Videos didn't help me, hands on clinic did!  I will be doing the Legacy of Legends event in Ft Worth with Buck in a few months. Buck has really evolved over the years. If you are in Texas this is a great chance to watch one of the best ambassadors of Ray Hunts teachings. This is a great event, and lots of fun to be part of.
I'm jealous. I would love to be able to go to that. | |
|
|