|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 679
     Location: KS | Diesel is down to $1.80 here in MO! I use to get excited when it was at $2.48... How low is Diesel where you guys live? |
|
|
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 762
     Location: NC | 2.39 is the lowest ive seen. Wish it would get under $2. Even reg gas is 2.19 |
|
|
|
 A Somebody to Everybody
Posts: 41354
              Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas | Diesel here is at 1.89 and reg. at 1.67... Crazy right.  |
|
|
|
 I Prefer to Live in Fantasy Land
Posts: 64864
                    Location: In the Hills of Texas | Enjoy it as our wonderful government is looking to increase the tax on fuel and it will end up really kicking us when the fuel goes back up. |
|
|
|
 Expert
Posts: 1718
    Location: Southeast Louisiana | I saw it for 1.99 here the other day!! The excuse for high grocery prices was that the price the truckers paid for fuel was passed on to the consumer. Sure would be nice if the prices fell back down along with the fuel prices! (Dreaming, I know.. ) |
|
|
|
 Coyote Country Queen
Posts: 5666
    
| We got diesel today for $1.83. I remember hauling to a college rodeo 10 years ago paying $2.50 and wondering how anyone would be able to afford to drive anywhere. |
|
|
|
 Coyote Country Queen
Posts: 5666
    
| Nita - 2015-12-17 9:34 PM
I saw it for 1.99 here the other day!! The excuse for high grocery prices was that the price the truckers paid for fuel was passed on to the consumer. Sure would be nice if the prices fell back down along with the fuel prices! (Dreaming, I know.. )
Grain prices have dropped along with livestock prices. I don't know if that means we'll see a drop in grocery prices. But I noticed today at the grocery store the price of ground beef was down. |
|
|
|
 Expert
Posts: 1718
    Location: Southeast Louisiana | Jenbabe - 2015-12-17 9:40 PM
Nita - 2015-12-17 9:34 PM
I saw it for 1.99 here the other day!! The excuse for high grocery prices was that the price the truckers paid for fuel was passed on to the consumer. Sure would be nice if the prices fell back down along with the fuel prices! (Dreaming, I know.. )
Grain prices have dropped along with livestock prices. I don't know if that means we'll see a drop in grocery prices. But I noticed today at the grocery store the price of ground beef was down.
That makes me smile. |
|
|
|
 Total Germophobe
Posts: 6437
       Location: Montana | Our gas is down to $2.06 and our diesel to $2.24. I'm liking it but don't have anywhere to go this time of the year! We have SNOW! Boo! |
|
|
|
 Mature beyond Years
Posts: 10780
        Location: North of the 49th Parallel | I'm still paying around $3.75/gallon up here which is nice but....... I'd rather be paying $4.50-5.00 if it meant oil would go back up to $60/barrel. These oil prices are killing us. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1037
 
| bccanchaser16 - 2015-12-17 11:53 PM
I'm still paying around $3.75/gallon up here which is nice but....... I'd rather be paying $4.50-5.00 if it meant oil would go back up to $60/barrel. These oil prices are killing us.
You and me both. Its getting pretty scary. |
|
|
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 629
  
| 2.09 For gas here, and 2.17 was diesel this morning. :) |
|
|
|
 Coyote Country Queen
Posts: 5666
    
| kboltwkreations - 2015-12-18 7:24 AM
bccanchaser16 - 2015-12-17 11:53 PM
I'm still paying around $3.75/gallon up here which is nice but....... I'd rather be paying $4.50-5.00 if it meant oil would go back up to $60/barrel. These oil prices are killing us.
You and me both. Its getting pretty scary.
I agree. And while I'm glad beef prices are looking a little more affordable, as a cattle owner it's not what we'd like to see. We all knew prices were going to correct and go back down, but I don't think many were expecting it to happen this soon or too drop off so quickly. |
|
|
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 672
   
| kboltwkreations - 2015-12-18 7:24 AM
bccanchaser16 - 2015-12-17 11:53 PM
I'm still paying around $3.75/gallon up here which is nice but....... I'd rather be paying $4.50-5.00 if it meant oil would go back up to $60/barrel. These oil prices are killing us.
You and me both. Its getting pretty scary.
Same here. I work for a large oil company and smile everyday I go to work and still have a job. It's scary! Wish the cattle prices would go back up too...but guessing that wont happen for quite a while!  |
|
|
|
 A Somebody to Everybody
Posts: 41354
              Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas | The oil prices should be going back up soon. And we need that to happen here in South Texas. The dropping of the gas prices here is a bad sign, but the good is coming, dont know when but its coming.. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | Gas prices are too darn low. It really isn't good. Think of it this way folks. The reason why oil prices are low is because the world economy is bad. Trucking prices have not dropped because trucking has fallen off, due to less goods being shipped. In places that oil is produced, the economy is trickled through with the effects of oil profits, or lack thereof. Additionally, oil needs to be at a certain price point for drilling to occur. We are well below that price point and less drilling, means less production. You cannot have increased production (read less imported oil) and low prices. Low prices are just as harmful, in the big picture, as extremely high prices. This just proves the point that oil prices are not a conspiracy, as well. Many people have lost their jobs and oil companies are hurting right now. So much for Hillary taking their profits! Finally, the government receives huge amounts or funds from oil taxes, which have dramatically fallen off. |
|
|
|
 Bulls Eye
Posts: 6443
       Location: Oklahoma | $1.65 for regular gas and I saw diesel for $1.95 yesterday in Oklahoma City |
|
|
|
 Expert
Posts: 1525
  
| My boyfriend works in oilfield sales...large equipment, and his customers don't think the o/f will come back until 2017. I live in Midland, Tx. We have 2 rigs behind our house drilling in our back pasture right now. I am not sure why we are drilling with $37 a barrel oil prices...supply and demand apparently isn't a working concept right now.
Edited by MOTIVATED 2015-12-18 9:47 AM
|
|
|
|
 Accident Prone
Posts: 22277
          Location: 100 miles from Nowhere, AR | Jenbabe - 2015-12-18 7:33 AM kboltwkreations - 2015-12-18 7:24 AM bccanchaser16 - 2015-12-17 11:53 PM I'm still paying around $3.75/gallon up here which is nice but....... I'd rather be paying $4.50-5.00 if it meant oil would go back up to $60/barrel. These oil prices are killing us. You and me both. Its getting pretty scary. I agree. And while I'm glad beef prices are looking a little more affordable, as a cattle owner it's not what we'd like to see. We all knew prices were going to correct and go back down, but I don't think many were expecting it to happen this soon or too drop off so quickly.
The grain markets had the same drastic correction. We went from comfortably profitable, to below cost of production in a few months. No one expected the "OMG I can't believe how great the markets are" of 2012-2013 to last, but it would have been nice if the decline had stopped where we could still make some money. We're looking at adding cotton acres next year and very little to zero corn.
Last time I was in town, diesel was $1.89. I remember when diesel first went over a dollar and I didn't think I could afford to haul anymore. That was only about 15 years ago. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | MOTIVATED - 2015-12-18 9:46 AM
My boyfriend works in oilfield sales...large equipment, and his customers don't think the o/f will come back until 2017. I live in Midland, Tx. We have 2 rigs behind our house drilling in our back pasture right now. I am not sure why we are drilling with $37 a barrel oil prices...supply and demand apparently isn't a working concept right now.
The only reason the rigs are behind your house is that the oil companies have leases that require a certain minimum level of drilling. If they just quit drilling entirely, they will loose their leases and have no place to drill when prices get better. Also, they have to keep a certain level of skilled employees so that when things do improve, they will have a good base workforce to start up with. At $37/barrel, they are definitely loosing money to drill each well. Most wells around here are 10 million dollar plus propositions. I am sure this doesn't apply to you, but actual drilling rigs look similar to pulling and rework units and some people get those confused. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1037
 
| Tdove - 2015-12-18 9:51 AM
MOTIVATED - 2015-12-18 9:46 AM
My boyfriend works in oilfield sales...large equipment, and his customers don't think the o/f will come back until 2017. I live in Midland, Tx. We have 2 rigs behind our house drilling in our back pasture right now. I am not sure why we are drilling with $37 a barrel oil prices...supply and demand apparently isn't a working concept right now.
The only reason the rigs are behind your house is that the oil companies have leases that require a certain minimum level of drilling. If they just quit drilling entirely, they will loose their leases and have no place to drill when prices get better. Also, they have to keep a certain level of skilled employees so that when things do improve, they will have a good base workforce to start up with. At $37/barrel, they are definitely loosing money to drill each well. Most wells around here are 10 million dollar plus pro positions. I am sure this doesn't apply to you, but actual drilling rigs look similar to pulling and rework units and some people get those confused.
And those companies havent seen the worst of it yet. Just now getting paid for "October" oil, which was around $44. When they take the 12-15% hit in February for this "December" oil, you will see the drilling slow down even more. Production realization takes 4-6 months to catch up. It will get way worse before it gets better. Not a fun place to be right now. |
|
|
|
BHW's Simon Cowell
      Location: The Saudia Arabia of Wind Energy, Western Oklahoma | Nita - 2015-12-17 9:43 PM Jenbabe - 2015-12-17 9:40 PM Nita - 2015-12-17 9:34 PM I saw it for 1.99 here the other day!! The excuse for high grocery prices was that the price the truckers paid for fuel was passed on to the consumer. Sure would be nice if the prices fell back down along with the fuel prices! (Dreaming, I know.. ) Grain prices have dropped along with livestock prices. I don't know if that means we'll see a drop in grocery prices. But I noticed today at the grocery store the price of ground beef was down. That makes me smile.
Not me. The low cattle prices are going to take out a lot of people. Add in low crop prices and low oil, it is a disaster. |
|
|
|
 Veteran
Posts: 239
  
| veintiocho - 2015-12-18 8:26 AM kboltwkreations - 2015-12-18 7:24 AM bccanchaser16 - 2015-12-17 11:53 PM I'm still paying around $3.75/gallon up here which is nice but....... I'd rather be paying $4.50-5.00 if it meant oil would go back up to $60/barrel. These oil prices are killing us. You and me both. Its getting pretty scary. Same here. I work for a large oil company and smile everyday I go to work and still have a job. It's scary! Wish the cattle prices would go back up too...but guessing that wont happen for quite a while! 
I think you are blessed to be working for a big company, they can sustain operations for much longer than the little guys -- so you hopefully will be able to keep working
My husband and I operate a teeny tiny oilfield fluid hauling company. Needless to say we do not have the cash flow to sit for long. He has not worked since October and I am worried we will lose our business. |
|
|
|
Common Sense and then some
         Location: So. California | MOTIVATED - 2015-12-18 7:46 AM My boyfriend works in oilfield sales...large equipment, and his customers don't think the o/f will come back until 2017. I live in Midland, Tx. We have 2 rigs behind our house drilling in our back pasture right now. I am not sure why we are drilling with $37 a barrel oil prices...supply and demand apparently isn't a working concept right now.
Supply and demand is working. There is a tremendous amount of supply on the open market, which in turn is driving the prices down. Mid $30's for Jan/Feb 16 pricing... For the every day Joe consumer, this is a great thing. For those in the industry it is not what you want to see. |
|
|
|
Miss Southern Sunshine
Posts: 7427
       Location: South Central Florida | I completely understand both sides of this conversation, but for 80% of the population, it is a good thing...great thing. I know that when we were payinb over $4 per gallon for diesel several years ago, the country was plumitting into a deep recession. I had very good friends in Texas that had seen zero effects of the recession. Now this is effecting them hard. But that's part of any economy. My personal belief is that it was inflated too high. Now it is too low (for profit) but it will balance out. Every industry has gone through this, it's just a first for the Oil people. If the mid east continus to flood the market, and drop prices...American companies will stop drilling because they can not profit. Then the middle east will raise prices.....when they get too high, American companies will start to drill again. It is completely free market, that's how the free market works. A product is worth what someone will pay for it. Unless, of course, the government steps in and forces you to buy something  |
|
|
|
 Veteran
Posts: 239
  
| Swannranch - 2015-12-18 11:14 AM I completely understand both sides of this conversation, but for 80% of the population, it is a good thing...great thing.
I know that when we were payinb over $4 per gallon for diesel several years ago, the country was plumitting into a deep recession. I had very good friends in Texas that had seen zero effects of the recession.
Now this is effecting them hard. But that's part of any economy. My personal belief is that it was inflated too high. Now it is too low (for profit) but it will balance out. Every industry has gone through this, it's just a first for the Oil people.
If the mid east continus to flood the market, and drop prices...American companies will stop drilling because they can not profit. Then the middle east will raise prices.....when they get too high, American companies will start to drill again.
It is completely free market, that's how the free market works. A product is worth what someone will pay for it.
Unless, of course, the government steps in and forces you to buy something
Not sure about in the US, but Alberta has definitely seen an oil based recession before - 2007/2008 was terrible for us also. It was not this bad, but it was bad. I definitely agree with you that the price of oil was ridiculously inflated. We are suffering the effects of how quickly it fell.
Here in AB we are also hurting from the poor value of our dollar combined with the fact that so much of our province depends on this industry, it is trickling down to other industries as well (because nobody can afford to buy things).
We are trying hard to get out of oil, but our economy is such that nobody else is hiring trucks right now.  |
|
|
|
 Texas Tenderheart
Posts: 6715
     Location: Red Raiderland | Tdove - 2015-12-18 9:46 AM Gas prices are too darn low. It really isn't good. Think of it this way folks. The reason why oil prices are low is because the world economy is bad. Trucking prices have not dropped because trucking has fallen off, due to less goods being shipped. In places that oil is produced, the economy is trickled through with the effects of oil profits, or lack thereof. Additionally, oil needs to be at a certain price point for drilling to occur. We are well below that price point and less drilling, means less production. You cannot have increased production (read less imported oil) and low prices. Low prices are just as harmful, in the big picture, as extremely high prices. This just proves the point that oil prices are not a conspiracy, as well. Many people have lost their jobs and oil companies are hurting right now. So much for Hillary taking their profits! Finally, the government receives huge amounts or funds from oil taxes, which have dramatically fallen off.
     |
|
|
|
 Texas Tenderheart
Posts: 6715
     Location: Red Raiderland | Swannranch - 2015-12-18 12:14 PM I completely understand both sides of this conversation, but for 80% of the population, it is a good thing...great thing.
I know that when we were payinb over $4 per gallon for diesel several years ago, the country was plumitting into a deep recession. I had very good friends in Texas that had seen zero effects of the recession.
Now this is effecting them hard. But that's part of any economy. My personal belief is that it was inflated too high. Now it is too low (for profit) but it will balance out. Every industry has gone through this, it's just a first for the Oil people.
If the mid east continus to flood the market, and drop prices...American companies will stop drilling because they can not profit. Then the middle east will raise prices.....when they get too high, American companies will start to drill again.
It is completely free market, that's how the free market works. A product is worth what someone will pay for it.
Unless, of course, the government steps in and forces you to buy something
It's certainly not a first for the oil/gas business. My family has been involved in the Texas energy sector since the 1960's and we have seen these peaks and valleys before. It does come back. "When?" is the crystal ball question.    |
|
|
|
"Heck's Coming With Me"
Posts: 10794
        Location: Kansas | I found it interesting that Social Security recipients were denied a COLA raise this year (always very small anyway) because the cost of fuel is down. That should have nothing to do with Social Security benefits.
|
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | I'm working at a clinic/ER here in Stanley, ND until Monday, and I've been coming here for quite a while now. Stanley is in the Bakken, and the talk has been in anticipation that the local economy is expecting to be hit hard in 2016. That's the nature of the industry, I'm afraid.....boom and bust. The recent legislation that allows crude oil exports should help quite a bit, I would think, but the impact of that won't be as immediate as people would like to see. The Keystone will eventually become reality, I think. When that happens, the only immediate impact will be seen with investors, but I think the impact on the overall economy will lag. That might be a good thing, though. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | Swannranch - 2015-12-18 12:14 PM
I completely understand both sides of this conversation, but for 80% of the population, it is a good thing...great thing. I know that when we were payinb over $4 per gallon for diesel several years ago, the country was plumitting into a deep recession. I had very good friends in Texas that had seen zero effects of the recession. Now this is effecting them hard. But that's part of any economy. My personal belief is that it was inflated too high. Now it is too low (for profit) but it will balance out. Every industry has gone through this, it's just a first for the Oil people. If the mid east continus to flood the market, and drop prices...American companies will stop drilling because they can not profit. Then the middle east will raise prices.....when they get too high, American companies will start to drill again. It is completely free market, that's how the free market works. A product is worth what someone will pay for it. Unless, of course, the government steps in and forces you to buy something
A few points:
Low oil prices are not a good thing. Reason being. Oil has to be at a certain level for sustainable oil production. No oil company can make long term money at today's prices. No oil production means no US oil. That is really really bad for the US economy.
The Middle East is not flooding the market. Two things have happened to make oil plummet. The first is increase US oil production, mainly from horizontal and shale oil extraction. Both of these are expensive to produce and can only occur at higher prices. The second thing, and most important, is that the global economy tanked! Oil is a global market. A bad global economy is a bad thing, especially with US debt levels as dangerously high as we are.......think playing with the risk of a US depression, not recession. Oil prices are a symptom or marker of a much bigger problem. OPEC has had nothing to do with this. OPEC is actually hurt worse than the US by low prices. They continue to produce existing wells, not increasing drilling and production (two different things).
Lastly, as others have pointed out, this is far from the first time oil has had to deal with this issue. Furthermore, this is FAR FAR from as bad as it has been in the past. If it doesn't improve soon, we are looking at harder times, but no way to tell at this point. The last US recession did hit oil fairly hard, but it came back up pretty quick because China was flourishing and global oil demand increased rapidly enough that we made it through. Still, not even remotely close to what happened in the mid 80's (that time it was OPEC that flooded the market). OPEC does not have the capability to do so anymore.
Trust me, too low of oil prices means other things that are really bad are lurking out there for us all. Then, it wont matter how cheap oil is, you will still be completely broke....IF... that were to happen. For example, do you know what happened during the Great Depression?....All goods plummeted...but it didn't make any difference because no one could afford them at any low price!
|
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | Bear - 2015-12-18 2:12 PM
I'm working at a clinic/ER here in Stanley, ND until Monday, and I've been coming here for quite a while now. Stanley is in the Bakken, and the talk has been in anticipation that the local economy is expecting to be hit hard in 2016. That's the nature of the industry, I'm afraid.....boom and bust. The recent legislation that allows crude oil exports should help quite a bit, I would think, but the impact of that won't be as immediate as people would like to see. The Keystone will eventually become reality, I think. When that happens, the only immediate impact will be seen with investors, but I think the impact on the overall economy will lag. That might be a good thing, though.
I don't see any way that exporting oil will do anything at all. Look at it this way, the US uses more oil than it produces. So we net import oil. Now that we are going to export crude just means that we will have to purchase the same amount for US consumption. With all oil trading on a global market, in US dollars, means that what we sell and what we purchase will be roughly the exact same price. There is no real benefit whatsoever. We should keep our current oil and use it. If we sell some of our oil, that just means we have to buy even more Saudi oil and that is pretty dumb to me. |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Tdove - 2015-12-18 2:18 PM
Bear - 2015-12-18 2:12 PM
I'm working at a clinic/ER here in Stanley, ND until Monday, and I've been coming here for quite a while now. Stanley is in the Bakken, and the talk has been in anticipation that the local economy is expecting to be hit hard in 2016. That's the nature of the industry, I'm afraid.....boom and bust. The recent legislation that allows crude oil exports should help quite a bit, I would think, but the impact of that won't be as immediate as people would like to see. The Keystone will eventually become reality, I think. When that happens, the only immediate impact will be seen with investors, but I think the impact on the overall economy will lag. That might be a good thing, though.
I don't see any way that exporting oil will do anything at all. Look at it this way, the US uses more oil than it produces. So we net import oil. Now that we are going to export crude just means that we will have to purchase the same amount for US consumption. With all oil trading on a global market, in US dollars, means that what we sell and what we purchase will be roughly the exact same price. There is no real benefit whatsoever. We should keep our current oil and use it. If we sell some of our oil, that just means we have to buy even more Saudi oil and that is pretty dumb to me.
So are you saying that lifting the ban on selling US crude to foreign countries is a bad thing? |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Very good thread, by the way. We all are guilty of only having concerns that our Ox isn't being gored, without looking at the big picture. |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Frodo - 2015-12-18 1:53 PM
I found it interesting that Social Security recipients were denied a COLA raise this year (always very small anyway) because the cost of fuel is down. That should have nothing to do with Social Security benefits.
Is that the reason they cited? Who said this? That's just nuts. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | Bear - 2015-12-18 2:47 PM
Tdove - 2015-12-18 2:18 PM
Bear - 2015-12-18 2:12 PM
I'm working at a clinic/ER here in Stanley, ND until Monday, and I've been coming here for quite a while now. Stanley is in the Bakken, and the talk has been in anticipation that the local economy is expecting to be hit hard in 2016. That's the nature of the industry, I'm afraid.....boom and bust. The recent legislation that allows crude oil exports should help quite a bit, I would think, but the impact of that won't be as immediate as people would like to see. The Keystone will eventually become reality, I think. When that happens, the only immediate impact will be seen with investors, but I think the impact on the overall economy will lag. That might be a good thing, though.
I don't see any way that exporting oil will do anything at all. Look at it this way, the US uses more oil than it produces. So we net import oil. Now that we are going to export crude just means that we will have to purchase the same amount for US consumption. With all oil trading on a global market, in US dollars, means that what we sell and what we purchase will be roughly the exact same price. There is no real benefit whatsoever. We should keep our current oil and use it. If we sell some of our oil, that just means we have to buy even more Saudi oil and that is pretty dumb to me.
So are you saying that lifting the ban on selling US crude to foreign countries is a bad thing?
What I am saying is I don't understand how it is anything more than neutral. If you consider we will be buying more foreign oil from the middle east, then yes, it is marginally a bad thing the way I see it.
I would like to see oil around $75 a barrel and just sit right there, as long as the general economy is in good shape. Cheap oil prices right now are simply a reflection of a weak economy. That is not a good thing.
I would love for oil to be profitable at $35 a barrel, but the reality is that just isn't the case and never will be again. |
|
|
|
"Heck's Coming With Me"
Posts: 10794
        Location: Kansas | Bear - 2015-12-18 3:20 PM Frodo - 2015-12-18 1:53 PM I found it interesting that Social Security recipients were denied a COLA raise this year (always very small anyway) because the cost of fuel is down. That should have nothing to do with Social Security benefits. Is that the reason they cited? Who said this? That's just nuts.
Reason being: "A decline in inflation caused by falling gas prices." (taken from the internet) |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-18 2:13 PM.... The Middle East is not flooding the market. Two things have happened to make oil plummet. The first is increase US oil production, mainly from horizontal and shale oil extraction. Both of these are expensive to produce and can only occur at higher prices. The second thing, and most important, is that the global economy tanked! Oil is a global market. A bad global economy is a bad thing, especially with US debt levels as dangerously high as we are.......think playing with the risk of a US depression, not recession. Oil prices are a symptom or marker of a much bigger problem. OPEC has had nothing to do with this. OPEC is actually hurt worse than the US by low prices. They continue to produce existing wells, not increasing drilling and production (two different things).
Technically, OPEC may not be flooding the market but they have everything to do with this. They don't technically have a monopoly but they are a large enough producer to control current prices. As competitive production has increased, OPEC refuses to lose marketshare. They are most certainly participating in predatory pricing through supply control to limit exploration and production while killing competition.
OPEC has everything to do with this. |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | TXBO - 2015-12-18 3:38 PM
Tdove - 2015-12-18 2:13 PM.... The Middle East is not flooding the market. Two things have happened to make oil plummet. The first is increase US oil production, mainly from horizontal and shale oil extraction. Both of these are expensive to produce and can only occur at higher prices. The second thing, and most important, is that the global economy tanked! Oil is a global market. A bad global economy is a bad thing, especially with US debt levels as dangerously high as we are.......think playing with the risk of a US depression, not recession. Oil prices are a symptom or marker of a much bigger problem. OPEC has had nothing to do with this. OPEC is actually hurt worse than the US by low prices. They continue to produce existing wells, not increasing drilling and production (two different things).
Technically, OPEC may not be flooding the market but they have everything to do with this. They don't technically have a monopoly but they are a large enough producer to control current prices. As competitive production has increased, OPEC refuses to lose marketshare. They are most certainly participating in predatory pricing through supply control to limit exploration and production while killing competition.
OPEC has everything to do with this.
This makes a ton of sense, Jim. What is your opinion of the lifting of the ban on oil exports and while you are at it, what is your position on Keystone and it's impact, assuming it ever comes to fruition? |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Frodo - 2015-12-18 3:36 PM
Bear - 2015-12-18 3:20 PM Frodo - 2015-12-18 1:53 PM I found it interesting that Social Security recipients were denied a COLA raise this year (always very small anyway) because the cost of fuel is down. That should have nothing to do with Social Security benefits. Is that the reason they cited? Who said this? That's just nuts.
Reason being: "A decline in inflation caused by falling gas prices." (taken from the internet)
I would think that the CPI is much more multifactorial than that! |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Bear - 2015-12-18 3:45 PMThis makes a ton of sense, Jim. What is your opinion of the lifting of the ban on oil exports and while you are at it, what is your position on Keystone and it's impact, assuming it ever comes to fruition? I'm ok with it, Doc, but I'd really like to see domestic production exceed consumption before it happens. It's possible that exporting American crude could pizz off OPEC and cause prices to drop more. Our refining is at capacity so at some point you either have to increase refining capacity or export crud. I'd certainly prefer that refining capacity were increased domestically.
Keystone is a no brainer and should have been done years ago. Many permanent jobs and increased refining production in US. Crude coming from a neighbor country that doesn't hate us. Impact is significant long term but I haven't read the numbers in a while. I live in Baytown, TX in the heart of gas and oil. Keystone would be just one of several booms to our economy.
Edited by TXBO 2015-12-18 4:03 PM
|
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | This has very little to do with OPEC. They do not control prices and have lost market share, due to increase US production. The low prices are hurting them more than us. OPEC cannot increase production anymore than they are doing. When oil was at $100, OPEC was producing as much as they possibly could, every quarter loosing market share to increased US gains. The price fell when China and Europe's economy tanked, leaving more oil on the market than demand. Previous to this tanking, there was less oil than demand and OPEC was a full steam. |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-18 4:04 PM This has very little to do with OPEC. They do not control prices and have lost market share, due to increase US production. The low prices are hurting them more than us. OPEC cannot increase production anymore than they are doing. When oil was at $100, OPEC was producing as much as they possibly could, every quarter loosing market share to increased US gains. The price fell when China and Europe's economy tanked, leaving more oil on the market than demand. Previous to this tanking, there was less oil than demand and OPEC was a full steam. OPEC control aproximately 75% to 80% of current crude reserves. Worldwide production of crude is about 88M barrels per day. OPEC produces 33.87M barrels per day.... about 40%.
As everyone else has cut back on production, OPEC has increased over the last two years. Aug 2013 32.84M BPD Aug 2015 33.87M BPD
If you think that a cartel that holds 80% of the oil reserves and produces 40% of the daily barrels of crude in the world doesn't control prices, you're just wrong.
I'll make it as simple as I possibly can. OPEC is certainly not making the same money that they were when crude was at $100. However, they aren't hurting and they could be making more but they don't want to. They could cut production, increasing prices and generate more revenue than they currently are..... much more. They are strategically producing beyond the point of marginal utility in order to keep prices low, discourage exploration, and backrupt competition. It's predatory pricing. If the drop in prices is due to a poor economy and decreased demand, why would OPEC be producing roughly a million more barrels per day than they where a year ago?
Edited by TXBO 2015-12-18 4:36 PM
|
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | You two fellas are good to have around here. I hope others appreciate it as much as I do. It's nice to get information from trustworthy sources, even if it conflicts a bit. |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-18 4:04 PM This has very little to do with OPEC. They do not control prices and have lost market share, due to increase US production. The low prices are hurting them more than us. OPEC cannot increase production anymore than they are doing. When oil was at $100, OPEC was producing as much as they possibly could, every quarter loosing market share to increased US gains. The price fell when China and Europe's economy tanked, leaving more oil on the market than demand. Previous to this tanking, there was less oil than demand and OPEC was a full steam.
BTW.... I think your basic premise is that the main issue is supply and demand.
While that is quite true, you're focused solely on the demand side of the equation and assuming a purely competitive market without monoply or oligopy. OPEC is certainly an oligopy making the equation not as simple. Oligopies can control supply and manipulate prices for reasons other than marginal utility to maximize profit. |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| I'm getting ready to take my family to a Christmas play but let me give you some numbers to contemplate. I'm going to round them off so don't get pedantic on me.
OPEC current production 34M BPD Crude at $40 = $1.36B per day in revenue
If OPEC cut production in half that would take 20% of current world crude production off the market sending prices sky rocketing. But assume it only raised crude prices back to $100. 17M BPD x $100 = $1.7B per day in revenue.
Why would OPEC want to sacrifice $340 million dollars per day?
|
|
|
|
 Proud to be Deplorable
Posts: 1929
      
| Can one of the oil guys answer a question for me. What if the USA,Canada an Mexico formed their own cartel. Would there be enough oil reverses to compete with OPEC? |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | Well I will make it simple as well. Increasing production by 1 million barrels a day will not send crude prices down from $100 to $35. So OPEC increased oil production by 1 mil barrels in 2 years. Just the U.S. increased by 1.4 mil in 2014 alone and 2 mil in the in the same time period. Like I said OPEC was pretty much maxed out.
OPEC increase 3% increase in production
Just USA alone 25% increase
I am not focusing on demand alone. Read back in an earlier post, I have said the increase in U.S. production coupled with the worldwide recession.
Edited by Tdove 2015-12-18 6:45 PM
|
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | jbhoot - 2015-12-18 5:27 PM
Can one of the oil guys answer a question for me. What if the USA,Canada an Mexico formed their own cartel. Would there be enough oil reverses to compete with OPEC?
Cartels are illegal in U.S. law. Here is an article supporting what I am saying.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/business/energy-environment... |
|
|
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 621
  Location: Arkansas | TXBO - 2015-12-18 5:10 PM
I'm getting ready to take my family to a Christmas play but let me give you some numbers to contemplate. I'm going to round them off so don't get pedantic on me.
OPEC current production 34M BPD Crude at $40 = $1.36B per day in revenue
If OPEC cut production in half that would take 20% of current world crude production off the market sending prices sky rocketing. But assume it only raised crude prices back to $100. 17M BPD x $100 = $1.7B per day in revenue.
Why would OPEC want to sacrifice $340 million dollars per day?
This is true. I worked in the Treasury dept. of a major oil company up until mid July when i was one of the 7% worldwide layoff. A few months before being laid off i attended a meeting where the CEO spoke and the Director of Planning, who i knew personally, also spoke and what TXBO said is what we were told the problem is and they can't forecast when it will get better because no one knows the mind of OPEC.....i was fortunate and found another job in a month. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | TXBO - 2015-12-18 5:10 PM
I'm getting ready to take my family to a Christmas play but let me give you some numbers to contemplate. I'm going to round them off so don't get pedantic on me.
OPEC current production 34M BPD Crude at $40 = $1.36B per day in revenue
If OPEC cut production in half that would take 20% of current world crude production off the market sending prices sky rocketing. But assume it only raised crude prices back to $100. 17M BPD x $100 = $1.7B per day in revenue.
Why would OPEC want to sacrifice $340 million dollars per day?
What kind of math is this. Oil prices drop from $100 to $35 dollars with only a 1 mil/barrel/day increase in production but a 17 mil/barrel/day cut would only send prices back to $100 again? What! What alternate universe does economics and math do this? If OPEC cut by 17 million barrels a day, even the king of Saudi Arabia wouldn't be able to afford to drive accoss town! I am trying to bring real world sense to this.
OPEC had little to do with oil prices falling. Since they are a loose cartel, they can bring it back up. Several of the OPEC nations want to cut production, BUT the Saudis mainly don't want to. They are afraid if they agree to cut that Venezuela and others would secretly not abide by the agreement and Saudi's would loose revenue and market share. They don't trust one another enough to cut. That is exactly what happened in 1985. The only difference from then and today is Saudi Arabia had the ability to flood the market, today they don't. Simple as that. Everyone is hoping OPEC will cut production to help the situation. No one else has the ability to do that legally. But in no way is the oversupply caused by OPEC in the 1st place. Is anyone following me? I am oversimplifying it, sure, but it is the factual truth of what has happened.
One other thing to keep in mind is the market is short term sensitive and over reactive. In the short term OPEC can effect things some, but long term, the market will correct itself because of the hard supply/demand facts. The price is lower than it should be now and was higher than it should have been before. This is how stock and contract trading works.
Edited by Tdove 2015-12-19 1:03 PM
|
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-18 8:19 PM What kind of math is this. Oil prices drop from $100 to $35 dollars with only a 1 mil/barrel/day increase in production but a 17 mil/barrel/day cut would only send prices back to $100 again? What! What alternate universe does economics and math do this? If OPEC cut by 17 million barrels a day, even the king of Saudi Arabia wouldn't be able to afford to drive accoss town! LMAO. Read my post closer and you'll see that I state that crude prices would sky rocket and not to get pedantic. The math was a ridiculous exaggeration with assumptions so absurd that nobody could challenge it. Let's use your numbers instead. They make my point even stronger.
OPEC current production 34 mil BPD x $35 = $1.19 Billion per day in revenue. 1 M drop in OPEC production equals 33 mil BPD x $100 = $3.3 Billion per day in revenue. According to your numbers, OPEC revenues almost triple with a 3% decrease in production.
Now just to prove how accurate your numbers and assumptions are, Tdove, lets look at some historical facts:
Aug 2013 OPEC produced 32.84 BPD. Aug 2013 ave crude prices $106 per barrel.
Aug 2015 OPEC produced 33.87 BPD. Aug 2015 ave price $42 per barrel.
By the way, suggesting that OPEC's 3% increase or decrease in production would triple market prices and then say that OPEC has nothing to do with the current prices is completely contradictory. So which is it?
Edited by TXBO 2015-12-19 11:46 AM
|
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-18 4:04 PM ...OPEC cannot increase production anymore than they are doing. When oil was at $100, OPEC was producing as much as they possibly could, every quarter loosing market share to increased US gains. ....
OPEC currently has capacity to produce an additional 1.48 million barrels per day.
In the first quarter of 2008, crude was $100.56 and OPEC had an excess capacity of 1.36 million barrels per day. In the 3rd quarter of 2008, crude jumped to $120.20 and OPEC had an excess capacity of .99 million barrels per day. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | You should read all my posts again and reread yours, and see if you can comprehend any better a second time. You have really misunderstood the simple economics of what I have put forth. Where did I say 1 million or 3% decrease would triple prices? You can LMAO all you want.
What is your involvemebt in the oil industry?
Edited by Tdove 2015-12-19 12:02 PM
|
|
|
|
 Hog Tie My Mojo
Posts: 4847
       Location: Opelousas, LA | Just curious, what would happen to the market if all the ISIS held oil/oil production capabilities were wiped out? What would the impact be now and in the future? Is there a good reason we (or Russia) are not doing this, does it have anything to do with who is buying the black market oil? |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | Barnmom - 2015-12-19 12:01 PM
Just curious, what would happen to the market if all the ISIS held oil/oil production capabilities were wiped out? What would the impact be now and in the future? Is there a good reason we (or Russia) are not doing this, does it have anything to do with who is buying the black market oil?
It would likely send prices up. How much is hard to say. Generally uncertainty and unrest, causes the market to over react in an upwards price move. If anyone ever says they can predict oil prices they just lied to you. It is pretty hard to ever know what it will do or where it will go. |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-18 4:04 PM This has very little to do with OPEC. They do not control prices .......
LOL. You lose all credibility after this. |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-19 12:00 PM You should read all my posts again and reread yours, and see if you can comprehend any better a second time. You have really misunderstood the simple economics of what I have put forth. Where did I say 1 million or 3% decrease would triple prices? You can LMAO all you want. What is your involvemebt in the oil industry?
Yea ok. I'll take a few econ classes and work on my comprehension. LOL
In the mean time challenge my numbers or change the assumptions. Let's see how you do. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | TXBO - 2015-12-19 12:26 PM
Tdove - 2015-12-18 4:04 PM This has very little to do with OPEC. They do not control prices .......
LOL. You lose all credibility after this.
Here you go, from a real expert and market watch article.
"In recent years, the shale boom and increased production from the U.S. has “greatly reduced OPEC’s [ability to dominate] world oil markets,” said Charles Perry, chief executive officer of energy-consulting firm Perry Management."
The fall had little to do with OPEC. They can cut production to try to help increase prices. But infighting has not allowed that. Just facts.
Edited by Tdove 2015-12-19 12:46 PM
|
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-18 6:47 PM jbhoot - 2015-12-18 5:27 PM Can one of the oil guys answer a question for me. What if the USA,Canada an Mexico formed their own cartel. Would there be enough oil reverses to compete with OPEC? Cartels are illegal in U.S. law. Here is an article supporting what I am saying. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/business/energy-environment...
You're article supports exactly what I've said. Here's a snippet:
What happened to OPEC? A central factor in the sharp price drops, analysts say, is the continuing unwillingness of OPEC, a cartel of oil producers, to intervene to stabilize markets that are widely viewed as oversupplied. Prices of OPEC’s benchmark crude oil have fallen about 50 percent since the organization declined to cut production at a 2014 meeting in Vienna.
Iran, Venezuela, Ecuador and Algeria have been pressing the cartel to cut production to firm up prices, but Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other gulf allies are refusing to do so. At the same time, Iraq is actually pumping more, and Iran is expected to become a major exporter again under the recent nuclear deal.
Saudi officials have said that if they cut production and prices go up, they will lose market share and merely benefit their competitors. They say they are willing to see oil prices go much lower, but some oil analysts think they are merely bluffing. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | TXBO - 2015-12-19 12:46 PM
Tdove - 2015-12-18 6:47 PM jbhoot - 2015-12-18 5:27 PM Can one of the oil guys answer a question for me. What if the USA,Canada an Mexico formed their own cartel. Would there be enough oil reverses to compete with OPEC? Cartels are illegal in U.S. law. Here is an article supporting what I am saying. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/business/energy-environment...
You're article supports exactly what I've said. Here's a snippet:
What happened to OPEC? A central factor in the sharp price drops, analysts say, is the continuing unwillingness of OPEC, a cartel of oil producers, to intervene to stabilize markets that are widely viewed as oversupplied. Prices of OPEC’s benchmark crude oil have fallen about 50 percent since the organization declined to cut production at a 2014 meeting in Vienna.
Iran, Venezuela, Ecuador and Algeria have been pressing the cartel to cut production to firm up prices, but Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other gulf allies are refusing to do so. At the same time, Iraq is actually pumping more, and Iran is expected to become a major exporter again under the recent nuclear deal.
Saudi officials have said that if they cut production and prices go up, they will lose market share and merely benefit their competitors. They say they are willing to see oil prices go much lower, but some oil analysts think they are merely bluffing.
Yes that is exactly what I have been saying. They didn't cause it to go down but they can help it go back up. Just supports how I said you can't read very well. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | Why did it go down?
From Fortune
"The current free-fall in oil prices is drawing comparisons with the “bubble bursting” crash of 2008, although there are some key differences this time around, said Tarun Dang, managing partner with Trend-Wise Capital Management.
“While decline in demand was the key driver for the 2008 crash, the sharp drop in prices this time around is being caused by a supply glut. Continued growth in U.S. shale production and increase in non-OPEC countries oil exports have led to excess capacity,” he wrote in a note to clients."
Again, what is your involvement in the oil industry? |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-19 12:43 PM TXBO - 2015-12-19 12:26 PM Tdove - 2015-12-18 4:04 PM This has very little to do with OPEC. They do not control prices ....... LOL. You lose all credibility after this. Here you go, from a real expert and market watch article. "In recent years, the shale boom and increased production from the U.S. has “greatly reduced OPEC’s [ability to dominate] world oil markets,” said Charles Perry, chief executive officer of energy-consulting firm Perry Management." The fall had little to do with OPEC. They can cut production to try to help increase prices. But infighting has not allowed that. Just facts.
His statement is absolutely correct. Increased production from US has reduced their ability to dominate. That's why they want to keep crude prices low so additional production and exploration are thwarted. That does not however mean that OPEC has lost its ability to manipulate world crude prices with production levels. Here is another line from the same report you just quoted:
" Venezuela had asked the cartel to consider a coordination with non-OPEC Russia. But analysts have said that Saudi Arabia, the group’s largest oil producer, has made it clear that it will not lower output as it fights for market share."
|
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-19 12:49 PM TXBO - 2015-12-19 12:46 PM Tdove - 2015-12-18 6:47 PM jbhoot - 2015-12-18 5:27 PM Can one of the oil guys answer a question for me. What if the USA,Canada an Mexico formed their own cartel. Would there be enough oil reverses to compete with OPEC? Cartels are illegal in U.S. law. Here is an article supporting what I am saying. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/business/energy-environment... You're article supports exactly what I've said. Here's a snippet:
What happened to OPEC?
A central factor in the sharp price drops, analysts say, is the continuing unwillingness of OPEC, a cartel of oil producers, to intervene to stabilize markets that are widely viewed as oversupplied. Prices of OPEC’s benchmark crude oil have fallen about 50 percent since the organization declined to cut production at a 2014 meeting in Vienna.
Iran, Venezuela, Ecuador and Algeria have been pressing the cartel to cut production to firm up prices, but Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other gulf allies are refusing to do so. At the same time, Iraq is actually pumping more, and Iran is expected to become a major exporter again under the recent nuclear deal.
Saudi officials have said that if they cut production and prices go up, they will lose market share and merely benefit their competitors. They say they are willing to see oil prices go much lower, but some oil analysts think they are merely bluffing.
Yes that is exactly what I have been saying. They didn't cause it to go down but they can help it go back up. Just supports how I said you can't read very well.
Mostly correct. They weren't the sole cause for it to go down but they could have manipulated the decline to whatever they wanted. |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-19 12:50 PM Why did it go down? From Fortune "The current free-fall in oil prices is drawing comparisons with the “bubble bursting” crash of 2008, although there are some key differences this time around, said Tarun Dang, managing partner with Trend-Wise Capital Management. “While decline in demand was the key driver for the 2008 crash, the sharp drop in prices this time around is being caused by a supply glut. Continued growth in U.S. shale production and increase in non-OPEC countries oil exports have led to excess capacity,” he wrote in a note to clients." Again, what is your involvement in the oil industry?
I mostly agree with that statement. I have not argued that a "supply glut" is not the primary underlying factor in current crude prices. It absolutely is. My problem is with this statement of yours and I quote:
"Oil prices are a symptom or marker of a much bigger problem. OPEC has had nothing to do with this. OPEC is actually hurt worse than the US by low prices."
Every bit of that statement is absolutely 100% inaccurate. OPEC has the power to manipulate prices well beyond what we have already seen. |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-19 12:50 PM Again, what is your involvement in the oil industry?
I put it in my car. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | TXBO - 2015-12-19 1:26 PM
Tdove - 2015-12-19 12:50 PM Again, what is your involvement in the oil industry?
I put it in my car.
I am MBA with an undergraduate emphasis in economics and have worked for WTG in Midland Tx as a pipeline business manager for 10 years. The ranch we work for is owned by the owner and president of Shenandoah Petroleum. I am involved with oil industry experts every day, in the largest oil producing basin in the continental U.S.
Edited by Tdove 2015-12-19 1:39 PM
|
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-19 1:34 PM TXBO - 2015-12-19 1:26 PM Tdove - 2015-12-19 12:50 PM Again, what is your involvement in the oil industry? I put it in my car. I am MBA with an undergraduate emphasis in economics and have worked for WTG in Midland Tx as a pipeline business manager for 10 years. The ranch we work for is owned by the owner and president of Shenandoah Petroleum. I am involved with oil industry experts every day, in the largest oil producing basin in the continental U.S.
Well that explains it. If you had gotten a BS or MS in Econ it would fill in a lot of what you're missing. But then again, since economics is only useful for theory and telling you why you went broke, once you already had, the MBA was probably the right choice. Otherwise, you'd probably ended up a car salesman like me instead of a pipeline manager. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | I have no idea what you are trying to say. You are quite the circle talking smart aleck, at least today. It's not very becoming. I don't appreciate it. That is okay, I am pretty secure in myself. I wish you well. |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-19 2:21 PM I have no idea what you are trying to say. You are quite the circle talking smart aleck, at least today. It's not very becoming. I don't appreciate it. That is okay, I am pretty secure in myself. I wish you well.
I'm not being a smart aleck. Sorry if I hurt your feelings though.
You were the one that started measuring manhood with education and job status. I just wish you'd challenge my OPEC numbers. If they're wrong, give me the right ones. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | TXBO - 2015-12-19 2:47 PM
Tdove - 2015-12-19 2:21 PM I have no idea what you are trying to say. You are quite the circle talking smart aleck, at least today. It's not very becoming. I don't appreciate it. That is okay, I am pretty secure in myself. I wish you well.
I'm not being a smart aleck. Sorry if I hurt your feelings though.
You were the one that started measuring manhood with education and job status. I just wish you'd challenge my OPEC numbers. If they're wrong, give me the right ones.
My feelings are not hurt at all. I didn't challenge your manhood education or job status. I challenged your credibility on the subject matter. You have been nothing but a smart aleck. You act like some type of expert in the field and spout numbers that don't support or match your own argument. I doubt anyone here cares what either of us think. Bottom line is oil is down and gas is cheap. This is needed help to some and obviously hurts others. There are people in the industry in this board that have lost their job, because of this. Maybe every one celebrating the low fuel might not be all that welcomed to them. Also, the horse industry, ranching, etc has fairly strong ties to oil in many parts of the country. I just wanted to put some of that in prospective. We all would like to see lower prices than too high. It really would be helpful long term for almost everyone reading this post with higher crude prices that would stabilize at a moderate level.
I really wish I hadn't got caught up in this petty argument. I apologize to the board for so much back and forth over nothing more than my pride.
Edited by Tdove 2015-12-19 3:26 PM
|
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-19 3:09 PM TXBO - 2015-12-19 2:47 PM Tdove - 2015-12-19 2:21 PM I have no idea what you are trying to say. You are quite the circle talking smart aleck, at least today. It's not very becoming. I don't appreciate it. That is okay, I am pretty secure in myself. I wish you well. I'm not being a smart aleck. Sorry if I hurt your feelings though.
You were the one that started measuring manhood with education and job status. I just wish you'd challenge my OPEC numbers. If they're wrong, give me the right ones. ....... I really wish I hadn't got caught up in this petty argument. I apologize to the board for so much back and forth over nothing more than my pride.
Don't apologize to the board. Most people reading the thread were pulling for you. They'd love to see somebody put me in my place. Heck even I was pulling for you. |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | LMAO!!!! |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | I waxed the floor with you sir. |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Tdove - 2015-12-19 4:35 PM I waxed the floor with you sir. Right..... And OPEC has nothing to do with crude prices.
Edited by TXBO 2015-12-19 4:53 PM
|
|
|
|
 Last Comedian Standing 
Posts: 10919
       Location: South Texas | Buccees $1.69 diesel
Edited by snazzy 2015-12-19 4:53 PM
|
|
|
|
 Proud to be Deplorable
Posts: 1929
      
| Interesting thread!!!! But I will bet oil and gas prices will go up by next year just before the election. |
|
|
|
 I Prefer to Live in Fantasy Land
Posts: 64864
                    Location: In the Hills of Texas | snazzy - 2015-12-19 4:52 PM Buccees $1.69 diesel
Has the oilfied traffic slowed down? |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | How long can diesel be stored in a tank? |
|
|
|
The Advice Guru
Posts: 6419
     
| TXBO - 2015-12-19 4:43 PM
Tdove - 2015-12-19 4:35 PM I waxed the floor with you sir. Right..... And OPEC has nothing to do with crude prices.
To add one thing no one has discussed
The sanctions have just been lifted off of Iraq so now they can produce and sell as much oil as they want.
What I have heard is at the last OPEC meeting, Iraq is the reason they did not slow their taps down, as this is Iraq's way of flipping the bird to USA.
I have also heard OPEC can sustain at 30/barrel whereas USA and Canada need 40/barrel to break even.
In Canada most of our large oil companies are on contract, so they haven't been affected yet as till jan 2016 they were still making 70/barrel (est). We will see more layoffs in the new year as the new contracts will be in place so they will be loosing approx 40/barrel revenue compared to 2015.
Sadly this will end the little mom and pop companies, the global companies may survive.
For someone who said this doesn't effect the majority of people, you will actually see it this year.
Donations have shrivelled up (to hospitals, galas, barrel races)
Horse prices have decreased (nobody wants to spend due to the uncertainty)
Government makes a lot of money off of oil, so if they are not getting their share, they will be making cuts somewhere
Our federal government has already tightened up mortgage lending.
In Alberta suicide rate has increased by 30 percent
Theft has increased substantially.
|
|
|
|
The Advice Guru
Posts: 6419
     
| Bear - 2015-12-19 5:56 PM
How long can diesel be stored in a tank?
Goes stale in less then a year |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | TXBO - 2015-12-19 4:43 PM
Tdove - 2015-12-19 4:35 PM I waxed the floor with you sir. Right..... And OPEC has nothing to do with crude prices.
If anyone CONTROLLED oil prices you would not have seen prices go from $140 to $40 to $110 to $35 in the course of 8 years. It's the free market and world production that controls the price. "If" OPEC were one country with one leader, they could theoretically control the price. But you have to figure, it's the markets reaction to supply, demand, and future outlook that determines the price. Production and consumption are at a near parody, over the last 8 years or so. Only when there is vast more production than usage can anyone simply control the price. You have to figure that Saudi Arabia is loosing $600 million dollars a day in revenue. Those boys sure would like to have that money back. It is their economy. If you don't think they don't want world wide consumption to improve, well I can't help you. Yeah they are hoping that the low prices squeeze out some market share back their way. But U.S. tech has increased so much they are betting a dangerous game. Saudi cannot horizontal drill or frack. So I stand by my current statement that in 2014-2015, OPEC did not cause oil prices to plummet. That is my assertion, and context for all my statements. It's not just me. Many many real experts in the industry are saying the same thing. That is where I am getting my information. |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Cheryl, I think you are getting Iraq and Iran mixed up. I get what you are saying though.
Good thread. |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Tdove - 2015-12-19 6:13 PM
TXBO - 2015-12-19 4:43 PM
Tdove - 2015-12-19 4:35 PM I waxed the floor with you sir. Right..... And OPEC has nothing to do with crude prices.
If anyone CONTROLLED oil prices you would not have seen prices go from $140 to $40 to $110 to $35 in the course of 8 years. It's the free market and world production that controls the price. "If" OPEC were one country with one leader, they could theoretically control the price. But you have to figure, it's the markets reaction to supply, demand, and future outlook that determines the price. Production and consumption are at a near parody, over the last 8 years or so. Only when there is vast more production than usage can anyone simply control the price. You have to figure that Saudi Arabia is loosing $600 million dollars a day in revenue. Those boys sure would like to have that money back. It is their economy. If you don't think they don't want world wide consumption to improve, well I can't help you. Yeah they are hoping that the low prices squeeze out some market share back their way. But U.S. tech has increased so much they are betting a dangerous game. Saudi cannot horizontal drill or frack. So I stand by my current statement that in 2014-2015, OPEC did not cause oil prices to plummet. That is my assertion, and context for all my statements. It's not just me. Many many real experts in the industry are saying the same thing. That is where I am getting my information.
Why can't they horizontal drill or frack? Is it the geology? |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Bear - 2015-12-19 6:27 PM Tdove - 2015-12-19 6:13 PM TXBO - 2015-12-19 4:43 PM Tdove - 2015-12-19 4:35 PM I waxed the floor with you sir. Right..... And OPEC has nothing to do with crude prices.
If anyone CONTROLLED oil prices you would not have seen prices go from $140 to $40 to $110 to $35 in the course of 8 years. It's the free market and world production that controls the price. "If" OPEC were one country with one leader, they could theoretically control the price. But you have to figure, it's the markets reaction to supply, demand, and future outlook that determines the price. Production and consumption are at a near parody, over the last 8 years or so. Only when there is vast more production than usage can anyone simply control the price. You have to figure that Saudi Arabia is loosing $600 million dollars a day in revenue. Those boys sure would like to have that money back. It is their economy. If you don't think they don't want world wide consumption to improve, well I can't help you. Yeah they are hoping that the low prices squeeze out some market share back their way. But U.S. tech has increased so much they are betting a dangerous game. Saudi cannot horizontal drill or frack. So I stand by my current statement that in 2014-2015, OPEC did not cause oil prices to plummet. That is my assertion, and context for all my statements. It's not just me. Many many real experts in the industry are saying the same thing. That is where I am getting my information. Why can't they horizontal drill or frack? Is it the geology?
They have no need to. They have 50% of their reserves untapped. |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Tdove said they can't horizontal drill or frack. Is it that they actually can't for some reason, or there's no need?
|
|
|
|
The Advice Guru
Posts: 6419
     
| Bear - 2015-12-19 6:24 PM
Cheryl, I think you are getting Iraq and Iran mixed up. I get what you are saying though.
Good thread.
I could have, I always get those two mixed up, lol |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 851
      Location: West Texas | I think I may need to revise my statement (but not 100% sure). I think they can horizontal, but they don't have the technology to frack effectively, yet. I think they do want to and their formation might not be as conducive to fracking benefits, I don't know. The one thing I know is that the future of oil consumption and production is an ever evolving entity with technology changing things all the time. The issue will remain to be drilling costs. The real problem with fracking and horizontal now is that the drilling and completion costs are so high. No oil prices, no horizontal frack wells. Eventually, production slowing will force prices back up and the roller coaster will continue.
Edited by Tdove 2015-12-19 7:07 PM
|
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Bear - 2015-12-19 6:38 PM Tdove said they can't horizontal drill or frack. Is it that they actually can't for some reason, or there's no need? I really don't know about their capability Doc. It is reasonable to assume their technology is behind the times. They have had such easy access to crude for so many years, there is no need to invest in advancements.
Edited by TXBO 2015-12-19 7:11 PM
|
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | This is a wee bit off topic, but I've always toyed with the idea of getting a tank, say 1000 gals, and buying in bulk. These low diesel prices make me wish I'd done this. I just think it's nice to have that kind of reserve on hand.
Comments? Advice? |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Bear - 2015-12-19 7:11 PM This is a wee bit off topic, but I've always toyed with the idea of getting a tank, say 1000 gals, and buying in bulk. These low diesel prices make me wish I'd done this. I just think it's nice to have that kind of reserve on hand. Comments? Advice?
Hell yea! Can't have too much desiel, food, ammo or whiskey in reserve. |
|
|
|
 Last Comedian Standing 
Posts: 10919
       Location: South Texas | Oh yeah and all those big RV parks are pretty vacant |
|
|
|
 Last Comedian Standing 
Posts: 10919
       Location: South Texas | This unbelievable. Buccees in Baytown Diesel $1.56. We are filling every tank we have! |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| snazzy - 2015-12-19 8:16 PM This unbelievable. Buccees in Baytown Diesel $1.56. We are filling every tank we have!
That's 5 minutes from my crib, Snazzy. Come by and have a beer. |
|
|
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Everyone agrees that our economy is on thin ice. I remember back about 5 years ago when gas prices rose precipitously from about $1.60 to over $4.00 a gallon within about 18 months. If something happens to cause gas prices to shoot through the roof, that could really tip us over the edge. |
|
|