Posted 2016-11-16 9:02 AM Subject: RE: Muscle Mass Vs Performance
Midget Lover
Location: Kentucky
I have used both on the same mare, and although I liked both of them, MM worked better on my 19 year old mare. I noticed she looked bulkier, her top line has filled out, and her coat is incredibly shiny.
Posted 2016-11-16 9:28 AM Subject: RE: Muscle Mass Vs Performance
Neat Freak
Posts: 11216 Location: Wonderful Wyoming
I have used Muscle Mass on just about all but I do have a gelding of my son's that is so fat he gets fat rolls on fat rolls. He doesn't need the extra bulk but I want him to have the vitamins.
Posted 2016-11-16 9:31 AM Subject: RE: Muscle Mass Vs Performance
Regular
Posts: 77
I want to take advantage of your special I'm just undecided on if I want to put my easy keeper who isn't overweight but is on the heavier side on the muscle mass or just performance because I don't want him to gain any more weight. We're now feeding rounds and expecting snow so won't get rode as much coming into the winter months.
Posted 2016-11-16 12:13 PM Subject: RE: Muscle Mass Vs Performance
Elite Veteran
Posts: 999 Location: Sunny So Cal
I have my 4 and 21 year old on the muscle mass and then my 13 and 15 year old get the performance. I think it really depends on if they need weight or if they are heavily competing.
Posted 2016-11-16 1:42 PM Subject: RE: Muscle Mass Vs Performance
Neat Freak
Posts: 11216 Location: Wonderful Wyoming
smoothsailing - 2016-11-16 8:31 AM
I want to take advantage of your special I'm just undecided on if I want to put my easy keeper who isn't overweight but is on the heavier side on the muscle mass or just performance because I don't want him to gain any more weight. We're now feeding rounds and expecting snow so won't get rode as much coming into the winter months.
usually easy keepers are just right with the Performance Formula.
Muscle Mass Vs Performance
