Today is
I need your opinion on which one of these you would rather have. I want a quality saddle that will fit a wide variety of horses.
Coats if I had to pick between the two.
And why would you pick the Coats? Any particular reason?
Bump
I enjoyed my Coats while I owned one. I think the Jeff Smith are heavy.
100% coats. Jeff's saddles have too much twist to the tree. Coats is a flatter tree that will fit a bigger majority of horses.
I like the Jeff Smiths saddles too, but the Coats are just a much better fitting saddle if you have a stocky cow bred horse, I love how they sit down on the horse not perched and if you have one with the dropped rigging its even a better fit. Its just a better close contact saddle I feel..
I had both, if you're going for saddle fit go with the Coats.The Jeff Smith wide didn't fit my cow horse bred mare, it wasn't wide enough. I did like how the Jeff Smith fit me, it sat deeper than the Coats one did. They both are good saddles, if you are able to try one out I would.
I have two Coats with dropped rigging. They fit everything from the 15.2 appendix to the 14 cutter to the 14.3 tank without withers.
I like the input. Thank you.
I have a Coats and have never had a Jeff Smith to compare. I like my Coats and it seems to fit different horses. I talked to Larry Coats when I was buying it and he explained the difference between the handmade Coats and the Lazy L saddles. He told me that they are similar but that the handmade saddles will have a more comfortable seat. I saved money and bought the Lazy L. I am sure that the handmade saddles are much better, but the Lazy L fit my price range.
I went with a Coats. Many have said I will not be disappointed, so we shall see. Thank you for all the opinions. Have any of you tried his balance pads by chance?
Support - Contact / Log in to my account