|
|
  Shipwrecked and Flat Out Zapped
Posts: 16390
          Location: DUMPING CATS AND PIGS IN TEXAS :) | Just Bring It - 2014-03-28 12:36 PM 3canstorun - 2014-03-28 12:26 PM runsupport - 2014-03-28 12:59 PM Herbie - 2014-03-28 9:37 AM Not buying it. Justin Boots is a publicly traded company owned by a conglomerate known as Berkshire Hathaway, which is owned by Warren Buffett. I don't think Justin Boots has that kind of "power" to stand alone as a company or make those decisions. Warren Buffett can do and pay whatever he wants and use whatever company he owns to do it. JMHO Do your research on which Justin boots. There is also a Discount Justin boots that is totally separate and mentioned on Mary's FB page. Isn't that who Byron works for?
Still yes lol. |
|
| |
|
  Queen Boobie 2
Posts: 7521
  
| jbhoot - 2014-03-28 12:31 PM ksjackofalltrades - 2014-03-28 12:26 PM jbhoot - 2014-03-28 12:23 PM Whiteboy - 2014-03-28 12:19 PM ksjackofalltrades - 2014-03-28 12:16 PM Whiteboy - 2014-03-28 12:14 PM ksjackofalltrades - 2014-03-28 12:10 PM ksjackofalltrades - 2014-03-28 12:09 PM ridinbygrace - 2014-03-28 12:06 PM Please don't imply that I'm a "crook" or support a "crook"! I like and support Mary Walker as a competitor. I truly believe that neither side is innocent, however I also believe that the entire truth has yet to be revealed! Just curious why do you think the "other" side is guilty of something? I keep seeing this. You think she should have just ignored the contract that THEY drew up. Why is she guilty of anything? The ones that didn't pay up would be guilty, not the person that wasn't paid. Oh my hell. How about we stop twisting other peoples words. We get you are defending your friend, but nobody knows all of the details, NOBODY! What are you talking about? I have seen the contract is all I know, not defending a friend. And where did you see the contract? People dont just flash those around. Bingo!! Its public record. Hunt Ct. Lots have people have seen it. Really care to share a link?
I think there is a fee to research and look up the court documents in that county...maybe in all of Texas, I don't know. Once a contract is entered as evidence in a lawsuit, I believe that makes it public record. |
|
| |
|
 Scorpions R Us
Posts: 9586
       Location: So. Cali. |   |
|
| |
|
  More bootie than waist!
Posts: 18425
          Location: Riding Crackhead. | LRQHS - 2014-03-28 12:39 PM Just Bring It - 2014-03-28 12:36 PM 3canstorun - 2014-03-28 12:26 PM runsupport - 2014-03-28 12:59 PM Herbie - 2014-03-28 9:37 AM Not buying it. Justin Boots is a publicly traded company owned by a conglomerate known as Berkshire Hathaway, which is owned by Warren Buffett. I don't think Justin Boots has that kind of "power" to stand alone as a company or make those decisions. Warren Buffett can do and pay whatever he wants and use whatever company he owns to do it. JMHO Do your research on which Justin boots. There is also a Discount Justin boots that is totally separate and mentioned on Mary's FB page. Isn't that who Byron works for? Still yes lol.
LOL I was going to call her Mel Tillis. Her submit button must have a stutter this cold morning. |
|
| |
|
      Location: Keeping up with the numbers! | Directly from the Justin Discount Boots - "About Us" page
Justin Heritage
History
The Justin Boots story began in 1879, when H.J. Justin left Lafayette, Indiana to start a new life in Spanish Fort, Texas. Initially a boot repairman, H.J. soon began his own boot company working out of his home.
When a railroad was built in Nocona, Texas in 1889, H.J. moved his family and business there to capitalize on the bigger market opportunity.
In 1908, John and Earl came to work for their father, and the company was renamed H.J. Justin and Sons. In 1910, Justin boots were sold in 26 states, Canada, Mexico, and Cuba for $11 a pair.
John, Earl and Avis took over the business after their father's death in 1918. In 1925, the brothers moved the company headquarters to Fort Worth.
In 1948, John Justin, Jr. purchased controlling interest in the company. It wasn't long before H.J. Justin & Sons was growing again. In 1968, the company made a deal with Acme Brick, another Fort Worth company with pioneering roots, to form Justin Industries.
Nocona Boot Company became part of Justin Industries when John Jr. purchased the controlling shares from his aunt, Enid Justin, in 1981. Three years later, Chippewa Shoe Company was added to the Justin family of brands. And in 1990, Justin Industries purchased competitor Tony Lama Boots after years of intense rivalry.
In August of 2000, Justin Boots was purchased by Berkshire Hathaway, managed by Warren Buffet. With strong financial backing, a lasting tradition of quality, and a talented management team, Justin Boots today is stronger than ever.
.
Edited by BeanCounter 2014-03-28 12:53 PM
|
|
| |
|
 Husband Spoiler
Posts: 4151
     Location: North Dakota | LRQHS - 2014-03-28 12:39 PM Just Bring It - 2014-03-28 12:36 PM 3canstorun - 2014-03-28 12:26 PM runsupport - 2014-03-28 12:59 PM Herbie - 2014-03-28 9:37 AM Not buying it. Justin Boots is a publicly traded company owned by a conglomerate known as Berkshire Hathaway, which is owned by Warren Buffett. I don't think Justin Boots has that kind of "power" to stand alone as a company or make those decisions. Warren Buffett can do and pay whatever he wants and use whatever company he owns to do it. JMHO Do your research on which Justin boots. There is also a Discount Justin boots that is totally separate and mentioned on Mary's FB page. Isn't that who Byron works for? Still yes lol.
hahaha! I'm so sorry! I was using my kindle and whenever I tried to submit my post it kept telling me that I had to wait and try to repost due to flood control and everytime I hit submit it wouldn't leave the page so I didn't think it was working. Well I guess it was! |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 1857
      
| bennie1 - 2014-03-28 12:40 PM
jbhoot - 2014-03-28 12:31 PM ksjackofalltrades - 2014-03-28 12:26 PM jbhoot - 2014-03-28 12:23 PM Whiteboy - 2014-03-28 12:19 PM ksjackofalltrades - 2014-03-28 12:16 PM Whiteboy - 2014-03-28 12:14 PM ksjackofalltrades - 2014-03-28 12:10 PM ksjackofalltrades - 2014-03-28 12:09 PM ridinbygrace - 2014-03-28 12:06 PM Please don't imply that I'm a "crook" or support a "crook"! I like and support Mary Walker as a competitor. I truly believe that neither side is innocent, however I also believe that the entire truth has yet to be revealed! Just curious why do you think the "other" side is guilty of something? I keep seeing this. You think she should have just ignored the contract that THEY drew up. Why is she guilty of anything? The ones that didn't pay up would be guilty, not the person that wasn't paid.   Oh my hell. How about we stop twisting other peoples words. We get you are defending your friend, but nobody knows all of the details, NOBODY! What are you talking about?  I have seen the contract is all I know, not defending a friend.  And where did you see the contract? People dont just flash those around.   Bingo!! Its public record. Hunt Ct. Lots have people have seen it.  Really care to share a link?
I think there is a fee to research and look up the court documents in that county...maybe in all of Texas, I don't know.    Once a contract is entered as evidence in a lawsuit, I believe that makes it  public record. Â
I think you have to request them and they will send them to you. |
|
| |
|
 Wide Darn Open
Posts: 2141
  
| Something I've been curious about...this other lady who owned 10% of Latte so she was due money for winnings...wouldn't that also mean she pays 10% of entry fees, vet, farrier, feed, fuel, etc? Also would she be 10% liable for Mary's medical bills from where a horse she partially owns injured her? Don't anybody get in an uproar on me I'm genuinely wondering... |
|
| |
|
 Husband Spoiler
Posts: 4151
     Location: North Dakota | grullagirl - 2014-03-28 12:48 PM Something I've been curious about...this other lady who owned 10% of Latte so she was due money for winnings...wouldn't that also mean she pays 10% of entry fees, vet, farrier, feed, fuel, etc? Also would she be 10% liable for Mary's medical bills from where a horse she partially owns injured her? Don't anybody get in an uproar on me I'm genuinely wondering...
I was curious about that as well but maybe the 10% discount in original selling price covered that?? She didn't buy into 10% of him. She sold 90% of him. I'm sure that is all layed out in the contract. |
|
| |
|
 Water Weight Barbie
Posts: 6829
       Location: Oz, Kansas | grullagirl - 2014-03-28 11:48 AM Something I've been curious about...this other lady who owned 10% of Latte so she was due money for winnings...wouldn't that also mean she pays 10% of entry fees, vet, farrier, feed, fuel, etc? Also would she be 10% liable for Mary's medical bills from where a horse she partially owns injured her? Don't anybody get in an uproar on me I'm genuinely wondering...
I don't know about Mary's hospital bills from when she was hurt but if the Walkers have a decent attorney at all he will pull out every expense that they incurred to keep him healthy & running down the road to bring her payout down as low as possible. I'm sure they were honest on tax returns so a lot of the expenses & gains should have been claimed. |
|
| |
|
 Vodka for Lunch
     Location: Lala Land | grullagirl - 2014-03-28 12:48 PM Something I've been curious about...this other lady who owned 10% of Latte so she was due money for winnings...wouldn't that also mean she pays 10% of entry fees, vet, farrier, feed, fuel, etc? Also would she be 10% liable for Mary's medical bills from where a horse she partially owns injured her? Don't anybody get in an uproar on me I'm genuinely wondering...
Only if that was part of the contract. |
|
| |
|
 Holy Macaroni!
Posts: 3957
         Location: I am not FROM California I just live here! | Mods have been so busy today!!!! |
|
| |
|
 No Tune in a Bucket
Posts: 2935
       Location: Texas | Contract states daily expenses for Latte will be paid by Walker LLC. |
|
| |
|
  Semper Fi
             Location: North Texas | lookout hill - 2014-03-28 12:52 PM
grullagirl - 2014-03-28 11:48 AM Â Something I've been curious about...this other lady who owned 10% of Latte so she was due money for winnings...wouldn't that also mean she pays 10% of entry fees, vet, farrier, feed, fuel, etc? Also would she be 10% liable for Mary's medical bills from where a horse she partially owns injured her? Don't anybody get in an uproar on me I'm genuinely wondering...
I don't know about Mary's hospital bills from when she was hurt but if the Walkers have a decent attorney at all he will pull out every expense that they incurred to keep him healthy & running down the road to bring her payout down as low as possible. Â I'm sure they were honest on tax returns so a lot of the expenses & gains should have been claimed.Â
Define honest, please. |
|
| |
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| RocketPilot - 2014-03-28 5:05 PM Contract states daily expenses for Latte will be paid by Walker LLC.
I'd sure like to see that contract. |
|
| |
|
  Semper Fi
             Location: North Texas | TXBO - 2014-03-28 5:28 PM
RocketPilot - 2014-03-28 5:05 PM Contract states daily expenses for Latte will be paid by Walker LLC.Â
I'd sure like to see that contract.Â
You along with many others!  |
|
| |
|
 Proud to be Deplorable
Posts: 1929
      
| TXBO - 2014-03-28 5:28 PM
RocketPilot - 2014-03-28 5:05 PM Contract states daily expenses for Latte will be paid by Walker LLC.Â
I'd sure like to see that contract.Â
Yes and with time stamp and case number from the court. Other wise it is just internet BS. |
|
| |
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25352
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | So, without naming names I saw a video of the auction and at the end a certain someone walked off singing "ding dong the witch is dead". Nice. |
|
| |
|
  That's White "Man" to You
Posts: 5515
 
| HotbearLVR - 2014-03-28 5:57 PM So, without naming names I saw a video of the auction and at the end a certain someone walked off singing "ding dong the witch is dead". Nice.
So where did you see this "video"? |
|
| |