|
|
  Champ
Posts: 19623
       Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtyYUibJjTg
Talking about Kamala Harris said about health insurance. This person is running for president.  | |
| |
Elite Veteran
Posts: 705
   Location: Weatherford, TX |
Gotcha!
Whatcha got goin?!! Kamala Harris?
She is so very far Left. Harris is trying desparately hard to compete with AOC. Free healthcare is a Right, free tuition/college - free, free and more free.
Yeh, right...who pays for everything? The 'tippy top' as AOC says? No, that is not nearly enough to fund what they want. That 'tippy top' already pays more than enough.
Fair share? Exactly what is that 'fair share'? No one since back to Obama in 2008 will actually say exactly what a 'fair share' exactly is.
It never stops with the 'tippy top' or 1 percent. It always goes further as demonstrated as to what is already going on on...
The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid a 27.1 percent individual income tax rate, which is more than seven times higher than taxpayers in the bottom 50 perci
In 2015, the top 50 percent of all taxpayers paid 97.2 percent of all individual income taxes while the bottom 50 percent paid the remaining 2.8 percent.
That is just 2015 Stats, exactly what is it recently; like 2017 or even 2018? I could not immediately find it on Google, but I am sure more recent stats are available with researching time. It is probably worse in percentage when looked up with time.
I still have not heard EXACTLY what a 'fair share' is?!?!?! City, Town of, State, Federal taxes?!?!? Anyone? What is that fair share? In NYC, with ALL ypthose taxes just listed, it is about 63%. Do you really want to pay ALL that in ALL those taxes? Welcome to AOC's World. And with her and THAT agenda, get ready to pay for a 'new green deal' and a carbon tax, plus a health care tax for all.
Have fun working to pay for it all.
Anyone? Bueller!!! Hello?!?!?!!!!
Explain that point of 'fair share' to me.
Edited by Gator Bug 2019-01-30 6:57 PM
| |
| |
 Expert
Posts: 1395
       Location: Missouri | Gator Bug - 2019-01-30 6:23 PM
 Gotcha! Whatcha got goin?!! Kamala Harris?
She is so very far Left. Harris is trying desparately hard to compete with AOC. Â Free healthcare is a Right, free tuition/college - free, free and more free.
Yeh, right...who pays for everything? The 'tippy top' as AOC says? No, that is not nearly enough to fund what they want. That ' tippy top' already pays about
Fair share? Exactly what is that 'fair share'? No one since back to Obama in 2008 will say exactly what a 'fair share' exactly is.Â
It never stops with the 'tippy top' or 1 percent. It always goes further as demonstrated as to what is already going on on...The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid a 27.1 percent individual income tax rate, which is more than seven times higher than taxpayers in the bottom 50 perciIn 2015, the top 50 percent of all taxpayers paid 97.2 percent of all individual income taxes while the bottom 50 percent paid the remaining 2.8 percent. That is jus 2015 Stats, exactly what is it recently; like 2017 or even 2018? I could not immediately find it on Google, but I am sure more recent stats are available with researching time. It is probably worse in percentage when looked up with time.
IÂ still have not heard EXACTLY what a 'fair share' is?!?!?! City, Town of, State, Federal taxes?!?!? Anyone? What is that fair share? In NYC, with ALL ypthose taxes just listed, it is about 63%. Do you really want to pay ALL that in ALL those taxes? Welcome to AOC's World. And with her and THAT agenda, get ready to pay for a 'new green deal' and a carbon tax, plus a health care tax for all.
Have fun working to pay for it all.
Anyone? Bueller!!! Hello?!?!?!!!!
Explain that point of 'fair share' to me.
It kills me when these clowns try to claim that taxing the top earners will pay for their freebies when the math just doesnt. add. up.  | |
| |
Elite Veteran
Posts: 705
   Location: Weatherford, TX | MOGirl07 - 2019-01-30 6:55 PM Gator Bug - 2019-01-30 6:23 PM
Gotcha!
Whatcha got goin?!! Kamala Harris?
She is so very far Left. Harris is trying desparately hard to compete with AOC. Free healthcare is a Right, free tuition/college - free, free and more free.
Yeh, right...who pays for everything? The 'tippy top' as AOC says? No, that is not nearly enough to fund what they want. That ' tippy top' already pays about
Fair share? Exactly what is that 'fair share'? No one since back to Obama in 2008 will say exactly what a 'fair share' exactly is.
It never stops with the 'tippy top' or 1 percent. It always goes further as demonstrated as to what is already going on on...
The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid a 27.1 percent individual income tax rate, which is more than seven times higher than taxpayers in the bottom 50 perci
In 2015, the top 50 percent of all taxpayers paid 97.2 percent of all individual income taxes while the bottom 50 percent paid the remaining 2.8 percent.
That is jus 2015 Stats, exactly what is it recently; like 2017 or even 2018? I could not immediately find it on Google, but I am sure more recent stats are available with researching time. It is probably worse in percentage when looked up with time.
I still have not heard EXACTLY what a 'fair share' is?!?!?! City, Town of, State, Federal taxes?!?!? Anyone? What is that fair share? In NYC, with ALL ypthose taxes just listed, it is about 63%. Do you really want to pay ALL that in ALL those taxes? Welcome to AOC's World. And with her and THAT agenda, get ready to pay for a 'new green deal' and a carbon tax, plus a health care tax for all.
Have fun working to pay for it all.
Anyone? Bueller!!! Hello?!?!?!!!!
Explain that point of 'fair share' to me. It kills me when these clowns try to claim that taxing the top earners will pay for their freebies when the math just doesnt. add. up. 
No, the ' math' NEVER actually adds up... Never.
Just keep saying it over and over and it will be true. Like Dorothy clicking her heels three times to go back home! Yeh, right.
Ask Detroit, San Francisco, LA, Baltimore, Chicago, etc..
OR...for that matter...CA, IL or NY as states.
They are all way, way broke under Dem rule for 30 or so years; deficits and unfunded liabilities that they CANNOT even begin to cover. However, NO ONE is around to explain exactly WHY they are broke or so far in debt that they will eventually have to ask for Federal help. Get prepared to pay up...other states... for their way of life. No questions asked. | |
| |
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | She doesn’t have clue one about healthcare.
Here I was under the impression ObamaCare was the answer.
It’s worse.
The dirty little secret is that while the progressives are trying to make our healthcare system like all these countries with single payer/nationalized healthcare.....those countries are slowly re-introducing free market capitalism into their healthcare system. | |
| |
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25351
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Our total federal budget is about $4.4 Trillion per year.
Kamala’s plan would cost an estimated $3.2 Trillion per year.
Our budget deficit is around $800 Billion.
That means our budget deficit would run $4 Trillion per year.
But relax, folks. We will get that by taxing the wealthy.....won’t we?
Nope....not even remotely close. Here’s a number to consider.
If we add up the total net worth of every single billionaire in the US, that comes to $2.4 Trillion. Yay! If we confiscate every billionaire’s wealth, that will cover Kamala’s program for about 8 months.
After that, the well will be dry......next step....multimillionaires....and after that, people worth less than $1 million.
That will probably get her program funded for ? 2-3 years.
After that....nada, zip, zilch, bupkus, ugats.....
Here’s another way of looking at it. Our GDP is the sum of all the goods and services of the entire country, from your horse, to your house, to Trump Towers, to GM, to Amazon, to the US military.
Our GDP (total value of the USA) is roughly $19 Trillion. Her plan would cost nearly twice our GDP over 10 years.
The only thing Kamala know’s well is Willie Brown’s willy. | |
| |
 My Heart Be Happy
Posts: 9159
      Location: Arkansas | Bear - 2019-01-30 9:22 PM
Our total federal budget is about $4.4 Trillion per year.
Kamala’s plan would cost an estimated $3.2 Trillion per year.
Our budget deficit is around $800 Billion.
That means our budget deficit would run $4 Trillion per year.
But relax, folks. We will get that by taxing the wealthy.....won’t we?
Nope....not even remotely close. Here’s a number to consider.
If we add up the total net worth of every single billionaire in the US, that comes to $2.4 Trillion. Yay! If we confiscate every billionaire’s wealth, that will cover Kamala’s program for about 8 months.
After that, the well will be dry......next step....multimillionaires....and after that, people worth less than $1 million.
That will probably get her program funded for ? 2-3 years.
After that....nada, zip, zilch, bupkus, ugats.....
Here’s another way of looking at it. Our GDP is the sum of all the goods and services of the entire country, from your horse, to your house, to Trump Towers, to GM, to Amazon, to the US military.
Our GDP (total value of the USA) is roughly $19 Trillion. Her plan would cost nearly twice our GDP over 10 years.
The only thing Kamala know’s well is Willie Brown’s willy.
It's not funny, but THAT is funny  | |
| |
 My Heart Be Happy
Posts: 9159
      Location: Arkansas | Did anyone else see where they said how much the shutdown cost us? I'm confused as to how they got their figure. . . (And I apologize, I can't remember the figure.) | |
| |
 Expert
Posts: 1395
       Location: Missouri | Bear - 2019-01-30 9:22 PM
Our total federal budget is about $4.4 Trillion per year.
Kamala’s plan would cost an estimated $3.2 Trillion per year.
Our budget deficit is around $800 Billion.
That means our budget deficit would run $4 Trillion per year.
But relax, folks. We will get that by taxing the wealthy.....won’t we?
Nope....not even remotely close. Here’s a number to consider.
If we add up the total net worth of every single billionaire in the US, that comes to $2.4 Trillion. Yay! If we confiscate every billionaire’s wealth, that will cover Kamala’s program for about 8 months.
After that, the well will be dry......next step....multimillionaires....and after that, people worth less than $1 million.
That will probably get her program funded for ? 2-3 years.
After that....nada, zip, zilch, bupkus, ugats.....
Here’s another way of looking at it. Our GDP is the sum of all the goods and services of the entire country, from your horse, to your house, to Trump Towers, to GM, to Amazon, to the US military.
Our GDP (total value of the USA) is roughly $19 Trillion. Her plan would cost nearly twice our GDP over 10 years.
The only thing Kamala know’s well is Willie Brown’s willy.
Wait wait wait hold up hold up! Kamala wants to spend $3.2 Trillion per year on healthcare but Trump is the wasteful one asking for $5.7 billion (roughly, what, 0.13% of our federal budget? Someone correct me if I'm wrong here though, it is late and my math may be wonky) on a border wall?
Yeah, okay, makes total sense to me *sarcasm*.  | |
| |
  Champ
Posts: 19623
       Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm | Chandler's Mom - 2019-01-30 7:29 PM
Did anyone else see where they said how much the shutdown cost us? I'm confused as to how they got their figure. . . (And I apologize, I can't remember the figure.)
This is the most credible source I can find for that. The shutdown was 35 days long.
(Meme Cost of Illegal aliens 2018.jpg)
Attachments ----------------
Meme Cost of Illegal aliens 2018.jpg (45KB - 215 downloads)
| |
| |
 Expert
Posts: 1395
       Location: Missouri | OregonBR - 2019-01-31 2:15 PM
Chandler's Mom - 2019-01-30 7:29 PM
Did anyone else see where they said how much the shutdown cost us? I'm confused as to how they got their figure. . . (And I apologize, I can't remember the figure.)
This is the most credible source I can find for that. The shutdown was 35 days long.
Interesting. That's more than 3 times the cost of the border wall and yet.....I have lib friends on fb that claim the border wall is wasteful.
Alrighty then. | |
|
| |