|
|
 Miss Laundry Misshap
Posts: 5271
  
| I really hope Bo and Taylor can keep their momentum moving from top of the ground to bottom of the ground.
I wish I had a stable full of Bos and Stingrays!!! So smooth and fun to watch! They certainly make it look easier than it is! |
|
| |
|
 Leggs
Posts: 4680
 
Location: lexington KY | They are a great team! We interviewed Taylor earlier this year, she talks about her relationship with Bo. Here is the link incase you havent seen it.
http://ontherodeoroad.com/wpra-rookie-taylor-jacob-talks-to-otrr-video/
|
|
| |
|
Miss Laundry Misshap
Posts: 5271
|
 |
|
| |
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 680
Location: Texas | These two are an awesome pair! Anyone know what kind of bit she uses on him?? |
|
| |
|
Miss Laundry Misshap
Posts: 5271
| Lbarrelracer08 - 2013-12-09 9:28 AM These two are an awesome pair! Anyone know what kind of bit she uses on him??
It looked like a Hodges Futurity bit to me. |
|
| |
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1117
Location: MI |
Every interview with her I read/watch I become even more of a fan. Thanks for posting! |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1543
Location: MI | I think in the last Barrel Horse News mag they talked about the 2, and had mentioned that Bo had a different registered name prior to Taylor getting him. I don't remember what it used to be, but I had to laugh, because his current one is definitely more "distinguished"! I agree though, they seem like a great pair!
(I totally could be wrong that Bo was the horse with a different reg name....I don't have the mag in front of me, but I think it was him) |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1218
Location: Too far from home | I thought Marne Loosenort had futuritied him under that name, but absolutely could be wrong!
Edited by crazy&lazy 2013-12-09 11:13 AM
|
|
| |
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 733
| Does anyone know his back story? Did she buy him young or finished? Thanks! |
|
| |
|
The Expert Expert
Posts: 3455
Location: Western performance horse Hades | Rope-N-Run - 2013-12-09 10:00 AM Does anyone know his back story? Did she buy him young or finished? Thanks!
Here ya' go
http://www.barrelracingreport.com/issues/2_12_13_BarrelRacingReport_HighRes.pdf |
|
| |
|
Miss Laundry Misshap
Posts: 5271
|
|
|
| |
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 733
| Awesome thank you! I didn't realize she did so good at Ft. Worth, I thought you had to qualify for Ft. Worth but I was looking on the WPRA website and looking at the ground rules it sounds like they just take the first 210 cards entered?? Uggh I hand to those girls for just getting entered, it all seems so over whelming. I heard Taylor does her own entering also, kutos to her!! |
|
| |
|
 You get what you give
Posts: 13030
Location: Texas | Rope-N-Run - 2013-12-09 11:46 AM
Awesome thank you! I didn't realize she did so good at Ft. Worth, I thought you had to qualify for Ft. Worth but I was looking on the WPRA website and looking at the ground rules it sounds like they just take the first 210 cards entered?? Uggh I hand to those girls for just getting entered, it all seems so over whelming. I heard Taylor does her own entering also, kutos to her!!
she was on the WAIT list and someone turned out!! thats how she got in! if i remember correctly |
|
| |
|
Miss Laundry Misshap
Posts: 5271
| Well, I think I got my answer about the bottom of the ground and how Bo would handle it! Holy Smokes what a run! |
|
| |
|
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
| Her 13. 37 was almost the bottom of the ground.
Edited by rodeomom3 2013-12-11 8:29 AM
|
|
| |
|
Miss Laundry Misshap
Posts: 5271
| rodeomom3 - 2013-12-11 8:19 AM Her 13. 77 was almost the bottom of the ground.
I know, but people were talking about her 13.49 and it was on the top of the ground, first out. I wondered if she could get faster at the bottom. The 13.77 wasn't faster. :) |
|
| |
|
Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
| Nateracer - 2013-12-11 8:20 AM rodeomom3 - 2013-12-11 8:19 AM Her 13. 77 was almost the bottom of the ground. I know, but people were talking about her 13.49 and it was on the top of the ground, first out. I wondered if she could get faster at the bottom. The 13.77 wasn't faster. :)
Meant .37 ;) |
|
| |
|
Miss Laundry Misshap
Posts: 5271
| rodeomom3 - 2013-12-11 8:29 AM Nateracer - 2013-12-11 8:20 AM rodeomom3 - 2013-12-11 8:19 AM Her 13. 77 was almost the bottom of the ground. I know, but people were talking about her 13.49 and it was on the top of the ground, first out. I wondered if she could get faster at the bottom. The 13.77 wasn't faster. :)
LOL! |
|
| |
|
Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
| Nateracer - 2013-12-11 8:36 AM rodeomom3 - 2013-12-11 8:29 AM Nateracer - 2013-12-11 8:20 AM rodeomom3 - 2013-12-11 8:19 AM Her 13. 77 was almost the bottom of the ground. I know, but people were talking about her 13.49 and it was on the top of the ground, first out. I wondered if she could get faster at the bottom. The 13.77 wasn't faster. :)
Seems like .37 should be the typo not .77. Crazy fast!!!! |
|
| |
|
 Always Off Topic
Posts: 6382
Location: ND | rodeomom3 - 2013-12-11 9:22 AM Nateracer - 2013-12-11 8:36 AM rodeomom3 - 2013-12-11 8:29 AM Nateracer - 2013-12-11 8:20 AM rodeomom3 - 2013-12-11 8:19 AM Her 13. 77 was almost the bottom of the ground. I know, but people were talking about her 13.49 and it was on the top of the ground, first out. I wondered if she could get faster at the bottom. The 13.77 wasn't faster. :)
i'd even breed to his clone....
Edited by dhdqhllc 2013-12-11 9:28 AM
|
|
| |
Folks on-line