Log in to my account Barrel Horse World
Come on in Folks on-line

Today is

You are logged in as a guest. Logon or register an account to access more features.


would this be a red flag for you?

Jump to page :
Last activity 2014-09-20 10:49 PM
23 replies, 6030 views

View previous thread :: View next thread
   General Discussion -> Barrel Talk
Refresh
 
wishes4kissez
Reg. Jan 2011
Posted 2014-09-18 4:10 PM
Subject: would this be a red flag for you?



Expert


Posts: 1261
10001001002525
Looking at a young horse for sale that has been mounted and ridden bare back at a walk lightly at 12-14 months old by a 100ish pound person? Thinking that's awfully young to be mounting them and concerned about longevity but i know race colts are started as long yearlings and many hold up just fine. It's a cow bred that I am looking at if that makes any difference.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
mruggles
Reg. Oct 2008
Posted 2014-09-18 4:20 PM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Good Grief!


Posts: 6343
5000100010010010025
Location: Cap'n Joan Rotgut.....alberta
i just wonder why anybody would think thats a good idea.........racehorses excluded

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
hoofs_in_motion
Reg. Apr 2011
Posted 2014-09-18 4:23 PM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Undercover Amish Mafia Member


Posts: 9992
500020002000500100100100100252525
Location: Kansas
I would pass on by that deal! 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Gunner11
Reg. Mar 2011
Posted 2014-09-18 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Cute Little Imp


Posts: 2747
200050010010025
Location: N Texas
If they're just hopping on to mess around and only on them a few minutes, I don't think it's a big deal.
Now if it's every single day for over 30 minutes, then no, I don't like that.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
nmeastplains
Reg. Oct 2009
Posted 2014-09-18 4:34 PM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 596
500252525
Location: Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
Gunner11 - 2014-09-18 3:25 PM If they're just hopping on to mess around and only on them a few minutes, I don't think it's a big deal. Now if it's every single day for over 30 minutes, then no, I don't like that.

I agree with Gunner....find out how much riding time and what they have actually done before you decide if its too much. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Southtxponygirl
Reg. Nov 2006
Posted 2014-09-18 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



A Somebody to Everybody


Posts: 41354
5000500050005000500050005000500010001001001002525
Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas
No red flag to me, if they were just jumping up on them and sitting there and maybe walking around a little no problem, in my younger days I would sit on my long yearlings and let them walk around with me while they were in their pens but I didnt go out and do any racing. 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
bowersk
Reg. Feb 2009
Posted 2014-09-18 4:47 PM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?


Elite Veteran


Posts: 1028
100025
As long as it wasn't excessive riding (which it doesn't sound like it was), it wouldn't worry me.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
wishes4kissez
Reg. Jan 2011
Posted 2014-09-18 4:49 PM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Expert


Posts: 1261
10001001002525
Ok thanks guys it's sounds like it's just hopping on a few times and walking a little but I will definitely find out the specifics.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Aqhaczy
Reg. Jan 2004
Posted 2014-09-18 5:58 PM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?


Military family

Texas Lone Star


Posts: 5318
5000100100100
Location: where ever my L/Q trl is parked
When you do the pre-vet exam and have those knees, hocks and fetlocks x-rays for sure.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
RacingQH
Reg. Aug 2004
Posted 2014-09-18 9:36 PM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?


Military family

The Color Specialist


Posts: 7530
5000200050025
Location: Washington. (The DRY side.)
My feeling its that there is NO reason to be on a 12 month old BABY. Personally I would pass. Because I would be wondering what other kinds of stupid crap they have been doing that they DIDN'T tell me. And for those that don't have a problem with starting a "long" yearling,12 months is not "long".
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Lopin' Leopard
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2014-09-19 5:59 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Extreme Veteran


Posts: 495
100100100100252525
Location: Washington
Personally I would be more concerned with one that has had extensive ground work done over one that's been sat on a couple times. Sitting on one and walking around is less harmful then repetitive circles or direction changes, stressing the legs.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
hoofs_in_motion
Reg. Apr 2011
Posted 2014-09-19 7:49 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Undercover Amish Mafia Member


Posts: 9992
500020002000500100100100100252525
Location: Kansas
RacingQH - 2014-09-18 9:36 PM My feeling its that there is NO reason to be on a 12 month old BABY. Personally I would pass. Because I would be wondering what other kinds of stupid crap they have been doing that they DIDN'T tell me. And for those that don't have a problem with starting a "long" yearling,12 months is not "long".

I agree 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
BamaCanChaser
Reg. Nov 2012
Posted 2014-09-19 8:22 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Expert


Posts: 2097
2000252525
Location: Deep South
RacingQH - 2014-09-18 9:36 PM My feeling its that there is NO reason to be on a 12 month old BABY. Personally I would pass. Because I would be wondering what other kinds of stupid crap they have been doing that they DIDN'T tell me. And for those that don't have a problem with starting a "long" yearling,12 months is not "long".

This.....

Specifically the part about wondering what other kinds of stupid crap they've been doing to a BABY.

I would consider 18-20 months a "long" yearling. 12 months is NOT a long yearling, it is BARELY a yearling.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
suzy2qtee
Reg. Jan 2012
Posted 2014-09-19 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?


Military family

Playing the Waiting Game


Posts: 2304
2000100100100
I have been known to put smaller kids less than 50 pounds on one here and there... but 100 pounds only if it was on and off less than 5- 10 mins
 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
mruggles
Reg. Oct 2008
Posted 2014-09-19 9:05 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Good Grief!


Posts: 6343
5000100010010010025
Location: Cap'n Joan Rotgut.....alberta
RacingQH - 2014-09-19 8:36 PM My feeling its that there is NO reason to be on a 12 month old BABY. Personally I would pass. Because I would be wondering what other kinds of stupid crap they have been doing that they DIDN'T tell me. And for those that don't have a problem with starting a "long" yearling,12 months is not "long".

..well said

m 
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
clover girl
Reg. Dec 2005
Posted 2014-09-19 9:16 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



The Worst Seller Ever


Posts: 4138
2000200010025
Location: Oklahoma
suzy2qtee - 2014-09-19 8:56 AM I have been known to put smaller kids less than 50 pounds on one here and there... but 100 pounds only if it was on and off less than 5- 10 mins

 

I have memories of being the crash test dummy as a child. :)  We pulled them all in as yearlings, taught them to lead, then I was thrown up there and was led to the end of the road and back.  I was thrown off a few times, but someone was always close to catch me.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
slowrunnin
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2014-09-19 10:03 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 477
100100100100252525
clover girl - 2014-09-19 9:16 AM

suzy2qtee - 2014-09-19 8:56 AM I have been known to put smaller kids less than 50 pounds on one here and there... but 100 pounds only if it was on and off less than 5- 10 mins

 

I have memories of being the crash test dummy as a child. :)  We pulled them all in as yearlings, taught them to lead, then I was thrown up there and was led to the end of the road and back.  I was thrown off a few times, but someone was always close to catch me.  

As a parent I can only shake my head at this.
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Nateracer
Reg. Feb 2008
Posted 2014-09-19 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Miss Laundry Misshap


Posts: 5271
50001001002525
12-14 months isn't a long yearling...   It's a long weanling! 

22-24 months would be a long yearling.  
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Gunner11
Reg. Mar 2011
Posted 2014-09-19 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



Cute Little Imp


Posts: 2747
200050010010025
Location: N Texas
slowrunnin - 2014-09-19 10:03 AM

clover girl - 2014-09-19 9:16 AM

suzy2qtee - 2014-09-19 8:56 AM I have been known to put smaller kids less than 50 pounds on one here and there... but 100 pounds only if it was on and off less than 5- 10 mins

 

I have memories of being the crash test dummy as a child. :)  We pulled them all in as yearlings, taught them to lead, then I was thrown up there and was led to the end of the road and back.  I was thrown off a few times, but someone was always close to catch me.  

As a parent I can only shake my head at this.

Then you'd probably pass clear out if you knew what kind of stuff we did as kids
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
casualdust07
Reg. Mar 2005
Posted 2014-09-19 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: would this be a red flag for you?



You get what you give


Posts: 13030
500050002000100025
Location: Texas
Like someone else said- riding a LONG YEARLING is one thing- they are 20 mos and are close to 2


A 12-14 month old yearling is by no means ready for that- at all- period. I've raised a few babies and there is no way I would put myself on them at 12-14 mos for ANY period of time, and I weigh 100 lb and am 4'11".

Edited by casualdust07 2014-09-19 11:04 AM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Jump to page :
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread
 

© Copyright 2002- BarrelHorseWorld.com All rights reserved including digital rights

Support - Contact / Log in to my account


Working Truck World Working Horse World Cargo Trailer World Horse Trailer World Roping Horse World
'
Registered to: Barrel Horse World
(Delete all cookies set by this site)
Running MegaBBS ASP Forum Software
© 2002-2026 PD9 Software