I thought  I would pass this review on so that those of you that would want to voice your opinion to MSNBC could do so.

Note the review by MSNBC's John Hartl. I sent an opinion stating that it was completely inappropriate and that I thought they would have hired someone with at least a little bit of intelligence to write a review, and that fortunately for him, Christ died for that idiot even though he's spitting in his face.

I understand not everyone is going to like the movie and they don't have the same views. But I think it's atrocious that a company such as MSNBC would employ a critic that would write such stupid ludacris trash and pass it off as a valid critque.

Here's the link. Go click contact us and voice your opinion!

http://entertainment.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?mp=v&m=549602

All the critics dislike the film . . . and appear shocked with the violence He suffered for their sake.  Guilt is a terrible thing to bear.

Ironically, the critics appear to be rabbling the same cry of 2000 years ago. 

"Crucify this film!"   

You're absolutely right... which although I am a believer and think differently, I can at least understand the controversy. What I can't tolerate however is inuendo that Chris Hartl makes in his comment. JMO, critique, but at least have some decency and respect at some level.

The critics just can't get by the point that this movie wasn't made for them nor was it made for entertainment.  It's one mans interpretation of the events that happened.  The real truth is in the money the movie is making off ticket sales.  That shows you the people are going to see it.  Believe me, they wouldn't go if they didn't want to.