|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 972
       Location: Texas! | ozcancrasher13 - 2014-01-08 8:27 PM bccanchaser16 - 2014-01-08 8:26 PM ozcancrasher13 - 2014-01-08 6:12 PM CJE - 2014-01-08 7:12 PM dhdqhllc - 2014-01-07 7:31 PM CYA Ranch - 2014-01-08 6:17 PM dhdqhllc - 2014-01-08 6:12 PM CYA Ranch - 2014-01-08 6:01 PM threeponies - 2014-01-08 5:26 PM There is an update on the Facebook page - part of it says that what they are trying to do wouldn't be until 2015. It also mentions something about a 2 card system, anyone know what the 'two card' reference means on the facebook page? From my understanding if you want to try to qualify for the NFR you buy a certain card and if you don't you buy a different card. where did you get that from?? Oh boy now your putting me to the test. I input info in my brain and don't remember where it comes from. I think I heard it from my brother who was at the NFR this year and maybe heard it out there? Or he has a buddy in Arkansas that's a pro roper and he maybe told bro. I'll text him and find out. forget it....lol Never heard of 2 different "cards"......may have been in reference to a permit and then a card holder after the $1000.00 is won on the permit.........????? I'm not exactly sure of the 2 card option, but what I've heard is that there would be something similar to what Canada has put in. A card that you can go qualify for the NFR on and then a regular PRCA card. The NFR card, you can go to only PRCA sanctioned rodeos. The other card, you can enter PRCA sanctioned rodeos, open rodeos, invitation rodeos... Uh, I don't have my CPRA (Canadian Pro ) card but I'm pretty sure that's not the case. There's a permit (need to win $1,000 ) and then a semi-pro (where you need to win $1,000 that same year you purchased it ) and then you can buy your regular card but the last time that rumour went around, I'm almost positive it was shot down. And as far as the semi-pro, it has to do with ammy-rodeos and eligibility (as I understand it ), not rodeos like Calgary, etc. It's just being put in. Randa was explaining it the other day. The way she explained it is that it is to encourage the rodeos to sanction their rodeos CPRA so that the rodeos will get all the cowboys/cowgirls who are running at the CFR to enter.
I thought PRCA tried something similar and were sued for the right to work laws? That is from why I was assuming they rejected the proposal. But could be being fed hot air who knows.
I also just read the new release on the FB page, and I still don't think I like the sounds of it...not trying to jump to conclusions but pretty hard when it makes it sound like they are turning pro rodeo basically into a "4D of rodeo" with a tier and ranking system? Oh I don't know all this is giving me a headache and it won't even be an issue for another year! Yikes! |
|
|
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 1034
 
| casualdust07 - 2014-01-08 8:47 PM
I have no idea what is going on with the PRCA and these cowboys. I have no idea what they asked the PRCA to do or not do. Maybe the PRCA is doing the right thing, maybe it's not. I would really like to know WHAT they wanted to change, not just the vague things they are saying.
My only concern is this, when they talk about how people come to see the top professionals in their sport, like THAT'S the reason why people are coming to all the rodeos. Ehhh, part of it. But it's not the main reason, except for the NFR when you wait all year to see WHO is making it.
I personally believe the reason why MOST spectators come to MOST rodeos except the NFR, is for the concert after the rodeo and the carnival/fair activities.
You don't even know who is entered at MOST of the rodeos except for the handful of super big rodeos where they limit the top 50, or invite people and then post it on their website. The only way to know who is up what day and when is if you get your hands on a trade list. People come to the rodeos anyway, not knowing who will be there.
I am all for change if it is fair and good for all members. I still have goals of trying to make it as far to the top as I can in rodeo… I don't know where my limit will be. I hope whatever the change is, it doesn't make people like me feel like it's no longer a possibility to do that. For all I know, this could be in our favor too. Or it couldn't.. I would *really* like to know what they want changed…
ETA- I am not saying people aren't coming to see the rodeo itself or the cowboys. I know as far as we are concerned, when we go to rodeos to watch, that is ALL I care about. But just seeing the people I see spectating at rodeos and I am there, there's a lot of people who are not involved with rodeo personally, who are just coming to watch, that don't keep track of standings, and are just wanting to have a good time that weekend.
THIS. how do I know whether to support it if I don't know what IT is? |
|
|
|
 Veteran
Posts: 253
    Location: EDGE OF INSANITY | Has everyone seen this? the most interesting thing to me is in the comments -Lynn McKenzie's husband commented. very interesting
1/8/2014
On behalf of the cowboys and cowgirls who issued yesterday’s statement, we want to thank everyone for their support. We understand that everyone would like further answers and details. We ask for your patience as we continue to move forward during this exciting time.
We also would like everyone to understand that our original plan was not to form a new organization. We put everything we had into working over the Christmas break to try and create some meaningful change within the PRCA structure that would have given the top contestants a direct voice on the PRCA board. We want to be more involved with the direction of our sport.
This new effort resulted only after our proposal to the PRCA Board was rejected. As a result we are still in the early stages of formation. Our purpose is to create a model that is better for the fans, committees and top contestants in the sport, but that also has a fair process for people to work their way to the top. Our group is committed to protecting the integrity of the sport of professional rodeo and the meaning of a gold buckle by making sure there is one, true championship.
Some people have expressed an opinion that the current National Finals Rodeo is “just a rodeo” and “it doesn’t really matter which cowboys you put out there.” We believe people that express that opinion do not understand the loyalty of true rodeo fans. We know that true rodeo fans respect the talent and drive it takes to make it to the top of this great sport. We ask you to step up, as we have, and let your voice be heard. It did not work when the NFL tried to have games with replacement players and while we respect every contestant who rodeos, we believe that fans deserve the right to see the very best cowboys and cowgirls compete for a true championship. We are equally committed to making sure that rodeo remains a true sport with a level playing field that allows advancement through the ranks.
Know that we are taking this effort seriously and have involved smart professionals with a strong background in both rodeo and professional sports. You would not see the names quoted in the release supporting this effort if we did not believe it was being done in a thoughtful and first-class way.
Also, we want to make clear that this is an effort that begins with the 2015 season. No one is talking about any disruption to the 2014 season. For that reason, we ask you to understand that rather than throw out details and get bogged down in an open debate on everything wrong with the sport of professional rodeo, we are working systematically to build a system that advances the sport and we look forward to working with everyone who wants to see the sport move to the next level.
Thank you again for your support, trust and patience and please join us in letting everyone know that the cowboys and cowgirls do matter.
The Organizing Top Cowboys and Cowgirls |
|
|
|
 Always Off Topic
Posts: 6382
        Location: ND | Wow....nobody involved in this has a clue or direction or anything...and obviously knows nothing about PR, business or logic....except LVE......i think TXBO and the boys would love to have these guys sit up to the game as well.......more easy money now that we've got Stressman's....lol |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| dhdqhllc - 2014-01-09 3:06 PM Wow....nobody involved in this has a clue or direction or anything...and obviously knows nothing about PR, business or logic....except LVE......i think TXBO and the boys would love to have these guys sit up to the game as well.......more easy money now that we've got Stressman's....lol
LMAO! I'd love to see the proposal for changing the 18 bylaws. |
|
|
|
 Always Off Topic
Posts: 6382
        Location: ND | TXBO - 2014-01-09 3:15 PM dhdqhllc - 2014-01-09 3:06 PM Wow....nobody involved in this has a clue or direction or anything...and obviously knows nothing about PR, business or logic....except LVE......i think TXBO and the boys would love to have these guys sit up to the game as well.......more easy money now that we've got Stressman's....lol LMAO! I'd love to see the proposal for changing the 18 bylaws.
and then to think the board would just vote to accept all of them right then and there.........wth...... |
|
|
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| dhdqhllc - 2014-01-09 3:18 PM TXBO - 2014-01-09 3:15 PM dhdqhllc - 2014-01-09 3:06 PM Wow....nobody involved in this has a clue or direction or anything...and obviously knows nothing about PR, business or logic....except LVE......i think TXBO and the boys would love to have these guys sit up to the game as well.......more easy money now that we've got Stressman's....lol LMAO! I'd love to see the proposal for changing the 18 bylaws. and then to think the board would just vote to accept all of them right then and there.........wth......
Exactly. It's amateur hour. |
|
|
|
   
| "we believe that fans deserve the right to see the very best cowboys and cowgirls compete for a true championship." This quote was taken from above post by "Horsepoor1".
And sometimes the BEST cowboys and cowgirls are NOT necessarily those who can afford to get into the limited entry rodeos. Limited rodeos prevent many from competing at the NFR, while letting in other competitors who may not be as exciting to watch. I think the "Slot Races" at barrel races are a PRIME example. Where else can you win $100,000 for running a 2D time? ANSWER: SLOT RACES!! WHY? Because they are a LIMITED BARREL RACE. Are they the fastest times in the arena during that whole weekend of events? NO, often times not. And where else can you win $50,000.00 on one barrel racing run?? ANSWER: Closed/limited entry rodeo like Houston, Calgary.... I think it was REAL obvious at this year's NFR in the barrel race. ONE limited entry rodeo with a huge purse prevented a competitor from making the NFR, by allowing in a competitor into the standings who would have NOT made the NFR except for that one win. Just that ONE rodeo did this. IMO limited rodeo's do NOT work in favor of the MAJORITY of competitors. If it doesn't favor the MAJORITY of contestants, it does NOT help promote the sport. Does limiting the "Super Stars" in the eyes of rodeo fans work best for promoting rodeo??? HHHmmmm.... That is a totally different question. I have to do some real thinking on that....
Edited by bingo 2014-01-09 5:50 PM
|
|
|
|
 Wishing I were a Wildcat
    Location: 'Hawk Country | Crawford said the NFR draws the top 120 cowboys, but their voices are not heard at the PRCA board meetings. Overall, there were 5,071 PRCA contestant card holders in 2013.
This statement is what bothers me. They are really only concerned about themselves. They are trying to sell it that they are wanting to make rodeo better for the fans and all contestants, but I think this comes down to the top 20-25 in each event.
There are a lot more cowboys/cowgirls who go to 25-30 rodeos a year than ones who go to 80+ and "do it for a living".
|
|
|
|
 Wishing I were a Wildcat
    Location: 'Hawk Country | Also, not everyone who makes the NFR is rodeoing for a living. I have more than one friend who has made it and they do not rodeo for a living. The years they made it, they did not work their job. They had the horse to try. It worked out. They did it because they wanted to make the NFR, not rodeo for a living. In barrel racing, how many people get there one or two years and never again?
I know the PRCA and WPRA are not perfect. I just don't want either destroyed and end up with no place to rodeo. Or worse, end up with multiple associations and have the number of rodeos limited even more due to having to buy multiple association cards. Like around here, you can go broke buying ammey association cards. We already have enough limited rodeos the way it is.
A lot of us card holders, who help pay the bills too, just want to go to as many as our day jobs allows us;) |
|
|
|
 Always Off Topic
Posts: 6382
        Location: ND | ozcancrasher13 - 2014-01-09 7:48 PM Crawford said the NFR draws the top 120 cowboys, but their voices are not heard at the PRCA board meetings. Overall, there were 5,071 PRCA contestant card holders in 2013.
This statement is what bothers me. They are really only concerned about themselves. They are trying to sell it that they are wanting to make rodeo better for the fans and all contestants, but I think this comes down to the top 20-25 in each event.
There are a lot more cowboys/cowgirls who go to 25-30 rodeos a year than ones who go to 80+ and "do it for a living".
i don't think much of Crawford at all by his statements throughout this ordeal.... |
|
|
|
 Famous for Not Complaining
Posts: 8848
        Location: Broxton, Ga | bingo - 2014-01-08 6:42 PM "we believe that fans deserve the right to see the very best cowboys and cowgirls compete for a true championship." This quote was taken from above post by "Horsepoor1". And sometimes the BEST cowboys and cowgirls are NOT necessarily those who can afford to get into the limited entry rodeos. Limited rodeos prevent many from competing at the NFR, while letting in other competitors who may not be as exciting to watch. I think the "Slot Races" at barrel races are a PRIME example. Where else can you win $100,000 for running a 2D time? ANSWER: SLOT RACES!! WHY? Because they are a LIMITED BARREL RACE. Are they the fastest times in the arena during that whole weekend of events? NO, often times not. And where else can you win $50,000.00 on one barrel racing run?? ANSWER: Closed/limited entry rodeo like Houston, Calgary.... I think it was REAL obvious at this year's NFR in the barrel race. ONE limited entry rodeo with a huge purse prevented a competitor from making the NFR, by allowing in a competitor into the standings who would have NOT made the NFR except for that one win. Just that ONE rodeo did this. IMO limited rodeo's do NOT work in favor of the MAJORITY of competitors. If it doesn't favor the MAJORITY of contestants, it does NOT help promote the sport. Does limiting the "Super Stars" in the eyes of rodeo fans work best for promoting rodeo??? HHHmmmm.... That is a totally different question. I have to do some real thinking on that....
Agree! |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 972
       Location: Texas! | |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 972
       Location: Texas! | I just saw that Shada "liked" the group Keep the NFR in Vegas. I still don't understand the contestants wanting them to turn down the offer then jumping back in the fight against the PRCA for turning it down? |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1062
   Location: Probably On the Road to the Next Barrel Race! | horsepoor1 - 2014-01-09 3:01 PM Has everyone seen this? the most interesting thing to me is in the comments -Lynn McKenzie's husband commented. very interesting 1/8/2014 On behalf of the cowboys and cowgirls who issued yesterday’s statement, we want to thank everyone for their support. We understand that everyone would like further answers and details. We ask for your patience as we continue to move forward during this exciting time. We also would like everyone to understand that our original plan was not to form a new organization. We put everything we had into working over the Christmas break to try and create some meaningful change within the PRCA structure that would have given the top contestants a direct voice on the PRCA board. We want to be more involved with the direction of our sport. This new effort resulted only after our proposal to the PRCA Board was rejected. As a result we are still in the early stages of formation. Our purpose is to create a model that is better for the fans, committees and top contestants in the sport, but that also has a fair process for people to work their way to the top. Our group is committed to protecting the integrity of the sport of professional rodeo and the meaning of a gold buckle by making sure there is one, true championship. Some people have expressed an opinion that the current National Finals Rodeo is “just a rodeo” and “it doesn’t really matter which cowboys you put out there.” We believe people that express that opinion do not understand the loyalty of true rodeo fans. We know that true rodeo fans respect the talent and drive it takes to make it to the top of this great sport. We ask you to step up, as we have, and let your voice be heard. It did not work when the NFL tried to have games with replacement players and while we respect every contestant who rodeos, we believe that fans deserve the right to see the very best cowboys and cowgirls compete for a true championship. We are equally committed to making sure that rodeo remains a true sport with a level playing field that allows advancement through the ranks. Know that we are taking this effort seriously and have involved smart professionals with a strong background in both rodeo and professional sports. You would not see the names quoted in the release supporting this effort if we did not believe it was being done in a thoughtful and first-class way. Also, we want to make clear that this is an effort that begins with the 2015 season. No one is talking about any disruption to the 2014 season. For that reason, we ask you to understand that rather than throw out details and get bogged down in an open debate on everything wrong with the sport of professional rodeo, we are working systematically to build a system that advances the sport and we look forward to working with everyone who wants to see the sport move to the next level. Thank you again for your support, trust and patience and please join us in letting everyone know that the cowboys and cowgirls do matter. The Organizing Top Cowboys and Cowgirls
What exactly is the definition of a "true champion"?? The term is used twice here...I'm sincerely curious what they mean? |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1062
   Location: Probably On the Road to the Next Barrel Race! | WYOracer - 2014-01-09 9:21 PM
Yes, Murray, it looks that way to me, as well...thank you for putting words to my confusion... I agree... |
|
|
|
 You get what you give
Posts: 13030
     Location: Texas | CrossCreek - 2014-01-09 9:29 PM
WYOracer - 2014-01-09 9:21 PM Â
Â
 Yes, Murray, it looks that way to me, as well...thank you for putting words to my confusion... I agree...
That is my biggest fear as well. I am busting my butt so that I can hopefully within the next 6 months to year return to rodeo competition. I would hate for all my efforts to suddenly get squashed in a new format that keeps the little dog out. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 972
       Location: Texas! | What I am wondering how do they expect to fill these big 10 day rodeos that they are planning to what steal away from PRCA with 25 contestants? The people coming to Cheyenne sitting in those seats don't know who they're cheering for (of course many do and are rodeo people and year round fans), I've watched rounds in the perf where not one girl ran a time that placed in the rodeo and didn't recognize a single name but those people cheered and rooted like they were cheering Sherry Cervi to a new title! They are there because that rodeo is so historic not just to see Trevor Brazil or whoever else MIGHT be up that day.
Edited by WYOracer 2014-01-09 9:43 PM
|
|
|
|
 You get what you give
Posts: 13030
     Location: Texas | WYOracer - 2014-01-09 9:41 PM
 What I am wondering how do they expect to fill these big 10 day rodeos that they are planning to what steal away from PRCA with 25 contestants?  The people coming to Cheyenne sitting in those seats don't know who they're cheering for (of course many do and are rodeo people and year round fans), I've watched rounds in the perf where not one girl ran a time that placed in the rodeo and didn't recognize a single name but those people cheered and rooted like they were cheering Sherry Cervi to a new title!  They are there because that rodeo is so historic not just to see Trevor Brazil or whoever else MIGHT be up that day.
my point exactly!!! |
|
|
|
Regular
Posts: 61
 
| I see some comments against this and some saying its amateur hour. My thought is I bet the top bull riders don't wish they were back in the PRCA. And I think Trevor and the guys who are pushing this are probably further ahead of the game than the group who started the PBR was at the same point. |
|
|