|
|
  You just got to get mean and mean it.
     Location: Arkansas | TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:01 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 2:51 PM If it had been left up to the "Do-Nothings" we'd be debating Bergdahl's release into next year!
Ummm...Wasn't it Eastwood who talked to a chair? So the rule of laws is subject to convenience?
It always has been.
Read my signature. |
|
| |
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| Lobo - 2014-06-03 4:04 PM TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:01 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 2:51 PM If it had been left up to the "Do-Nothings" we'd be debating Bergdahl's release into next year!
Ummm...Wasn't it Eastwood who talked to a chair? So the rule of laws is subject to convenience? It always has been.
Read my signature.
I know plenty of stupid people that have lived long lives but thats got nothing to do with rule of law. |
|
| |
|
 Hawty & Nawty
Posts: 20424
       
| TXBO - 2014-06-04 2:06 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 4:04 PM TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:01 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 2:51 PM If it had been left up to the "Do-Nothings" we'd be debating Bergdahl's release into next year!
Ummm...Wasn't it Eastwood who talked to a chair? So the rule of laws is subject to convenience? It always has been.
Read my signature. I know plenty of stupid people that have lived long lives but thats got nothing to do with rule of law.
Without law, there is chaos.
Love you, TXBO
|
|
| |
|
  You just got to get mean and mean it.
     Location: Arkansas | TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:06 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 4:04 PM TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:01 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 2:51 PM If it had been left up to the "Do-Nothings" we'd be debating Bergdahl's release into next year!
Ummm...Wasn't it Eastwood who talked to a chair? So the rule of laws is subject to convenience? It always has been.
Read my signature. I know plenty of stupid people that have lived long lives but thats got nothing to do with rule of law.
Why, Thank you for calling old people stupid. They think a lot of "younger" people are foolish AND stupid. They'll still support you!  |
|
| |
|
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
      
| Lobo - 2014-06-03 4:23 PM TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:06 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 4:04 PM TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:01 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 2:51 PM If it had been left up to the "Do-Nothings" we'd be debating Bergdahl's release into next year!
Ummm...Wasn't it Eastwood who talked to a chair? So the rule of laws is subject to convenience? It always has been.
Read my signature. I know plenty of stupid people that have lived long lives but thats got nothing to do with rule of law. Why, Thank you for calling old people stupid. They think a lot of "younger" people are foolish AND stupid. They'll still support you! 
He did not call old people stupid, he said longevity had nothing to do with intelligence. |
|
| |
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| rodeomom3 - 2014-06-03 4:31 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 4:23 PM TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:06 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 4:04 PM TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:01 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 2:51 PM If it had been left up to the "Do-Nothings" we'd be debating Bergdahl's release into next year!
Ummm...Wasn't it Eastwood who talked to a chair? So the rule of laws is subject to convenience? It always has been.
Read my signature. I know plenty of stupid people that have lived long lives but thats got nothing to do with rule of law. Why, Thank you for calling old people stupid. They think a lot of "younger" people are foolish AND stupid. They'll still support you!  He did not call old people stupid, he said longevity had nothing to do with intelligence. LOL! She knows that. Ad hominem is so predictable absent a cohesive argument.
Edited by TXBO 2014-06-03 4:41 PM
|
|
| |
|
 Get a Clue
Posts: 1228
    Location: A Higher Elevation | Lobo - 2014-06-03 2:01 PM
I still think letting the Justices, Court or Military handle the disposition of Bergdahl is the best method.Β Not a single one of us know what happened, just rumors and innuendo's.Β Due toΒ past militry experience, we can guess what will be done...but it's a new military. Β This is, after all,Β a country of Law's.Β If he end's up in Leavenworth or home in Idaho...so be it.
And Estwood looked like an idiot! As far as the Do-Nothings...they earned the title.  Β
Yes. This is a Nation of Laws. Laws that the current CinC seems to think he can just pick and choose his way thru. He will make sure that Bergdahl doesn't have to face Court Martial. And if he does go to UCMJ hearings/trial, then it's all rigged already. The key witnesses will be found dead for one reason or another... B0/BS needed a feel-good story to get the VA issue off the front page. I could go on and on about personal experience with military and VA healthcare, but this isn't about that. Other than Bergdahl is the newest/latest/shiniest distraction at the moment.
I find it kind of funny that his hometown in Idaho WAS planning a Welcome Home parade & celebration. It's been cancelled before they could even set the date...
|
|
| |
|
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
      
| Lobo - 2014-06-03 4:04 PM TXBO - 2014-06-03 4:01 PM Lobo - 2014-06-03 2:51 PM If it had been left up to the "Do-Nothings" we'd be debating Bergdahl's release into next year!
Ummm...Wasn't it Eastwood who talked to a chair? So the rule of laws is subject to convenience? It always has been.
Read my signature. Some Dems even agree with those who feel the 30 day notice should have been given.
CONGRESS Dianne Feinstein Disappointed Lawmakers Not Given 30-Day Notice on Bergdahl Swap The Senate Intel Committee chairwoman says the administration has apologized for not giving her a heads up. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)  June 3, 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein took at shot at the Obama administration on Tuesday for failing to give lawmakers 30 days' notice about a deal to release five Taliban prisoners from Guantanamo Bay in exchange for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the only POW from America's war in Afghanistan. "It's very disappointing that there was not a level of trust sufficient to justify alerting us," Feinstein told reporters in the Capitol. A defense bill that President Obama signed into law in December 2013 requires that Congress be notified 30 days ahead of releasing prisoners from Guantanamo Bay. Feinstein said that National Deputy Security Adviser Tony Blinken called her Monday night "apologizing" for failing to notify lawmakers sooner. "He apologized for it and said it was an oversight," Feinstein said. When asked whether he used the word "oversight," Feinstein clarified: "In so many words, I can't say. That was my impression." While the California Democrat says "the president certainly has an executive authority that he can use," she also wants to know whether Bergdahl was a deserter, and she wants to know the terms of the deal with the Qatari government, which has pledged to keep the Taliban prisoners for a year. There will be a briefing Tuesday for Intel Committee members, and a closed Senate Armed Services Committee hearing next Tuesday about the swap.In December, Obama issued a signing statement that said the executive branch should have the flexibility "to act swiftly in conducting negotiations with foreign countries regarding the circumstances of detainee transfers." The administration has defended the prisoner swap, pointing to the signing statement as a clear indication that Congress was put on notice, and that lawmakers knew for a long time about the possibility of such a swap. "We have consulted with Congress for quite some time about the possibility that we might need to execute a prisoner exchange in order to recover Sergeant Bergdahl," Obama said in Poland on Tuesday morning. "We saw an opportunity. We were concerned about Sergeant Bergdahl's health. We had the cooperation of the Qataris to execute an exchange, and we seized that opportunity. And the process was truncated because we wanted to make sure that we did not miss that window." House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon has already pledged to hold hearings on the prisoner swap, saying his "impression" is that the president broke the law when he failed to give notice. Feinstein conceded that op position to the deal could have been one reason lawmakers weren't notified. "But the White House is pretty unilateral about what they want to do when they want to do it," she added.
Edited by rodeomom3 2014-06-04 6:14 AM
|
|
| |
|
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | this country is a country of Laws for us abiding citizens but not for that obama or his cronies and sometimes not even for criminals.. they have no laws so it seems.. |
|
| |
|
 A Somebody to Everybody
Posts: 41354
              Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas | Bibliafarm - 2014-06-03 6:42 PM this country is a country of Laws for us abiding citizens but not for that obama or his cronies and sometimes not even for criminals.. they have no laws so it seems..
If your a criminal Obama is on your side so no worrie's for all the criminals do what you do best cause there's no rules or laws for you |
|
| |
|
  More bootie than waist!
Posts: 18425
          Location: Riding Crackhead. | Southtxponygirl - 2014-06-03 7:19 PM Bibliafarm - 2014-06-03 6:42 PM this country is a country of Laws for us abiding citizens but not for that obama or his cronies and sometimes not even for criminals.. they have no laws so it seems.. If your a criminal Obama is on your side so no worrie's for all the criminals do what you do best cause there's no rules or laws for you
Birds of a feather....... |
|
| |
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25352
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | I think it's entirely possible that, since Obama is a lame duck president, the strategy is to have him do anything possible to shift the focus away from the one topic that leaves Democrats up for election this fall most vulnerable: ObamaCare. The more outrage, the more the focus is shifted away from the constant drip-drip-drip of the disaster called ObamaCare.
|
|
| |
|
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | he needs impeached.. but no one will start the process.. they all are sorry excuses for leaders.. |
|
| |
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| I'm real interested to see who this president pardons in his final hours. Anyone care to prognosticate? |
|
| |
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25352
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | TXBO - 2014-06-04 9:48 AM
I'm real interested to see who this president pardons in his final hours.Β Anyone care to prognosticate?Β
I'm sure he would love to start by somehow "pardoning" himself and making himself immune to any prosecution that might arise. |
|
| |
|
 Famous for Not Complaining
Posts: 8848
        Location: Broxton, Ga | Nothing will happen to Obama...........nor will Bergdahl be found guilty of anything............welcome to Obama's world from Obamacare "you keep your insurance if you want".........Benghazi...........Fast and Furious..........IRS.......etc....... |
|
| |
|
 Proud to be Deplorable
Posts: 1929
      
| TXBO - 2014-06-04 9:48 AM
I'm real interested to see who this president pardons in his final hours.Β Anyone care to prognosticate?Β
Himself. |
|
| |
|
  Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
           Location: Florida.. | yep it will just dissolve in the wind.. |
|
| |
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
   
| jbhoot - 2014-06-04 10:25 AM TXBO - 2014-06-04 9:48 AM I'm real interested to see who this president pardons in his final hours. Anyone care to prognosticate? Himself. You think he'll empty Gitmo? It was one of his campaign promises.
Edited by TXBO 2014-06-04 10:54 AM
|
|
| |
|
 Proud to be Deplorable
Posts: 1929
      
| TXBO - 2014-06-04 10:53 AM
jbhoot - 2014-06-04 10:25 AM TXBO - 2014-06-04 9:48 AM I'm real interested to see who this president pardons in his final hours.Β Anyone care to prognosticate?Β Himself. You think he'll empty Gitmo?Β It was one of his campaign promises.Β
I am sure he'll try. |
|
| |