|
|
 No Tune in a Bucket
Posts: 2935
       Location: Texas | March 27 @ 10:00 waxahachie rodeo arena |
|
| |
|
 Not Afraid to Work
Posts: 4717
    
| fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:40 PM
It would be educational to talk about this if it's going to be allowed and not deleted again.
I agree. Maybe if there are enough hurt feeling, they refuse to sell their half to her? Sometimes that happens. I've never heard of this before. I thought they owned him too  |
|
| |
|
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
      
| sodapop - 2014-03-16 8:32 PM I'm sad for whomever was truly wronged in the whole situation.
Ditto. I would think a lawsuit would be a last resort between partners. It is a shame. |
|
| |
|
 Accident Prone
Posts: 22277
          Location: 100 miles from Nowhere, AR | stayceem - 2014-03-16 8:45 PM
fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:40 PM
It would be educational to talk about this if it's going to be allowed and not deleted again.
I agree. Maybe if there are enough hurt feeling, they refuse to sell their half to her? Sometimes that happens. I've never heard of this before. I thought they owned him too 
Breach of contract is a big deal. If the money owed had been paid, it would never have come to this. The "other" partner claimed she was owed money by the Walkers. Byron disagreed, judge ruled against him. That's the bare bones.
Edited by Three 4 Luck 2014-03-16 8:52 PM
|
|
| |
|
  The Original Cyber Bartender
          Location: Washington | Three 4 Luck - 2014-03-16 6:49 PM
stayceem - 2014-03-16 8:45 PM
fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:40 PM
It would be educational to talk about this if it's going to be allowed and not deleted again.
I agree. Maybe if there are enough hurt feeling, they refuse to sell their half to her? Sometimes that happens. I've never heard of this before. I thought they owned him too 
Breach of contract is a big deal. If the money owed had been paid, it would never have come to this. The "other" partner was owed money by the Walkers. Byron disagreed, judge ruled against him. That's the bare bones.
It sucks that you(most) mentioned Byron. I do not think of Byron when I hear the name Latte, I think of Mary. Praying for Mary that this get's resolved. |
|
| |
|
 Hog Tie My Mojo
Posts: 4847
       Location: Opelousas, LA | I would think she could get a loan to buy him considering she has already proven she can make good money running him. I sure hope some jackwagon doesn't go running the bid up with no intentions to actually buy Latte. |
|
| |
|
 Accident Prone
Posts: 22277
          Location: 100 miles from Nowhere, AR | fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:53 PM
Three 4 Luck - 2014-03-16 6:49 PM
stayceem - 2014-03-16 8:45 PM
fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:40 PM
It would be educational to talk about this if it's going to be allowed and not deleted again.
I agree. Maybe if there are enough hurt feeling, they refuse to sell their half to her? Sometimes that happens. I've never heard of this before. I thought they owned him too 
Breach of contract is a big deal. If the money owed had been paid, it would never have come to this. The "other" partner was owed money by the Walkers. Byron disagreed, judge ruled against him. That's the bare bones.
It sucks that you (most ) mentioned Byron. I do not think of Byron when I hear the name Latte, I think of Mary. Praying for Mary that this get's resolved.
Oh yeah, Mary and Latte are like peanutbutter and jelly. It does suck. It makes me especially sad for the horse who had absolutely no say in the mess. |
|
| |
|
 Not Afraid to Work
Posts: 4717
    
| fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:53 PM
Three 4 Luck - 2014-03-16 6:49 PM
stayceem - 2014-03-16 8:45 PM
fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:40 PM
It would be educational to talk about this if it's going to be allowed and not deleted again.
I agree. Maybe if there are enough hurt feeling, they refuse to sell their half to her? Sometimes that happens. I've never heard of this before. I thought they owned him too 
Breach of contract is a big deal. If the money owed had been paid, it would never have come to this. The "other" partner was owed money by the Walkers. Byron disagreed, judge ruled against him. That's the bare bones.
It sucks that you (most ) mentioned Byron. I do not think of Byron when I hear the name Latte, I think of Mary. Praying for Mary that this get's resolved.
Yeah if I remember right, Byron bought him for Mary so he would likely be the person involved with this. Must have been a substantial enough money. You would think if the Judge ruled against him, if it were me... I would be paying whatever amount in question (if I could obviously).
As bad as I feel for Mary... I feel even worse for Latte. He is the innocent party in this. |
|
| |
|
 You get what you give
Posts: 13030
     Location: Texas | That's my question too.. why not try and buy him out?? I'm sure that's been an option?? |
|
| |
|
  More bootie than waist!
Posts: 18425
          Location: Riding Crackhead. | So am I to assume that Mary's husband didn't actually "buy" Latte for Mary but bought a share in the horse? |
|
| |
|
10D Crack Champion
         
| casualdust07 - 2014-03-16 9:01 PM
That's my question too.. why not try and buy him out?? I'm sure that's been an option??
Maybe it isn't an option or maybe all that is owed is too substantial to repay & pay the price of the horse.....or maybe nothing I said at all. |
|
| |
|
  The Original Cyber Bartender
          Location: Washington | They couldn't settle on who did what and actually what the contract read. SO now it's going down to the line. Remember folks this horse was bought by Walkers but with a % held back back by the seller with conditions.
The lesson in this is do not do the latter two of what I typed.
|
|
| |
|
 Total Germophobe
Posts: 6443
       Location: Montana | Whatever the case, I too wish I had the money and could buy Latte and give him back to Mary. They seem to be made for each other. |
|
| |
|
 Hog Tie My Mojo
Posts: 4847
       Location: Opelousas, LA | Horse deals like this usually bring out the very worst in people. |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1414
    
| stayceem - 2014-03-16 10:01 PM fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:53 PM Three 4 Luck - 2014-03-16 6:49 PM stayceem - 2014-03-16 8:45 PM fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:40 PM It would be educational to talk about this if it's going to be allowed and not deleted again. I agree. Maybe if there are enough hurt feeling, they refuse to sell their half to her? Sometimes that happens. I've never heard of this before. I thought they owned him too  Breach of contract is a big deal. If the money owed had been paid, it would never have come to this. The "other" partner was owed money by the Walkers. Byron disagreed, judge ruled against him. That's the bare bones. It sucks that you (most ) mentioned Byron. I do not think of Byron when I hear the name Latte, I think of Mary. Praying for Mary that this get's resolved. Yeah if I remember right, Byron bought him for Mary so he would likely be the person involved with this. Must have been a substantial enough money. You would think if the Judge ruled against him, if it were me... I would be paying whatever amount in question (if I could obviously ). As bad as I feel for Mary... I feel even worse for Latte. He is the innocent party in this.
EXACTLY!! I just said to my husband it feels like such a cold, impersonable way to sell a horse, especially of this caliber. I hope and pray everything turns out with Latte's best interest in mind. |
|
| |
|
 No Tune in a Bucket
Posts: 2935
       Location: Texas | fatchance - 2014-03-16 9:06 PM They couldn't settle on who did what and actually what the contract read. SO now it's going down to the line. Remember folks this horse was bought by Walkers but with a % held back back by the seller with conditions. The lesson in this is do not do the latter two of what I typed.
It is my understanding that there was a purchase price plus a % of winnings, neither of which were completely paid resulting in the lawsuit. Yes it is a sad situation which should have never happened. |
|
| |
|
 Not Afraid to Work
Posts: 4717
    
| rodeomom3 - 2014-03-16 9:21 PM
Three 4 Luck - 2014-03-16 8:49 PM stayceem - 2014-03-16 8:45 PM fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:40 PM It would be educational to talk about this if it's going to be allowed and not deleted again. I agree. Maybe if there are enough hurt feeling, they refuse to sell their half to her? Sometimes that happens. I've never heard of this before. I thought they owned him too  Breach of contract is a big deal. If the money owed had been paid, it would never have come to this. The "other" partner claimed she was owed money by the Walkers. Byron disagreed, judge ruled against him. That's the bare bones.
 I agree.  There was a written contract that judge ruled was breached by the Walkers.  Maybe the Walkers hope to buy him trough a 3rd party at auction, may be cheaper then paying what they owe according to the contract.  The partnership on the horse may have included a percentage of winnings till horse was paid in full.  Regardless, judge ruled against the Walkers.  Maybe Cheri will buy him, the auction will be interesting to say the least.
I'm gonna buy him.
Oh wait... im broke and would probably fall off. |
|
| |
|
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
      
| stayceem - 2014-03-16 9:23 PM rodeomom3 - 2014-03-16 9:21 PM Three 4 Luck - 2014-03-16 8:49 PM stayceem - 2014-03-16 8:45 PM fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:40 PM It would be educational to talk about this if it's going to be allowed and not deleted again. I agree. Maybe if there are enough hurt feeling, they refuse to sell their half to her? Sometimes that happens. I've never heard of this before. I thought they owned him too  Breach of contract is a big deal. If the money owed had been paid, it would never have come to this. The "other" partner claimed she was owed money by the Walkers. Byron disagreed, judge ruled against him. That's the bare bones. Â I agree. Â There was a written contract that judge ruled was breached by the Walkers. Â Maybe the Walkers hope to buy him trough a 3rd party at auction, may be cheaper then paying what they owe according to the contract. Â The partnership on the horse may have included a percentage of winnings till horse was paid in full. Â Regardless, judge ruled against the Walkers. Â Maybe Cheri will buy him, the auction will be interesting to say the least. I'm gonna buy him.  Oh wait... im broke and would probably fall off. Â I have a new Caldwell on the way, think I could stay on him in that :), maybe with some duct tape.
Edited by rodeomom3 2014-03-16 9:26 PM
|
|
| |
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 1131
  
| I bet we are gonna see a lot of big names there.... No one is gonna pass up this chance, because he will be back in the big rodeos, under who is another question entirely. |
|
| |
|
 Not Afraid to Work
Posts: 4717
    
| rodeomom3 - 2014-03-16 9:25 PM
stayceem - 2014-03-16 9:23 PM rodeomom3 - 2014-03-16 9:21 PM Three 4 Luck - 2014-03-16 8:49 PM stayceem - 2014-03-16 8:45 PM fatchance - 2014-03-16 8:40 PM It would be educational to talk about this if it's going to be allowed and not deleted again. I agree. Maybe if there are enough hurt feeling, they refuse to sell their half to her? Sometimes that happens. I've never heard of this before. I thought they owned him too  Breach of contract is a big deal. If the money owed had been paid, it would never have come to this. The "other" partner claimed she was owed money by the Walkers. Byron disagreed, judge ruled against him. That's the bare bones. Â I agree. Â There was a written contract that judge ruled was breached by the Walkers. Â Maybe the Walkers hope to buy him trough a 3rd party at auction, may be cheaper then paying what they owe according to the contract. Â The partnership on the horse may have included a percentage of winnings till horse was paid in full. Â Regardless, judge ruled against the Walkers. Â Maybe Cheri will buy him, the auction will be interesting to say the least. I'm gonna buy him.  Oh wait... im broke and would probably fall off. Â I have a new Caldwell on the way, think I could stay on him in that :), maybe with some duct tape.
VELCRO SEAT! |
|
| |