|
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1094
 
Location: Florida | Nope! I believe in only breeding the best of the best which doesn't incude "defects" he may be nice but why risk it. |
|
| |
|
  The Color Specialist
Posts: 7530
  
Location: Washington. (The DRY side.) | I wonder how many people that are against it are breeding their mares (via shipped semen) to a stallion they have never seen in person? How do these same people know they aren't (unknowingly) breeding to a crypt? To answer the original question, ABSOLUTELY NOT!! |
|
| |
|
 Champ
Posts: 19623
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm | Nope. |
|
| |
|
Miracle in the Making
Posts: 4013
| no and he should be castrated it painfull for them |
|
| |
|
 Keep those crap slapping tails away!
Posts: 8871
Location: Around here somewhere... | No, I would not knowingly breed to one, and if I had one he'd be gelded no matter his breeding, etc. The ENTIRE purpose of being is to better the breed. |
|
| |
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 898
Location: Mountains of VA | RacingQH - 2014-09-11 10:11 PM I wonder how many people that are against it are breeding their mares (via shipped semen) to a stallion they have never seen in person? How do these same people know they aren't (unknowingly) breeding to a crypt? To answer the original question, ABSOLUTELY NOT!!
I wouldn't breed to one either but with that said, how many people are breeding to stallions off of pictures when these pics can be "doctored" to hide conformation problems. Not to mention temperment, etc. Also, how many people are breeding mares with serious conformation/temperament problems that think these genetics faults are o.k. but being a crypt is a serious no-no? |
|
| |
|
 Undercover Amish Mafia Member
Posts: 9992
Location: Kansas | How do I put this nicely......................EFF NO!!!!! |
|
| |
|
 BHW's Lance Armstrong 
Posts: 11134
Location: Somewhere between S@%&# stirrer and Saint | I had testicle cancer 25 years ago so I guess I could be considered a cryptorchid. LOL
Here is what I produced after wards. I would breed to a cryptorcid but I am biased.
 (4634_92110534742_827989742_1795158_2827019_n.jpg)
 (29499_1409552192693_1049128962_1231918_8249552_n[1].jpg)
 (29499_1409551952687_1049128962_1231917_1925660_n[1].jpg)
 (IMG_5733.JPG)
Attachments
----------------
 4634_92110534742_827989742_1795158_2827019_n.jpg (40KB - 239 downloads)
29499_1409552192693_1049128962_1231918_8249552_n[1].jpg (56KB - 238 downloads)
29499_1409551952687_1049128962_1231917_1925660_n[1].jpg (73KB - 243 downloads)
IMG_5733.JPG (84KB - 217 downloads)
|
|
| |
|
 Queen Boobie 2
Posts: 7521
| Douglas J Gordon - 2014-09-12 12:53 PM I had testicle cancer 25 years ago so I guess I could be considered a cryptorchid. LOL
Here is what I produced after wards. I would breed to a cryptorcid but I am biased.
You're a 'mechanical crypt' not a genetic crypt LOL |
|
| |
|
BHW's Lance Armstrong
Posts: 11134
Location: Somewhere between S@%&# stirrer and Saint | bennie1 - 2014-09-12 12:54 PM Douglas J Gordon - 2014-09-12 12:53 PM I had testicle cancer 25 years ago so I guess I could be considered a cryptorchid. LOL
Here is what I produced after wards. I would breed to a cryptorcid but I am biased.
You're a 'mechanical crypt' not a genetic crypt LOL
  |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 4625
Location: Desert Land | RacingQH - 2014-09-11 8:11 PM I wonder how many people that are against it are breeding their mares (via shipped semen) to a stallion they have never seen in person? How do these same people know they aren't (unknowingly) breeding to a crypt? To answer the original question, ABSOLUTELY NOT!!
It is possible I have bred to a crypt and didn't know it. I have bred to and plan next year to breed to stallions I have not met in person. But I would not knowingly breed to one. |
|
| |
|
 Guys Just Wanna Have Fun
Posts: 5530
Location: OH | Not On Purpose. |
|
| |
|
 Neat Freak
Posts: 11216
Location: Wonderful Wyoming | TheOldGrayMare - 2014-09-12 12:11 PM RacingQH - 2014-09-11 8:11 PM I wonder how many people that are against it are breeding their mares (via shipped semen) to a stallion they have never seen in person? How do these same people know they aren't (unknowingly) breeding to a crypt? To answer the original question, ABSOLUTELY NOT!! It is possible I have bred to a crypt and didn't know it. I have bred to and plan next year to breed to stallions I have not met in person. But I would not knowingly breed to one.
I would have to agree with this. If I knew, then no I would not breed to that stud, but there are a lot of things that AI can hide :/ |
|
| |
|
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 396
| I may be the odd man out here, but we stood a cryptorcid (Son of Special Effort) for years, who produced foals with proven track records. If you're considering breeding to a cryptorcid I would do my homework with that horse just like any other (what has the stud done, and what has he thrown). Remember 70% of your foal is your mare (or at least that's what they say)  |
|
| |
|
The Color Specialist
Posts: 7530
Location: Washington. (The DRY side.) | hotpaints - 2014-09-12 10:23 AM RacingQH - 2014-09-11 10:11 PM I wonder how many people that are against it are breeding their mares (via shipped semen) to a stallion they have never seen in person? How do these same people know they aren't (unknowingly) breeding to a crypt? To answer the original question, ABSOLUTELY NOT!! I wouldn't breed to one either but with that said, how many people are breeding to stallions off of pictures when these pics can be "doctored" to hide conformation problems. Not to mention temperment, etc. Also, how many people are breeding mares with serious conformation/temperament problems that think these genetics faults are o.k. but being a crypt is a serious no-no?
Since you brought it up, I 1000% agree about breeding to a stallion based off of pictures. Especially "professional" pictures. I really wish photoshop had never been invented! That is one thing I like about some owners, sure, they may have professional pictures, but they also have "canded" pictures taken by themselves or employees, friends ect.. that they share on Fb or their website.
|
|
| |
Folks on-line