|
|
 Expert
Posts: 1525
  
| TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:28 PM hoofs_in_motion - 2015-10-28 3:00 PM nvrenuf - 2015-10-28 2:53 PM lhighquality - 2015-10-29 12:11 PM nvrenuf - 2015-10-28 12:48 PM Pretty sure if your not the brand inspector or the indiviual this is addressed to or the parties involved, you did not obtain this legally. You would need a gramma request to get this legally where it is a civil matter. So are you stirring the pot?!?!?!!?! LOL
Wasn't it on Facebook though? So, however it was "got", its out there now. |
|
| |
|
 Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
 
| MOTIVATED - 2015-10-28 3:33 PM Wasn't it on Facebook though? So, however it was "got", its out there now.
LOL! I don't know. I've never been on Facebook. |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1525
| BamaCanChaser - 2015-10-28 12:52 PM That letter was posted on Facebook.
I am just taking their word for it. |
|
| |
|
| TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:24 PM Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 12:54 PM I apologize for stirring the pot or potty. I am interested in equine law and will be using this particular case in the future and will be attending law school based upon my previous LSAT, am retaking only to improve my chances at scholarship. Congratulations and best of luck in your further education. Let us know your thoughts on the case when you get the documents. I don't think you're stirring the pot at all. Reviewing sworn documents is not even close to gossip.
Thank you, I started at FB looking for answers but when I asked questions I was received unfair backlash. Looking for the judgement and the comments of the judgement and that is all. I appreicate that you are not slamming me. |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1525
| Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 3:45 PM TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:24 PM Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 12:54 PM I apologize for stirring the pot or potty. I am interested in equine law and will be using this particular case in the future and will be attending law school based upon my previous LSAT, am retaking only to improve my chances at scholarship. Congratulations and best of luck in your further education. Let us know your thoughts on the case when you get the documents. I don't think you're stirring the pot at all. Reviewing sworn documents is not even close to gossip.
Dont you know you cant ask questions on here???? You might say..."how was everyone's day?"...and someone is going to jump on you....because you are discriminating against the people who live in China as its nighttime there. You little pot stirrer You...
Dont ask questions unless its about contaminated feed, video critiques, breeding a horse, or horse rescue. JUST DONNNNT haha
kidding kidding kidding |
|
| |
|
Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
| Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 3:45 PM TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:24 PM Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 12:54 PM I apologize for stirring the pot or potty. I am interested in equine law and will be using this particular case in the future and will be attending law school based upon my previous LSAT, am retaking only to improve my chances at scholarship. Congratulations and best of luck in your further education. Let us know your thoughts on the case when you get the documents. I don't think you're stirring the pot at all. Reviewing sworn documents is not even close to gossip.
I wish more kids today would take your approach and actually read sworn documents to form their opinions. Today everyone reads the first article that Google pulls up and considers that their fact checking.
Edited by TXBO 2015-10-28 3:56 PM
|
|
| |
|
 Own It and Move On
Location: The edge of no where | TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:28 PM hoofs_in_motion - 2015-10-28 3:00 PM nvrenuf - 2015-10-28 2:53 PM lhighquality - 2015-10-29 12:11 PM nvrenuf - 2015-10-28 12:48 PM Pretty sure if your not the brand inspector or the indiviual this is addressed to or the parties involved, you did not obtain this legally. You would need a gramma request to get this legally where it is a civil matter. So are you stirring the pot?!?!?!!?! LOL
LOL - you're gonna get yet another thread deleted. |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 3815
Location: The best kept secret in TX | MOTIVATED - 2015-10-28 3:52 PM Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 3:45 PM TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:24 PM Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 12:54 PM I apologize for stirring the pot or potty. I am interested in equine law and will be using this particular case in the future and will be attending law school based upon my previous LSAT, am retaking only to improve my chances at scholarship. Congratulations and best of luck in your further education. Let us know your thoughts on the case when you get the documents. I don't think you're stirring the pot at all. Reviewing sworn documents is not even close to gossip.
Dont ask questions unless its about contaminated feed, video critiques, breeding a horse, or horse rescue. JUST DONNNNT haha
kidding kidding kidding
LOL People are going to start jumping each other more now that it's getting colder. It always happens. I'm always over here like *pops popcorn* *puts on fuzzy slippers* *opens up BHW*  
Proceed you pot stirrers you!
Hehe |
|
| |
|
 Accident Prone
Posts: 22277
Location: 100 miles from Nowhere, AR | TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:53 PM Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 3:45 PM TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:24 PM Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 12:54 PM I apologize for stirring the pot or potty. I am interested in equine law and will be using this particular case in the future and will be attending law school based upon my previous LSAT, am retaking only to improve my chances at scholarship. Congratulations and best of luck in your further education. Let us know your thoughts on the case when you get the documents. I don't think you're stirring the pot at all. Reviewing sworn documents is not even close to gossip.
I wish more kids today would take your approach and actually read sworn documents to form their opinions. Today everyone reads the first article that Google pulls up and considers that their fact checking.
The way you break yourself of that is to google something you know a lot about and see how much BS pops up on the first page. |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 4121
Location: SE Louisiana | TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:28 PM
hoofs_in_motion - 2015-10-28 3:00 PM nvrenuf - 2015-10-28 2:53 PM lhighquality - 2015-10-29 12:11 PM nvrenuf - 2015-10-28 12:48 PM Pretty sure if your not the brand inspector or the indiviual this is addressed to or the parties involved, you did not obtain this legally. You would need a gramma request to get this legally where it is a civil matter. So are you stirring the pot?!?!?!!?! LOL
Psstt.... Need some help?? It's always easier with 2 or 3. I'm sure we can talk Norma into a 3-some.. |
|
| |
|
 Elite Veteran
Posts: 1062
Location: Probably On the Road to the Next Barrel Race! | Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 10:04 AM If you have a copy of the judges decision from the ruling of Jacobs vs Loflin please I would like to see it. Thank you. This is not a bash post. I just want to see for myself how the judge ruled as I studying for my LSATS.
So...somebody wanna tell me what's going on with this? |
|
| |
|
 Thread Killer
Posts: 7545
| TXBO - 2015-10-28 4:53 PM
Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 3:45 PM TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:24 PM Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 12:54 PM I apologize for stirring the pot or potty. I am interested in equine law and will be using this particular case in the future and will be attending law school based upon my previous LSAT,  am retaking only to improve my chances at scholarship.   Congratulations and best of luck in your further education. Let us know your thoughts on the case when you get the documents. I don't think you're stirring the pot at all. Reviewing sworn documents is not even close to gossip.
I wish more kids today would take your approach and actually read sworn documents to form their opinions.  Today everyone reads the first article that Google pulls up and considers that their fact checking. Â
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one....I don't like to be pompous, but I can't believe most people don't know that court papers are often public knowledge. Most news outlets no longer do what they're supposed to do anymore (you know, REPORT NEWS), which often leads to incorrect information being spread around.
|
|
| |
|
Googly Goo
Posts: 7053
| CrossCreek - 2015-10-28 4:17 PM Angel Wings - 2015-10-28 10:04 AM If you have a copy of the judges decision from the ruling of Jacobs vs Loflin please I would like to see it. Thank you. This is not a bash post. I just want to see for myself how the judge ruled as I studying for my LSATS. So...somebody wanna tell me what's going on with this?
Their was a dispute over the ownership of Movin between Christy Loflin and another party. The courts have ruled that the other party is the sole legal owner of Movin. |
|
| |
|
  Roan Wonder
Location: SW MO | You are all more than welcome to discuss the case. As long as the thread stays on topic & civil there is no problem |
|
| |
|
 "Spaz-tacular"!!
Posts: 20309
Location: Bennett, CO | crossspur - 2015-10-28 4:07 PM You are all more than welcome to discuss the case. As long as the thread stays on topic & civil there is no problem
Yup! What she said! We are not censoring or banning this topic... Just trying to keep it clean. |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 4121
Location: SE Louisiana | gotothewhip - 2015-10-28 5:18 PM
crossspur - 2015-10-28 4:07 PM You are all more than welcome to discuss the case. As long as the thread stays on topic & civil there is no problem
Yup!  What she said! We are not censoring or banning this topic... Just trying to keep it clean.Â
But it's no fun stirring a clean pot....  |
|
| |
|
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25352
Location: Bastrop, Texas | Hey who deleted my post?
Can't we talk about Bubba?
Edited by Bear 2015-10-28 6:11 PM
|
|
| |
|
 Warmblood with Wings
Posts: 27846
Location: Florida.. | komet. - 2015-10-28 6:33 PM gotothewhip - 2015-10-28 5:18 PM crossspur - 2015-10-28 4:07 PM You are all more than welcome to discuss the case. As long as the thread stays on topic & civil there is no problem Yup! What she said! We are not censoring or banning this topic... Just trying to keep it clean. But it's no fun stirring a clean pot....
that made me laugh Komet |
|
| |
|
Location: horseback looking for cows | MS2011 - 2015-10-28 3:55 PM
TXBO - 2015-10-28 3:28 PM hoofs_in_motion - 2015-10-28 3:00 PM nvrenuf - 2015-10-28 2:53 PM lhighquality - 2015-10-29 12:11 PM nvrenuf - 2015-10-28 12:48 PM Pretty sure if your not the brand inspector or the indiviual this is addressed to or the parties involved, you did not obtain this legally. You would need a gramma request to get this legally where it is a civil matter. So are you stirring the pot?!?!?!!?! LOL
Just an FYI Civil court documents are public and anyone can request them. You just have to contact the Court to request them and pay a copy fee. And I know this because I work for the Court. |
|
| |
|
 Fact Checker
Posts: 16575
Location: Displaced Iowegian | Bibliafarm - 2015-10-28 5:40 PM komet. - 2015-10-28 6:33 PM gotothewhip - 2015-10-28 5:18 PM crossspur - 2015-10-28 4:07 PM You are all more than welcome to discuss the case. As long as the thread stays on topic & civil there is no problem Yup! What she said! We are not censoring or banning this topic... Just trying to keep it clean. But it's no fun stirring a clean pot....
|
|
| |
Folks on-line