3 To Go - 2014-03-17 1:10 PM


Geldings are useless to the Brazilians unless one of them wants to have a daughter make an NFR run here. Geldings can't be imported into Brazil.

3rdtimesacharm - 2014-03-17 3:02 PM

someone stated that money is the root of all money.  actually its the LOVE of money is the root of all evil.  Some may think there isnt a difference but there is.  Someone didnt do their part, which is why it was taken to court.  A great horse maybe sold mostly because someone didnt keep their promises.  A lot of what is wrong in this world is 'someone' didnt keep their promises.  I for one just want wrongs made right but the best way Im going to do that is pray that God will work miracles in this situation and it wont have to come down to a bidding war. Let everyone involved forgive and forget and do the right thing.  

3rdtimesacharm - 2014-03-17 3:06 PM

well its pretty obvious or they wouldnt be in this situation 

FlyingJT - 2014-03-17 1:20 PM

For those of you that are joining this thread that haven't taken the time to read it, here is a few things to ponder when passing your judgment. Mary and Christy are close and I would assume that what Ms Loflin says is fairly close to spot on, one side of the story but more knowledge of the situation than just about anyone else on here.

loflin06 - 2014-03-16 9:25 PM

For the record here let's get a few facts straight:

Latte was purchased by the Walkers from the Cogburns for $120,000 and they own 90% of Lattle. Cogburns retained 10% interest in him. He was paid IN FULL at the time of the sale. He is going up for auction to determine his value not because there is money owed by the Walkers. At this time there are two separate cases pending to determine if Walkers owe Cogburns or Cogburns owe Walkers. This is a very complicated situation and sadly as a result of the high profile of this amazing team rumors and lies have been spread like wild fire.

he is the only asset in the Walker/Cogburn llc corporation. Therefore when you are ordered to dissolve a corporation and determine the value of the shares the assets are sold.

the highest bidder will go home with the horse. If Latte sells for $100,000 Walkers will receive $90,000 as they own 90% and the other party will receive $10,000. I can assure you that the Walkers have every intention and the funds to purchase Latte from this auction. Unfortunately this means they will have bought him twice.

runsupport - 2014-03-17 3:23 PM

I am just guessing here but if the 2 parties cannot agree on a price for Latte and settle the dispute, the auction may be the only way the court could get a fair price for both parties. Most likely Walkers will be the purchasing party, the real question is who is going to be bidding them up.

ThreeCorners - 2014-03-18 9:26 AM Abuse comes in many forms and lets be realistic here. ALOT of barrel raers can and are quite brutal and unfortunatelly, it seems the higher dollar horses that maybe dont quite perform for the new owner to the level of the past owner/rider are brutalized even more because they have all that money layed out there and the horse isnt re-couping it to their expectations.  

FlyingJT - 2014-03-17 3:20 PM For those of you that are joining this thread that haven't taken the time to read it, here is a few things to ponder when passing your judgment. Mary and Christy are close and I would assume that what Ms Loflin says is fairly close to spot on, one side of the story but more knowledge of the situation than just about anyone else on here. loflin06 - 2014-03-16 9:25 PM For the record here let's get a few facts straight: Latte was purchased by the Walkers from the Cogburns for $120,000 and they own 90% of Lattle. Cogburns retained 10% interest in him. He was paid IN FULL at the time of the sale. He is going up for auction to determine his value not because there is money owed by the Walkers. At this time there are two separate cases pending to determine if Walkers owe Cogburns or Cogburns owe Walkers. This is a very complicated situation and sadly as a result of the high profile of this amazing team rumors and lies have been spread like wild fire. he is the only asset in the Walker/Cogburn llc corporation. Therefore when you are ordered to dissolve a corporation and determine the value of the shares the assets are sold. the highest bidder will go home with the horse. If Latte sells for $100,000 Walkers will receive $90,000 as they own 90% and the other party will receive $10,000. I can assure you that the Walkers have every intention and the funds to purchase Latte from this auction. Unfortunately this means they will have bought him twice.

rodeomom3 - 2014-03-17 3:31 PM

Christy Loflin is incorrect.  Her post is no more fact than any other on here.  Yes, she is close to Mary, her hauling partner so I take her version with a grain of salt just as you would those close to Cheri.   There are posts on here from those just as close to Cheri as Christy is to Mary and they say it is a simple case of non payment by the Walkers.  Also there are post from those close to the situation that say the $$ will go into a trust till Cheri is paid.