|
|
 Expert
Posts: 1525
  
| So if I understand right. The rodeos...have to have 36 contestents...easy enough. AAAAnd YOUR event has to have $5k added....I am going to go see how many rodeo associations other than the PRCA added that much money to the barrels. I was really excited about the qualifications system being released....and the ERA for that matter. The more options the better. But I have to say that this guy said it best.
Edited by MOTIVATED 2015-10-29 12:20 PM
 (Capture.PNG)
 (Capture.PNG)
Attachments
----------------
 Capture.PNG (31KB - 172 downloads)
Capture.PNG (24KB - 164 downloads)
|
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 3815
 
Location: The best kept secret in TX | Oh Boy... I see many ticked off qualifiers in the near future... I feel like they can change the rules or qualifications at any time. Definitley an unstable Organization at this point.... |
|
| |
|
Hungarian Midget Woman
Location: Midwest | It says the rodeo can't have LIMITS less than 36 for an event... it doesn't say there needs to be 36 people that actually show up |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1525
| NJJ - 2015-10-29 10:52 AM
rachellyn80 - 2015-10-29 10:49 AM NJJ - 2015-10-29 9:22 AM Dash4KJ - 2015-10-29 9:16 AM SKM - 2015-10-29 6:17 AM On the 36 thing....I'm not reading it that they expect 36 contestants per event. I'm reading it as the rodeos can't set limits that make it where they accept less than 36 contestants. I do feel the ERA seems to be making this up as they go along. Â That part means you can't go to a small rodeo that does have the 5k added and they only get 15 contestants in your event. Makes it too easy to qualify for ERA so they say your rodeo has to have at least 36 in your event to make it a qualified rodeo to make your money count for ERA.
eta: Some rodeos limit the number of team ropers, etc
 
 (200_s.gif)
Attachments
----------------
200_s.gif (25KB - 160 downloads)
|
|
| |
|
 Saint Stacey
| Just Plain Lucky - 2015-10-29 10:03 AM
rachellyn80 - 2015-10-29 11:49 AM
NJJ - 2015-10-29 9:22 AM Dash4KJ - 2015-10-29 9:16 AM SKM - 2015-10-29 6:17 AM On the 36 thing....I'm not reading it that they expect 36 contestants per event. I'm reading it as the rodeos can't set limits that make it where they accept less than 36 contestants. I do feel the ERA seems to be making this up as they go along. Â That part means you can't go to a small rodeo that does have the 5k added and they only get 15 contestants in your event. Makes it too easy to qualify for ERA so they say your rodeo has to have at least 36 in your event to make it a qualified rodeo to make your money count for ERA.
eta: Some rodeos limit the number of team ropers, etc
Â
Oh please. No one would have said a dsmn thing if NJJ wouldn't have started her post with "Do you people READ????" It was an uncalled for statement. Just because everyone bows down to her on you alls secret little Fallout Shelter bash group doesn't mean the same treatment will be given on BHW. |
|
| |
|
Hungarian Midget Woman
Location: Midwest | A FB group with over 500 people is hardly a secret
I think everyone needs a chill pill. Goodness gracious. |
|
| |
|
BHW's Simon Cowell
Location: The Saudia Arabia of Wind Energy, Western Oklahoma | MOTIVATED - 2015-10-29 11:50 AM So if I understand right. The rodeos...have to have 36 contestents...easy enough. AAAAnd YOUR event has to have $5k added....I am going to go see how many rodeo associations other than the PRCA added that much money to the barrels. I was really excited about the qualifications system being released....and the ERA for that matter. The more options the better. But I have to say that this guy said it best.
Well I gathered that they would allow you to use PRCA rodeos. Is that not the case? I don't know of many other associations that will have added money of 5k plus. |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1525
| ksjackofalltrades - 2015-10-29 1:01 PM MOTIVATED - 2015-10-29 11:50 AM So if I understand right. The rodeos...have to have 36 contestents...easy enough. AAAAnd YOUR event has to have $5k added....I am going to go see how many rodeo associations other than the PRCA added that much money to the barrels. I was really excited about the qualifications system being released....and the ERA for that matter. The more options the better. But I have to say that this guy said it best.
Yes, that is what I meant....that most of the qualifying rodeos would be PRCA rodeos it looks like |
|
| |
|
 Jr. Detective
Location: Beggs, OK | barrelracr131 - 2015-10-29 12:53 PM A FB group with over 500 people is hardly a secret
I think everyone needs a chill pill. Goodness gracious.
It's a secret when you delete members so that you can talk about them "privately" with a chosen audience. Norma dismissed me some time back. |
|
| |
|
BHW's Simon Cowell
Location: The Saudia Arabia of Wind Energy, Western Oklahoma | MOTIVATED - 2015-10-29 1:04 PM ksjackofalltrades - 2015-10-29 1:01 PM MOTIVATED - 2015-10-29 11:50 AM So if I understand right. The rodeos...have to have 36 contestents...easy enough. AAAAnd YOUR event has to have $5k added....I am going to go see how many rodeo associations other than the PRCA added that much money to the barrels. I was really excited about the qualifications system being released....and the ERA for that matter. The more options the better. But I have to say that this guy said it best.
Well that pretty much assures that that it will be the same people having a chance to qualify. Just about any PRCA rodeo will qualify, even San Antonio. I think their limits are 40. |
|
| |
|
 Expert
Posts: 1409
| Why don't they form their own Association and provide their OWN qualifiers and QUIT piggy back riding on an association that is not elite enough. My goodness it APPEARS that they have much disdain for the very association that provided the way for them to become elite. I'm surely not against new things, BUT they sure come across as spoiled snots. jmho. |
|
| |
|
Veteran
Posts: 112
| IRunOnFaith - 2015-10-29 12:04 PM
Oh Boy... I see many ticked off qualifiers in the near future... I feel like they can change the rules or qualifications at any time. Definitley an unstable Organization at this point....Â
I think qualifiers, such as myself, are more upset at the fact that they made this Organization out to be all about bettering Rodeo and giving people a chance at more money with less travel. And well it does, for those hand picked on the roster but not those trying to qualify. We will have to go just as hard to try to unseat their chosen few as it stands right now, which is not bettering Rodeo IMO. |
|
| |
|
 The Worst Seller Ever
Posts: 4138
Location: Oklahoma | The UPRA Membership rodeos last year would qualify with the exception of the rough stock.
There are a few IPRA rodeos that qualify on added money and participation in the timed events.
|
|
| |
|
The Resident Destroyer of Liberal Logic
Location: PNW | SKM - 2015-10-29 10:48 AM
Just Plain Lucky - 2015-10-29 10:03 AM
rachellyn80 - 2015-10-29 11:49 AM
NJJ - 2015-10-29 9:22 AM Dash4KJ - 2015-10-29 9:16 AM SKM - 2015-10-29 6:17 AM On the 36 thing....I'm not reading it that they expect 36 contestants per event. I'm reading it as the rodeos can't set limits that make it where they accept less than 36 contestants. I do feel the ERA seems to be making this up as they go along. Â That part means you can't go to a small rodeo that does have the 5k added and they only get 15 contestants in your event. Makes it too easy to qualify for ERA so they say your rodeo has to have at least 36 in your event to make it a qualified rodeo to make your money count for ERA.
eta: Some rodeos limit the number of team ropers, etc
Â
Oh please. No one would have said a dsmn thing if NJJ wouldn't have started her post with "Do you people READ????" It was an uncalled for statement. Just because everyone bows down to her on you alls secret little Fallout Shelter bash group doesn't mean the same treatment will be given on BHW.
Not true!!!
She hates me here, there, and everywhere!
She does not like that Rude Sam V.
She hates me everywhere equally. |
|
| |
|
I just read the headlines
Posts: 4483
| TyE - 2015-10-29 1:18 PM
Why don't they form their own Association and provide their OWN qualifiers and QUIT piggy back riding on an association that is not elite enough. My goodness it APPEARS that they have much disdain for the very association that provided the way for them to become elite. I'm surely not against new things, BUT they sure come across as spoiled snots. jmho.
 |
|
| |
|
  Fact Checker
Posts: 16575
Location: Displaced Iowegian | svincent - 2015-10-29 3:04 PM SKM - 2015-10-29 10:48 AM Just Plain Lucky - 2015-10-29 10:03 AM rachellyn80 - 2015-10-29 11:49 AM NJJ - 2015-10-29 9:22 AM Dash4KJ - 2015-10-29 9:16 AM SKM - 2015-10-29 6:17 AM On the 36 thing....I'm not reading it that they expect 36 contestants per event. I'm reading it as the rodeos can't set limits that make it where they accept less than 36 contestants. I do feel the ERA seems to be making this up as they go along. That part means you can't go to a small rodeo that does have the 5k added and they only get 15 contestants in your event. Makes it too easy to qualify for ERA so they say your rodeo has to have at least 36 in your event to make it a qualified rodeo to make your money count for ERA.
eta: Some rodeos limit the number of team ropers, etc
Oh please. No one would have said a dsmn thing if NJJ wouldn't have started her post with "Do you people READ????" It was an uncalled for statement. Just because everyone bows down to her on you alls secret little Fallout Shelter bash group doesn't mean the same treatment will be given on BHW. Not true!!! She hates me here, there, and everywhere! She does not like that Rude Sam V. She hates me everywhere equally.
Right, Sam....... 
I will readily admit that my statement "do you people read" was a little rude (Does that make you do the "happy dance", Stacey?) But after days of reading all these rumors and mis-information being bandied about and repeated because many don't take the time to ACTUALLY READ the rules, must have flipped my switch.....LOL |
|
| |
|
 A Somebody to Everybody
Posts: 41354
Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas | NJJ - 2015-10-29 4:52 PM svincent - 2015-10-29 3:04 PM SKM - 2015-10-29 10:48 AM Just Plain Lucky - 2015-10-29 10:03 AM rachellyn80 - 2015-10-29 11:49 AM NJJ - 2015-10-29 9:22 AM Dash4KJ - 2015-10-29 9:16 AM SKM - 2015-10-29 6:17 AM On the 36 thing....I'm not reading it that they expect 36 contestants per event. I'm reading it as the rodeos can't set limits that make it where they accept less than 36 contestants. I do feel the ERA seems to be making this up as they go along. That part means you can't go to a small rodeo that does have the 5k added and they only get 15 contestants in your event. Makes it too easy to qualify for ERA so they say your rodeo has to have at least 36 in your event to make it a qualified rodeo to make your money count for ERA.
eta: Some rodeos limit the number of team ropers, etc
Oh please. No one would have said a dsmn thing if NJJ wouldn't have started her post with "Do you people READ????" It was an uncalled for statement. Just because everyone bows down to her on you alls secret little Fallout Shelter bash group doesn't mean the same treatment will be given on BHW. Not true!!! She hates me here, there, and everywhere! She does not like that Rude Sam V. She hates me everywhere equally.
I dont have a puppy in this little war, but what the heck, why is this NJJ's fault now, my gosh  |
|
| |
|
Location: In my own little world | There are some Indian Rodeos that will fit the criteria I believe. |
|
| |
|
The Resident Destroyer of Liberal Logic
Location: PNW | Southtxponygirl - 2015-10-29 2:59 PM
NJJ - 2015-10-29 4:52 PM svincent - 2015-10-29 3:04 PM SKM - 2015-10-29 10:48 AM Just Plain Lucky - 2015-10-29 10:03 AM rachellyn80 - 2015-10-29 11:49 AM NJJ - 2015-10-29 9:22 AM Dash4KJ - 2015-10-29 9:16 AM SKM - 2015-10-29 6:17 AM On the 36 thing....I'm not reading it that they expect 36 contestants per event. I'm reading it as the rodeos can't set limits that make it where they accept less than 36 contestants. I do feel the ERA seems to be making this up as they go along. Â That part means you can't go to a small rodeo that does have the 5k added and they only get 15 contestants in your event. Makes it too easy to qualify for ERA so they say your rodeo has to have at least 36 in your event to make it a qualified rodeo to make your money count for ERA.
eta: Some rodeos limit the number of team ropers, etc
 Oh please. No one would have said a dsmn thing if NJJ wouldn't have started her post with "Do you people READ????" It was an uncalled for statement. Just because everyone bows down to her on you alls secret little Fallout Shelter bash group doesn't mean the same treatment will be given on BHW. Not true!!! She hates me here, there, and everywhere! She does not like that Rude Sam V. She hates me everywhere equally.
It's not. Lol. I was just being a sheet head. |
|
| |
|
A Somebody to Everybody
Posts: 41354
Location: Under The Big Sky Of Texas | svincent - 2015-10-29 5:48 PM Southtxponygirl - 2015-10-29 2:59 PM NJJ - 2015-10-29 4:52 PM svincent - 2015-10-29 3:04 PM SKM - 2015-10-29 10:48 AM Just Plain Lucky - 2015-10-29 10:03 AM rachellyn80 - 2015-10-29 11:49 AM NJJ - 2015-10-29 9:22 AM Dash4KJ - 2015-10-29 9:16 AM SKM - 2015-10-29 6:17 AM On the 36 thing....I'm not reading it that they expect 36 contestants per event. I'm reading it as the rodeos can't set limits that make it where they accept less than 36 contestants. I do feel the ERA seems to be making this up as they go along. That part means you can't go to a small rodeo that does have the 5k added and they only get 15 contestants in your event. Makes it too easy to qualify for ERA so they say your rodeo has to have at least 36 in your event to make it a qualified rodeo to make your money count for ERA.
eta: Some rodeos limit the number of team ropers, etc
Oh please. No one would have said a dsmn thing if NJJ wouldn't have started her post with "Do you people READ????" It was an uncalled for statement. Just because everyone bows down to her on you alls secret little Fallout Shelter bash group doesn't mean the same treatment will be given on BHW. Not true!!! She hates me here, there, and everywhere! She does not like that Rude Sam V. She hates me everywhere equally. It's not. Lol. I was just being a sheet head.
 |
|
| |
Folks on-line