Log in to my account Barrel Horse World
Come on in Folks on-line

Today is

You are logged in as a guest. Logon or register an account to access more features.


2nd amendment

Jump to page :
Last activity 2020-07-27 8:47 AM
64 replies, 6746 views

View previous thread :: View next thread
   General Discussion -> Barrel Talk
Refresh
 
Turnburnsis
Reg. Nov 2004
Posted 2020-07-24 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Expert


Posts: 1409
1000100100100100
Location: Oklahoma

I thought the reason she was copying and pasting was because she showing what her sources are sayings so no one can come back and say you intrpret it wrong, you read yourself what she found and  you do your own interpretaion.  Yeah I probably didnt spell the big word right.... anyways thats why I think she does it but maybe not...

its up to you to read or not  

just like on fb you scroll on by....

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2020-07-24 9:45 AM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19623
50005000500020002000500100
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Turnburnsis - 2020-07-24 6:29 AM


I thought the reason she was copying and pasting was because she showing what her sources are sayings so no one can come back and say you intrpret it wrong, you read yourself what she found and  you do your own interpretaion.  Yeah I probably didnt spell the big word right.... anyways thats why I think she does it but maybe not...


its up to you to read or not  


just like on fb you scroll on by....


Exactly.  Some people are going to find fault no matter what. Some people don't want to click links, so I provide the text. Some don't like videos so I find an article.  I do this ALL the time on other forums. Nobody has a problem with it. In fact, if you don't provide links for them to read for themselves, they will call you a liar. Everybody is a fact checker these days.  I don't have a problem interpreting what I'm reading but everyone is different and sharing the source is my way of letting people use their own brain.  You must skip over the posts where I do say it in my own words.  So why don't you just put me on ignore save us both the aggrevation?  Have you ever noticed that only about a dozen people post on these threads but they get hundreds if not thousands of clicks.  THAT means people are reading them.  Those people are who I do this for. Plus the clicks are money in Dave and Gails pocket.  

I'm also tired of people who bully others to conform to the way they think things need to be. Roxy I'm talking to you. If you wanted me to remove the picture to return the thread to normal, all you had to do was ask me.  But you chose to be snarky.  That kind trips my trigger when people are that way.  So whatever you want to do going forward is up to you.  We can be civil or we can fight.

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2020-07-24 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19623
50005000500020002000500100
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Bear - 2020-07-23 10:00 PM


Chandler's Mom - 2020-07-23 11:24 PM


Bear - 2020-07-23 5:42 PM


OregonBR - 2020-07-23 1:37 PM


Southtxponygirl - 2020-07-23 11:19 AM


OregonBR - 2020-07-23 1:13 PM


I went back in my post and made the pic smaller but it didn't take.  Are you going to read it if I delete the pic. Cause you're really high maintenance.  If you're going to read it, I will fix it.


 



Why do you have to copy and paste all the time, just use your own words.. And No I wont read it because I have already heard about this couple from others on here that didnt have to copy and paste. I looked them up myself very easy. 





Too much readin.  Too many fancy big words.  I don't have time for that.  Just post a meme and some emojis.



This is awful tacky to Miss Roxie, Mr Scott. . . I have so much respect for you, but we can present both sides without being a smartbutt, yes???!!!



Here's the deal, as I see it.  Did you notice she called Peggy my "girlfriend"? Of course not.  She knows I'm married.  I didn't make a fuss over it, did I?  Do you know why I didn't make a fuss about it?  Do you think some might consider that disrespectful to me and my wife?  Think about that.  I didn't make a fuss about it because I figured out it wasn't intended to be an insult.  I'm not that thin skinned.  In my opinion, Peggy says an awful lot, and contributes a lot....a lot more than most.  So what if she cuts and pastes things?   If you have an issue about the substance contained in her posts, then you can state your opinion or just ignore it.  
I poked her a little because she was belly aching about C&P's.  Uffda.  


Not only do I know Scott and Carol are married, they are both in my friends on FB. I got tired of sharing PM's with them separately so I made a group to share with both at the same time. They live in TX and I'm in Oregon.  So.... I find your insinuation that there's something besides information/opinion sharing between us to be really LOW, hurtful and a bullying tactic.  

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bear
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2020-07-24 10:25 AM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment



BHW Resident Surgeon


Posts: 25351
500050005000500050001001001002525
Location: Bastrop, Texas

I always thought I had a fairly good vocabulary.....but over the past few years I've had to learn a lot of new words and expressions like "virtue signaling", "woke", and "microaggression".  Now I have discovered where they apply these new words.  Calling Peggy my "girlfriend" falls under the microaggression category, I suppose.

I prefer the term "pussification".  It's more of a catch-all phrase, and it covers everything.

 

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
NJJ
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2020-07-24 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Fact Checker


Posts: 16572
50005000500010005002525
Location: Displaced Iowegian

OregonBR - 2020-07-24 9:45 AM

Turnburnsis - 2020-07-24 6:29 AM

I thought the reason she was copying and pasting was because she showing what her sources are sayings so no one can come back and say you intrpret it wrong, you read yourself what she found and  you do your own interpretaion.  Yeah I probably didnt spell the big word right.... anyways thats why I think she does it but maybe not...

its up to you to read or not  

just like on fb you scroll on by....

Exactly.  Some people are going to find fault no matter what. Some people don't want to click links, so I provide the text. Some don't like videos so I find an article.  I do this ALL the time on other forums. Nobody has a problem with it. In fact, if you don't provide links for them to read for themselves, they will call you a liar. Everybody is a fact checker these days.  I don't have a problem interpreting what I'm reading but everyone is different and sharing the source is my way of letting people use their own brain.  You must skip over the posts where I do say it in my own words.  So why don't you just put me on ignore save us both the aggrevation?  Have you ever noticed that only about a dozen people post on these threads but they get hundreds if not thousands of clicks.  THAT means people are reading them.  Those people are who I do this for. Plus the clicks are money in Dave and Gails pocket.  

I'm also tired of people who bully others to conform to the way they think things need to be. Roxy I'm talking to you. If you wanted me to remove the picture to return the thread to normal, all you had to do was ask me.  But you chose to be snarky.  That kind trips my trigger when people are that way.  So whatever you want to do going forward is up to you.  We can be civil or we can fight.

Exactly why you post the entire articles......you are afraid that no one will pay attention to what you are trying to prove. The problem with MOST of your "cut and pastes" is that they take up PAGES and also make a person have to scroll over and down because they are too big which is a REAL problem for any person using a phone  ....Then when someone "quotes" the c&p, it is worse ..... but hey ..... what ever is best for YOU ......

"Have you ever noticed that only about a dozen people post on these threads"  WHY???? Because you and your "cohorts" have managed to RUN OFF anyone who dared to post any kind of opinion (or FACTS) that don't align with yours. The days of a civil discussion have gone out the window ...... now you TWO (YOU AND SCOTT) can quit picking on Roxie ..... she probably won't post much now ..... 



Edited by NJJ 2020-07-24 11:17 AM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bear
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2020-07-24 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment



BHW Resident Surgeon


Posts: 25351
500050005000500050001001001002525
Location: Bastrop, Texas

NJJ - 2020-07-24 10:51 AM


OregonBR - 2020-07-24 9:45 AM


Turnburnsis - 2020-07-24 6:29 AM


I thought the reason she was copying and pasting was because she showing what her sources are sayings so no one can come back and say you intrpret it wrong, you read yourself what she found and  you do your own interpretaion.  Yeah I probably didnt spell the big word right.... anyways thats why I think she does it but maybe not...


its up to you to read or not  


just like on fb you scroll on by....



Exactly.  Some people are going to find fault no matter what. Some people don't want to click links, so I provide the text. Some don't like videos so I find an article.  I do this ALL the time on other forums. Nobody has a problem with it. In fact, if you don't provide links for them to read for themselves, they will call you a liar. Everybody is a fact checker these days.  I don't have a problem interpreting what I'm reading but everyone is different and sharing the source is my way of letting people use their own brain.  You must skip over the posts where I do say it in my own words.  So why don't you just put me on ignore save us both the aggrevation?  Have you ever noticed that only about a dozen people post on these threads but they get hundreds if not thousands of clicks.  THAT means people are reading them.  Those people are who I do this for. Plus the clicks are money in Dave and Gails pocket.  


I'm also tired of people who bully others to conform to the way they think things need to be. Roxy I'm talking to you. If you wanted me to remove the picture to return the thread to normal, all you had to do was ask me.  But you chose to be snarky.  That kind trips my trigger when people are that way.  So whatever you want to do going forward is up to you.  We can be civil or we can fight.



Exactly why you post the entire articles......you are afraid that no one will pay attention to what you are trying to prove. The problem with MOST of your "cut and pastes" is that they take up PAGES and also make a person have to scroll over and down because they are too big which is a REAL problem for any person using a phone  ....but hey ..... what ever is best for YOU ......


"Have you ever noticed that only about a dozen people post on these threads"   WHY???? Because you and your "cohorts" have managed to RUN OFF anyone who dared to post any kind of opinion (or FACTS) that don't align with yours. The days of a civil discussion have gone out the window ...... now you TWO (YOU AND SCOTT) can quit picking on Roxie ..... she probably won't post much now ..... 


Now now, Norma.  That's microaggression.  We used to call it something else.  

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2020-07-24 11:56 AM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19623
50005000500020002000500100
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

NJJ - 2020-07-24 8:51 AM


OregonBR - 2020-07-24 9:45 AM


Turnburnsis - 2020-07-24 6:29 AM


I thought the reason she was copying and pasting was because she showing what her sources are sayings so no one can come back and say you intrpret it wrong, you read yourself what she found and  you do your own interpretaion.  Yeah I probably didnt spell the big word right.... anyways thats why I think she does it but maybe not...


its up to you to read or not  


just like on fb you scroll on by....



Exactly.  Some people are going to find fault no matter what. Some people don't want to click links, so I provide the text. Some don't like videos so I find an article.  I do this ALL the time on other forums. Nobody has a problem with it. In fact, if you don't provide links for them to read for themselves, they will call you a liar. Everybody is a fact checker these days.  I don't have a problem interpreting what I'm reading but everyone is different and sharing the source is my way of letting people use their own brain.  You must skip over the posts where I do say it in my own words.  So why don't you just put me on ignore save us both the aggrevation?  Have you ever noticed that only about a dozen people post on these threads but they get hundreds if not thousands of clicks.  THAT means people are reading them.  Those people are who I do this for. Plus the clicks are money in Dave and Gails pocket.  


I'm also tired of people who bully others to conform to the way they think things need to be. Roxy I'm talking to you. If you wanted me to remove the picture to return the thread to normal, all you had to do was ask me.  But you chose to be snarky.  That kind trips my trigger when people are that way.  So whatever you want to do going forward is up to you.  We can be civil or we can fight.



Exactly why you post the entire articles......you are afraid that no one will pay attention to what you are trying to prove. The problem with MOST of your "cut and pastes" is that they take up PAGES and also make a person have to scroll over and down because they are too big which is a REAL problem for any person using a phone  ....but hey ..... what ever is best for YOU ......


"Have you ever noticed that only about a dozen people post on these threads"   WHY???? Because you and your "cohorts" have managed to RUN OFF anyone who dared to post any kind of opinion (or FACTS) that don't align with yours. The days of a civil discussion have gone out the window ...... now you TWO (YOU AND SCOTT) can quit picking on Roxie ..... she probably won't post much now ..... 


Sigh. You are so tiresome.  Why do I have to explain everything ad nauseam? This is why I copy and paste.  You misinterpret everything said and assign nefarious intent.  I'll go through your complaints one at a time. 

I don't have a smart phone. People have said they don't like links because it uses data. Thus why I provide the text in addition to the links to video and articles for those that DO want to go to the source. I'm TRYING to accomodate what will make it easier for others to get facts from what I provide.  I took out all the advertising from the c & p so I already cleaned up that much. I will go back and delete the pic if SOMEONE would just be nice about it and ask me.  But if you're going to be a bully. I will NOT reward that behavior.

You just skipped right over the first part of the sentence that explains who I do this for and went right for the jugular. People don't post on these threads because of people like you who tear them up for one thing or another that you don't like.  I could give a sh*t what you think of me. You don't pay my bills nor is my value dependent on your opinion of me. 

I provide information for the many other people who don't post and won't post. But they WILL READ. The MSM sure won't tell the truth. If someone doesn't have access to real information, they may be totally in the dark about this. That's what/who I do this for. For sure not to get harrassed by you and Roxy every day. 

You're the ones people are avoiding contact with.  It's not pleasant for me to deal with you either. But you can't take my birthday away and I'm not letting you chase me away.   I have as much right to be here and voice my opinion/things that I think are important as you do. 

Because you don't read what I provide, you probably don't know that the prosecutor in this case had the crime lab tamper with the gun the woman was holding to make it operable again.  Thus she was not holding a lethal weapon at the time of the incident and can't be charged for that. That was the point of my providing this information. I'm pretty sure tampering with evidence is against the law and doesn't bode well for the defendants. 

I'M picking on Roxy??? BWAHAHAHA  I'm pretty sure she got up in my face, not the opposite. I'm having a civil discussion with you now.  I'm not cursing at you. I'm not calling names.  I sure have said a few things under my breath though. I'm pretty darn sure any name calling, snarky comments and curse words have come from BOTH sides in the past. They sure did come from your side this time. But putting blame on your opponent just one tactic used by people with nothing to say and no valid argument. Roxy is going to be just fine when she gets over being mad.  Are we going to be friends....probably not. I'm OK with that.

It's really SIMPLE. Don't like threads that have a political nature, don't click on them. Just scroll on by.

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
NJJ
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2020-07-24 12:03 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Fact Checker


Posts: 16572
50005000500010005002525
Location: Displaced Iowegian

OregonBR - 2020-07-24 11:56 AM


NJJ - 2020-07-24 8:51 AM


OregonBR - 2020-07-24 9:45 AM


Turnburnsis - 2020-07-24 6:29 AM


I thought the reason she was copying and pasting was because she showing what her sources are sayings so no one can come back and say you intrpret it wrong, you read yourself what she found and  you do your own interpretaion.  Yeah I probably didnt spell the big word right.... anyways thats why I think she does it but maybe not...


its up to you to read or not  


just like on fb you scroll on by....



Exactly.  Some people are going to find fault no matter what. Some people don't want to click links, so I provide the text. Some don't like videos so I find an article.  I do this ALL the time on other forums. Nobody has a problem with it. In fact, if you don't provide links for them to read for themselves, they will call you a liar. Everybody is a fact checker these days.  I don't have a problem interpreting what I'm reading but everyone is different and sharing the source is my way of letting people use their own brain.  You must skip over the posts where I do say it in my own words.  So why don't you just put me on ignore save us both the aggrevation?  Have you ever noticed that only about a dozen people post on these threads but they get hundreds if not thousands of clicks.  THAT means people are reading them.  Those people are who I do this for. Plus the clicks are money in Dave and Gails pocket.  


I'm also tired of people who bully others to conform to the way they think things need to be. Roxy I'm talking to you. If you wanted me to remove the picture to return the thread to normal, all you had to do was ask me.  But you chose to be snarky.  That kind trips my trigger when people are that way.  So whatever you want to do going forward is up to you.  We can be civil or we can fight.



Exactly why you post the entire articles......you are afraid that no one will pay attention to what you are trying to prove. The problem with MOST of your "cut and pastes" is that they take up PAGES and also make a person have to scroll over and down because they are too big which is a REAL problem for any person using a phone  ....but hey ..... what ever is best for YOU ......


"Have you ever noticed that only about a dozen people post on these threads"   WHY???? Because you and your "cohorts" have managed to RUN OFF anyone who dared to post any kind of opinion (or FACTS) that don't align with yours. The days of a civil discussion have gone out the window ...... now you TWO (YOU AND SCOTT) can quit picking on Roxie ..... she probably won't post much now ..... 



Sigh. You are so tiresome.  Why do I have to explain everything ad nauseam? This is why I copy and paste.  You misinterpret everything said and assign nefarious intent.  I'll go through your complaints one at a time. 


I don't have a smart phone. People have said they don't like links because it uses data. Thus why I provide the text in addition to the links to video and articles for those that DO want to go to the source. I'm TRYING to accomodate what will make it easier for others to get facts from what I provide.  I took out all the advertising from the c & p so I already cleaned up that much. I will go back and delete the pic if SOMEONE would just be nice about it and ask me.  But if you're going to be a bully. I will NOT reward that behavior.


You just skipped right over the first part of the sentence that explains who I do this for and went right for the jugular. People don't post on these threads because of people like you who tear them up for one thing or another that you don't like.  I could give a sh*t what you think of me. You don't pay my bills nor is my value dependent on your opinion of me. 


I provide information for the many other people who don't post and won't post. But they WILL READ. The MSM sure won't tell the truth. If someone doesn't have access to real information, they may be totally in the dark about this. That's what/who I do this for. For sure not to get harrassed by you and Roxy every day. 


You're the ones people are avoiding contact with.  It's not pleasant for me to deal with you either. But you can't take my birthday away and I'm not letting you chase me away.   I have as much right to be here and voice my opinion/things that I think are important as you do. 


Because you don't read what I provide, you probably don't know that the prosecutor in this case had the crime lab tamper with the gun the woman was holding to make it operable again.  Thus she was not holding a lethal weapon at the time of the incident and can't be charged for that. That was the point of my providing this information. I'm pretty sure tampering with evidence is against the law and doesn't bode well for the defendants. 


I'M picking on Roxy??? BWAHAHAHA  I'm pretty sure she got up in my face, not the opposite. I'm having a civil discussion with you now.  I'm not cursing at you. I'm not calling names.  I sure have said a few things under my breath though. I'm pretty darn sure any name calling, snarky comments and curse words have come from BOTH sides in the past. They sure did come from your side this time. But putting blame on your opponent just one tactic used by people with nothing to say and no valid argument. Roxy is going to be just fine when she gets over being mad.  Are we going to be friends....probably not. I'm OK with that.


It's really SIMPLE. Don't like threads that have a political nature, don't click on them. Just scroll on by.


↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Silly Filly
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2020-07-24 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Elite Veteran


Posts: 695
500100252525
Location: Windoming

OregonBR, I enjoy your posts and count on you to keep me informed.  You're right, I am one of the ones who just read and don't comment!  But I think you are being unfairly attacked. 

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bear
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2020-07-24 12:18 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment



BHW Resident Surgeon


Posts: 25351
500050005000500050001001001002525
Location: Bastrop, Texas

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2020-07-24 12:40 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19623
50005000500020002000500100
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Silly Filly - 2020-07-24 10:15 AM


OregonBR, I enjoy your posts and count on you to keep me informed.  You're right, I am one of the ones who just read and don't comment!  But I think you are being unfairly attacked. 


Thank you so much. 

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
NJJ
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2020-07-24 12:49 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Fact Checker


Posts: 16572
50005000500010005002525
Location: Displaced Iowegian

Since you want to point fingers ..... let's go back and just SEE who REALLY started the "fuss":

Roxie's post ......

"I hate this copy and paste mess/stuff/cra*, it really messed up this page and now its hard to read without having to move this page around.. "

And then ......

Peggy's response ......

"I went back in my post and made the pic smaller but it didn't take.  Are you going to read it if I delete the pic. Cause you're really high maintenance. If you're going to read it, I will fix it."

 

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2020-07-24 12:57 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19623
50005000500020002000500100
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

NJJ - 2020-07-24 10:49 AM


Since you want to point fingers ..... let's go back and just SEE who REALLY started the "fuss":


Roxie's post ......


"I hate this copy and paste mess/stuff/cra*, it really messed up this page and now its hard to read without having to move this page around.. "


And then ......


Peggy's response ......


"I went back in my post and made the pic smaller but it didn't take.  Are you going to read it if I delete the pic. Cause you're really high maintenance. If you're going to read it, I will fix it."


 


Did I lie? She is high maintenance. Everything I do is wrong in her mind and in yours.  

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bear
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2020-07-24 1:06 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment



BHW Resident Surgeon


Posts: 25351
500050005000500050001001001002525
Location: Bastrop, Texas

NJJ - 2020-07-24 12:49 PM


Since you want to point fingers ..... let's go back and just SEE who REALLY started the "fuss":


Roxie's post ......


"I hate this copy and paste mess/stuff/cra*, it really messed up this page and now its hard to read without having to move this page around.. "


And then ......


Peggy's response ......


"I went back in my post and made the pic smaller but it didn't take.  Are you going to read it if I delete the pic. Cause you're really high maintenance. If you're going to read it, I will fix it."


 


↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bear
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2020-07-24 1:12 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment



BHW Resident Surgeon


Posts: 25351
500050005000500050001001001002525
Location: Bastrop, Texas

Here's a good article from the American Thinker (C&P):

The left is ‘projecting’ its own evil onto conservatives

 

Have there ever been better examples of the psychological phenomenon known as “projection” than what we see and hear from the left each day?

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.

1. The right is violent.

Anti-Trump rioting in Portland, Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, Miami, Atlanta, Dallas, and Omaha by the left in which private and public property is destroyed.  During the campaign, the husband of elected congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, Robert Creamer, boasted on video of hiring thugs to violently disrupt the Trump rally in Chicago.

We still await the violent right-wing extremism of which the left always warns.  Maybe it is they to whom they really refer.  Projecting?

2. The right is not tolerant.

All one need to do is suggest that a conservative lecturer visit a college campus.  The opposing arguments and points of view are not tolerated by the left, and there are repeated examples.  “Liberal” education in its pure form “invites” discussion and opposing views.  Open debate and civil discourse is welcomed by the right, yet shouting down and denying opposing viewpoints is the new discourse delivered by the “projecting” left and driven by the Saul Alinsky principles.

3. The right is racist.

Everything the left witnesses is shot through the prism of race.  Race is their oxygen, and they can’t take a breath without it.   Of late, Lebron James, and the liberal press, thinks a reference to the people with whom he travels as his “posse” is racist.   (The pendulum is hitting the wall.)  Gene Autry and Roy Rogers had posses – was that racist?  The absurdity and prevalence of these instances requires no further comment.  Who invites race into each discussion or dissection of the events of the day?   The “projecting” left.

4. The Republican Party is infighting and in disarray.

As is the case in the previous examples of “projection,” this was patently false.  And, in glaring fashion, it was indeed just the other way around.  There were 17 candidates for the Republican nomination for president.  There were three from the Democratic Party, and quickly down to two as Jim Webb saw the game unfold and withdrew.

Seventeen candidates engaged in lively debate and constitutional discourse on the Republican side.  A Socialist and a former first lady with a checkered performance as secretary of state on the Democrat side.  The primary involvement of the Republican voters was record-breaking, not so much so with the Democrats.

In fact, in actuality, it was the Democratic Party that was imploding.  Nine hundred state legislative seats lost in the past eight years.  That is a record for a presidential stint, Mr. Obama.  Only five states have a Democrat governor, House and Senate.   Republican governors rose from 22 to 31, Democrats falling from 28 to 18.  Republican state Senate seats rose from a 2009 level of 899 to 1,089, as Democrat seats fell from a 2009 level of 1,024 to 823.  Likewise, Republican state House seats rose from 2009 level of 2,334 to 3,029, as Democrats fell from 3,058 to 2,340.

Finally, Barack Obama seems bent on reminding everyone that “I did a pretty good job.”  This is more delusional than projecting, but both are similar in their detachment from reality.

If this is a pretty good job, Mr. Obama, play on.  Your legacy will be shrouded in this detachment from reality, and the history books will speak of riots from the left, not the right.  It will speak of the steep decline in your party’s stature.  These “successes” you delivered will speak for themselves.  The Democratic Party looks to pick up the pieces, if they can find them.  Accusations and “projections” from the left begin to fall on deaf ears. 

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
OregonBR
Reg. Dec 2003
Posted 2020-07-24 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Champ


Posts: 19623
50005000500020002000500100
Location: Peg-Leg Julia Grimm

Great C & P Scott! 

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
NJJ
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2020-07-24 1:16 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Fact Checker


Posts: 16572
50005000500010005002525
Location: Displaced Iowegian

OH .....LOOK ...... We now have Scott coming back to protect his "friend" ........

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Bear
Reg. Dec 2007
Posted 2020-07-24 1:31 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment



BHW Resident Surgeon


Posts: 25351
500050005000500050001001001002525
Location: Bastrop, Texas

NJJ - 2020-07-24 1:16 PM


OH .....LOOK ...... We now have Scott coming back to protect his "friend" ........


You're just mad because of that photo I posted.  Leave my "girlfriend" alone Norma.

You need some Beano for all your bad gas.

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
geronabean
Reg. Sep 2003
Posted 2020-07-24 1:57 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Queen Bean of Ponyland


Posts: 24952
5000500050005000200020005001001001001002525
Location: WYOMING

Dang you just never know what kinda ****storm you are gonna get when you click on a topic



Edited by geronabean 2020-07-24 1:58 PM
↑ Top ↓ Bottom
NJJ
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2020-07-24 2:03 PM
Subject: RE: 2nd amendment


Military family

Fact Checker


Posts: 16572
50005000500010005002525
Location: Displaced Iowegian

Bear - 2020-07-24 1:31 PM


NJJ - 2020-07-24 1:16 PM


OH .....LOOK ...... We now have Scott coming back to protect his "friend" ........



You're just mad because of that photo I posted.  Leave my "girlfriend" alone Norma.


You need some Beano for all your bad gas.


 


SOOOOOO ....you admit it .... she IS your "girlfriend" ..... I thought you had better taste than that....   LOL

↑ Top ↓ Bottom
Jump to page :
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread
 

© Copyright 2002- BarrelHorseWorld.com All rights reserved including digital rights

Support - Contact / Log in to my account


Working Truck World Working Horse World Cargo Trailer World Horse Trailer World Roping Horse World
'
Registered to: Barrel Horse World
(Delete all cookies set by this site)
Running MegaBBS ASP Forum Software
© 2002-2025 PD9 Software