|
|
 Jr. Detective
      Location: Beggs, OK | Ultimately the sickest part of this whole procedure is the manner in which it's being performed. If they are harvesting organs, there's no way that they are using the drugs normally used to stop the heart prior to removing the baby. (Yes, I said BABY) The drugs would damage the tissue that they so badly want to get their disgusting hands on. That process needs to be explained in detail to everyone in the the world that wants to have an opinion about these little lives that are being taken, many times out of CONVENIENCE for the female that decided that she just "wasn't ready to be a mother".
The females that I know who have killed their babies are still emotionally distressed to this day. If anyone can sincerely say that they feel no regret whatsoever, they need to be sterilized immediately so that it can never happen again. | |
| | |
  Friendly horse swapper
Posts: 4122
   Location: Buffalo, TX | TXBO - 2015-07-17 11:34 AM Cindy Hamilton - 2015-07-17 11:15 AM AMEN....Abortion is the holy grail of the left and trumps EVERYTHING...oh yeah, but they are anti death penalty...huh???...just shows how screwed up they all are...  You just got your second "like" from me today.
Well, I learned something today...I never realized there were "like' buttons...LOL...(I don't get out much)..., but thanks.... | |
| | |
 I Prefer to Live in Fantasy Land
Posts: 64864
                    Location: In the Hills of Texas | Heartswideopen...That was an awesome read. 
This part sure explains a lot of why this country is so screwed up.
If we flip the switch as a nation which has exported its industrial sector and increasingly demands HIGH skilled labor, with abortion ==> high artificial mortality ==> increased birth rate among young women, we land up with low-skilled laborers producing more children, while high skilled laborers have fewer children, greater income, and less economic burden. Again, this is empirically backed. The more education a female receives, the LESS children she will have. In this country it is currently easier to have children and obtain a welfare check than it is to go to college. Thus, If we live in a service-based economy such as the U.S. (and most developed nations) and also have an aging population, by allowing for abortion, we increase the rate at which women will continue to have MORE children and LESS education. Thus, by allowing for a large population of low skilled labor, and conversely a low population of high skilled labor, we have a recipe for economic disaster and we further stratify the social classes and increase the income gap. | |
| | |
 Expert
Posts: 2128
  
| So as a country we have the most teen pregnancies, and highest abortion rates correct?
I dont like the thought of yanking a child out of its mother with a pair or forecepts and crushing its skull. Blunt, yes, but thats what happends. I also hate the thought of kids being raised in homes with unfit parents. I feel empathetic toward kids who are part of the system and grow up in foster homes. Since I dont like ANY of the options above I feel very strongly about preventing situations that lead to circumstances like those stated. We need to work harder to educate young women AND YOUNG MEN. . I also would love to see an ingestible or injectable option of birth control for males. I dont remember sex education in high school, it was not emphasised. I think it should have been. Parents need to talk to their children, it all starts at home right. I would like to see proposals for solutions that solve the problem up wind of abortion. Thats just me. | |
| | |
 Hugs to You
Posts: 7551
     Location: In The Land of Cotton | Nevertooold - 2015-07-17 1:29 PM Heartswideopen...That was an awesome read.
This part sure explains a lot of why this country is so screwed up.
If we flip the switch as a nation which has exported its industrial sector and increasingly demands HIGH skilled labor, with abortion ==> high artificial mortality ==> increased birth rate among young women, we land up with low-skilled laborers producing more children, while high skilled laborers have fewer children, greater income, and less economic burden. Again, this is empirically backed. The more education a female receives, the LESS children she will have. In this country it is currently easier to have children and obtain a welfare check than it is to go to college. Thus, If we live in a service-based economy such as the U.S. (and most developed nations) and also have an aging population, by allowing for abortion, we increase the rate at which women will continue to have MORE children and LESS education. Thus, by allowing for a large population of low skilled labor, and conversely a low population of high skilled labor, we have a recipe for economic disaster and we further stratify the social classes and increase the income gap.
JMO - but this paragraph alone needs to be sent to all news stations, papers, etc. Anyone with any sense will read it and realize in a nutshell this is what is happening. | |
| | |
 I Prefer to Live in Fantasy Land
Posts: 64864
                    Location: In the Hills of Texas | 3canstorun - 2015-07-17 1:16 PM Nevertooold - 2015-07-17 1:29 PM Heartswideopen...That was an awesome read.
This part sure explains a lot of why this country is so screwed up.
If we flip the switch as a nation which has exported its industrial sector and increasingly demands HIGH skilled labor, with abortion ==> high artificial mortality ==> increased birth rate among young women, we land up with low-skilled laborers producing more children, while high skilled laborers have fewer children, greater income, and less economic burden. Again, this is empirically backed. The more education a female receives, the LESS children she will have. In this country it is currently easier to have children and obtain a welfare check than it is to go to college. Thus, If we live in a service-based economy such as the U.S. (and most developed nations) and also have an aging population, by allowing for abortion, we increase the rate at which women will continue to have MORE children and LESS education. Thus, by allowing for a large population of low skilled labor, and conversely a low population of high skilled labor, we have a recipe for economic disaster and we further stratify the social classes and increase the income gap.
JMO - but this paragraph alone needs to be sent to all news stations, papers, etc. Anyone with any sense will read it and realize in a nutshell this is what is happening.
The main stream media doesn't want to report the truth as it might hurt someone's feelings and it might not look good for liberal policies, proving that they don't work. | |
| | |
 Expert
Posts: 3782
        Location: Gainesville, TX | Cindy Hamilton - 2015-07-17 10:28 AM
oija - 2015-07-16 11:56 AM TrailGirl - 2015-07-16 11:24 AM oija - 2015-07-16 11:03 AM horsesinharleton - 2015-07-16 11:01 AM oija - 2015-07-16 10:52 AM TrailGirl - 2015-07-16 10:35 AM Sorry....I certainly do not see her callous nature as "irrelevant". I didn't say what many will see as callousness as irrelevant. I said her meal was. I don't care if she was sitting down for a meal, what she was eating or drinking, or if she was on a casual trail ride... it was WHAT she said that is the issue with me!! Which is what I was asking people to focus on. Look at the first page and the number of comments on her meal though. The fact that she is talking about this casually over a meal IS relevant. It speaks to her absolute comfort with the topic. While a heart transplant surgeon may be comfortable discussing his work over dinner...that is completely different. It's not just her comfort level with the blood/organs/tissues itself (I get that as I can discuss veterinary procedures all day eating a hamburger )...it's the fact that unlike the heart surgeon who is performing a life saving procedure...she is discussing the best means to kill an infant in order to keep it's parts useful for sale. See the difference? See why context matters? No I think she would come across as callous even without eating. I still find the meal irrelevant. I think it is being overplayed only because people feel so emotional about this topic. Abortion and her attitude is what matters, not her meal.
I didn't have time to read all of the posts, but if you don't get emotional over this topic and feel like it's being overplayed, you are beyond help.....I know there are people out there who can remain emotionless in the face of horrible tragedies, but they aren't the kind I want to know....there's something very cold about your acceptance of the circumstances surrounding this event, and I fear it's the same feeling that is overtaking the country and going to send us down the tubes....
This comment is inappropriate because you failed to read those posts. I never said the woman's attitude was acceptable. I said she would come across that way in any context. I simply said people comments should focus more on the issue of abortion than what the woman was eating.
ETA. The meal was overplayed on the first page. The post has largely corrected itself to the actual issue now which is a much more fruitful discussion.
Edited by oija 2015-07-17 5:10 PM
| |
| | |
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25352
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | oija - 2015-07-17 5:07 PM
Cindy Hamilton - 2015-07-17 10:28 AM
oija - 2015-07-16 11:56 AM TrailGirl - 2015-07-16 11:24 AM oija - 2015-07-16 11:03 AM horsesinharleton - 2015-07-16 11:01 AM oija - 2015-07-16 10:52 AM TrailGirl - 2015-07-16 10:35 AM Sorry....I certainly do not see her callous nature as "irrelevant". I didn't say what many will see as callousness as irrelevant. I said her meal was. I don't care if she was sitting down for a meal, what she was eating or drinking, or if she was on a casual trail ride... it was WHAT she said that is the issue with me!! Which is what I was asking people to focus on. Look at the first page and the number of comments on her meal though. The fact that she is talking about this casually over a meal IS relevant. It speaks to her absolute comfort with the topic. While a heart transplant surgeon may be comfortable discussing his work over dinner...that is completely different. It's not just her comfort level with the blood/organs/tissues itself (I get that as I can discuss veterinary procedures all day eating a hamburger )...it's the fact that unlike the heart surgeon who is performing a life saving procedure...she is discussing the best means to kill an infant in order to keep it's parts useful for sale. See the difference? See why context matters? No I think she would come across as callous even without eating. I still find the meal irrelevant. I think it is being overplayed only because people feel so emotional about this topic. Abortion and her attitude is what matters, not her meal.
I didn't have time to read all of the posts, but if you don't get emotional over this topic and feel like it's being overplayed, you are beyond help.....I know there are people out there who can remain emotionless in the face of horrible tragedies, but they aren't the kind I want to know....there's something very cold about your acceptance of the circumstances surrounding this event, and I fear it's the same feeling that is overtaking the country and going to send us down the tubes....
This comment is inappropriate because you failed to read those posts. I never said the woman's attitude was acceptable. I said she would come across that way in any context. I simply said people comments should focus more on the issue of abortion than what the woman was eating.
ETA. The meal was overplayed on the first page. The post has largely corrected itself to the actual issue now which is a much more fruitful discussion.
I always get hungry when I watch documentaries about Auschwitz.
I'm sure we all crave canape's and a fine wine when discussing graphic details of crushing the skull of a squirming, living fetus carefully, so as to eviscerate it with the internal organs intact. After all, this doctor gets to do this every day. My favorite is fava beans and a fine Chianti when I think of things of this sort. I don't understand what this has to do with this topic. | |
| | |
 Regular
Posts: 54
 
| oija - 2015-07-16 12:35 PM
Bear - 2015-07-16 11:55 AM
oija - 2015-07-16 10:31 AM
To get away, just a minute, from the overly emotional appeals and prevent a different perspective. This may have been a poor venue choice or not. Most people are more relaxed over a meal. Plenty of pro lifers like to eat salads and drink wine too. Her meal choices have NOTHING to do with this issue. Many of us watch starving children eat on television or watch people eat on sitcoms and somehow this is not disgusting. If this bothers you, it bothers you that someone who is opposed to your point of view treats it more casually or views the life of a child as valuable for other reasons, like saving the life of a child that has already been born, than what you personally think. You would find the topic disgusting no matter what. You just find it disturbing that she can treat it casually enough that she can discuss it while she eats. What she is eating and honestly the fact that she is eating is IRRELEVANT. Many medical professionals, my mother included as she is a nurse, have strong stomachs and can discuss topics over lunch that might turn many of our stomachs. If you want to discuss the issue, then discuss the issue, not her meal.
That being said. The parents with the premature baby born at 28 weeks that they have prayed and wished for may truly appreciate the fact that these organs are there in the first place to save their son or daughter. A life may be lost and another one saved.
Please just remember these points when you are discussing the issue.
Personally I'm not a fan of abortions. I'm a huge major fan of family planning and handing out condoms like its going out of style. But when we discuss these issues we do a disservice not to consider all sides of the issue with some logic, not just emotion, and to separate out the irrelevant bits. We do not want to be like politicians, throwing out red herrings to distract from the central issue. Frankly a video of heart surgery or a heart transplant, especially from a beating heart cadaver, is also disturbing to many people but it saves lives.
Be against this issue because you hate to see a life, any life, cut short. Don't be against it because the doctor is eating and the procedure is hard to look at.
Handing out condoms is a cheap ploy....a ruse. Condoms are cheap.....go out and buy your own condoms. They hand out condoms so people can talk about how wonderful they are. It's a marketing tool. For that matter, I think birth control, in general, ought to be the responsibility of those who decide they need it. Why should hard working taxpayers be expected to provide free birth control? That money would be much better spent educating idiots on basic communication skills like grammar and spelling, because it would benefit society in general. If someone decides they want to have an abortion, that is their right. They are the ones who will have to live with it. They should also be fully aware that they are terminating life. They should be aware that those unborn babies can perceive pain much earlier than once thought. They should also be aware of how abortions are performed, particularly late term abortions. They need to know that the baby squirms and writhes as the baby is crushed, dismembered, mascerated, and pithed. They need to realize that there's a significant chance they will have to deal with the psychological after effects, possibly for a very long time.
What I found to be most disturbing about this video was how the woman callously described the gruesome technical details while eating. If you don't find that at least a little disturbing, then I have to wonder about you.
For 18 years, as part of a transplant team, I participated in organ procurement on organ donors. Even though their hearts were beating and they looked very much alive, they were brain dead. Without fail, the procedure was conducted as a very solemn procedure. Our behavior and conduct in that operating room was dignified and everyone felt gratified that some family was willing to donate the organs of a loved one. It really is a sight to behold, and nothing illustrates the better angels of our nature, as human beings. Deep inside, in a certain way, we also viewed it as a joyous occasion, because we knew the organs we harvested could save countless lives. The family also found consolation in knowing that their loved one was a hero in death to many people. That provided lasting comfort to them, in an otherwise very sad day. This is why I was appalled with the woman in the video. We conducted ourselves with dignity and respect. We didn't play our usual music, and nobody told jokes. We behaved as if we were under the watchful eye of that donor's family. I'll never forget the imagery of a 12 year old boy who was a donor. As I finished removing his heart, I looked over the drapes at his face, and over at his arm on the IV board. He had fallen out of a treehouse earlier that day. He still had Popsicle stains around his pink lips. He had a bandaid on his hand from a scrape he sustained probably several days earlier. He still had a washable bubblegum tattoo of a cartoon figure on his forearm. He was someone's pride and joy and very much loved. I later met the family and witnessed their joy and sadness at the same time, something a person can find hard to comprehend......until it happens to them.
I would never ever allow a doctor this cold and calloused in my operating room. She wouldn't understand.....she wouldn't fit in.
To the person who can't afford a box of condoms and probably can't afford a kid either or treatment for STDs, that condom may make a real difference. Better a condom than an abortion, cheaper too. And marketing can work. We all became convinced we needed diamond engagement rings because of marketing, silly as that may be. If marketing can make someone use a condom then hallelujah. Taxpayers paying for biirth control is a completely different issue. I never said anything about the government needing to fund it. Private groups can hand these out as easily as public ones.
I totally agree on the point that we should treat any of these issues and any lives connected with them with dignity and respect. I just firmly believe that whether she were eating or not that people who disagree with her views are going to see her as callous due to her tone of voice and opinions. I believe that she has given herself some emotional distance from this procedure as a survival skill and this comes across; it would come across in any context. I think it is more pertinent to talk about the issue and the procedure than her meal.
When we simply attack her as completely disgusting we are engaging in an ad hominem attack, criticizing the person and not the issue. She is not disgusting though her attitude may be. She is a fully developed human being who believes that what she is doing helps other people. Anyone has the right to disagree with her. Don't attack the person, attack the problem. Hate the sin, love the sinner.
We should not dehumanize her and talk about her like she is an animal at a trough with no human feeling anymore than she should appear to dehumanize the lives of the children that are lost through abortion. She would talk about the technical details the same in any context though I am convinced and seem cold thus I still firmly believe that the meal is irrelevant.
She IS disgusting. She doesn't give a single intercourse about those murdered babies or their mothers. She's a greedy, selfish , sick, twisted tnuc and she puts Mengele to shame. "planned parenthood" is as bad as isis. | |
| | |
One Grateful Mom
Posts: 2702
    Location: wolverton,mn | Heartswideopen........excellent work | |
| | |
 My Heart Be Happy
Posts: 9159
      Location: Arkansas | Bear - 2015-07-16 11:55 AM
oija - 2015-07-16 10:31 AM
To get away, just a minute, from the overly emotional appeals and prevent a different perspective. This may have been a poor venue choice or not. Most people are more relaxed over a meal. Plenty of pro lifers like to eat salads and drink wine too. Her meal choices have NOTHING to do with this issue. Many of us watch starving children eat on television or watch people eat on sitcoms and somehow this is not disgusting. If this bothers you, it bothers you that someone who is opposed to your point of view treats it more casually or views the life of a child as valuable for other reasons, like saving the life of a child that has already been born, than what you personally think. You would find the topic disgusting no matter what. You just find it disturbing that she can treat it casually enough that she can discuss it while she eats. What she is eating and honestly the fact that she is eating is IRRELEVANT. Many medical professionals, my mother included as she is a nurse, have strong stomachs and can discuss topics over lunch that might turn many of our stomachs. If you want to discuss the issue, then discuss the issue, not her meal.
That being said. The parents with the premature baby born at 28 weeks that they have prayed and wished for may truly appreciate the fact that these organs are there in the first place to save their son or daughter. A life may be lost and another one saved.
Please just remember these points when you are discussing the issue.
Personally I'm not a fan of abortions. I'm a huge major fan of family planning and handing out condoms like its going out of style. But when we discuss these issues we do a disservice not to consider all sides of the issue with some logic, not just emotion, and to separate out the irrelevant bits. We do not want to be like politicians, throwing out red herrings to distract from the central issue. Frankly a video of heart surgery or a heart transplant, especially from a beating heart cadaver, is also disturbing to many people but it saves lives.
Be against this issue because you hate to see a life, any life, cut short. Don't be against it because the doctor is eating and the procedure is hard to look at.
Handing out condoms is a cheap ploy....a ruse. Condoms are cheap.....go out and buy your own condoms. They hand out condoms so people can talk about how wonderful they are. It's a marketing tool. For that matter, I think birth control, in general, ought to be the responsibility of those who decide they need it. Why should hard working taxpayers be expected to provide free birth control? That money would be much better spent educating idiots on basic communication skills like grammar and spelling, because it would benefit society in general. If someone decides they want to have an abortion, that is their right. They are the ones who will have to live with it. They should also be fully aware that they are terminating life. They should be aware that those unborn babies can perceive pain much earlier than once thought. They should also be aware of how abortions are performed, particularly late term abortions. They need to know that the baby squirms and writhes as the baby is crushed, dismembered, mascerated, and pithed. They need to realize that there's a significant chance they will have to deal with the psychological after effects, possibly for a very long time.
What I found to be most disturbing about this video was how the woman callously described the gruesome technical details while eating. If you don't find that at least a little disturbing, then I have to wonder about you.
For 18 years, as part of a transplant team, I participated in organ procurement on organ donors. Even though their hearts were beating and they looked very much alive, they were brain dead. Without fail, the procedure was conducted as a very solemn procedure. Our behavior and conduct in that operating room was dignified and everyone felt gratified that some family was willing to donate the organs of a loved one. It really is a sight to behold, and nothing illustrates the better angels of our nature, as human beings. Deep inside, in a certain way, we also viewed it as a joyous occasion, because we knew the organs we harvested could save countless lives. The family also found consolation in knowing that their loved one was a hero in death to many people. That provided lasting comfort to them, in an otherwise very sad day. This is why I was appalled with the woman in the video. We conducted ourselves with dignity and respect. We didn't play our usual music, and nobody told jokes. We behaved as if we were under the watchful eye of that donor's family. I'll never forget the imagery of a 12 year old boy who was a donor. As I finished removing his heart, I looked over the drapes at his face, and over at his arm on the IV board. He had fallen out of a treehouse earlier that day. He still had Popsicle stains around his pink lips. He had a bandaid on his hand from a scrape he sustained probably several days earlier. He still had a washable bubblegum tattoo of a cartoon figure on his forearm. He was someone's pride and joy and very much loved. I later met the family and witnessed their joy and sadness at the same time, something a person can find hard to comprehend......until it happens to them.
I would never ever allow a doctor this cold and calloused in my operating room. She wouldn't understand.....she wouldn't fit in.
This brought tears to my eyes. . . . What a horrible situation for those parents, but what a blessing that you and your team were the respectful professionals that still cared about their baby at the end. | |
| | |
Holy Fruit Loops!
Posts: 1708
    Location: Colorado | Bear - 2015-07-16 11:55 AM oija - 2015-07-16 10:31 AM To get away, just a minute, from the overly emotional appeals and prevent a different perspective. This may have been a poor venue choice or not. Most people are more relaxed over a meal. Plenty of pro lifers like to eat salads and drink wine too. Her meal choices have NOTHING to do with this issue. Many of us watch starving children eat on television or watch people eat on sitcoms and somehow this is not disgusting. If this bothers you, it bothers you that someone who is opposed to your point of view treats it more casually or views the life of a child as valuable for other reasons, like saving the life of a child that has already been born, than what you personally think. You would find the topic disgusting no matter what. You just find it disturbing that she can treat it casually enough that she can discuss it while she eats. What she is eating and honestly the fact that she is eating is IRRELEVANT. Many medical professionals, my mother included as she is a nurse, have strong stomachs and can discuss topics over lunch that might turn many of our stomachs. If you want to discuss the issue, then discuss the issue, not her meal. That being said. The parents with the premature baby born at 28 weeks that they have prayed and wished for may truly appreciate the fact that these organs are there in the first place to save their son or daughter. A life may be lost and another one saved. Please just remember these points when you are discussing the issue. Personally I'm not a fan of abortions. I'm a huge major fan of family planning and handing out condoms like its going out of style. But when we discuss these issues we do a disservice not to consider all sides of the issue with some logic, not just emotion, and to separate out the irrelevant bits. We do not want to be like politicians, throwing out red herrings to distract from the central issue. Frankly a video of heart surgery or a heart transplant, especially from a beating heart cadaver, is also disturbing to many people but it saves lives. Be against this issue because you hate to see a life, any life, cut short. Don't be against it because the doctor is eating and the procedure is hard to look at. Handing out condoms is a cheap ploy....a ruse. Condoms are cheap.....go out and buy your own condoms. They hand out condoms so people can talk about how wonderful they are. It's a marketing tool. For that matter, I think birth control, in general, ought to be the responsibility of those who decide they need it. Why should hard working taxpayers be expected to provide free birth control? That money would be much better spent educating idiots on basic communication skills like grammar and spelling, because it would benefit society in general. If someone decides they want to have an abortion, that is their right. They are the ones who will have to live with it. They should also be fully aware that they are terminating life. They should be aware that those unborn babies can perceive pain much earlier than once thought. They should also be aware of how abortions are performed, particularly late term abortions. They need to know that the baby squirms and writhes as the baby is crushed, dismembered, mascerated, and pithed. They need to realize that there's a significant chance they will have to deal with the psychological after effects, possibly for a very long time. What I found to be most disturbing about this video was how the woman callously described the gruesome technical details while eating. If you don't find that at least a little disturbing, then I have to wonder about you. For 18 years, as part of a transplant team, I participated in organ procurement on organ donors. Even though their hearts were beating and they looked very much alive, they were brain dead. Without fail, the procedure was conducted as a very solemn procedure. Our behavior and conduct in that operating room was dignified and everyone felt gratified that some family was willing to donate the organs of a loved one. It really is a sight to behold, and nothing illustrates the better angels of our nature, as human beings. Deep inside, in a certain way, we also viewed it as a joyous occasion, because we knew the organs we harvested could save countless lives. The family also found consolation in knowing that their loved one was a hero in death to many people. That provided lasting comfort to them, in an otherwise very sad day. This is why I was appalled with the woman in the video. We conducted ourselves with dignity and respect. We didn't play our usual music, and nobody told jokes. We behaved as if we were under the watchful eye of that donor's family. I'll never forget the imagery of a 12 year old boy who was a donor. As I finished removing his heart, I looked over the drapes at his face, and over at his arm on the IV board. He had fallen out of a treehouse earlier that day. He still had Popsicle stains around his pink lips. He had a bandaid on his hand from a scrape he sustained probably several days earlier. He still had a washable bubblegum tattoo of a cartoon figure on his forearm. He was someone's pride and joy and very much loved. I later met the family and witnessed their joy and sadness at the same time, something a person can find hard to comprehend......until it happens to them. I would never ever allow a doctor this cold and calloused in my operating room. She wouldn't understand.....she wouldn't fit in.
Read about the Colorado's Family Planning Initiative. Make sure and read the part where not only teen age pregnancy went Down but abortions dropped as well. Education and low cost or free birth control is a good thing!
If as a Nation we decide to force all pregnancies to term then we better be ready to do right by those children. As long as there is ONE child that goes to bed hungry, cold, in an unsafe enviorment we are no better than any third world country.
karen
| |
| | |
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25352
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Karen, I notice you didn't comment on the original topic. I find that telling.
Of all the aspects of this thread to comment on, you choose the most benign.....free condoms. If planned parenthood or anyone else wants to hand out free condoms, then fine with me. Just because it's a good thing doesn't mean taxpayers should have to pitch in $500 Million to finance these extermination camps. In the minds of a great many Americans, That's exactly what Planned Parenthood is......death camps for unborn children. The Nazi's did the same thing in WWII when they disguised Theresienstadt as some sort of idyllic spa for the purposes of public relations, when in reality it was a holding camp until victims could be shipped out for processing in death camps.....just like PP uses free birth control as some magnanimous ruse to whitewash their diabolical practice of processing exterminated babies with completely formed organs, which they sell.
Handing out free condoms is a cheap ploy so idiots can try convincing taxpayers that handing over half a billion dollars is some good "investment".
Condoms cost less than a can of Pepsi, or a Snickers bar. Everyone can afford a condom in today's world. Planned Parenthood can stand on their own, without taxpayer funding. Liberals such as yourself can donate as much to PP as they want. We give them hundreds of millions, and they turn around and funnel money to Democrat politicians. If you don't believe that, I have a nice bridge I can sell you in Brooklyn for an excellent price.
| |
| | |
Holy Fruit Loops!
Posts: 1708
    Location: Colorado | Doc, I have no doubt you were a great surg. but your psych skills suck.
The information I offered proves that education and low to no cost Birth Control works.
Please feel free to rail on about Nazi's and free condoms. Others are working to actually solve the problem.
I am off to help at a low cost Rabies clinic and then help some kids get ready for fair. Things I consider much more important than playing here.
karen
| |
| | |
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25352
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | Stitch4k9 - 2015-07-18 10:51 AM
Doc, Â Â I have no doubt you were a great surg. Â but your psych skills suck. Â
The information I offered proves that education and low to no cost Birth Control works.Â
Please feel free to rail on about Nazi's and free condoms. Â Others are working to actually solve the problem.Â
I am off to help at a low cost Rabies clinic and then help some kids get ready for fair. Â Things I consider much more important than playing here.
karen
Â
Karen, thank you for the personal insult. I'll consider the source and take it as a compliment. When you say "others are working to solve the problem", what "problem" are you talking about? The primary reason for my starting this thread was not to target free birth control. Nope....it was to target Planned Parenthood's operations.....particularly their gruesome late term abortion practices. You cherry picked a comparatively innocent, benign practice of handing out free condoms and other free birth control measures.
The fact that you say I suck as a psychiatrist tells me you can't engage in the topic. Losers typically resort to name calling, as they slink away.
My understanding is the "Colorado Family Planning Initiative" is privately funded....gasp! Thank you for bolstering my contention that PP can survive with private funding.
My apologies to the Nazi's for suggesting what they did to babies was on the same level as as what PP is doing. PP is much more cunning and skilled at concealing their own ongoing holocaust.
Anyway, Karen, I apologize for my inability to meet your psychiatric needs.
Edited by Bear 2015-07-18 3:30 PM
| |
| | |
 Shelter Dog Lover
Posts: 10277
      
| How anybody can justify late term abortions is beyond my scope of understanding. The fact that the babies head remains in the birth canal while they are pierced with a scalpel is so barbaric there are no words for it. It is such a technicality that the "baby has not been birthed and therefore not considered a human and not afforded therights as a birthed baby'. Deliver the baby a few more inches and you have a human. Those who are willing to sacrifice these babies for fear making late term abortions will lead to more restrictions need to google and watch one of these procedures. PP can definitely survive through private funding. I would support any organization that focuses on education and birth control, no group who performs abortions would get a dime of my money. I am pro choice with restrictions but don't ask me to pay for it. | |
| | |
 I Prefer to Live in Fantasy Land
Posts: 64864
                    Location: In the Hills of Texas | This thread is about late term abortions and I know many aren't against early term abortions and if a mother has to wait until she is 17 weeks or longer to decide to terminate, she indeed needs a pysch test.
As far as a third world country, come down to southern Texas, we are already there and it has nothing to do with abortions, it's about all the illegals crossing our border and then you have lib cities like Detroit, Chicago and Baltimore where Libs have created their false utopias where people are taken care of by our government. You can't keep giving people stuff without teaching them how to make money to buy their own stuff. You can't continue to throw money at these problems. If a kid has no structure from the home, how can they have any structure in society? Where having illegitimate children is awarded by more welfare dollars, how do you expect these people to stop having them? Just like middle America has taught their children to work hard and make something of themselves, the lib ghettos continue to teach women to lay on their backs with numerous men and have illegitimate children to get more money. Don't even think of getting married and have a real family as the government dollars stop.
I believe in helping people that really need help, not the people that have been taught by generations before them to work the system and complain how whitey enslaved some of them over a hundred years ago, but be in denial that blacks are the ones that sold slaves to whitey and blacks.
| |
| | |
 Expert
Posts: 4121
   Location: SE Louisiana | Three percent of all Planned Parenthood health services are abortion services. They have done a lot of good over the years and I don't think we should trash the whole program because of this. I believe simply denying them the ability to perform abortions will fix this without denying the rest of the services to the poor. | |
| | |
 BHW Resident Surgeon
Posts: 25352
          Location: Bastrop, Texas | komet. - 2015-07-18 1:49 PM
Three percent of all Planned Parenthood health services are abortion services. They have done a lot of good over the years and I don't think we should trash the whole program because of this. I believe simply denying them the ability to perform abortions will fix this without denying the rest of the services to the poor.
Nobody is suggesting PP should be trashed. A LOT of taxpayers are saying they shouldn't be financed by taxpayer funds.
The "3%" number is misleading. In 2006, PP performed about 300,000 abortions, including 10,000 late term abortions. It's the late term abortions that most people find especially revolting.....particularly when they are backed by tax dollars. PP can fund themselves. Let liberals fund their own death houses. PP is nothing more than a political arm of the Democrat party. In fact, PP donates money to Democrat politicians....while we fund them.
Most Americans are repulsed by late term abortions, including quite a number of Democrats. How we, as a society, can turn a blind eye to this kind of barbarism for convenience boggles my mind. | |
| | |
 My Heart Be Happy
Posts: 9159
      Location: Arkansas | Nevertooold - 2015-07-18 12:59 PM
This thread is about late term abortions and I know many aren't against early term abortions and if a mother has to wait until she is 17 weeks or longer to decide to terminate, she indeed needs a pysch test.
As far as a third world country, come down to southern Texas, we are already there and it has nothing to do with abortions, it's about all the illegals crossing our border and then you have lib cities like Detroit, Chicago and Baltimore where Libs have created their false utopias where people are taken care of by our government. You can't keep giving people stuff without teaching them how to make money to buy their own stuff. You can't continue to throw money at these problems. If a kid has no structure from the home, how can they have any structure in society? Where having illegitimate children is awarded by more welfare dollars, how do you expect these people to stop having them? Just like middle America has taught their children to work hard and make something of themselves, the lib ghettos continue to teach women to lay on their backs with numerous men and have illegitimate children to get more money. Don't even think of getting married and have a real family as the government dollars stop.
I believe in helping people that really need help, not the people that have been taught by generations before them to work the system and complain how whitey enslaved some of them over a hundred years ago, but be in denial that blacks are the ones that sold slaves to whitey and blacks.
Â
You would be shocked, or maybe not (!!) at some of the abuses I see during tax season. Live together but don't marry cause then you can't use two different addresses and each claim the max number of kids to get the most earned income credit by each of you filing head of household. Let Grandma claim some of the kids since you have over the max number to get EIC on that way she can get some EIC too if she works. Or rent out the kids SS numbers to other people so they get EIC----and give you a kickback of course. Also have people who know just how much money to make for the year in order to get max refund. Then they quit!!!! I even had a Hispanic couple this year all gung ho to get their taxes filed early cause they were claiming one of their daughter's FIVE children and wanted the big bucks refund. When I informed them they had to have EARNED income to get EIC and they did not, they were upset and I didn't hear back from them until last week!!! Lastly, had someone fuss last year because they ONLY got back 6500 and the year before it was 8000----90% was EIC and child tax credit. . . . Money they didn't pay in but expected back from other taxpayer's money. Appalling | |
| |
| |